Poquito Loco wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 10:24:51 -0400, Justan Olphart wrote:

On 6/10/2016 10:13 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 09:45:10 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 6/10/16 7:06 AM, Justan Olphart wrote:
On 6/9/2016 6:39 PM, True North wrote:
The Ford Ranger got the same reports of low uncomfortable seats. Took
me a while to break-in the hard padding.
I don't know why they have to jack up the truck so much. Most people
don't go off roading with them.

You're right. Most girls use them as a grocery getter.

And once again, you demonstrate your ability to retain the title of
Reigning Asshole of Wrecked Boats. The Ranger was a fine little
utilitarian truck, economical, reliable, and a good size for its
intended purposes.
Again, that's just total ignorance on your part. Last week you called *me* the reigning asshole. You
can't even keep your names straight.

Comprehension and retention aren't his strong suits. Can you name any of
his strong suits?
Yes. He's almost mastered this:

http://www.liars.org.uk/wp-content/u...t-766x1024.png

But, his memory is failing, so he has a hard time keeping his webs untangled.

That's nearly perfect!

Its Me wrote:
On Friday, June 10, 2016 at 12:21:59 PM UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/10/16 12:10 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 10:47:51 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:

On 6/10/2016 7:06 AM, Justan Olphart wrote:
On 6/9/2016 6:39 PM, True North wrote:
The Ford Ranger got the same reports of low uncomfortable seats. Took
me a while to break-in the hard padding.
I don't know why they have to jack up the truck so much. Most people
don't go off roading with them.

You're right. Most girls use them as a grocery getter.

I don't know about that. I've had three Rangers. For their size I
think they were one of the best trucks made. I towed a car trailer
loaded with the John Deere tractor with one of them. I don't recommend
it and wouldn't drive it very far but it handled it ok for the three or
four miles I had to tow it.

Best one I had was a "Level Three" or something like that. Heavier
suspension and a higher tow rating.
He was talking about what most girls use them for. You ain't a girl. Although, I guess if you wanted
to use the girls bathroom it would be OK.

You and FlaJim are a pair of Turd Blossoms for sure.
Turd blossom? I haven't heard that since the 5th grade. Is that how far you've regressed?

At least.

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/10/16 1:11 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 09:46:59 -0700 (PDT), Its Me
wrote:

You and FlaJim are a pair of Turd Blossoms for sure.

Turd blossom? I haven't heard that since the 5th grade. Is that
how far you've regressed?

That is a Psilocybin mushroom isn't it? It may explain a lot



It was one of Dubya's nicknames for Karl Rove.

You Googled yourself out of that one, eh?

Califbill wrote:
Tim wrote:
10:21 AMCalifbill
- show quoted text -
The Ranger which is a Mazda, with a ladder frame was a good truck. Maybe
looked better because it replaced the Courier. One of the really crap
trucks.
....

Wasn't the Courier a Mitsubishi? I know the original Chevy s-10 was a glorified Isuzu

I think so. My old S-10 was an Isuzu. But GM owns a bunch of Isuzu. My
89 Aerostar was partly Mitsubishi. At least the crap Trany.


Mitsubishi was tied in with Chrysler for quite a while. I don't
remember the Ford relationship.

On Thu, 09 Jun 2016 18:16:03 -0400, Poquito Loco
wrote:

If I were to buy a small truck, the Tacoma, because of it's reliability, would probably be the one
I'd get - if I could fit in the damn thing!

===

The Tundra is the Toyota truck that you really want.

On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 20:31:33 -0400, Alex wrote:

Mitsubishi was tied in with Chrysler for quite a while.

They made the engine in my LeBaron