Go Bernie!
 

'Nuff said.

Go Bernie!
 

On 3/27/2016 10:37 AM, John H. wrote:
'Nuff said.

It's sad that there isn't a single candidate worthy of a thoughtful
intelligent vote.

Go Bernie!
 

On 3/27/16 10:37 AM, John H. wrote:
'Nuff said.



I suspect he will be "going" soon after the next round of actual
primaries, not caucuses, in the big states. Nice guy, though.

Go Bernie!
 

On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 10:37:30 -0400, John H.
wrote:

'Nuff said.

He is doing such a good job of discrediting Hillary among democrats
that this may end up being one of the lowest turnout elections in
history.
It has the possibility of also being the strangest. It may be the
first time in almost 50 years that a third party candidate gets more
than one EC vote.

Go Bernie!
 

On 3/27/16 1:35 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 10:37:30 -0400, John H.
wrote:

'Nuff said.

He is doing such a good job of discrediting Hillary among democrats
that this may end up being one of the lowest turnout elections in
history.
It has the possibility of also being the strangest. It may be the
first time in almost 50 years that a third party candidate gets more
than one EC vote.


Doubtful, especially if the GOPer nominee is Trump or Cruz, perhaps the
two biggest hate-filled and lying assholes to ever run for that
nomination and office. Bernie is doing a good job with the
non-secret-ballot caucus states, but not so well in the secret ballot
states, and there are a number of big ones coming up shortly. I can't
see Bernie winning New York, Pennsylvania, or California

If Trump is denied the nomination, I still think he'll run as an Indy,
even if it is apparent he won't be on the ballot in enough states to
win. He will help destroy the GOP nominee, though, which would be fine
with me.

Go Bernie!
 

On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 13:58:09 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/27/16 1:35 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 10:37:30 -0400, John H.
wrote:

'Nuff said.

He is doing such a good job of discrediting Hillary among democrats
that this may end up being one of the lowest turnout elections in
history.
It has the possibility of also being the strangest. It may be the
first time in almost 50 years that a third party candidate gets more
than one EC vote.


Doubtful, especially if the GOPer nominee is Trump or Cruz, perhaps the
two biggest hate-filled and lying assholes to ever run for that
nomination and office. Bernie is doing a good job with the
non-secret-ballot caucus states, but not so well in the secret ballot
states, and there are a number of big ones coming up shortly. I can't
see Bernie winning New York, Pennsylvania, or California

So you are saying people are embarrassed to be voting for Hillary but
in the sanctity of the voting booth they can hold their nose and do
it.

If Trump is denied the nomination, I still think he'll run as an Indy,
even if it is apparent he won't be on the ballot in enough states to
win. He will help destroy the GOP nominee, though, which would be fine
with me.

I don't really have a dog in that fight,. the GOP left me years ago

Go Bernie!
 

On 3/27/16 3:15 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 13:58:09 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/27/16 1:35 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 10:37:30 -0400, John H.
wrote:

'Nuff said.

He is doing such a good job of discrediting Hillary among democrats
that this may end up being one of the lowest turnout elections in
history.
It has the possibility of also being the strangest. It may be the
first time in almost 50 years that a third party candidate gets more
than one EC vote.


Doubtful, especially if the GOPer nominee is Trump or Cruz, perhaps the
two biggest hate-filled and lying assholes to ever run for that
nomination and office. Bernie is doing a good job with the
non-secret-ballot caucus states, but not so well in the secret ballot
states, and there are a number of big ones coming up shortly. I can't
see Bernie winning New York, Pennsylvania, or California

So you are saying people are embarrassed to be voting for Hillary but
in the sanctity of the voting booth they can hold their nose and do
it.

If Trump is denied the nomination, I still think he'll run as an Indy,
even if it is apparent he won't be on the ballot in enough states to
win. He will help destroy the GOP nominee, though, which would be fine
with me.

I don't really have a dog in that fight,. the GOP left me years ago


Hillary was and is my first choice, and I'll be delighted to see her
become POTUS.

Go Bernie!
 

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/27/16 3:15 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 13:58:09 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/27/16 1:35 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 10:37:30 -0400, John H.
wrote:

'Nuff said.

He is doing such a good job of discrediting Hillary among democrats
that this may end up being one of the lowest turnout elections in
history.
It has the possibility of also being the strangest. It may be the
first time in almost 50 years that a third party candidate gets more
than one EC vote.


