On 3/27/16 1:35 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 10:37:30 -0400, John H.
wrote:

'Nuff said.

He is doing such a good job of discrediting Hillary among democrats
that this may end up being one of the lowest turnout elections in
history.
It has the possibility of also being the strangest. It may be the
first time in almost 50 years that a third party candidate gets more
than one EC vote.


Doubtful, especially if the GOPer nominee is Trump or Cruz, perhaps the
two biggest hate-filled and lying assholes to ever run for that
nomination and office. Bernie is doing a good job with the
non-secret-ballot caucus states, but not so well in the secret ballot
states, and there are a number of big ones coming up shortly. I can't
see Bernie winning New York, Pennsylvania, or California

If Trump is denied the nomination, I still think he'll run as an Indy,
even if it is apparent he won't be on the ballot in enough states to
win. He will help destroy the GOP nominee, though, which would be fine
with me.

On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 13:58:09 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/27/16 1:35 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 10:37:30 -0400, John H.
wrote:

'Nuff said.

He is doing such a good job of discrediting Hillary among democrats
that this may end up being one of the lowest turnout elections in
history.
It has the possibility of also being the strangest. It may be the
first time in almost 50 years that a third party candidate gets more
than one EC vote.


Doubtful, especially if the GOPer nominee is Trump or Cruz, perhaps the
two biggest hate-filled and lying assholes to ever run for that
nomination and office. Bernie is doing a good job with the
non-secret-ballot caucus states, but not so well in the secret ballot
states, and there are a number of big ones coming up shortly. I can't
see Bernie winning New York, Pennsylvania, or California

So you are saying people are embarrassed to be voting for Hillary but
in the sanctity of the voting booth they can hold their nose and do
it.

If Trump is denied the nomination, I still think he'll run as an Indy,
even if it is apparent he won't be on the ballot in enough states to
win. He will help destroy the GOP nominee, though, which would be fine
with me.

I don't really have a dog in that fight,. the GOP left me years ago

On 3/27/16 3:15 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 13:58:09 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/27/16 1:35 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 10:37:30 -0400, John H.
wrote:

'Nuff said.

He is doing such a good job of discrediting Hillary among democrats
that this may end up being one of the lowest turnout elections in
history.
It has the possibility of also being the strangest. It may be the
first time in almost 50 years that a third party candidate gets more
than one EC vote.


Doubtful, especially if the GOPer nominee is Trump or Cruz, perhaps the
two biggest hate-filled and lying assholes to ever run for that
nomination and office. Bernie is doing a good job with the
non-secret-ballot caucus states, but not so well in the secret ballot
states, and there are a number of big ones coming up shortly. I can't
see Bernie winning New York, Pennsylvania, or California

So you are saying people are embarrassed to be voting for Hillary but
in the sanctity of the voting booth they can hold their nose and do
it.

If Trump is denied the nomination, I still think he'll run as an Indy,
even if it is apparent he won't be on the ballot in enough states to
win. He will help destroy the GOP nominee, though, which would be fine
with me.

I don't really have a dog in that fight,. the GOP left me years ago


Hillary was and is my first choice, and I'll be delighted to see her
become POTUS.

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/27/16 3:15 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 13:58:09 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/27/16 1:35 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 10:37:30 -0400, John H.
wrote:

'Nuff said.

He is doing such a good job of discrediting Hillary among democrats
that this may end up being one of the lowest turnout elections in
history.
It has the possibility of also being the strangest. It may be the
first time in almost 50 years that a third party candidate gets more
than one EC vote.


Doubtful, especially if the GOPer nominee is Trump or Cruz, perhaps the
two biggest hate-filled and lying assholes to ever run for that
nomination and office. Bernie is doing a good job with the
non-secret-ballot caucus states, but not so well in the secret ballot
states, and there are a number of big ones coming up shortly. I can't
see Bernie winning New York, Pennsylvania, or California

So you are saying people are embarrassed to be voting for Hillary but
in the sanctity of the voting booth they can hold their nose and do
it.

