On 3/2/16 12:56 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 11:31:17 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 3/2/16 10:40 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 10:19:54 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 3/2/16 10:09 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 1 Mar 2016 14:21:17 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

I vote but I vote for someone who reflects my views, not someone in a
given party


None of the GOP "frontrunners" reflect my views on any issue of
importance to me. I certainly wouldn't want any of the Republithugs
nominating to the Supreme Court.

I suppose that all depends on what you expect out of the court.
Liberals want to court to do social engineering and bypass the
legislative process. True conservatives simply want the court to
defend the constitution.


True conservatives... gosh, what is the litmus test for that these days?

It is not what passes for the current test,
I would say a person who respects the text of the constitution,
defends the individual rights of the population against an oppressive
government and someone who wants a sustainable fiscal policy.


Gosh, what national politicians meet your standards? Preferably name
those who hold or who have held national office.

At least you and BAO recognize my frustration with the weasels we have
been presented with. Those do not seem to be unreasonable things to
ask for


I'm simply indulging your fantasies...

On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 13:24:48 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 3/2/16 12:56 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 11:31:17 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 3/2/16 10:40 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 10:19:54 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 3/2/16 10:09 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 1 Mar 2016 14:21:17 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

I vote but I vote for someone who reflects my views, not someone in a
given party


None of the GOP "frontrunners" reflect my views on any issue of
importance to me. I certainly wouldn't want any of the Republithugs
nominating to the Supreme Court.

I suppose that all depends on what you expect out of the court.
Liberals want to court to do social engineering and bypass the
legislative process. True conservatives simply want the court to
defend the constitution.


True conservatives... gosh, what is the litmus test for that these days?

It is not what passes for the current test,
I would say a person who respects the text of the constitution,
defends the individual rights of the population against an oppressive
government and someone who wants a sustainable fiscal policy.


Gosh, what national politicians meet your standards? Preferably name
those who hold or who have held national office.

At least you and BAO recognize my frustration with the weasels we have
been presented with. Those do not seem to be unreasonable things to
ask for


I'm simply indulging your fantasies...

What? the fantasy of someone who wants to protect our rights and the
value of our money?
Is that really too much to ask?
If they can't provide that, maybe we should be stocking up on gold,
ammo and MREs

2:39
- show quoted text -
What? the fantasy of someone who wants to protect our rights and the
value of our money?
Is that really too much to ask?
If they can't provide that, maybe we should be stocking up on gold,
ammo and MREs
......

Doesn't hurt to have some of that anyhow...

wrote:
On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 13:24:48 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 3/2/16 12:56 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 11:31:17 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 3/2/16 10:40 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 10:19:54 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 3/2/16 10:09 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 1 Mar 2016 14:21:17 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

I vote but I vote for someone who reflects my views, not someone in a
given party


None of the GOP "frontrunners" reflect my views on any issue of
importance to me. I certainly wouldn't want any of the Republithugs
nominating to the Supreme Court.

I suppose that all depends on what you expect out of the court.
Liberals want to court to do social engineering and bypass the
legislative process. True conservatives simply want the court to
defend the constitution.


True conservatives... gosh, what is the litmus test for that these days?

It is not what passes for the current test,
I would say a person who respects the text of the constitution,
defends the individual rights of the population against an oppressive
government and someone who wants a sustainable fiscal policy.


Gosh, what national politicians meet your standards? Preferably name
those who hold or who have held national office.

At least you and BAO recognize my frustration with the weasels we have
been presented with. Those do not seem to be unreasonable things to
ask for


I'm simply indulging your fantasies...

What? the fantasy of someone who wants to protect our rights and the
value of our money?
Is that really too much to ask?
If they can't provide that, maybe we should be stocking up on gold,
ammo and MREs


Thank you, mr. Beck

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

On 3/2/16 3:47 PM, Tim wrote:
2:39
- show quoted text -
What? the fantasy of someone who wants to protect our rights and the
value of our money?
Is that really too much to ask?
If they can't provide that, maybe we should be stocking up on gold,
ammo and MREs
.....

Doesn't hurt to have some of that anyhow...


IGA in your town closing?

On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 12:47:48 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

2:39
- show quoted text -
What? the fantasy of someone who wants to protect our rights and the
value of our money?
Is that really too much to ask?
If they can't provide that, maybe we should be stocking up on gold,
ammo and MREs
.....

Doesn't hurt to have some of that anyhow...

Ammo and gold, OK, but these are much better than MREs:

http://www.bushbeans.com/en_US/product/texas-rancheror
--

Ban liars, tax cheats, idiots, audiophools, and narcissists...not guns!

On 3/2/16 4:56 PM, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 12:47:48 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

2:39
- show quoted text -
What? the fantasy of someone who wants to protect our rights and the
value of our money?
Is that really too much to ask?
If they can't provide that, maybe we should be stocking up on gold,
ammo and MREs
.....

