|
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
On 12/11/2015 8:04 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/11/15 6:56 AM, Tim wrote: Somebody described Starbucks ass tasting like burnt water. I'd agree. Expensive burnt water at that. McDonalds isn't bad though.. I don't know what it is with Starbucks. I've tried it a few times over the years and it always seems to taste too strong for me...and sometimes burnt. I do like WaWa coffee, though. They sell gallons and gallons of it during the day, so it is always fresh-brewed and hot, and a lot less expensive than $tarbuck$. As Tim says, McDonald's has decent coffee...can't say the same for the food there, though. During the summer I got hooked on iced coffee. Now I can't give it up. Have to have a large after the morning van run. Learned not to get it *before starting the run. |
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
On 12/11/15 8:21 AM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 16:30:24 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:25:42 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/10/15 3:21 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:02:16 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/10/15 12:30 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 09:11:43 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 12/10/2015 8:00 AM, True North wrote: The John flushes.... You'll note he still hasn't answered the question eating meat, shoes, and gloves. Wonder why?" Why the rancor, Johnny? It's Christmas season, don't y'all know? Not if Harry can help it. Try and send a little Christmas spirit his way and see what happens. :-) Is there something rancorous about the question, "Do you eat meat, wear leather shoes, or leather gloves?" Maybe Don doesn't know what 'rancor' means....? -- Ban idiots, not guns! Why the sense of entitlement? ?? -- Ban idiots, not guns! You act as if you are *entitled* to get your questions or those questions of your buddies answered. You often repeat these questions many times and push for answers, sometimes a dozen times or more. My conclusion is that you somehow feel as if you are entitled to answers. You aren't. Don't need answers to make the point, which was done a dozen times or more! :) -- Ban idiots, not guns! The point is that some aren't playing your games. Of course not. It's hard to get out of the corners you and Don back yourself in to. Brash (and that's being charitable) statements, get called on them, and shut up. Works for me. -- Ban idiots, not guns! "It" has nothing to do with corners, but everything to do with your game-playing here. But...if it makes you feel better, what the hell...it's only you regurgitating and therefore of no matter. |
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 11:09:55 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/11/15 8:21 AM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 16:30:24 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:25:42 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/10/15 3:21 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:02:16 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/10/15 12:30 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 09:11:43 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 12/10/2015 8:00 AM, True North wrote: The John flushes.... You'll note he still hasn't answered the question eating meat, shoes, and gloves. Wonder why?" Why the rancor, Johnny? It's Christmas season, don't y'all know? Not if Harry can help it. Try and send a little Christmas spirit his way and see what happens. :-) Is there something rancorous about the question, "Do you eat meat, wear leather shoes, or leather gloves?" Maybe Don doesn't know what 'rancor' means....? -- Ban idiots, not guns! Why the sense of entitlement? ?? -- Ban idiots, not guns! You act as if you are *entitled* to get your questions or those questions of your buddies answered. You often repeat these questions many times and push for answers, sometimes a dozen times or more. My conclusion is that you somehow feel as if you are entitled to answers. You aren't. Don't need answers to make the point, which was done a dozen times or more! :) -- Ban idiots, not guns! The point is that some aren't playing your games. Of course not. It's hard to get out of the corners you and Don back yourself in to. Brash (and that's being charitable) statements, get called on them, and shut up. Works for me. -- Ban idiots, not guns! "It" has nothing to do with corners, but everything to do with your game-playing here. But...if it makes you feel better, what the hell...it's only you regurgitating and therefore of no matter. You make it sound as though I'm the only one asking questions you (or Don) can't/won't answer. You need to add a lot more names to that list. I think Luddite first asked the question about your Vietnam unit that searched and recovered dead soldiers. Hee, hee. -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
wrote:
On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 21:49:14 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote: wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 16:08:26 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote: Was he a great hockey player? Coffee is a personal taste thing. I think Starbucks mostly tastes like a burned bean brew. I really liked the old 7-11 coffee in the paper cup but it may have just been a taste from the cup ;-) It wasn't the same when they went to foam cups. Best coffee I ever drank was a Circle K shop near here. Coffee was always fantastic in the morning. I think they used good beans, and the machine had perfect water temperature. Was consistently great. By far the best coffee I ever had was at the Myrtle Bank Hotel in Kingston Jamaica (1968). A close second is the Ritz in Naples Fla. Same sort of taste and I have not had anything like it anywhere else. Not a clue what they do. It is strong and rich without being burnt tasting like Seattle coffee but "mellow" without a hint of sharpness. It is a primo cup of joe. I thought it was just a memory that I was embellishing for 40 years until I had some at the Ritz. Jamaica Blue Mountain are some of the worlds best beans. |