If Trump is denied the nomination, I still think he'll run as an Indy,
even if it is apparent he won't be on the ballot in enough states to
win. He will help destroy the GOP nominee, though, which would be fine
with me.

I don't really have a dog in that fight,. the GOP left me years ago


Hillary was and is my first choice, and I'll be delighted to see her
become POTUS.


Which war she starts are you prepared to support?

On 3/27/16 3:55 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/27/16 3:15 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 13:58:09 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/27/16 1:35 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 10:37:30 -0400, John H.
wrote:

'Nuff said.

He is doing such a good job of discrediting Hillary among democrats
that this may end up being one of the lowest turnout elections in
history.
It has the possibility of also being the strangest. It may be the
first time in almost 50 years that a third party candidate gets more
than one EC vote.


Doubtful, especially if the GOPer nominee is Trump or Cruz, perhaps the
two biggest hate-filled and lying assholes to ever run for that
nomination and office. Bernie is doing a good job with the
non-secret-ballot caucus states, but not so well in the secret ballot
states, and there are a number of big ones coming up shortly. I can't
see Bernie winning New York, Pennsylvania, or California

So you are saying people are embarrassed to be voting for Hillary but
in the sanctity of the voting booth they can hold their nose and do
it.

If Trump is denied the nomination, I still think he'll run as an Indy,
even if it is apparent he won't be on the ballot in enough states to
win. He will help destroy the GOP nominee, though, which would be fine
with me.

I don't really have a dog in that fight,. the GOP left me years ago


Hillary was and is my first choice, and I'll be delighted to see her
become POTUS.


Which war she starts are you prepared to support?



Whichever one sends you, the other righties here, and your kids and
grandkids off to fight it.

In terms of rhetoric, Hillary is far less likely to start a new war than
your boys Trump and Cruz.

On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 15:42:45 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/27/16 3:15 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 13:58:09 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/27/16 1:35 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 10:37:30 -0400, John H.
wrote:

'Nuff said.

He is doing such a good job of discrediting Hillary among democrats
that this may end up being one of the lowest turnout elections in
history.
It has the possibility of also being the strangest. It may be the
first time in almost 50 years that a third party candidate gets more
than one EC vote.


Doubtful, especially if the GOPer nominee is Trump or Cruz, perhaps the
two biggest hate-filled and lying assholes to ever run for that
nomination and office. Bernie is doing a good job with the
non-secret-ballot caucus states, but not so well in the secret ballot
states, and there are a number of big ones coming up shortly. I can't
see Bernie winning New York, Pennsylvania, or California

So you are saying people are embarrassed to be voting for Hillary but
in the sanctity of the voting booth they can hold their nose and do
it.

If Trump is denied the nomination, I still think he'll run as an Indy,
even if it is apparent he won't be on the ballot in enough states to
win. He will help destroy the GOP nominee, though, which would be fine
with me.

I don't really have a dog in that fight,. the GOP left me years ago


Hillary was and is my first choice, and I'll be delighted to see her
become POTUS.

I am sure you would but you liked her husband in spite of all of the
things he did to screw your causes ("Unleashing" wall street, anti gay
legislation, deregulating banks, increasing tax benefits for raping
the corporate safety net, downsizing and off shoring jobs. etc).
If you like being screwed by bill, I am sure you will rationalize
being screwed by hillary.
It will just be the 5th Bush administration as far as Wall Street is
concerned and the GHWB wars will go on into the 2020s.

On 3/27/16 6:51 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 15:42:45 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/27/16 3:15 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 13:58:09 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/27/16 1:35 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 10:37:30 -0400, John H.
wrote:

'Nuff said.

He is doing such a good job of discrediting Hillary among democrats
that this may end up being one of the lowest turnout elections in
history.
It has the possibility of also being the strangest. It may be the
first time in almost 50 years that a third party candidate gets more
than one EC vote.