Doubtful, especially if the GOPer nominee is Trump or Cruz, perhaps the
two biggest hate-filled and lying assholes to ever run for that
nomination and office. Bernie is doing a good job with the
non-secret-ballot caucus states, but not so well in the secret ballot
states, and there are a number of big ones coming up shortly. I can't
see Bernie winning New York, Pennsylvania, or California

So you are saying people are embarrassed to be voting for Hillary but
in the sanctity of the voting booth they can hold their nose and do
it.

If Trump is denied the nomination, I still think he'll run as an Indy,
even if it is apparent he won't be on the ballot in enough states to
win. He will help destroy the GOP nominee, though, which would be fine
with me.

I don't really have a dog in that fight,. the GOP left me years ago


Hillary was and is my first choice, and I'll be delighted to see her
become POTUS.


Which war she starts are you prepared to support?

Go Bernie!
 

On 3/27/16 3:55 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/27/16 3:15 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 13:58:09 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/27/16 1:35 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 10:37:30 -0400, John H.
wrote:

'Nuff said.

He is doing such a good job of discrediting Hillary among democrats
that this may end up being one of the lowest turnout elections in
history.
It has the possibility of also being the strangest. It may be the
first time in almost 50 years that a third party candidate gets more
than one EC vote.


Doubtful, especially if the GOPer nominee is Trump or Cruz, perhaps the
two biggest hate-filled and lying assholes to ever run for that
nomination and office. Bernie is doing a good job with the
non-secret-ballot caucus states, but not so well in the secret ballot
states, and there are a number of big ones coming up shortly. I can't
see Bernie winning New York, Pennsylvania, or California

So you are saying people are embarrassed to be voting for Hillary but
in the sanctity of the voting booth they can hold their nose and do
it.

If Trump is denied the nomination, I still think he'll run as an Indy,
even if it is apparent he won't be on the ballot in enough states to
win. He will help destroy the GOP nominee, though, which would be fine
with me.

I don't really have a dog in that fight,. the GOP left me years ago


Hillary was and is my first choice, and I'll be delighted to see her
become POTUS.


Which war she starts are you prepared to support?



Whichever one sends you, the other righties here, and your kids and
grandkids off to fight it. :)

In terms of rhetoric, Hillary is far less likely to start a new war than
your boys Trump and Cruz.

Go Bernie!
 

On 3/27/2016 12:03 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/27/16 10:37 AM, John H. wrote:
'Nuff said.



I suspect he will be "going" soon after the next round of actual
primaries, not caucuses, in the big states.

Nice guy, though.

Oh Keys, that's so sensitive of you. I, I, could almost cry! lol.
Mikek

Go Bernie!
 

On 3/27/16 4:20 PM, amdx wrote:
On 3/27/2016 12:03 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/27/16 10:37 AM, John H. wrote:
'Nuff said.



I suspect he will be "going" soon after the next round of actual
primaries, not caucuses, in the big states.

Nice guy, though.

Oh Keys, that's so sensitive of you. I, I, could almost cry! lol.
Mikek





"Nice guy" is more than anyone can say about your two likely
possibilities, the two assholes known as Trump and Cruz. No one is going
to accuse either of them of decency.

Go Bernie!
 

On Sunday, March 27, 2016 at 11:05:42 AM UTC-5, Justan Olphart wrote:
On 3/27/2016 10:37 AM, John H. wrote:
'Nuff said.

It's sad that there isn't a single candidate worthy of a thoughtful
intelligent vote.

Exactly! None are very impressive at least for the positive...

Go Bernie!
 

On Sunday, March 27, 2016 at 3:21:15 PM UTC-5, amdx wrote:
On 3/27/2016 12:03 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/27/16 10:37 AM, John H. wrote:
'Nuff said.



I suspect he will be "going" soon after the next round of actual
primaries, not caucuses, in the big states.

Nice guy, though.

Oh Keys, that's so sensitive of you. I, I, could almost cry! lol.
Mikek

LOL!

Go Bernie!
 

On Sunday, March 27, 2016 at 3:25:48 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/27/16 4:20 PM, amdx wrote:
On 3/27/2016 12:03 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/27/16 10:37 AM, John H. wrote:
'Nuff said.



I suspect he will be "going" soon after the next round of actual
primaries, not caucuses, in the big states.

Nice guy, though.

Oh Keys, that's so sensitive of you. I, I, could almost cry! lol.
Mikek





"Nice guy" is more than anyone can say about your two likely
possibilities, the two assholes known as Trump and Cruz. No one is going
to accuse either of them of decency.

Well, at least you wont

Go Bernie!
 