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
John H. wrote:
On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 03:56:14 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: Somebody described Starbucks ass tasting like burnt water. I'd agree. Expensive burnt water at that. McDonalds isn't bad though.. They switched brands or something a few years back, and the new (?) stuff is much better. The old stuff was atrocious. Their sausage biscuit is the only thing on their menu worth buying, as far as I'm concerned. -- Ban idiots, not guns! McDonalds has very good salads. The Southwest is very good. And senior drink is less,than a buck. Locally is $0.75 for coffee. Some franchises are cheaper. And the bathrooms are normally very clean when traveling. |
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 09:14:35 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote:
John H. wrote: On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 03:56:14 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: Somebody described Starbucks ass tasting like burnt water. I'd agree. Expensive burnt water at that. McDonalds isn't bad though.. They switched brands or something a few years back, and the new (?) stuff is much better. The old stuff was atrocious. Their sausage biscuit is the only thing on their menu worth buying, as far as I'm concerned. -- Ban idiots, not guns! McDonalds has very good salads. The Southwest is very good. And senior drink is less,than a buck. Locally is $0.75 for coffee. Some franchises are cheaper. And the bathrooms are normally very clean when traveling. My wife likes their salads - and the bathrooms. I've seen their senior coffees for anywhere between $.50 and $.85. If I'm on a long ride, they're a great place to stop for a break. -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
On 12/11/2015 11:37 AM, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 11:09:55 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/11/15 8:21 AM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 16:30:24 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:25:42 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/10/15 3:21 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:02:16 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/10/15 12:30 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 09:11:43 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 12/10/2015 8:00 AM, True North wrote: The John flushes.... You'll note he still hasn't answered the question eating meat, shoes, and gloves. Wonder why?" Why the rancor, Johnny? It's Christmas season, don't y'all know? Not if Harry can help it. Try and send a little Christmas spirit his way and see what happens. :-) Is there something rancorous about the question, "Do you eat meat, wear leather shoes, or leather gloves?" Maybe Don doesn't know what 'rancor' means....? -- Ban idiots, not guns! Why the sense of entitlement? ?? -- Ban idiots, not guns! You act as if you are *entitled* to get your questions or those questions of your buddies answered. You often repeat these questions many times and push for answers, sometimes a dozen times or more. My conclusion is that you somehow feel as if you are entitled to answers. You aren't. Don't need answers to make the point, which was done a dozen times or more! :) -- Ban idiots, not guns! The point is that some aren't playing your games. Of course not. It's hard to get out of the corners you and Don back yourself in to. Brash (and that's being charitable) statements, get called on them, and shut up. Works for me. -- Ban idiots, not guns! "It" has nothing to do with corners, but everything to do with your game-playing here. But...if it makes you feel better, what the hell...it's only you regurgitating and therefore of no matter. You make it sound as though I'm the only one asking questions you (or Don) can't/won't answer. You need to add a lot more names to that list. I think Luddite first asked the question about your Vietnam unit that searched and recovered dead soldiers. Hee, hee. I didn't "ask". I just commented that I had not heard of civilians in any official capacity searching for bodies while the war was going on. |
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
On Friday, 11 December 2015 13:34:30 UTC-4, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/11/2015 11:37 AM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 11:09:55 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/11/15 8:21 AM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 16:30:24 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:25:42 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/10/15 3:21 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:02:16 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/10/15 12:30 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 09:11:43 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 12/10/2015 8:00 AM, True North wrote: The John flushes.... You'll note he still hasn't answered the question eating meat, shoes, and gloves. Wonder why?" Why the rancor, Johnny? It's Christmas season, don't y'all know? Not if Harry can help it. Try and send a little Christmas spirit his way and see what happens. :-) Is there something rancorous about the question, "Do you eat meat, wear leather shoes, or leather gloves?" Maybe Don doesn't know what 'rancor' means....? -- Ban idiots, not guns! Why the sense of