![]() |
We can't do nuttin'...
On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 08:38:40 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: On 10/11/15 9:53 PM, wrote: On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 20:15:58 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/11/15 7:43 PM, wrote: On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 15:42:16 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 10/11/2015 12:22 PM, wrote: On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 11:19:16 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/11/15 10:23 AM, wrote: On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 08:27:37 -0400, Keyser Söze g infrastructure. I will give you half of that. I agree some of the money could be spent on infrastructure but you would be trading high tech jobs for blue collar construction jobs. We wouldn't need as much of that education you are talking about. You don't need a bachelors degree to run a loader. Education is a pursuit on its own...as we have discussed before, I think there is far more use for education than learning a trade. Education isn't a singular pursuit. Foremost is the need for an education, professional or vocational, in order to be self sufficient, earn a living, provide for a family, be a contributing member of society and not be dependent on everyone else for survival. The need for this level of education is drilled into every kid's head at a young age. Then there's education for pleasure and intellectual curiosity. That's secondary. General liberal arts is a good example. Harry thinks that in an economy where we have the lowest labor participation rate since the end of WWII and the massive loss of white collar middle class jobs, that we need more people coming out of college without any real marketable skills and a huge debt, simply because they had a pursuit of higher learning. And once again, your opinion of what I think is completely wrong. You should just give up on these "projections" of yours. I think for some students, the pursuit of knowledge and the hope of making a contribution to the bank of knowledge is purpose enough. It wasn't a projection. I was simply referencing your quote Education is a pursuit on its own...as we have discussed before, I think there is far more use for education than learning a trade. In this economic climate, kids need the tools to find a job. They can learn all about more esoteric things after they are gainfully employed Their employer might even kick some money in if they can see the same value in liberal arts as you do. Why don't we just leave it at the fact that you have no appreciation for intellectual pursuits that don't produce significant amounts of money, and that you believe rigorous thinking is an esoteric pursuit. After all, what use have we for someone like Leonardo da Vinci and his students? Just have the drones line up for their jobs at The Corporation each morning so they can produce their daily quota of widgets and widget ideas. I have pursued knowledge in all sorts of fields but it was after I was able to feed myself. I know a lot of stuff about a lot of different things and I am not afraid to try anything. I didn't have the catholic church or rich parents to feed me. These days, the idea that you need to pay someone tens of thousands of dollars a year to learn something is ridiculous. there is so much college level information on the internet that the only reason you would go to a university would be to get that piece of paper, in hopes that it would lead to that job making widgets. If you simply seek the information for your own enlightenment, it is free. |
We can't do nuttin'...
On 10/12/15 10:17 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 08:38:40 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/11/15 9:53 PM, wrote: On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 20:15:58 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/11/15 7:43 PM, wrote: On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 15:42:16 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 10/11/2015 12:22 PM, wrote: On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 11:19:16 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/11/15 10:23 AM, wrote: On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 08:27:37 -0400, Keyser Söze g infrastructure. I will give you half of that. I agree some of the money could be spent on infrastructure but you would be trading high tech jobs for blue collar construction jobs. We wouldn't need as much of that education you are talking about. You don't need a bachelors degree to run a loader. Education is a pursuit on its own...as we have discussed before, I think there is far more use for education than learning a trade. Education isn't a singular pursuit. Foremost is the need for an education, professional or vocational, in order to be self sufficient, earn a living, provide for a family, be a contributing member of society and not be dependent on everyone else for survival. The need for this level of education is drilled into every kid's head at a young age. Then there's education for pleasure and intellectual curiosity. That's secondary. General liberal arts is a good example. Harry thinks that in an economy where we have the lowest labor participation rate since the end of WWII and the massive loss of white collar middle class jobs, that we need more people coming out of college without any real marketable skills and a huge debt, simply because they had a pursuit of higher learning. And once again, your opinion of what I think is completely wrong. You should just give up on these "projections" of yours. I think for some students, the pursuit of knowledge and the hope of making a contribution to the bank of knowledge is purpose enough. It wasn't a projection. I was simply referencing your quote Education is a pursuit on its own...as we have discussed before, I think there is far more use for education than learning a trade. In this economic climate, kids need the tools to find a job. They can learn all about more esoteric things after they are gainfully employed Their employer might even kick some money in if they can see the same value in liberal arts as you do. Why don't we just leave it at the fact that you have no appreciation for intellectual pursuits that don't produce significant amounts of money, and that you believe rigorous thinking is an esoteric pursuit. After all, what use have we for someone like Leonardo da Vinci and his students? Just have the drones line up for their jobs at The Corporation each morning so they can produce their daily quota of widgets and widget ideas. I have pursued knowledge in all sorts of fields but it was after I was able to feed myself. I know a lot of stuff about a lot of different things and I am not afraid to try anything. I didn't have the catholic church or rich parents to feed me. These days, the idea that you need to pay someone tens of thousands of dollars a year to learn something is ridiculous. there is so much college level information on the internet that the only reason you would go to a university would be to get that piece of paper, in hopes that it would lead to that job making widgets. If you simply seek the information for your own enlightenment, it is free. You don't understand the college experience. It's not just "the information," and, no, I am not referring to fraternity parties. |
We can't do nuttin'...