Tim wrote:
On Sunday, March 27, 2016 at 3:25:48 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/27/16 4:20 PM, amdx wrote:
On 3/27/2016 12:03 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/27/16 10:37 AM, John H. wrote:
'Nuff said.



I suspect he will be "going" soon after the next round of actual
primaries, not caucuses, in the big states.

Nice guy, though.

Oh Keys, that's so sensitive of you. I, I, could almost cry! lol.
Mikek




or
"Nice guy" is more than anyone can say about your two likely
possibilities, the two assholes known as Trump and Cruz. No one is going
to accuse either of them of decency.

Well, at least you wont


No one decent consider trump or Cruz decent

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

Go Bernie!
 

On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 15:42:45 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/27/16 3:15 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 13:58:09 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/27/16 1:35 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 10:37:30 -0400, John H.
wrote:

'Nuff said.

He is doing such a good job of discrediting Hillary among democrats
that this may end up being one of the lowest turnout elections in
history.
It has the possibility of also being the strangest. It may be the
first time in almost 50 years that a third party candidate gets more
than one EC vote.


Doubtful, especially if the GOPer nominee is Trump or Cruz, perhaps the
two biggest hate-filled and lying assholes to ever run for that
nomination and office. Bernie is doing a good job with the
non-secret-ballot caucus states, but not so well in the secret ballot
states, and there are a number of big ones coming up shortly. I can't
see Bernie winning New York, Pennsylvania, or California

So you are saying people are embarrassed to be voting for Hillary but
in the sanctity of the voting booth they can hold their nose and do
it.

If Trump is denied the nomination, I still think he'll run as an Indy,
even if it is apparent he won't be on the ballot in enough states to
win. He will help destroy the GOP nominee, though, which would be fine
with me.

I don't really have a dog in that fight,. the GOP left me years ago


Hillary was and is my first choice, and I'll be delighted to see her
become POTUS.

I am sure you would but you liked her husband in spite of all of the
things he did to screw your causes ("Unleashing" wall street, anti gay
legislation, deregulating banks, increasing tax benefits for raping
the corporate safety net, downsizing and off shoring jobs. etc).
If you like being screwed by bill, I am sure you will rationalize
being screwed by hillary.
It will just be the 5th Bush administration as far as Wall Street is
concerned and the GHWB wars will go on into the 2020s.

Go Bernie!
 

On 3/27/16 6:51 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 15:42:45 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/27/16 3:15 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 13:58:09 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/27/16 1:35 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 10:37:30 -0400, John H.
wrote:

'Nuff said.

He is doing such a good job of discrediting Hillary among democrats
that this may end up being one of the lowest turnout elections in
history.
It has the possibility of also being the strangest. It may be the
first time in almost 50 years that a third party candidate gets more
than one EC vote.


Doubtful, especially if the GOPer nominee is Trump or Cruz, perhaps the
two biggest hate-filled and lying assholes to ever run for that
nomination and office. Bernie is doing a good job with the
non-secret-ballot caucus states, but not so well in the secret ballot
states, and there are a number of big ones coming up shortly. I can't
see Bernie winning New York, Pennsylvania, or California

So you are saying people are embarrassed to be voting for Hillary but
in the sanctity of the voting booth they can hold their nose and do
it.

If Trump is denied the nomination, I still think he'll run as an Indy,
even if it is apparent he won't be on the ballot in enough states to
win. He will help destroy the GOP nominee, though, which would be fine
with me.

I don't really have a dog in that fight,. the GOP left me years ago


Hillary was and is my first choice, and I'll be delighted to see her
become POTUS.

I am sure you would but you liked her husband in spite of all of the
things he did to screw your causes ("Unleashing" wall street, anti gay
legislation, deregulating banks, increasing tax benefits for raping
the corporate safety net, downsizing and off shoring jobs. etc).
If you like being screwed by bill, I am sure you will rationalize
being screwed by hillary.
It will just be the 5th Bush administration as far as Wall Street is
concerned and the GHWB wars will go on into the 2020s.


I still like President Bill. He was a far better president than the
asshole who followed him.

I've seen your comment about the "5th Bush Admin" about 150 times now.
You're beginning to repeat yourself as much as that flaming ass racist,
John Herring.

Go Bernie!
 

On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 20:08:56 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Hillary was and is my first choice, and I'll be delighted to see her
become POTUS.

