BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   What could be nicer... (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/169331-what-could-nicer.html)

John H.[_5_] November 12th 15 10:46 AM

What could be nicer...
 
On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 22:47:47 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:01:29 -0500, John H.
wrote:

So it should be illegal to fly a drone over a neighboring farmer's field? Or would it
only be illegal to fly over his back yard? And if the question is privacy, how would
you know whether or not the drone had a camera? Or a first person view capability?

The mission of the FAA is 'is to provide the safest, most efficient aerospace system
in the world.'

Drones flying over back yards at low altitude pose no threat to the safety or
efficiency of the aerospace system.


The function of the FCC is to regulate the airwaves and make sure we
have the orderly use of the bandwidth but they got involved with Janet
Jackson's nipple. It is just the nature of federal agencies.


Janet's nipple was not an orderly use of the bandwidth. That was absolutely gross. A
Taylor Swift nip slip, on the other hand, would have been quite orderly.

(Hope that's not racist!)
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

John H.[_5_] November 12th 15 10:49 AM

What could be nicer...
 
On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 22:52:12 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:42:42 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

We were originally talking about flying the damn things over
neighbor's back yards. Now you want to discuss flying over
a neighboring farmer's field.


That is the problem when you write laws. What constitutes invading
privacy? Who knows what goes on in corn fields?


I think the bigger fear is for those guys swimming naked while a drone flown by a
12-year-old is overhead and then getting arrested for indecent exposure - as in
Harry's idea.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

Mr. Luddite November 12th 15 11:13 AM

What could be nicer...
 
On 11/12/2015 5:49 AM, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 22:52:12 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:42:42 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

We were originally talking about flying the damn things over
neighbor's back yards. Now you want to discuss flying over
a neighboring farmer's field.


That is the problem when you write laws. What constitutes invading
privacy? Who knows what goes on in corn fields?


I think the bigger fear is for those guys swimming naked while a drone flown by a
12-year-old is overhead and then getting arrested for indecent exposure - as in
Harry's idea.



Ah! I just thought of the perfect place for "hobbyists" to go fly
their quads.

Public and private golf courses. Lots of room, not too many people in
any particular area and sounding like giant mosquitoes will only offend
a few.


Keyser Söze November 12th 15 11:30 AM

What could be nicer...
 
On 11/12/15 6:13 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/12/2015 5:49 AM, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 22:52:12 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:42:42 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

We were originally talking about flying the damn things over
neighbor's back yards. Now you want to discuss flying over
a neighboring farmer's field.

That is the problem when you write laws. What constitutes invading
privacy? Who knows what goes on in corn fields?


I think the bigger fear is for those guys swimming naked while a drone
flown by a
12-year-old is overhead and then getting arrested for indecent
exposure - as in
Harry's idea.



Ah! I just thought of the perfect place for "hobbyists" to go fly
their quads.

Public and private golf courses. Lots of room, not too many people in
any particular area and sounding like giant mosquitoes will only offend
a few.


And RV parks...I mean, who really knows what goes on in those places? :)



John H.[_5_] November 12th 15 12:14 PM

What could be nicer...
 
On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 06:13:35 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:

On 11/12/2015 5:49 AM, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 22:52:12 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:42:42 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

We were originally talking about flying the damn things over
neighbor's back yards. Now you want to discuss flying over
a neighboring farmer's field.

That is the problem when you write laws. What constitutes invading
privacy? Who knows what goes on in corn fields?


I think the bigger fear is for those guys swimming naked while a drone flown by a
12-year-old is overhead and then getting arrested for indecent exposure - as in
Harry's idea.



Ah! I just thought of the perfect place for "hobbyists" to go fly
their quads.

Public and private golf courses. Lots of room, not too many people in
any particular area and sounding like giant mosquitoes will only offend
a few.


The county prohibits flying in any of the county golf courses! Actually, the drones
don't need room to fly. A deck makes a great field for a drone.

I wish the county would let airplanes have a couple holes every couple weeks. Numbers
11 and 12 at Greendale would be great. Players could go straight from 10 to 13.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

John H.[_5_] November 12th 15 12:15 PM

What could be nicer...
 
On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 06:30:53 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 11/12/15 6:13 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/12/2015 5:49 AM, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 22:52:12 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:42:42 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

We were originally talking about flying the damn things over
neighbor's back yards. Now you want to discuss flying over
a neighboring farmer's field.