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/12/15 10:17 AM, wrote: On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 08:38:40 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/11/15 9:53 PM, wrote: On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 20:15:58 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/11/15 7:43 PM, wrote: On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 15:42:16 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 10/11/2015 12:22 PM, wrote: On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 11:19:16 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/11/15 10:23 AM, wrote: On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 08:27:37 -0400, Keyser Söze g infrastructure. I will give you half of that. I agree some of the money could be spent on infrastructure but you would be trading high tech jobs for blue collar construction jobs. We wouldn't need as much of that education you are talking about. You don't need a bachelors degree to run a loader. Education is a pursuit on its own...as we have discussed before, I think there is far more use for education than learning a trade. Education isn't a singular pursuit. Foremost is the need for an education, professional or vocational, in order to be self sufficient, earn a living, provide for a family, be a contributing member of society and not be dependent on everyone else for survival. The need for this level of education is drilled into every kid's head at a young age. Then there's education for pleasure and intellectual curiosity. That's secondary. General liberal arts is a good example. Harry thinks that in an economy where we have the lowest labor participation rate since the end of WWII and the massive loss of white collar middle class jobs, that we need more people coming out of college without any real marketable skills and a huge debt, simply because they had a pursuit of higher learning. And once again, your opinion of what I think is completely wrong. You should just give up on these "projections" of yours. I think for some students, the pursuit of knowledge and the hope of making a contribution to the bank of knowledge is purpose enough. It wasn't a projection. I was simply referencing your quote Education is a pursuit on its own...as we have discussed before, I think there is far more use for education than learning a trade. In this economic climate, kids need the tools to find a job. They can learn all about more esoteric things after they are gainfully employed Their employer might even kick some money in if they can see the same value in liberal arts as you do. Why don't we just leave it at the fact that you have no appreciation for intellectual pursuits that don't produce significant amounts of money, and that you believe rigorous thinking is an esoteric pursuit. After all, what use have we for someone like Leonardo da Vinci and his students? Just have the drones line up for their jobs at The Corporation each morning so they can produce their daily quota of widgets and widget ideas. I have pursued knowledge in all sorts of fields but it was after I was able to feed myself. I know a lot of stuff about a lot of different things and I am not afraid to try anything. I didn't have the catholic church or rich parents to feed me. These days, the idea that you need to pay someone tens of thousands of dollars a year to learn something is ridiculous. there is so much college level information on the internet that the only reason you would go to a university would be to get that piece of paper, in hopes that it would lead to that job making widgets. If you simply seek the information for your own enlightenment, it is free. You don't understand the college experience. It's not just "the information," and, no, I am not referring to fraternity parties. You want to learn esoteric facts for self worth, pay for that education. If the rest of society is paying the bills, they should get a return on those investments. I take classes these days for fun and to learn something new. But why should the taxpayers pick up 80% of the cost of me taking a guitar class? And way to much overhead in universities these days, as well as the primary schools. Some university had Mexican Food Day in e cafeteria, been doing it for years. Two students complained, as was degrading to Mexicans. So the "Associate executive Vice President for Student Affairs" apologized. First, tell the complainers to suck it up. And if you have to have titles like that VP, you have way too many administrators! |
We can't do nuttin'...