I am sure you would but you liked her husband in spite of all of the
things he did to screw your causes ("Unleashing" wall street, anti gay
legislation, deregulating banks, increasing tax benefits for raping
the corporate safety net, downsizing and off shoring jobs. etc).
If you like being screwed by bill, I am sure you will rationalize
being screwed by hillary.
It will just be the 5th Bush administration as far as Wall Street is
concerned and the GHWB wars will go on into the 2020s.


I still like President Bill. He was a far better president than the
asshole who followed him.

You like him because he calls himself a democrat but he was a better
big business republican than GHW or Dole would have been.
The only real prosperity in the 90s was what showed up on corporate
bottom lines and a stock bubble. It was spun as being good for you and
me. It was phony profits based on selling off capital, offshoring jobs
and down sizing, not actual revenue growth. A significant part of
those profits were simply fraud.

I've seen your comment about the "5th Bush Admin" about 150 times now.

I haven't seen you actually refute it tho.

The Bushes call Bill the 4th Bush brother and if you stand back and
look at the policies, nothing has really changed much since Reagan
left office. The rhetoric is different but at the end of the day, we
are still doing most of the same things. To find differences, you need
to look at fairly insignificant fluff like gay marriage ... that Bill
was against. Hillary is going to be another wall street president and
you will make excuses for her just like you do for Bill, all the time
griping about banksters.

Go Bernie!
 

On 3/27/16 9:07 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 20:08:56 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Hillary was and is my first choice, and I'll be delighted to see her
become POTUS.

It will just be the 5th Bush administration as far as Wall Street is
concerned and the GHWB wars will go on into the 2020s.


I still like President Bill. He was a far better president than the
asshole who followed him.

You like him because he calls himself a democrat

**There you go again, trying to tell me why I like someone...** Give it
up.



I've seen your comment about the "5th Bush Admin" about 150 times now.

I haven't seen you actually refute it tho.

You may believe whatever you wish. Doesn't mean I have to believe it,
too, nor is it my responsibility to try to talk you out of that belief.
Hell, you probably aren't even going to vote in the 2016 presidential
election or, if you do, it'll be for some libertarian schlump whose
chance of winning is the same as yours or mine. So, what does it matter
if you think the 5th Bush Admin is upcoming.

Go Bernie!
 

On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 21:22:12 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/27/16 9:07 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 20:08:56 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Hillary was and is my first choice, and I'll be delighted to see her
become POTUS.

It will just be the 5th Bush administration as far as Wall Street is
concerned and the GHWB wars will go on into the 2020s.


I still like President Bill. He was a far better president than the
asshole who followed him.

You like him because he calls himself a democrat

**There you go again, trying to tell me why I like someone...** Give it
up.

Sometimes the answer is just obvious.


I've seen your comment about the "5th Bush Admin" about 150 times now.

I haven't seen you actually refute it tho.

You may believe whatever you wish. Doesn't mean I have to believe it,
too, nor is it my responsibility to try to talk you out of that belief.
Hell, you probably aren't even going to vote in the 2016 presidential
election or, if you do, it'll be for some libertarian schlump whose
chance of winning is the same as yours or mine. So, what does it matter
if you think the 5th Bush Admin is upcoming.

It is interesting that you always say I am wrong about things but you
don't seem to be able to say what part was wrong.
If both candidates are basically bought and paid for by the same
special interests, why shouldn't I cast a protest vote. Maybe, some
day, people will wake up and see what is going on.
Bernie is pointing that out fairly effectively.

Go Bernie!
 

On Sunday, March 27, 2016 at 5:28:01 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:



No one decent consider trump or Cruz decent


And I thought I was the on;y person tht madd serious typos.

;^)

Go Bernie!
 

On Sunday, March 27, 2016 at 8:22:15 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/27/16 9:07 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 20:08:56 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Hillary was and is my first choice, and I'll be delighted to see her
become POTUS.

It will just be the 5th Bush administration as far as Wall Street is
concerned and the GHWB wars will go on into the 2020s.


I still like President Bill. He was a far better president than the
asshole who followed him.

You like him because he calls himself a democrat

**There you go again, trying to tell me why I like someone...** Give it
up.


LOL! give it up? like you consistently saying to Greg or I that Trump is of *Our* party?

Give it up, Harry.




I've seen your comment about the "5th Bush Admin" about 150 times now.

I haven't seen you actually refute it tho.

You may believe whatever you wish. Doesn't mean I have to believe it,
too, nor is it my responsibility to try to talk you out of that belief.
Hell, you probably aren't even going to vote in the 2016 presidential
election or, if you do, it'll be for some libertarian schlump whose
chance of winning is the same as yours or mine. So, what does it matter
if you think the 5th Bush Admin is upcoming.