Doesn't hurt to have some of that anyhow...

Ammo and gold, OK, but these are much better than MREs:

http://www.bushbeans.com/en_US/product/texas-rancheror
--


Johnny and his rec.boats hillbilly camping buddies enjoying dinner:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FXHkFZ-nG4Y

On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 15:56:13 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

wrote:
On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 13:24:48 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 3/2/16 12:56 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 11:31:17 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 3/2/16 10:40 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 10:19:54 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 3/2/16 10:09 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 1 Mar 2016 14:21:17 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

I vote but I vote for someone who reflects my views, not someone in a
given party


None of the GOP "frontrunners" reflect my views on any issue of
importance to me. I certainly wouldn't want any of the Republithugs
nominating to the Supreme Court.

I suppose that all depends on what you expect out of the court.
Liberals want to court to do social engineering and bypass the
legislative process. True conservatives simply want the court to
defend the constitution.


True conservatives... gosh, what is the litmus test for that these days?

It is not what passes for the current test,
I would say a person who respects the text of the constitution,
defends the individual rights of the population against an oppressive
government and someone who wants a sustainable fiscal policy.


Gosh, what national politicians meet your standards? Preferably name
those who hold or who have held national office.

At least you and BAO recognize my frustration with the weasels we have
been presented with. Those do not seem to be unreasonable things to
ask for


I'm simply indulging your fantasies...

What? the fantasy of someone who wants to protect our rights and the
value of our money?
Is that really too much to ask?
If they can't provide that, maybe we should be stocking up on gold,
ammo and MREs


Thank you, mr. Beck

Another brain fart from Harry

Deal with the points I state or shut the **** up.

If the candidates are not going to actually give you your individual
freedoms and a money you can trust, what would you suggest?

Borrowing 3 trillion more money than the markets are willing to lend
you and printing the rest in the basement (aka monetary easing) is not
sound fiscal policy. Nobody wants to talk about that.
There is not much argument about the loss of individual freedoms
whether it is guns, abortion or drugs, legal and illegal. (the only
things they will talk about)
That doesn't even touch privacy, property rights and the trampling of
the 4th 5th 6th 9th and 10th amendments.

When a candidate is willing to talk about that, I will pay attention.
Otherwise I am going to vote for someone who will.

On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 16:07:44 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 3/2/16 3:47 PM, Tim wrote:
2:39
- show quoted text -
What? the fantasy of someone who wants to protect our rights and the
value of our money?
Is that really too much to ask?
If they can't provide that, maybe we should be stocking up on gold,
ammo and MREs
.....

Doesn't hurt to have some of that anyhow...


IGA in your town closing?

If people stop thinking the dollar is worth much. it might.

On Wed, 02 Mar 2016 19:00:42 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 15:56:13 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

wrote:
On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 13:24:48 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 3/2/16 12:56 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 11:31:17 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 3/2/16 10:40 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 10:19:54 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 3/2/16 10:09 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 1 Mar 2016 14:21:17 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

I vote but I vote for someone who reflects my views, not someone in a
given party


None of the GOP "frontrunners" reflect my views on any issue of
importance to me. I certainly wouldn't want any of the Republithugs
nominating to the Supreme Court.

I suppose that all depends on what you expect out of the court.
Liberals want to court to do social engineering and bypass the
legislative process. True conservatives simply want the court to
defend the constitution.


True conservatives... gosh, what is the litmus test for that these days?

It is not what passes for the current test,
I would say a person who respects the text of the constitution,
defends the individual rights of the population against an oppressive
government and someone who wants a sustainable fiscal policy.


Gosh, what national politicians meet your standards? Preferably name
those who hold or who have held national office.

At least you and BAO recognize my frustration with the weasels we have
been presented with. Those do not seem to be unreasonable things to
ask for


I'm simply indulging your fantasies...

What? the fantasy of someone who wants to protect our rights and the
value of our money?
Is that really too much to ask?
If they can't provide that, maybe we should be stocking up on gold,
ammo and MREs


Thank you, mr. Beck

Another brain fart from Harry

Deal with the points I state or shut the **** up.

If the candidates are not going to actually give you your individual
freedoms and a money you can trust, what would you suggest?

Borrowing 3 trillion more money than the markets are willing to lend
you and printing the rest in the basement (aka monetary easing) is not
sound fiscal policy. Nobody wants to talk about that.
There is not much argument about the loss of individual freedoms
whether it is guns, abortion or drugs, legal and illegal. (the only
things they will talk about)
That doesn't even touch privacy, property rights and the trampling of
the 4th 5th 6th 9th and 10th amendments.

When a candidate is willing to talk about that, I will pay attention.
Otherwise I am going to vote for someone who will.

Please tell when the hell Krause has ever dealt with the points you've made!
--

Ban liars, tax cheats, idiots, audiophools, and narcissists...not guns!