On 10/12/15 2:52 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/12/15 10:17 AM, wrote: On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 08:38:40 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/11/15 9:53 PM, wrote: On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 20:15:58 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/11/15 7:43 PM, wrote: On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 15:42:16 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 10/11/2015 12:22 PM, wrote: On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 11:19:16 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/11/15 10:23 AM, wrote: On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 08:27:37 -0400, Keyser Söze g infrastructure. I will give you half of that. I agree some of the money could be spent on infrastructure but you would be trading high tech jobs for blue collar construction jobs. We wouldn't need as much of that education you are talking about. You don't need a bachelors degree to run a loader. Education is a pursuit on its own...as we have discussed before, I think there is far more use for education than learning a trade. Education isn't a singular pursuit. Foremost is the need for an education, professional or vocational, in order to be self sufficient, earn a living, provide for a family, be a contributing member of society and not be dependent on everyone else for survival. The need for this level of education is drilled into every kid's head at a young age. Then there's education for pleasure and intellectual curiosity. That's secondary. General liberal arts is a good example. Harry thinks that in an economy where we have the lowest labor participation rate since the end of WWII and the massive loss of white collar middle class jobs, that we need more people coming out of college without any real marketable skills and a huge debt, simply because they had a pursuit of higher learning. And once again, your opinion of what I think is completely wrong. You should just give up on these "projections" of yours. I think for some students, the pursuit of knowledge and the hope of making a contribution to the bank of knowledge is purpose enough. It wasn't a projection. I was simply referencing your quote Education is a pursuit on its own...as we have discussed before, I think there is far more use for education than learning a trade. In this economic climate, kids need the tools to find a job. They can learn all about more esoteric things after they are gainfully employed Their employer might even kick some money in if they can see the same value in liberal arts as you do. Why don't we just leave it at the fact that you have no appreciation for intellectual pursuits that don't produce significant amounts of money, and that you believe rigorous thinking is an esoteric pursuit. After all, what use have we for someone like Leonardo da Vinci and his students? Just have the drones line up for their jobs at The Corporation each morning so they can produce their daily quota of widgets and widget ideas. I have pursued knowledge in all sorts of fields but it was after I was able to feed myself. I know a lot of stuff about a lot of different things and I am not afraid to try anything. I didn't have the catholic church or rich parents to feed me. These days, the idea that you need to pay someone tens of thousands of dollars a year to learn something is ridiculous. there is so much college level information on the internet that the only reason you would go to a university would be to get that piece of paper, in hopes that it would lead to that job making widgets. If you simply seek the information for your own enlightenment, it is free. You don't understand the college experience. It's not just "the information," and, no, I am not referring to fraternity parties. You want to learn esoteric facts for self worth, pay for that education. If the rest of society is paying the bills, they should get a return on those investments. I take classes these days for fun and to learn something new. But why should the taxpayers pick up 80% of the cost of me taking a guitar class? And way to much overhead in universities these days, as well as the primary schools. Some university had Mexican Food Day in e cafeteria, been doing it for years. Two students complained, as was degrading to Mexicans. So the "Associate executive Vice President for Student Affairs" apologized. First, tell the complainers to suck it up. And if you have to have titles like that VP, you have way too many administrators! "Esoteric facts for self worth..." Hehehe. Gotta love rec.bloats. |
We can't do nuttin'...
On 10/12/2015 10:17 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 08:38:40 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/11/15 9:53 PM, wrote: On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 20:15:58 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/11/15 7:43 PM, wrote: On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 15:42:16 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 10/11/2015 12:22 PM, wrote: On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 11:19:16 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/11/15 10:23 AM, wrote: On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 08:27:37 -0400, Keyser Söze g infrastructure. I will give you half of that. I agree some of the money could be spent on infrastructure but you would be trading high tech jobs for blue collar construction jobs. We wouldn't need as much of that education you are talking about. You don't need a bachelors degree to run a loader. Education is a pursuit on its own...as we have discussed before, I think there is far more use for education than learning a trade. Education isn't a singular pursuit. Foremost is the need for an education, professional or vocational, in order to be self sufficient, earn a living, provide for a family, be a contributing member of society and not be dependent on everyone else for survival. The need for this level of education is drilled into every kid's head at a young age. Then there's education for pleasure and intellectual curiosity. That's secondary. General liberal arts is a good example. Harry thinks that in an economy where we have the lowest labor participation rate since the end of WWII and the massive loss of white collar middle class jobs, that we need more people coming out of college without any real marketable skills and a huge debt, simply because they had a pursuit of higher learning. And once again, your opinion of what I think is completely wrong. You should just give up on these "projections" of yours. I think for some students, the pursuit of knowledge and the hope of making a contribution to the bank of knowledge is purpose enough. It wasn't a projection. I was simply referencing your quote Education is a pursuit on its own...as we have discussed before, I think there is far more use for education than learning a trade. In this economic climate, kids need the tools to find a job. They can learn all about more esoteric things after they are gainfully employed Their employer might even kick some money in if they can see the same value in liberal arts as you do. Why don't we just leave it at the fact that you have no appreciation for intellectual pursuits that don't produce significant amounts of money, and that you believe rigorous thinking is an esoteric pursuit. Here again is an example of Harry's dishonesty. You alluded to the fact that kids need an education in order to have the tools they need to find (qualify) for a job. Harry morphs that into earning "significant amounts" of money. Nobody came close to saying any such thing. |
We can't do nuttin'...