Who we vote for (or not) is our business, and if we do, whoever we vote for may not have a chance to win the election, but at least they're not a loser.

Go Bernie!
 

On 3/27/2016 10:07 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, March 27, 2016 at 5:28:01 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:



No one decent consider trump or Cruz decent


And I thought I was the on;y person tht madd serious typos.

;^)

You can tell by his typing of late that his brain is like a cracked egg
on hot pavement. It ain't just typos.

Go Bernie!
 

On 3/27/16 10:27 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, March 27, 2016 at 8:22:15 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/27/16 9:07 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 20:08:56 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Hillary was and is my first choice, and I'll be delighted to see her
become POTUS.

It will just be the 5th Bush administration as far as Wall Street is
concerned and the GHWB wars will go on into the 2020s.


I still like President Bill. He was a far better president than the
asshole who followed him.

You like him because he calls himself a democrat

**There you go again, trying to tell me why I like someone...** Give it
up.


LOL! give it up? like you consistently saying to Greg or I that Trump is of *Our* party?

Give it up, Harry.




I've seen your comment about the "5th Bush Admin" about 150 times now.

I haven't seen you actually refute it tho.

You may believe whatever you wish. Doesn't mean I have to believe it,
too, nor is it my responsibility to try to talk you out of that belief.
Hell, you probably aren't even going to vote in the 2016 presidential
election or, if you do, it'll be for some libertarian schlump whose
chance of winning is the same as yours or mine. So, what does it matter
if you think the 5th Bush Admin is upcoming.

Who we vote for (or not) is our business, and if we do, whoever we vote for may not have a chance to win the election, but at least they're not a loser.

\
Yeah, we have one of those loser assholes running for federal office
around here...his minibillboards says we should vote for him because his
priorities are "god and country." He might do okay out in Flyover, USA,
where you live, but not around here.

Go Bernie!
 

On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 07:49:26 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Who we vote for (or not) is our business, and if we do, whoever we vote for may not have a chance to win the election, but at least they're not a loser.

\
Yeah, we have one of those loser assholes running for federal office
around here...his minibillboards says we should vote for him because his
priorities are "god and country." He might do okay out in Flyover, USA,
where you live, but not around here.

I agree the DC metro area is a pretty godless place. They are not much
on family values either. DC always ranks #1 or #2 in per capita
alcohol consumption, drug use and unwed birth in most surveys.
..

Go Bernie!
 

wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 07:49:26 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Who we vote for (or not) is our business, and if we do, whoever we vote
for may not have a chance to win the election, but at least they're not a loser.

\
Yeah, we have one of those loser assholes running for federal office
around here...his minibillboards says we should vote for him because his
priorities are "god and country." He might do okay out in Flyover, USA,
where you live, but not around here.

I agree the DC metro area is a pretty godless place. They are not much
on family values either. DC always ranks #1 or #2 in per capita
alcohol consumption, drug use and unwed birth in most surveys.
.




He's not running in DC.

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

Go Bernie!
 

On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 09:28:51 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 07:49:26 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Who we vote for (or not) is our business, and if we do, whoever we vote
for may not have a chance to win the election, but at least they're not a loser.

\
Yeah, we have one of those loser assholes running for federal office
around here...his minibillboards says we should vote for him because his
priorities are "god and country." He might do okay out in Flyover, USA,
where you live, but not around here.

I agree the DC metro area is a pretty godless place. They are not much
on family values either. DC always ranks #1 or #2 in per capita
alcohol consumption, drug use and unwed birth in most surveys.
.




He's not running in DC.

So what. The comment was appropriate.
--

Ban liars, tax cheats, juvenile name-callers, and narcissists...not guns!

Go Bernie!
 

On 3/28/16 9:24 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 07:49:26 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Who we vote for (or not) is our business, and if we do, whoever we vote for may not have a chance to win the election, but at least they're not a loser.

\
Yeah, we have one of those loser assholes running for federal office
around here...his minibillboards says we should vote for him because his
priorities are "god and country." He might do okay out in Flyover, USA,
where you live, but not around here.

I agree the DC metro area is a pretty godless place. They are not much
on family values either. DC always ranks #1 or #2 in per capita
alcohol consumption, drug use and unwed birth in most surveys.
.




The reality is that *every* place is a godless place, if you are
referring to the presence of an actual deity.

