Tim wrote:
On Friday, February 26, 2016 at 2:03:38 AM UTC-6, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/25/2016 11:40 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 18:58:58 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/25/16 6:32 PM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 17:59:15 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote:

He must've been getting warm. The name-calling has crescendoed.

It's that damn fake set of Klipschorns that's got him ****ed. Damn, if the label
isn't even spelled correctly, you'd think they'd be able to recognize some
not-so-genuine Klipschorns.
--

This from a moron who believe expensive little speakers deliver more
lifelike sound than expensive big speakers. Are there no limits to your
ignorance, JohnnyTrash?

Everyone is getting better sound out of small speakers these days. If
you are not trying to fill a football stadium with sound, you can use
speakers you can hold in one hand.



You just hit the nail on the head. Harry is living in the audio world
of the 1960's and 1970's when "big" was always better.

Some people confuse quality with volume


" I don' care what you play, but play it loud". Good morning, Vietnam

John H. wrote:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 20:10:16 -0500, Alex wrote:

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 2/25/16 6:32 PM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 17:59:15 -0500, Justan Olphart
wrote:
He must've been getting warm. The name-calling has crescendoed.

It's that damn fake set of Klipschorns that's got him ****ed. Damn,
if the label
isn't even spelled correctly, you'd think they'd be able to recognize
some
not-so-genuine Klipschorns.
--
This from a moron who believe expensive little speakers deliver more
lifelike sound than expensive big speakers. Are there no limits to
your ignorance, JohnnyTrash?


He was discussing computer speakers. I have a pair of Klipsch speakers
in my living room that are rarely used but sound great. Two different
topics.

I have Sony speakers on one of my boats and they sound pretty good!
Hell, he doesn't know the difference between genuine and fake Klipschorns. How could
you expect him to stick to the subject?
--

Ban liars, tax cheats, idiots, audiophools, and narcissists...not guns!


His narcissism overtook the thread...again.

True North wrote:
Ditzy Dan Kruger blathers...
True North wrote:
There's a distinction...I do live on the North American continent but not in America. To the rest of the world..America is the United States...not Canada or Mexico.
Never said I hate America, that's The John at work playing his games.

"You forgot Greenland and about three dozen other countries in North
America, dummy."


OK dummy...list those three dozen countries that are in North America.
Does the heat down there fry everyone's brain or are you just a weak link?

I went to school so let's see who is the dummy, dummy...

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=countries+in+north+america

wrote:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 19:19:59 -0800 (PST), True North
wrote:

Ditzy Dan Kruger blathers...
True North wrote:
There's a distinction...I do live on the North American continent but not in America. To the rest of the world..America is the United States...not Canada or Mexico.
Never said I hate America, that's The John at work playing his games.

"You forgot Greenland and about three dozen other countries in North
America, dummy."


OK dummy...list those three dozen countries that are in North America.
Does the heat down there fry everyone's brain or are you just a weak link?
If you start in Panama and include all of the islands you end up with
23


I remember from high school many years ago that is was over 30 - trick
question, of course. It turns out that there are more than 30.

Tim wrote:
On Friday, February 26, 2016 at 2:03:38 AM UTC-6, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/25/2016 11:40 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 18:58:58 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/25/16 6:32 PM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 17:59:15 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote:
He must've been getting warm. The name-calling has crescendoed.

It's that damn fake set of Klipschorns that's got him ****ed. Damn, if the label
isn't even spelled correctly, you'd think they'd be able to recognize some
not-so-genuine Klipschorns.
--
This from a moron who believe expensive little speakers deliver more
lifelike sound than expensive big speakers. Are there no limits to your
ignorance, JohnnyTrash?
Everyone is getting better sound out of small speakers these days. If
you are not trying to fill a football stadium with sound, you can use
speakers you can hold in one hand.


You just hit the nail on the head. Harry is living in the audio world
of the 1960's and 1970's when "big" was always better.
Some people confuse quality with volume

I agree, but you need a certain amount of volume to bring out the
quality. That would depend on the source and the speakers, of course.

On Friday, February 26, 2016 at 8:01:23 PM UTC-6, Alex wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Friday, February 26, 2016 at 2:03:38 AM UTC-6, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/25/2016 11:40 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 18:58:58 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/25/16 6:32 PM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 17:59:15 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote:
He must've been getting warm. The name-calling has crescendoed.