On 10/12/15 3:47 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/12/2015 10:17 AM, wrote: On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 08:38:40 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/11/15 9:53 PM, wrote: On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 20:15:58 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/11/15 7:43 PM, wrote: On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 15:42:16 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 10/11/2015 12:22 PM, wrote: On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 11:19:16 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/11/15 10:23 AM, wrote: On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 08:27:37 -0400, Keyser Söze g infrastructure. I will give you half of that. I agree some of the money could be spent on infrastructure but you would be trading high tech jobs for blue collar construction jobs. We wouldn't need as much of that education you are talking about. You don't need a bachelors degree to run a loader. Education is a pursuit on its own...as we have discussed before, I think there is far more use for education than learning a trade. Education isn't a singular pursuit. Foremost is the need for an education, professional or vocational, in order to be self sufficient, earn a living, provide for a family, be a contributing member of society and not be dependent on everyone else for survival. The need for this level of education is drilled into every kid's head at a young age. Then there's education for pleasure and intellectual curiosity. That's secondary. General liberal arts is a good example. Harry thinks that in an economy where we have the lowest labor participation rate since the end of WWII and the massive loss of white collar middle class jobs, that we need more people coming out of college without any real marketable skills and a huge debt, simply because they had a pursuit of higher learning. And once again, your opinion of what I think is completely wrong. You should just give up on these "projections" of yours. I think for some students, the pursuit of knowledge and the hope of making a contribution to the bank of knowledge is purpose enough. It wasn't a projection. I was simply referencing your quote Education is a pursuit on its own...as we have discussed before, I think there is far more use for education than learning a trade. In this economic climate, kids need the tools to find a job. They can learn all about more esoteric things after they are gainfully employed Their employer might even kick some money in if they can see the same value in liberal arts as you do. Why don't we just leave it at the fact that you have no appreciation for intellectual pursuits that don't produce significant amounts of money, and that you believe rigorous thinking is an esoteric pursuit. Here again is an example of Harry's dishonesty. You alluded to the fact that kids need an education in order to have the tools they need to find (qualify) for a job. Harry morphs that into earning "significant amounts" of money. Nobody came close to saying any such thing. I was talking about intellectual pursuits...most of you see no need for that...that a trade school education will suffice. |
We can't do nuttin'...