And didn't we once discover your county has a higher crime rate than
mine, and one might extrapolate that means more booze and drug use, too.
As for unwed birth rates, Florida's is right below DC's, and Maryland's
is lower than both. I would guess the rate in my county is lower than in
your county.

Go Bernie!
 

On 3/28/16 10:06 AM, Keine Keyserschei�e wrote:


Somehow it seems appropriate that Johnny Herring the Racist would adopt
more and more German in here. Pretty soon he'll be quoting Nazis
directly as his mantra.

Go Bernie!
 

On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 10:44:19 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 3/28/16 9:24 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 07:49:26 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Who we vote for (or not) is our business, and if we do, whoever we vote for may not have a chance to win the election, but at least they're not a loser.

\
Yeah, we have one of those loser assholes running for federal office
around here...his minibillboards says we should vote for him because his
priorities are "god and country." He might do okay out in Flyover, USA,
where you live, but not around here.

I agree the DC metro area is a pretty godless place. They are not much
on family values either. DC always ranks #1 or #2 in per capita
alcohol consumption, drug use and unwed birth in most surveys.
.




The reality is that *every* place is a godless place, if you are
referring to the presence of an actual deity.

And didn't we once discover your county has a higher crime rate than
mine, and one might extrapolate that means more booze and drug use, too.
As for unwed birth rates, Florida's is right below DC's, and Maryland's
is lower than both. I would guess the rate in my county is lower than in
your county.

Demographics? Site?

http://www.heritage.org/multimedia/i...rates-by-state
--

Ban liars, tax cheats, juvenile name-callers, and narcissists...not guns!

Go Bernie!
 

On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 09:28:51 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 07:49:26 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Who we vote for (or not) is our business, and if we do, whoever we vote
for may not have a chance to win the election, but at least they're not a loser.

\
Yeah, we have one of those loser assholes running for federal office
around here...his minibillboards says we should vote for him because his
priorities are "god and country." He might do okay out in Flyover, USA,
where you live, but not around here.

I agree the DC metro area is a pretty godless place. They are not much
on family values either. DC always ranks #1 or #2 in per capita
alcohol consumption, drug use and unwed birth in most surveys.
.




He's not running in DC.

Urban sprawl has made most of suburban Maryland pretty much
indistinguishable from DC.
My ex seriously considered moving back to her old house on South
Dakota avenue and selling the Clinton house because DC was a better
neighborhood.

Go Bernie!
 

On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 10:44:19 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:



The reality is that *every* place is a godless place, if you are
referring to the presence of an actual deity.

And didn't we once discover your county has a higher crime rate than
mine, and one might extrapolate that means more booze and drug use, too.
As for unwed birth rates, Florida's is right below DC's, and Maryland's
is lower than both. I would guess the rate in my county is lower than in
your county.

If you separate unincorporated Lee County from Ft Myers, I would take
that bet. Ft Myers has the same problems as most big cities and it is
concentrated in 2 neighborhoods. I will not dwell on that, lest I be
called names. We are getting some new problems since the housing crash
because slumlords scooped up a bunch of cheap properties in Lehigh and
areas of the Cape. They are now cheap rentals. That is still pretty
far from me.

Go Bernie!
 

On 3/28/16 12:27 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 09:28:51 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 07:49:26 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Who we vote for (or not) is our business, and if we do, whoever we vote
for may not have a chance to win the election, but at least they're not a loser.

\
Yeah, we have one of those loser assholes running for federal office
around here...his minibillboards says we should vote for him because his
priorities are "god and country." He might do okay out in Flyover, USA,
where you live, but not around here.

I agree the DC metro area is a pretty godless place. They are not much
on family values either. DC always ranks #1 or #2 in per capita
alcohol consumption, drug use and unwed birth in most surveys.
.




He's not running in DC.

Urban sprawl has made most of suburban Maryland pretty much
indistinguishable from DC.


I used to think you knew your ass from a hole in the ground, but now I'm
not sure. That statement of yours is based upon absolute ignorance.

Go Bernie!
 

On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 13:33:32 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/28/16 12:27 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 09:28:51 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 07:49:26 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Who we vote for (or not) is our business, and if we do, whoever we vote
for may not have a chance to win the election, but at least they're not a loser.

\
Yeah, we have one of those loser assholes running for federal office
around here...his minibillboards says we should vote for him because his
priorities are "god and country." He might do okay out in Flyover, USA,
where you live, but not around here.

I agree the DC metro area is a pretty godless place. They are not much
on family values either. DC always ranks #1 or #2 in per capita
alcohol consumption, drug use and unwed birth in most surveys.
.




He's not running in DC.