entitlement? ?? -- Ban idiots, not guns! You act as if you are *entitled* to get your questions or those questions of your buddies answered. You often repeat these questions many times and push for answers, sometimes a dozen times or more. My conclusion is that you somehow feel as if you are entitled to answers. You aren't. Don't need answers to make the point, which was done a dozen times or more! :) -- Ban idiots, not guns! The point is that some aren't playing your games. Of course not. It's hard to get out of the corners you and Don back yourself in to. Brash (and that's being charitable) statements, get called on them, and shut up. Works for me. -- Ban idiots, not guns! "It" has nothing to do with corners, but everything to do with your game-playing here. But...if it makes you feel better, what the hell...it's only you regurgitating and therefore of no matter. You make it sound as though I'm the only one asking questions you (or Don) can't/won't answer. You need to add a lot more names to that list. I think Luddite first asked the question about your Vietnam unit that searched and recovered dead soldiers. Hee, hee. I didn't "ask". I just commented that I had not heard of civilians in any official capacity searching for bodies while the war was going on. The John isn't interested in the facts but some of us appreciate the truth. |
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
On 12/11/15 1:33 PM, True North wrote:
On Friday, 11 December 2015 13:34:30 UTC-4, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 12/11/2015 11:37 AM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 11:09:55 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/11/15 8:21 AM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 16:30:24 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:25:42 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/10/15 3:21 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:02:16 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/10/15 12:30 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 09:11:43 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 12/10/2015 8:00 AM, True North wrote: The John flushes.... You'll note he still hasn't answered the question eating meat, shoes, and gloves. Wonder why?" Why the rancor, Johnny? It's Christmas season, don't y'all know? Not if Harry can help it. Try and send a little Christmas spirit his way and see what happens. :-) Is there something rancorous about the question, "Do you eat meat, wear leather shoes, or leather gloves?" Maybe Don doesn't know what 'rancor' means....? -- Ban idiots, not guns! Why the sense of entitlement? ?? -- Ban idiots, not guns! You act as if you are *entitled* to get your questions or those questions of your buddies answered. You often repeat these questions many times and push for answers, sometimes a dozen times or more. My conclusion is that you somehow feel as if you are entitled to answers. You aren't. Don't need answers to make the point, which was done a dozen times or more! :) -- Ban idiots, not guns! The point is that some aren't playing your games. Of course not. It's hard to get out of the corners you and Don back yourself in to. Brash (and that's being charitable) statements, get called on them, and shut up. Works for me. -- Ban idiots, not guns! "It" has nothing to do with corners, but everything to do with your game-playing here. But...if it makes you feel better, what the hell...it's only you regurgitating and therefore of no matter. You make it sound as though I'm the only one asking questions you (or Don) can't/won't answer. You need to add a lot more names to that list. I think Luddite first asked the question about your Vietnam unit that searched and recovered dead soldiers. Hee, hee. I didn't "ask". I just commented that I had not heard of civilians in any official capacity searching for bodies while the war was going on. The John isn't interested in the facts but some of us appreciate the truth. Johnny loves to think he's the Donald Trump of the newsgroup, and that he can use his version of bluster to "demand" that other posters do as he wishes. It's sort of funny to watch once in a while. |
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 09:14:35 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote:
wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 21:49:14 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote: wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 16:08:26 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote: Was he a great hockey player? Coffee is a personal taste thing. I think Starbucks mostly tastes like a burned bean brew. I really liked the old 7-11 coffee in the paper cup but it may have just been a taste from the cup ;-) It wasn't the same when they went to foam cups. Best coffee I ever drank was a Circle K shop near here. Coffee was always fantastic in the morning. I think they used good beans, and the machine had perfect water temperature. Was consistently great. By far the best coffee I ever had was at the Myrtle Bank Hotel in Kingston Jamaica (1968). A close second is the Ritz in Naples Fla. Same sort of taste and I have not had anything like it anywhere else. Not a clue what they do. It is strong and rich without being burnt tasting like Seattle coffee but "mellow" without a hint of sharpness. It is a primo cup of joe. I thought it was just a memory that I was embellishing for 40 years until I had some at the Ritz. Jamaica Blue Mountain are some of the worlds best beans. I have purchased lots of Jamaican coffee but there must be something in the way they prepare it. This is not some kind of "one off" espresso. They had it in big urns in both places. I was sorry I didn't have a thermos in my pocket ;-) |
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 12:34:21 -0500, John H.