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/12/15 2:52 PM, Califbill wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/12/15 10:17 AM, wrote: On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 08:38:40 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/11/15 9:53 PM, wrote: On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 20:15:58 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/11/15 7:43 PM, wrote: On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 15:42:16 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 10/11/2015 12:22 PM, wrote: On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 11:19:16 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/11/15 10:23 AM, wrote: On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 08:27:37 -0400, Keyser Söze g infrastructure. I will give you half of that. I agree some of the money could be spent on infrastructure but you would be trading high tech jobs for blue collar construction jobs. We wouldn't need as much of that education you are talking about. You don't need a bachelors degree to run a loader. Education is a pursuit on its own...as we have discussed before, I think there is far more use for education than learning a trade. Education isn't a singular pursuit. Foremost is the need for an education, professional or vocational, in order to be self sufficient, earn a living, provide for a family, be a contributing member of society and not be dependent on everyone else for survival. The need for this level of education is drilled into every kid's head at a young age. Then there's education for pleasure and intellectual curiosity. That's secondary. General liberal arts is a good example. Harry thinks that in an economy where we have the lowest labor participation rate since the end of WWII and the massive loss of white collar middle class jobs, that we need more people coming out of college without any real marketable skills and a huge debt, simply because they had a pursuit of higher learning. And once again, your opinion of what I think is completely wrong. You should just give up on these "projections" of yours. I think for some students, the pursuit of knowledge and the hope of making a contribution to the bank of knowledge is purpose enough. It wasn't a projection. I was simply referencing your quote Education is a pursuit on its own...as we have discussed before, I think there is far more use for education than learning a trade. In this economic climate, kids need the tools to find a job. They can learn all about more esoteric things after they are gainfully employed Their employer might even kick some money in if they can see the same value in liberal arts as you do. Why don't we just leave it at the fact that you have no appreciation for intellectual pursuits that don't produce significant amounts of money, and that you believe rigorous thinking is an esoteric pursuit. After all, what use have we for someone like Leonardo da Vinci and his students? Just have the drones line up for their jobs at The Corporation each morning so they can produce their daily quota of widgets and widget ideas. I have pursued knowledge in all sorts of fields but it was after I was able to feed myself. I know a lot of stuff about a lot of different things and I am not afraid to try anything. I didn't have the catholic church or rich parents to feed me. These days, the idea that you need to pay someone tens of thousands of dollars a year to learn something is ridiculous. there is so much college level information on the internet that the only reason you would go to a university would be to get that piece of paper, in hopes that it would lead to that job making widgets. If you simply seek the information for your own enlightenment, it is free. You don't understand the college experience. It's not just "the information," and, no, I am not referring to fraternity parties. You want to learn esoteric facts for self worth, pay for that education. If the rest of society is paying the bills, they should get a return on those investments. I take classes these days for fun and to learn something new. But why should the taxpayers pick up 80% of the cost of me taking a guitar class? And way to much overhead in universities these days, as well as the primary schools. Some university had Mexican Food Day in e cafeteria, been doing it for years. Two students complained, as was degrading to Mexicans. So the "Associate executive Vice President for Student Affairs" apologized. First, tell the complainers to suck it up. And if you have to have titles like that VP, you have way too many administrators! "Esoteric facts for self worth..." Hehehe. Gotta love rec.bloats. And what I s wrong about not having the public pay for someone's desire the learn some great Trivial Pursuit answers, while we end up paying them welfare when they can not find a job playing Trivial Pursuit after they graduate? |
We can't do nuttin'...
On 10/12/15 4:14 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/12/15 2:52 PM, Califbill wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/12/15 10:17 AM, wrote: On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 08:38:40 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/11/15 9:53 PM, wrote: On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 20:15:58 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/11/15 7:43 PM, wrote: On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 15:42:16 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 10/11/2015 12:22 PM, wrote: On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 11:19:16 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/11/15 10:23 AM, wrote: On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 08:27:37 -0400, Keyser Söze g infrastructure. I will give you half of that. I agree some of the money could be spent on infrastructure but you would be trading high tech jobs for blue collar construction jobs. We wouldn't need as much of that education you are talking about. You don't need a bachelors degree to run a loader. Education is a pursuit on its own...as we have discussed before, I think there is far more use for education than learning a trade. Education isn't a singular pursuit. Foremost is the need for an education, professional or vocational, in order to be self sufficient, earn a living, provide for a family, be a contributing member of society and not be dependent on everyone else for survival. The need for this level of education is drilled into every kid's head at a young age. Then there's education for pleasure and intellectual curiosity. That's secondary. General liberal arts is a good example. Harry thinks that in an economy where we have the lowest labor participation rate since the end of WWII and the massive loss of white collar middle class