That is the problem when you write laws. What constitutes invading
privacy? Who knows what goes on in corn fields?

I think the bigger fear is for those guys swimming naked while a drone
flown by a
12-year-old is overhead and then getting arrested for indecent
exposure - as in
Harry's idea.



Ah! I just thought of the perfect place for "hobbyists" to go fly
their quads.

Public and private golf courses. Lots of room, not too many people in
any particular area and sounding like giant mosquitoes will only offend
a few.


And RV parks...I mean, who really knows what goes on in those places? :)



I've flown drones in RV parks twice, with grandkids. No problem.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

Justan Olphart[_2_] November 12th 15 12:16 PM

What could be nicer...
 
On 11/12/2015 6:13 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/12/2015 5:49 AM, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 22:52:12 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:42:42 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

We were originally talking about flying the damn things over
neighbor's back yards. Now you want to discuss flying over
a neighboring farmer's field.

That is the problem when you write laws. What constitutes invading
privacy? Who knows what goes on in corn fields?


I think the bigger fear is for those guys swimming naked while a drone
flown by a
12-year-old is overhead and then getting arrested for indecent
exposure - as in
Harry's idea.



Ah! I just thought of the perfect place for "hobbyists" to go fly
their quads.

Public and private golf courses. Lots of room, not too many people in
any particular area and sounding like giant mosquitoes will only offend
a few.

I have no objection to that so long as they abide by the rules and pay
the fees for the use of the course.

Justan Olphart[_2_] November 12th 15 12:26 PM

What could be nicer...
 
On 11/12/2015 6:30 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/12/15 6:13 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/12/2015 5:49 AM, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 22:52:12 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:42:42 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

We were originally talking about flying the damn things over
neighbor's back yards. Now you want to discuss flying over
a neighboring farmer's field.

That is the problem when you write laws. What constitutes invading
privacy? Who knows what goes on in corn fields?

I think the bigger fear is for those guys swimming naked while a drone
flown by a
12-year-old is overhead and then getting arrested for indecent
exposure - as in
Harry's idea.



Ah! I just thought of the perfect place for "hobbyists" to go fly
their quads.

Public and private golf courses. Lots of room, not too many people in
any particular area and sounding like giant mosquitoes will only offend
a few.


And RV parks...I mean, who really knows what goes on in those places? :)


Get yourself a quad and find out for yourself. Or, better yet, convince
your bride to buy you a camper and join in on the fun. The friendliness
and camaraderie might rub off on you. In a way it's like boating where
participants look after each other, usually. But, as in every social
situation, there's always a few jerks who won't play nice.

John H.[_5_] November 12th 15 12:47 PM

What could be nicer...
 
On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 07:26:38 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote:

On 11/12/2015 6:30 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/12/15 6:13 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/12/2015 5:49 AM, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 22:52:12 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:42:42 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

We were originally talking about flying the damn things over
neighbor's back yards. Now you want to discuss flying over
a neighboring farmer's field.

That is the problem when you write laws. What constitutes invading
privacy? Who knows what goes on in corn fields?

I think the bigger fear is for those guys swimming naked while a drone
flown by a
12-year-old is overhead and then getting arrested for indecent
exposure - as in
Harry's idea.


Ah! I just thought of the perfect place for "hobbyists" to go fly
their quads.

Public and private golf courses. Lots of room, not too many people in
any particular area and sounding like giant mosquitoes will only offend
a few.


And RV parks...I mean, who really knows what goes on in those places? :)


Get yourself a quad and find out for yourself. Or, better yet, convince
your bride to buy you a camper and join in on the fun. The friendliness
and camaraderie might rub off on you. In a way it's like boating where
participants look after each other, usually. But, as in every social
situation, there's always a few jerks who won't play nice.


So far, I've met only one jerk. But then Harry hasn't been to any RV parks that I
know of.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

Wayne.B November 12th 15 04:00 PM

What could be nicer...
 
On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 05:46:25 -0500, John H.
wrote:

Janet's nipple was not an orderly use of the bandwidth. That was absolutely gross. A
Taylor Swift nip slip, on the other hand, would have been quite orderly.

(Hope that's not racist!)


===

Quite possibly.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:30 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com