wrote: On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 09:14:35 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote: John H. wrote: On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 03:56:14 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: Somebody described Starbucks ass tasting like burnt water. I'd agree. Expensive burnt water at that. McDonalds isn't bad though.. They switched brands or something a few years back, and the new (?) stuff is much better. The old stuff was atrocious. Their sausage biscuit is the only thing on their menu worth buying, as far as I'm concerned. -- Ban idiots, not guns! McDonalds has very good salads. The Southwest is very good. And senior drink is less,than a buck. Locally is $0.75 for coffee. Some franchises are cheaper. And the bathrooms are normally very clean when traveling. My wife likes their salads - and the bathrooms. I've seen their senior coffees for anywhere between $.50 and $.85. If I'm on a long ride, they're a great place to stop for a break. I can eat a sausage and egg on a hamburger bun, if they will do it but I am not much of a muffin or biscuit guy. Too dry. McD doesn't have much on the lunch menu I like if I want more than a salad. I really like the S/E/C on a croissant at the Burger King but I suspect that is a heart attack in a bag. The thing seems to be dripping in butter. I am not really in love with any "fast food" fries. The best ones were at Sonny's BBQ but I haven't been there for a while. I imagine the health nuts may have changed the formula by now. I think they used to use lard. |
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
On 12/11/2015 1:39 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/11/15 1:33 PM, True North wrote: On Friday, 11 December 2015 13:34:30 UTC-4, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 12/11/2015 11:37 AM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 11:09:55 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/11/15 8:21 AM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 16:30:24 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:25:42 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/10/15 3:21 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:02:16 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/10/15 12:30 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 09:11:43 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 12/10/2015 8:00 AM, True North wrote: The John flushes.... You'll note he still hasn't answered the question eating meat, shoes, and gloves. Wonder why?" Why the rancor, Johnny? It's Christmas season, don't y'all know? Not if Harry can help it. Try and send a little Christmas spirit his way and see what happens. :-) Is there something rancorous about the question, "Do you eat meat, wear leather shoes, or leather gloves?" Maybe Don doesn't know what 'rancor' means....? -- Ban idiots, not guns! Why the sense of entitlement? ?? -- Ban idiots, not guns! You act as if you are *entitled* to get your questions or those questions of your buddies answered. You often repeat these questions many times and push for answers, sometimes a dozen times or more. My conclusion is that you somehow feel as if you are entitled to answers. You aren't. Don't need answers to make the point, which was done a dozen times or more! :) -- Ban idiots, not guns! The point is that some aren't playing your games. Of course not. It's hard to get out of the corners you and Don back yourself in to. Brash (and that's being charitable) statements, get called on them, and shut up. Works for me. -- Ban idiots, not guns! "It" has nothing to do with corners, but everything to do with your game-playing here. But...if it makes you feel better, what the hell...it's only you regurgitating and therefore of no matter. You make it sound as though I'm the only one asking questions you (or Don) can't/won't answer. You need to add a lot more names to that list. I think Luddite first asked the question about your Vietnam unit that searched and recovered dead soldiers. Hee, hee. I didn't "ask". I just commented that I had not heard of civilians in any official capacity searching for bodies while the war was going on. The John isn't interested in the facts but some of us appreciate the truth. Johnny loves to think he's the Donald Trump of the newsgroup, and that he can use his version of bluster to "demand" that other posters do as he wishes. It's sort of funny to watch once in a while. The truth isn't too much to ask, is it? |
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 14:29:32 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote:
On 12/11/2015 1:39 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/11/15 1:33 PM, True North wrote: On Friday, 11 December 2015 13:34:30 UTC-4, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 12/11/2015 11:37 AM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 11:09:55 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/11/15 8:21 AM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 16:30:24 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:25:42 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/10/15 3:21 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:02:16 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/10/15 12:30 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 09:11:43 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 12/10/2015 8:00 AM, True North wrote: The John flushes.... You'll note he still hasn't answered the question eating meat, shoes, and gloves. Wonder why?" Why the rancor, Johnny? It's Christmas season, don't y'all know? Not if Harry can help it. Try and send a little Christmas spirit his way and see what happens. :-) Is there something rancorous about the question, "Do you eat meat, wear leather shoes, or leather gloves?" Maybe Don doesn't know what 'rancor' means....? -- Ban idiots, not guns! Why the sense of entitlement? ?? -- Ban idiots, not guns! You act as if you are *entitled* to get your questions or those questions of your buddies answered. You often repeat these questions many times and push for answers, sometimes a dozen times or more. My conclusion is that you somehow feel as if you are entitled to answers. You aren't. Don't need answers to make the point, which was done a dozen times