Urban sprawl has made most of suburban Maryland pretty much
indistinguishable from DC.


I used to think you knew your ass from a hole in the ground, but now I'm
not sure. That statement of yours is based upon absolute ignorance.

Are you seriously going to say that PG and near in Montgomery county
does not share or even exceed the problems in DC?
Do I need to go get the crime reports? Perhaps you should look out the
window when you drive through

Go Bernie!
 

wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 13:33:32 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/28/16 12:27 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 09:28:51 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 07:49:26 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Who we vote for (or not) is our business, and if we do, whoever we vote
for may not have a chance to win the election, but at least they're not a loser.

\
Yeah, we have one of those loser assholes running for federal office
around here...his minibillboards says we should vote for him because his
priorities are "god and country." He might do okay out in Flyover, USA,
where you live, but not around here.

I agree the DC metro area is a pretty godless place. They are not much
on family values either. DC always ranks #1 or #2 in per capita
alcohol consumption, drug use and unwed birth in most surveys.
.




He's not running in DC.

Urban sprawl has made most of suburban Maryland pretty much
indistinguishable from DC.


I used to think you knew your ass from a hole in the ground, but now I'm
not sure. That statement of yours is based upon absolute ignorance.

Are you seriously going to say that PG and near in Montgomery county
does not share or even exceed the problems in DC?
Do I need to go get the crime reports? Perhaps you should look out the
window when you drive through


Most of Suburban Maryland is more than parts of PG and Monty County.
Further there are many areas of PG that are rural or upscale and are very
nice. We live in suburban Maryland and enjoy a relatively low crime rate.

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

Go Bernie!
 

On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 14:29:51 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 13:33:32 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/28/16 12:27 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 09:28:51 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 07:49:26 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Who we vote for (or not) is our business, and if we do, whoever we vote
for may not have a chance to win the election, but at least they're not a loser.

\
Yeah, we have one of those loser assholes running for federal office
around here...his minibillboards says we should vote for him because his
priorities are "god and country." He might do okay out in Flyover, USA,
where you live, but not around here.

I agree the DC metro area is a pretty godless place. They are not much
on family values either. DC always ranks #1 or #2 in per capita
alcohol consumption, drug use and unwed birth in most surveys.
.




He's not running in DC.

Urban sprawl has made most of suburban Maryland pretty much
indistinguishable from DC.


I used to think you knew your ass from a hole in the ground, but now I'm
not sure. That statement of yours is based upon absolute ignorance.

Are you seriously going to say that PG and near in Montgomery county
does not share or even exceed the problems in DC?
Do I need to go get the crime reports? Perhaps you should look out the
window when you drive through


Most of Suburban Maryland is more than parts of PG and Monty County.
Further there are many areas of PG that are rural or upscale and are very
nice. We live in suburban Maryland and enjoy a relatively low crime rate.

He's talking about the populated areas, Krause!
--

Ban liars, tax cheats, juvenile name-callers, and narcissists...not guns!

Go Bernie!
 

On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 14:29:51 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 13:33:32 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/28/16 12:27 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 09:28:51 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 07:49:26 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Who we vote for (or not) is our business, and if we do, whoever we vote
for may not have a chance to win the election, but at least they're not a loser.

\
Yeah, we have one of those loser assholes running for federal office
around here...his minibillboards says we should vote for him because his
priorities are "god and country." He might do okay out in Flyover, USA,
where you live, but not around here.

I agree the DC metro area is a pretty godless place. They are not much
on family values either. DC always ranks #1 or #2 in per capita
alcohol consumption, drug use and unwed birth in most surveys.
.




He's not running in DC.

Urban sprawl has made most of suburban Maryland pretty much
indistinguishable from DC.


I used to think you knew your ass from a hole in the ground, but now I'm
not sure. That statement of yours is based upon absolute ignorance.

Are you seriously going to say that PG and near in Montgomery county
does not share or even exceed the problems in DC?
Do I need to go get the crime reports? Perhaps you should look out the
window when you drive through


Most of Suburban Maryland is more than parts of PG and Monty County.
Further there are many areas of PG that are rural or upscale and are very
nice. We live in suburban Maryland and enjoy a relatively low crime rate.

I understand people still commute that far out but that is more rural
than suburban.

Go Bernie!
 

On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 14:57:28 -0400, Keine Keyserscheiße
wrote:

On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 14:29:51 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 13:33:32 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/28/16 12:27 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 09:28:51 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 07:49:26 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Who we vote for (or not) is our business, and if we do, whoever we vote
for may not have a chance to win the election, but at least they're not a loser.