It's that damn fake set of Klipschorns that's got him ****ed. Damn, if the label
isn't even spelled correctly, you'd think they'd be able to recognize some
not-so-genuine Klipschorns.
--
This from a moron who believe expensive little speakers deliver more
lifelike sound than expensive big speakers. Are there no limits to your
ignorance, JohnnyTrash?
Everyone is getting better sound out of small speakers these days. If
you are not trying to fill a football stadium with sound, you can use
speakers you can hold in one hand.


You just hit the nail on the head. Harry is living in the audio world
of the 1960's and 1970's when "big" was always better.

Some people confuse quality with volume

I agree, but you need a certain amount of volume to bring out the
quality. That would depend on the source and the speakers, of course.
agreed.

A minimum of 200w was recommended for the pair of Walsh f2's where quality earbud's can be rated in mW

Ditzy Dan Kruger blathers..
wrote:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 19:19:59 -0800 (PST), True North
wrote:

Ditzy Dan Kruger blathers...
True North wrote:
There's a distinction...I do live on the North American continent but not in America. To the rest of the world..America is the United States...not Canada or Mexico.
Never said I hate America, that's The John at work playing his games.

"You forgot Greenland and about three dozen other countries in North
America, dummy."


OK dummy...list those three dozen countries that are in North America.
Does the heat down there fry everyone's brain or are you just a weak link?
If you start in Panama and include all of the islands you end up with
23


"I remember from high school many years ago that is was over 30 - trick
question, of course. *It turns out that there are more than 30."


Greg is correct, dummy. You can't count dependent territories as countries.

The 23 countries in North America a

Antigua and Barbuda
Bahamas
Barbados
Belize
Canada
Costa Rica
Cuba
Dominica
Dominican Republic
El Salvador
Grenada
Guatemala
Haiti
Honduras
Jamaica
Mexico
Nicaragua
Panama
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Trinidad and Tobago
United States

On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 20:56:55 -0500, Alex wrote:

True North wrote:
Ditzy Dan Kruger blathers...
True North wrote:
There's a distinction...I do live on the North American continent but not in America. To the rest of the world..America is the United States...not Canada or Mexico.
Never said I hate America, that's The John at work playing his games.

"You forgot Greenland and about three dozen other countries in North
America, dummy."


OK dummy...list those three dozen countries that are in North America.
Does the heat down there fry everyone's brain or are you just a weak link?

I went to school so let's see who is the dummy, dummy...

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=countries+in+north+america

That was way cool. I thought you'd somehow got Team Viewer running on my machine
behind my back.

Obviously Don was overwhelmed. He's not responded.
--

Ban liars, tax cheats, idiots, audiophools, and narcissists...not guns!

On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 18:26:47 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

On Friday, February 26, 2016 at 8:01:23 PM UTC-6, Alex wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Friday, February 26, 2016 at 2:03:38 AM UTC-6, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/25/2016 11:40 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 18:58:58 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/25/16 6:32 PM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 17:59:15 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote:
He must've been getting warm. The name-calling has crescendoed.

It's that damn fake set of Klipschorns that's got him ****ed. Damn, if the label
isn't even spelled correctly, you'd think they'd be able to recognize some
not-so-genuine Klipschorns.
--
This from a moron who believe expensive little speakers deliver more
lifelike sound than expensive big speakers. Are there no limits to your
ignorance, JohnnyTrash?
Everyone is getting better sound out of small speakers these days. If
you are not trying to fill a football stadium with sound, you can use
speakers you can hold in one hand.


You just hit the nail on the head. Harry is living in the audio world
of the 1960's and 1970's when "big" was always better.

Some people confuse quality with volume

I agree, but you need a certain amount of volume to bring out the
quality. That would depend on the source and the speakers, of course.
agreed.

A minimum of 200w was recommended for the pair of Walsh f2's where quality earbud's can be rated in mW


I can hear Harry now:

"Christoph Eschenbach came to my house for dinner and said he wished the National
Symphony Orchestra could sound as good as my Magnepans."

Just a matter of time.
--

Ban liars, tax cheats, idiots, audiophools, and narcissists...not guns!