or more! :) -- Ban idiots, not guns! The point is that some aren't playing your games. Of course not. It's hard to get out of the corners you and Don back yourself in to. Brash (and that's being charitable) statements, get called on them, and shut up. Works for me. -- Ban idiots, not guns! "It" has nothing to do with corners, but everything to do with your game-playing here. But...if it makes you feel better, what the hell...it's only you regurgitating and therefore of no matter. You make it sound as though I'm the only one asking questions you (or Don) can't/won't answer. You need to add a lot more names to that list. I think Luddite first asked the question about your Vietnam unit that searched and recovered dead soldiers. Hee, hee. I didn't "ask". I just commented that I had not heard of civilians in any official capacity searching for bodies while the war was going on. The John isn't interested in the facts but some of us appreciate the truth. Johnny loves to think he's the Donald Trump of the newsgroup, and that he can use his version of bluster to "demand" that other posters do as he wishes. It's sort of funny to watch once in a while. The truth isn't too much to ask, is it? Apparently Don thinks there is a big difference between facts and truth. -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
|
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 12:34:24 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 12/11/2015 11:37 AM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 11:09:55 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/11/15 8:21 AM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 16:30:24 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:25:42 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/10/15 3:21 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:02:16 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/10/15 12:30 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 09:11:43 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 12/10/2015 8:00 AM, True North wrote: The John flushes.... You'll note he still hasn't answered the question eating meat, shoes, and gloves. Wonder why?" Why the rancor, Johnny? It's Christmas season, don't y'all know? Not if Harry can help it. Try and send a little Christmas spirit his way and see what happens. :-) Is there something rancorous about the question, "Do you eat meat, wear leather shoes, or leather gloves?" Maybe Don doesn't know what 'rancor' means....? -- Ban idiots, not guns! Why the sense of entitlement? ?? -- Ban idiots, not guns! You act as if you are *entitled* to get your questions or those questions of your buddies answered. You often repeat these questions many times and push for answers, sometimes a dozen times or more. My conclusion is that you somehow feel as if you are entitled to answers. You aren't. Don't need answers to make the point, which was done a dozen times or more! :) -- Ban idiots, not guns! The point is that some aren't playing your games. Of course not. It's hard to get out of the corners you and Don back yourself in to. Brash (and that's being charitable) statements, get called on them, and shut up. Works for me. -- Ban idiots, not guns! "It" has nothing to do with corners, but everything to do with your game-playing here. But...if it makes you feel better, what the hell...it's only you regurgitating and therefore of no matter. You make it sound as though I'm the only one asking questions you (or Don) can't/won't answer. You need to add a lot more names to that list. I think Luddite first asked the question about your Vietnam unit that searched and recovered dead soldiers. Hee, hee. I didn't "ask". I just commented that I had not heard of civilians in any official capacity searching for bodies while the war was going on. You should ask. Be interesting to see if you are 'entitled' to an answer. -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
John H. wrote:
On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 14:29:32 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 12/11/2015 1:39 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/11/15 1:33 PM, True North wrote: On Friday, 11 December 2015 13:34:30 UTC-4, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 12/11/2015 11:37 AM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 11:09:55 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/11/15 8:21 AM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 16:30:24 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:25:42 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/10/15 3:21 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:02:16 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/10/15 12:30 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 09:11:43 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 12/10/2015 8:00 AM, True North wrote: The John flushes.... You'll note he still hasn't answered the question eating meat, shoes, and gloves. Wonder why?" Why the rancor, Johnny? It's Christmas season, don't y'all know? Not if Harry can help it. Try and send a little Christmas spirit his way and see what happens. :-) Is there something rancorous about the question, "Do you eat meat, wear leather shoes, or leather gloves?" Maybe Don doesn't know what 'rancor' means....? -- Ban idiots, not guns! Why the sense of entitlement? ?? -- Ban idiots, not guns! You act as if you are *entitled* to get your questions or those questions of your buddies answered. You often repeat these questions many times and push for answers, sometimes a dozen times or more. My conclusion is that you somehow feel as if you are entitled to answers. You aren't. Don't need answers to make the point, which was done a dozen times or more! ) -- Ban idiots, not guns! The point is that some aren't playing your games. Of course not. It's hard to get out of the corners you and Don back yourself in to. Brash (and that's being charitable) statements, get called on them, and shut up. Works for me. -- Ban idiots, not guns! "It" has nothing to do with corners, but everything to do with your game-playing here. But...if it makes you feel better, what the hell...it's only you regurgitating and therefore of no matter. You make it sound as though I'm the only one asking questions you (or Don) can't/won't answer. You need to add a lot more names to that list. I think Luddite first asked the question about your Vietnam unit that searched and recovered dead soldiers. Hee, hee. I didn't "ask". I just commented that I had not heard of civilians in any official capacity searching for bodies while the war was going on. The John isn't interested in the facts but some of us appreciate the truth. Johnny loves to think he's the Donald Trump of the newsgroup, and that he can use his version of bluster to "demand" that other posters do as he wishes. It's sort of funny to watch once in a while. The truth isn't too much to ask, is it? Apparently Don thinks there is a big difference between facts and truth. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Apparently don thinks there is little reason to play your little games here. -- Sent from my iPhone 6+ |