\
Yeah, we have one of those loser assholes running for federal office
around here...his minibillboards says we should vote for him because his
priorities are "god and country." He might do okay out in Flyover, USA,
where you live, but not around here.

I agree the DC metro area is a pretty godless place. They are not much
on family values either. DC always ranks #1 or #2 in per capita
alcohol consumption, drug use and unwed birth in most surveys.
.




He's not running in DC.

Urban sprawl has made most of suburban Maryland pretty much
indistinguishable from DC.


I used to think you knew your ass from a hole in the ground, but now I'm
not sure. That statement of yours is based upon absolute ignorance.

Are you seriously going to say that PG and near in Montgomery county
does not share or even exceed the problems in DC?
Do I need to go get the crime reports? Perhaps you should look out the
window when you drive through


Most of Suburban Maryland is more than parts of PG and Monty County.
Further there are many areas of PG that are rural or upscale and are very
nice. We live in suburban Maryland and enjoy a relatively low crime rate.

He's talking about the populated areas, Krause!

Yeah. 40-50 miles away from downtown is not really the "suburbs"

Go Bernie!
 

On 3/28/16 3:21 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 14:29:51 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 13:33:32 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/28/16 12:27 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 09:28:51 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 07:49:26 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Who we vote for (or not) is our business, and if we do, whoever we vote
for may not have a chance to win the election, but at least they're not a loser.

\
Yeah, we have one of those loser assholes running for federal office
around here...his minibillboards says we should vote for him because his
priorities are "god and country." He might do okay out in Flyover, USA,
where you live, but not around here.

I agree the DC metro area is a pretty godless place. They are not much
on family values either. DC always ranks #1 or #2 in per capita
alcohol consumption, drug use and unwed birth in most surveys.
.




He's not running in DC.

Urban sprawl has made most of suburban Maryland pretty much
indistinguishable from DC.


I used to think you knew your ass from a hole in the ground, but now I'm
not sure. That statement of yours is based upon absolute ignorance.

Are you seriously going to say that PG and near in Montgomery county
does not share or even exceed the problems in DC?
Do I need to go get the crime reports? Perhaps you should look out the
window when you drive through


Most of Suburban Maryland is more than parts of PG and Monty County.
Further there are many areas of PG that are rural or upscale and are very
nice. We live in suburban Maryland and enjoy a relatively low crime rate.

I understand people still commute that far out but that is more rural
than suburban.


The Washington, D.C., metropolitan area:

The area includes the following counties, districts, and independent cities:
District of Columbia

Washington

Maryland

Calvert County
Charles County
Frederick County
Montgomery County
Prince George's County

Virginia

Alexandria
Arlington County
Clarke County
Culpeper County
Fairfax County
Fairfax
Falls Church
Fauquier County
Loudoun County
Manassas
Manassas Park
Prince William County
Rappahannock County
Spotsylvania County
Stafford County
Fredericksburg
Warren County

West Virginia

Jefferson County

Go Bernie!
 

On 3/28/16 3:25 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 14:57:28 -0400, Keine Keyserscheiße
wrote:

On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 14:29:51 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 13:33:32 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/28/16 12:27 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 09:28:51 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 07:49:26 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Who we vote for (or not) is our business, and if we do, whoever we vote
for may not have a chance to win the election, but at least they're not a loser.

\
Yeah, we have one of those loser assholes running for federal office
around here...his minibillboards says we should vote for him because his
priorities are "god and country." He might do okay out in Flyover, USA,
where you live, but not around here.

I agree the DC metro area is a pretty godless place. They are not much
on family values either. DC always ranks #1 or #2 in per capita
alcohol consumption, drug use and unwed birth in most surveys.
.




He's not running in DC.

Urban sprawl has made most of suburban Maryland pretty much
indistinguishable from DC.


I used to think you knew your ass from a hole in the ground, but now I'm
not sure. That statement of yours is based upon absolute ignorance.

Are you seriously going to say that PG and near in Montgomery county
does not share or even exceed the problems in DC?
Do I need to go get the crime reports? Perhaps you should look out the
window when you drive through


Most of Suburban Maryland is more than parts of PG and Monty County.
Further there are many areas of PG that are rural or upscale and are very
nice. We live in suburban Maryland and enjoy a relatively low crime rate.

He's talking about the populated areas, Krause!

Yeah. 40-50 miles away from downtown is not really the "suburbs"


It sure is, and we are 30 miles from DC.