Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Republican National Committee Chair Reince Priebus had hoped for a very
different kind of 2016 election cycle. He sat down yesterday with the conservative Washington Examiner, and looked ahead to next fall. …”I think that we have become, unfortunately, a midterm party that doesn’t lose and a presidential party that’s had a really hard time winning,” Priebus said. “We’re seeing more and more that if you don’t hold the White House, it’s very difficult to govern in this country – especially in Washington D.C.” “So I think that – I do think that we’re cooked as a party for quite a while as a party if we don’t win in 2016. So I do think that it’s going to be hard to dig out of something like that,” Priebus told the Examiner. = = = Cooked as a party...that'll be good for America and average Americans. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Keyser Söze wrote:
Republican National Committee Chair Reince Priebus had hoped for a very different kind of 2016 election cycle. He sat down yesterday with the conservative Washington Examiner, and looked ahead to next fall. …”I think that we have become, unfortunately, a midterm party that doesn’t lose and a presidential party that’s had a really hard time winning,” Priebus said. “We’re seeing more and more that if you don’t hold the White House, it’s very difficult to govern in this country – especially in Washington D.C.” “So I think that – I do think that we’re cooked as a party for quite a while as a party if we don’t win in 2016. So I do think that it’s going to be hard to dig out of something like that,” Priebus told the Examiner. = = = Cooked as a party...that'll be good for America and average Americans. Never good for America or the people for a one party system. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/16/15 11:33 AM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote: Republican National Committee Chair Reince Priebus had hoped for a very different kind of 2016 election cycle. He sat down yesterday with the conservative Washington Examiner, and looked ahead to next fall. …”I think that we have become, unfortunately, a midterm party that doesn’t lose and a presidential party that’s had a really hard time winning,” Priebus said. “We’re seeing more and more that if you don’t hold the White House, it’s very difficult to govern in this country – especially in Washington D.C.” “So I think that – I do think that we’re cooked as a party for quite a while as a party if we don’t win in 2016. So I do think that it’s going to be hard to dig out of something like that,” Priebus told the Examiner. = = = Cooked as a party...that'll be good for America and average Americans. Never good for America or the people for a one party system. Oh, I'm not advocating a one party system. Perhaps a three party system... The mainstream Democratic Party A reborn mainstream Republican Party A Tea Party/Abolitionist/Hate Party, concentrated mainly in the most "Dixie" of the southern states |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/16/2015 11:22 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
Republican National Committee Chair Reince Priebus had hoped for a very different kind of 2016 election cycle. He sat down yesterday with the conservative Washington Examiner, and looked ahead to next fall. …”I think that we have become, unfortunately, a midterm party that doesn’t lose and a presidential party that’s had a really hard time winning,” Priebus said. “We’re seeing more and more that if you don’t hold the White House, it’s very difficult to govern in this country – especially in Washington D.C.” “So I think that – I do think that we’re cooked as a party for quite a while as a party if we don’t win in 2016. So I do think that it’s going to be hard to dig out of something like that,” Priebus told the Examiner. = = = Cooked as a party...that'll be good for America and average Americans. Reuters just announced the results of a computer generated prediction for the 2016 Presidential election. It predicts a Republican will be moving into the White House in 2017. The prediction is full of flaws though. It's based primarily on historical data of things like how many times a two term party has successfully retained the presidency and other factors not really germane to this election cycle. The way things are going, the Republicans will be responsible for a major aberration of historical data by handing the White House to another Democrat after eight years and possibly control of Congress. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/16/15 11:48 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/16/2015 11:22 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: Republican National Committee Chair Reince Priebus had hoped for a very different kind of 2016 election cycle. He sat down yesterday with the conservative Washington Examiner, and looked ahead to next fall. …”I think that we have become, unfortunately, a midterm party that doesn’t lose and a presidential party that’s had a really hard time winning,” Priebus said. “We’re seeing more and more that if you don’t hold the White House, it’s very difficult to govern in this country – especially in Washington D.C.” “So I think that – I do think that we’re cooked as a party for quite a while as a party if we don’t win in 2016. So I do think that it’s going to be hard to dig out of something like that,” Priebus told the Examiner. = = = Cooked as a party...that'll be good for America and average Americans. Reuters just announced the results of a computer generated prediction for the 2016 Presidential election. It predicts a Republican will be moving into the White House in 2017. The prediction is full of flaws though. It's based primarily on historical data of things like how many times a two term party has successfully retained the presidency and other factors not really germane to this election cycle. The way things are going, the Republicans will be responsible for a major aberration of historical data by handing the White House to another Democrat after eight years and possibly control of Congress. The White House and the Senate are possibilities for the Dems. I don't see the Repubs losing the House, what with all the gerrymandering they've done over the years. I'm at a loss trying to guess who the 2016 GOP POTUS candidate might be. If Trump doesn't do himself in, I can't see any of the others who are running knocking him off. I think Jeb has cooked his own goose. Rubio? Pretty slim pickings there. I don't see Sanders getting the nomination, but he and his campaign are performing a great service for this country in many ways. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/16/2015 12:03 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/16/15 11:48 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/16/2015 11:22 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: Republican National Committee Chair Reince Priebus had hoped for a very different kind of 2016 election cycle. He sat down yesterday with the conservative Washington Examiner, and looked ahead to next fall. …”I think that we have become, unfortunately, a midterm party that doesn’t lose and a presidential party that’s had a really hard time winning,” Priebus said. “We’re seeing more and more that if you don’t hold the White House, it’s very difficult to govern in this country – especially in Washington D.C.” “So I think that – I do think that we’re cooked as a party for quite a while as a party if we don’t win in 2016. So I do think that it’s going to be hard to dig out of something like that,” Priebus told the Examiner. = = = Cooked as a party...that'll be good for America and average Americans. Reuters just announced the results of a computer generated prediction for the 2016 Presidential election. It predicts a Republican will be moving into the White House in 2017. The prediction is full of flaws though. It's based primarily on historical data of things like how many times a two term party has successfully retained the presidency and other factors not really germane to this election cycle. The way things are going, the Republicans will be responsible for a major aberration of historical data by handing the White House to another Democrat after eight years and possibly control of Congress. The White House and the Senate are possibilities for the Dems. I don't see the Repubs losing the House, what with all the gerrymandering they've done over the years. I'm at a loss trying to guess who the 2016 GOP POTUS candidate might be. If Trump doesn't do himself in, I can't see any of the others who are running knocking him off. I think Jeb has cooked his own goose. Rubio? Pretty slim pickings there. I don't see Sanders getting the nomination, but he and his campaign are performing a great service for this country in many ways. I like Bernie although I could never vote for him. He's honest, sincere and passionate in his beliefs. You can't be faulted for that. I caught the replays of his appearance on the Ellen DeGeneres where she asked him if he was ever in handcuffs. He has a genuine sense of humor. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 13:40:13 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: On 10/16/2015 12:03 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: I don't see Sanders getting the nomination, but he and his campaign are performing a great service for this country in many ways. I like Bernie although I could never vote for him. He's honest, sincere and passionate in his beliefs. You can't be faulted for that. I caught the replays of his appearance on the Ellen DeGeneres where she asked him if he was ever in handcuffs. He has a genuine sense of humor. He wouldn't take the bait and admit the possibility that they were furr lined handcuffs. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Finally, a bit of good news - maybe. | General | |||
Finally - Some good news about menhaden | General | |||
Finally some good news... | General | |||
Finally, some good news about religion | General | |||
Finally - Good News for Bush! | General |