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
Keyser Söze
- show quoted text - "Apparently don thinks there is little reason to play your little games here." I wholeheartedly agree with this post. The John must be getting senile...he thinks he's back in the army barking orders that underlings were forced to obey. |
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
On 12/11/2015 5:21 PM, True North wrote:
Keyser Söze - show quoted text - "Apparently don thinks there is little reason to play your little games here." I wholeheartedly agree with this post. The John must be getting senile...he thinks he's back in the army barking orders that underlings were forced to obey. Individually, you two are pretty dumb. Teamed up you are incredibly so. |
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
|
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
True North wrote:
Keyser Söze - show quoted text - "Apparently don thinks there is little reason to play your little games here." I wholeheartedly agree with this post. The John must be getting senile...he thinks he's back in the army barking orders that underlings were forced to obey. Even as dumb as you are, you should know that you have to back up your statements. |
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
Justan Olphart
- show quoted text - "Individually, you two are pretty dumb. Teamed up you are incredibly so." If I was you Stinky, I'd be more worried about a senile John accidentally flushing his bowl and sending you on a journey to the sea. |
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
On Friday, December 11, 2015 at 5:46:34 PM UTC-5, True North wrote:
Justan Olphart - show quoted text - "Individually, you two are pretty dumb. Teamed up you are incredibly so." If I was you Stinky, I'd be more worried about a senile John accidentally flushing his bowl and sending you on a journey to the sea. That was truly stupid and juvenile. |
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
JackOff spittles..
"That was truly stupid and juvenile" How are the Palm sisters treating you these days, JackOff? |
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
On 12/11/2015 5:46 PM, True North wrote:
Justan Olphart - show quoted text - "Individually, you two are pretty dumb. Teamed up you are incredibly so." If I was you Stinky, I'd be more worried about a senile John accidentally flushing his bowl and sending you on a journey to the sea. If I were you Donnie I'd concentrate My advice giving on folks dumber than you. |
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
FlatulentJim farts...
"If I were you Donnie I'd concentrate My advice giving on folks dumber than you." I sure do...how perceptive of you! |
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
True North wrote:
On Thursday, 10 December 2015 20:08:27 UTC-4, Califbill wrote: True North wrote: Califbill - show quoted text - "I have eaten in Tim Hortons a few times when traveling Canada. Good coffee, and they are attached to gas stations sometimes. W have gotten lunch there. Is a pretty nice place. I do eat in Jack in the box at times. Is close to my boat storage. They do a good grilled chicken sandwich. And I rarely eat French fries, so is a fairly healthy lunch." They are everywhere up here...we're almost infested with them. Funny thing is I don't really care for their coffee unless I'm having one of their sandwiches or a doughnut. Was he a great hockey player? Coffee is a personal taste thing. I think Starbucks mostly tastes like a burned bean brew. He was a big star...if you were a Toronto Maple Leaf fan. Montreal Canadiens were always my team. I met Guy Lafleur about 15 years ago. It was a business trip to Montreal where he was a guest. I had no idea who he was. I'm not a fan of sports like hockey and soccer that take three hours for 0-3 scores. |
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
True North wrote:
Tim " Somebody described Starbucks ass tasting like burnt water. I'd agree. Expensive burnt water at that. McDonalds isn't bad though.. " I agree about McDonalds.....for the few times I had coffee there. Seems most up here have bought into the Tim Horton advertising....I'm more of an odd ball...one of the few who'd rather drink coffee elsewhere. The guy who partnered with Tim Horton way back in the '60s or '70s wasca Nova Scotia working as a police officer in Hamilton,tonight. He has/ had a Hugh sailboat and a sport fisher type of motorboat one summer he docked the sportfisher at the RNSYS where we sailed from. "wasca", Net Cop? Really? |
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
True North wrote:
Keyser Söze - show quoted text - "Apparently don thinks there is little reason to play your little games here." I wholeheartedly agree with this post. The John must be getting senile...he thinks he's back in the army barking orders that underlings were forced to obey. Yet you are Harry's bitch. Carry on... |
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
True North wrote:
Justan Olphart - show quoted text - "Individually, you two are pretty dumb. Teamed up you are incredibly so." If I was you Stinky, I'd be more worried about a senile John accidentally flushing his bowl and sending you on a journey to the sea. Wow! That was--insane! It's one fr the Mrs. White file. Poor lady probably has no idea what keys dumb Don is punching on his Playbook! |
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 15:39:21 -0500, John H.