Doubtful, especially if the GOPer nominee is Trump or Cruz, perhaps the
two biggest hate-filled and lying assholes to ever run for that
nomination and office. Bernie is doing a good job with the
non-secret-ballot caucus states, but not so well in the secret ballot
states, and there are a number of big ones coming up shortly. I can't
see Bernie winning New York, Pennsylvania, or California

So you are saying people are embarrassed to be voting for Hillary but
in the sanctity of the voting booth they can hold their nose and do
it.

If Trump is denied the nomination, I still think he'll run as an Indy,
even if it is apparent he won't be on the ballot in enough states to
win. He will help destroy the GOP nominee, though, which would be fine
with me.

I don't really have a dog in that fight,. the GOP left me years ago


Hillary was and is my first choice, and I'll be delighted to see her
become POTUS.

I am sure you would but you liked her husband in spite of all of the
things he did to screw your causes ("Unleashing" wall street, anti gay
legislation, deregulating banks, increasing tax benefits for raping
the corporate safety net, downsizing and off shoring jobs. etc).
If you like being screwed by bill, I am sure you will rationalize
being screwed by hillary.
It will just be the 5th Bush administration as far as Wall Street is
concerned and the GHWB wars will go on into the 2020s.


I still like President Bill. He was a far better president than the
asshole who followed him.

I've seen your comment about the "5th Bush Admin" about 150 times now.
You're beginning to repeat yourself as much as that flaming ass racist,
John Herring.

On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 20:08:56 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Hillary was and is my first choice, and I'll be delighted to see her
become POTUS.

I am sure you would but you liked her husband in spite of all of the
things he did to screw your causes ("Unleashing" wall street, anti gay
legislation, deregulating banks, increasing tax benefits for raping
the corporate safety net, downsizing and off shoring jobs. etc).
If you like being screwed by bill, I am sure you will rationalize
being screwed by hillary.
It will just be the 5th Bush administration as far as Wall Street is
concerned and the GHWB wars will go on into the 2020s.


I still like President Bill. He was a far better president than the
asshole who followed him.

You like him because he calls himself a democrat but he was a better
big business republican than GHW or Dole would have been.
The only real prosperity in the 90s was what showed up on corporate
bottom lines and a stock bubble. It was spun as being good for you and
me. It was phony profits based on selling off capital, offshoring jobs
and down sizing, not actual revenue growth. A significant part of
those profits were simply fraud.

I've seen your comment about the "5th Bush Admin" about 150 times now.

I haven't seen you actually refute it tho.

The Bushes call Bill the 4th Bush brother and if you stand back and
look at the policies, nothing has really changed much since Reagan
left office. The rhetoric is different but at the end of the day, we
are still doing most of the same things. To find differences, you need
to look at fairly insignificant fluff like gay marriage ... that Bill
was against. Hillary is going to be another wall street president and
you will make excuses for her just like you do for Bill, all the time
griping about banksters.

On 3/27/16 9:07 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 20:08:56 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Hillary was and is my first choice, and I'll be delighted to see her
become POTUS.

It will just be the 5th Bush administration as far as Wall Street is
concerned and the GHWB wars will go on into the 2020s.


I still like President Bill. He was a far better president than the
asshole who followed him.

You like him because he calls himself a democrat

**There you go again, trying to tell me why I like someone...** Give it
up.



I've seen your comment about the "5th Bush Admin" about 150 times now.

I haven't seen you actually refute it tho.

You may believe whatever you wish. Doesn't mean I have to believe it,
too, nor is it my responsibility to try to talk you out of that belief.
Hell, you probably aren't even going to vote in the 2016 presidential
election or, if you do, it'll be for some libertarian schlump whose
chance of winning is the same as yours or mine. So, what does it matter
if you think the 5th Bush Admin is upcoming.