jobs, that we need more people coming out of college without any real marketable skills and a huge debt, simply because they had a pursuit of higher learning. And once again, your opinion of what I think is completely wrong. You should just give up on these "projections" of yours. I think for some students, the pursuit of knowledge and the hope of making a contribution to the bank of knowledge is purpose enough. It wasn't a projection. I was simply referencing your quote Education is a pursuit on its own...as we have discussed before, I think there is far more use for education than learning a trade. In this economic climate, kids need the tools to find a job. They can learn all about more esoteric things after they are gainfully employed Their employer might even kick some money in if they can see the same value in liberal arts as you do. Why don't we just leave it at the fact that you have no appreciation for intellectual pursuits that don't produce significant amounts of money, and that you believe rigorous thinking is an esoteric pursuit. After all, what use have we for someone like Leonardo da Vinci and his students? Just have the drones line up for their jobs at The Corporation each morning so they can produce their daily quota of widgets and widget ideas. I have pursued knowledge in all sorts of fields but it was after I was able to feed myself. I know a lot of stuff about a lot of different things and I am not afraid to try anything. I didn't have the catholic church or rich parents to feed me. These days, the idea that you need to pay someone tens of thousands of dollars a year to learn something is ridiculous. there is so much college level information on the internet that the only reason you would go to a university would be to get that piece of paper, in hopes that it would lead to that job making widgets. If you simply seek the information for your own enlightenment, it is free. You don't understand the college experience. It's not just "the information," and, no, I am not referring to fraternity parties. You want to learn esoteric facts for self worth, pay for that education. If the rest of society is paying the bills, they should get a return on those investments. I take classes these days for fun and to learn something new. But why should the taxpayers pick up 80% of the cost of me taking a guitar class? And way to much overhead in universities these days, as well as the primary schools. Some university had Mexican Food Day in e cafeteria, been doing it for years. Two students complained, as was degrading to Mexicans. So the "Associate executive Vice President for Student Affairs" apologized. First, tell the complainers to suck it up. And if you have to have titles like that VP, you have way too many administrators! "Esoteric facts for self worth..." Hehehe. Gotta love rec.bloats. And what I s wrong about not having the public pay for someone's desire the learn some great Trivial Pursuit answers, while we end up paying them welfare when they can not find a job playing Trivial Pursuit after they graduate? Hey, Bilious, if you think the answer is Trivial Pursuit, then you don't understand the questions. Gotta love rec.bloats. |
We can't do nuttin'...
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/12/15 3:47 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/12/2015 10:17 AM, wrote: On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 08:38:40 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/11/15 9:53 PM, wrote: On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 20:15:58 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/11/15 7:43 PM, wrote: On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 15:42:16 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 10/11/2015 12:22 PM, wrote: On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 11:19:16 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/11/15 10:23 AM, wrote: On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 08:27:37 -0400, Keyser Söze g infrastructure. I will give you half of that. I agree some of the money could be spent on infrastructure but you would be trading high tech jobs for blue collar construction jobs. We wouldn't need as much of that education you are talking about. You don't need a bachelors degree to run a loader. Education is a pursuit on its own...as we have discussed before, I think there is far more use for education than learning a trade. Education isn't a singular pursuit. Foremost is the need for an education, professional or vocational, in order to be self sufficient, earn a living, provide for a family, be a contributing member of society and not be dependent on everyone else for survival. The need for this level of education is drilled into every kid's head at a young age. Then there's education for pleasure and intellectual curiosity. That's secondary. General liberal arts is a good example. Harry thinks that in an economy where we have the lowest labor participation rate since the end of WWII and the massive loss of white collar middle class jobs, that we need more people coming out of college without any real marketable skills and a huge debt, simply because they had a pursuit of higher learning. And once again, your opinion of what I think is completely wrong. You should just give up on these "projections" of yours. I think for some students, the pursuit of knowledge and the hope of making a contribution to the bank of knowledge is purpose enough. It wasn't a projection. I was simply referencing your quote Education is a pursuit on its own...as we have discussed before, I think there is far more use for education than learning a trade. In this economic climate, kids need the tools to find a job. They can learn all about more esoteric things after they are gainfully employed Their employer might even kick some money in if they can see the same value in liberal arts as you do. Why don't we just leave it at the fact that you have no appreciation for intellectual pursuits that don't produce significant amounts of money, and that you believe rigorous thinking is an esoteric pursuit. Here again is an example of Harry's dishonesty. You alluded to the fact that kids need an education in order to have the tools they need to find (qualify) for a job. Harry morphs that into earning "significant amounts" of money. Nobody came close to saying any such thing. I was talking about intellectual pursuits...most of you see no need for that...that a trade school education will suffice. So you are saying college will not suffice for job preparation? We are saying a bunch of the degrees issued these days, have no use other than wall paper, and to prove you spent years on some insignificant pursuit. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:22 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com