wrote: McDonalds has very good salads. The Southwest is very good. And senior drink is less,than a buck. Locally is $0.75 for coffee. Some franchises are cheaper. And the bathrooms are normally very clean when traveling. My wife likes their salads - and the bathrooms. I've seen their senior coffees for anywhere between $.50 and $.85. If I'm on a long ride, they're a great place to stop for a break. I can eat a sausage and egg on a hamburger bun, if they will do it but I am not much of a muffin or biscuit guy. Too dry. McD doesn't have much on the lunch menu I like if I want more than a salad. I really like the S/E/C on a croissant at the Burger King but I suspect that is a heart attack in a bag. The thing seems to be dripping in butter. I am not really in love with any "fast food" fries. The best ones were at Sonny's BBQ but I haven't been there for a while. I imagine the health nuts may have changed the formula by now. I think they used to use lard. If I get the sausage and egg it's with a small orange juice for moisture! -- So you dip that crusty biscuit in orange juice and eat it ? ;-) |
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 22:45:36 -0500, Alex wrote:
I met Guy Lafleur about 15 years ago. It was a business trip to Montreal where he was a guest. I had no idea who he was. I'm not a fan of sports like hockey and soccer that take three hours for 0-3 scores. === Think of it as three touchdowns and 21- 0. :-) Hockey has gotten a lot better on large screen HD TVs but it's still one of those games best watched in person. |
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
On Friday, December 11, 2015 at 9:36:47 PM UTC-5, True North wrote:
JackOff spittles.. "That was truly stupid and juvenile" How are the Palm sisters treating you these days, JackOff? That was truly stupid and juvenile. |
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
|
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 17:34:34 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote:
On 12/11/2015 5:21 PM, True North wrote: Keyser Söze - show quoted text - "Apparently don thinks there is little reason to play your little games here." I wholeheartedly agree with this post. The John must be getting senile...he thinks he's back in the army barking orders that underlings were forced to obey. Individually, you two are pretty dumb. Teamed up you are incredibly so. LOL! -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
On 12/11/2015 10:57 PM, Alex wrote:
True North wrote: Justan Olphart - show quoted text - "Individually, you two are pretty dumb. Teamed up you are incredibly so." If I was you Stinky, I'd be more worried about a senile John accidentally flushing his bowl and sending you on a journey to the sea. Wow! That was--insane! It's one fr the Mrs. White file. Poor lady probably has no idea what keys dumb Don is punching on his Playbook! Flushing toilets into the harbour is only done in Halifax NS. A disgusting practice that was abandoned in civilized shoreside cities. |
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
|
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
|
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
|
Supremes let "Assault Weapon" ban stand
On Sat, 12 Dec 2015 08:30:42 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote:
On 12/11/2015 10:57 PM, Alex wrote: True North wrote: Justan Olphart - show quoted text - "Individually, you two are pretty dumb. Teamed up you are incredibly so." If I was you Stinky, I'd be more worried about a senile John accidentally flushing his bowl and sending you on a journey to the sea. Wow! That was--insane! It's one fr the Mrs. White file. Poor lady probably has no idea what keys dumb Don is punching on his Playbook! Flushing toilets into the harbour is only done in Halifax NS. A disgusting practice that was abandoned in civilized shoreside cities. I don't doubt Don's word on the issue, but I'm still surprised that recreational boaters are permitted to dump black water into Halifax Harbor. -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:58 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com