Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #51   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,244
Default Stirring up ****

On 5/22/2016 12:22 PM, Keine Krauseschei�e wrote:
On Thu, 19 May 2016 08:56:07 -0700 (PDT), True North wrote:

Justan Olphart
- show quoted text -
"Sadly they haven't found a way to exclude you from instigating and
stirring up ****, as it were."


Yes we have.....ban those with no interest in boating to recipe newsgroups.
Win win situation for everyone.


Gosh Don, of the folks you're castigating, who has not expressed an interest in the boat you're
buying and tried to offer you some advice?
--

Ban Krausescheiße-spouting narcissists...not guns!


I don't believe I have denegrated the brand..........................yet.
  #52   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,244
Default Stirring up ****

On 5/22/2016 10:49 AM, wrote:
On Sun, 22 May 2016 06:55:44 -0400, Justan Olphart
wrote:

On 5/21/2016 9:54 PM, Alex wrote:
True North wrote:
Justan Olphart
- show quoted text -
" Yabut he boats mainly in a protected cesspool of a harboUr."

Only a small fraction of my boating is in the harbour. That's why I
have a trailer boat. We have two large bays a short distance southwest
of the city plus numerous lakes, a few rivers and numerous coastal areas.


Yet you log 20 hours, or so, per year. What a waste.

He should sell his car-trailer-boat combo and get one of those old army
ducks if he likes to travel hither and yon to find water to float in. I
don't know why all little boats under 20' aren't fitted with wheels at
the least. The Amphicar was a great idea. I wonder why the concept
wasn't expanded upon. Harry could have used his family fortune to
develop a powered wheeled boat for consumer use instead of ****ing it
away on his personal toys. He could have been rich and Donnie could have
been happy with something that meets all of his vehicular needs.
Alas, I guess it wasn't meant to be. :-)


The problem with most of these combo vehicles is they suck at both
tasks. One of my IBM buddies knew the guy who ran the Naples "duck".
It was a maintenance nightmare. These things were combat vehicles that
were designed to last a few days in a war before they were blown up.
Day in and day out, splashing in salt water several times a day takes
a toll. They are lousy trucks and lousy boats ... but they do both.
The same was true of the Amphicar and all of those car/airplane deals.

Your right. Donnie's had enough experience with lousy trucks and lousy
boats.
  #53   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2016
Posts: 894
Default Stirring up ****

wrote:
On Sun, 22 May 2016 06:55:44 -0400, Justan Olphart
wrote:

On 5/21/2016 9:54 PM, Alex wrote:
True North wrote:
Justan Olphart
- show quoted text -
" Yabut he boats mainly in a protected cesspool of a harboUr."

Only a small fraction of my boating is in the harbour. That's why I
have a trailer boat. We have two large bays a short distance southwest
of the city plus numerous lakes, a few rivers and numerous coastal areas.


Yet you log 20 hours, or so, per year. What a waste.

He should sell his car-trailer-boat combo and get one of those old army
ducks if he likes to travel hither and yon to find water to float in. I
don't know why all little boats under 20' aren't fitted with wheels at
the least. The Amphicar was a great idea. I wonder why the concept
wasn't expanded upon. Harry could have used his family fortune to
develop a powered wheeled boat for consumer use instead of ****ing it
away on his personal toys. He could have been rich and Donnie could have
been happy with something that meets all of his vehicular needs.
Alas, I guess it wasn't meant to be. :-)


The problem with most of these combo vehicles is they suck at both
tasks. One of my IBM buddies knew the guy who ran the Naples "duck".
It was a maintenance nightmare. These things were combat vehicles that
were designed to last a few days in a war before they were blown up.
Day in and day out, splashing in salt water several times a day takes
a toll. They are lousy trucks and lousy boats ... but they do both.
The same was true of the Amphicar and all of those car/airplane deals.


Neighbor is helping to restore a Duck now. Is going to be used for local
wine tours. It was partially restored before buying and still has been
months getting it near working. Probably not be used as a boat.
Interesting about the design. Was 60 days from Stevens being approached
about designing an amphibious vehicle until first use. He decided on a
deuce and a half as the basic vehicle as GM was building so many f them.

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Shit happens John H.[_5_] General 45 September 4th 15 03:47 AM
Ahh, Faux News...stirring up the morons X ` Man General 6 October 16th 11 02:24 PM
Who gives a shit? jps General 123 June 27th 11 07:13 PM
Shit happens. Lil' John General 31 July 22nd 09 01:56 AM
Bob = Cat SHIT SkitchNYC ASA 3 July 19th 03 10:48 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017