Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John H. wrote:
On Thu, 03 Sep 2015 13:38:13 -0500, Califbill billnews wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: Kim Davis, the defiant Kentucky county clerk, was found in contempt of court and taken into federal custody. U.S. District Court Judge David Bunning ordered Davis, the Rowan County clerk, to be jailed on the contempt charges until she agrees to comply with multiple court orders to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. The judge ordered her held indefinitely because he did not believe fines would be enough to compel her to follow the law. Her office refused to issue a marriage license to a same-sex couple as recently as Thursday morning, before Davis and her staff closed the office made the half-hour trip from Morehead to Ashland. I question why a Federal Court. Should be a state issue. Perhaps state law hasn't caught up with the Supreme Court, such as in this case: http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/l...marria/323201/ -- Ban idiots, not guns! I saw the video, they were just out looking to offend and put someone in jail for their own amusement. Intolerance is after all the core of the gay rights movement.. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 03 Sep 2015 17:25:44 -0400, "Just wait a frekin' minute!"
wrote: John H. wrote: On Thu, 03 Sep 2015 13:38:13 -0500, Califbill billnews wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: Kim Davis, the defiant Kentucky county clerk, was found in contempt of court and taken into federal custody. U.S. District Court Judge David Bunning ordered Davis, the Rowan County clerk, to be jailed on the contempt charges until she agrees to comply with multiple court orders to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. The judge ordered her held indefinitely because he did not believe fines would be enough to compel her to follow the law. Her office refused to issue a marriage license to a same-sex couple as recently as Thursday morning, before Davis and her staff closed the office made the half-hour trip from Morehead to Ashland. I question why a Federal Court. Should be a state issue. Perhaps state law hasn't caught up with the Supreme Court, such as in this case: http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/l...marria/323201/ -- Ban idiots, not guns! I saw the video, they were just out looking to offend and put someone in jail for their own amusement. Intolerance is after all the core of the gay rights movement.. I noticed that the news did not show any pictures of the straight couples who could not get a license there. I suppose they just drove 15 miles down the road to the next county seat. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 19:53:00 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 9/3/15 7:16 PM, wrote: On Thu, 03 Sep 2015 17:25:44 -0400, "Just wait a frekin' minute!" wrote: John H. wrote: On Thu, 03 Sep 2015 13:38:13 -0500, Califbill billnews wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: Kim Davis, the defiant Kentucky county clerk, was found in contempt of court and taken into federal custody. U.S. District Court Judge David Bunning ordered Davis, the Rowan County clerk, to be jailed on the contempt charges until she agrees to comply with multiple court orders to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. The judge ordered her held indefinitely because he did not believe fines would be enough to compel her to follow the law. Her office refused to issue a marriage license to a same-sex couple as recently as Thursday morning, before Davis and her staff closed the office made the half-hour trip from Morehead to Ashland. I question why a Federal Court. Should be a state issue. Perhaps state law hasn't caught up with the Supreme Court, such as in this case: http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/l...marria/323201/ -- Ban idiots, not guns! I saw the video, they were just out looking to offend and put someone in jail for their own amusement. Intolerance is after all the core of the gay rights movement.. I noticed that the news did not show any pictures of the straight couples who could not get a license there. I suppose they just drove 15 miles down the road to the next county seat. Because the clerk in their county refused to do her job, and keep her damned religion out of it. So you admit this was just a political protest, not an actual hardship. I still say that as long as she did not issue any marriage licenses at all, she may have a case, for whatever the motive might be. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/3/15 8:42 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 19:53:00 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 9/3/15 7:16 PM, wrote: On Thu, 03 Sep 2015 17:25:44 -0400, "Just wait a frekin' minute!" wrote: John H. wrote: On Thu, 03 Sep 2015 13:38:13 -0500, Califbill billnews wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: Kim Davis, the defiant Kentucky county clerk, was found in contempt of court and taken into federal custody. U.S. District Court Judge David Bunning ordered Davis, the Rowan County clerk, to be jailed on the contempt charges until she agrees to comply with multiple court orders to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. The judge ordered her held indefinitely because he did not believe fines would be enough to compel her to follow the law. Her office refused to issue a marriage license to a same-sex couple as recently as Thursday morning, before Davis and her staff closed the office made the half-hour trip from Morehead to Ashland. I question why a Federal Court. Should be a state issue. Perhaps state law hasn't caught up with the Supreme Court, such as in this case: http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/l...marria/323201/ -- Ban idiots, not guns! I saw the video, they were just out looking to offend and put someone in jail for their own amusement. Intolerance is after all the core of the gay rights movement.. I noticed that the news did not show any pictures of the straight couples who could not get a license there. I suppose they just drove 15 miles down the road to the next county seat. Because the clerk in their county refused to do her job, and keep her damned religion out of it. So you admit this was just a political protest, not an actual hardship. I still say that as long as she did not issue any marriage licenses at all, she may have a case, for whatever the motive might be. I'm not admitting anything of the sort. What is the matter with your processing? |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 21:34:04 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 9/3/15 8:42 PM, wrote: On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 19:53:00 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: I noticed that the news did not show any pictures of the straight couples who could not get a license there. I suppose they just drove 15 miles down the road to the next county seat. Because the clerk in their county refused to do her job, and keep her damned religion out of it. So you admit this was just a political protest, not an actual hardship. I still say that as long as she did not issue any marriage licenses at all, she may have a case, for whatever the motive might be. I'm not admitting anything of the sort. What is the matter with your processing? Maybe if your answers were more responsive, it would make more sense. This was clearly a political protest because there were no straight couples protesting and they were locked out too. They arranged cameras to be there when a gay couple came up to the counter in a clearly staged event. If this is what you are referring to my statement is clearly relevant. BTW I would not be shocked if this couple never got married. It is like the handicapped, would be, stripper who forced the case of a wheelchair accessible titty bar stage. Once they put it in, she never came back Not one time,. There are just some professional protesters. I guess it is a living |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/3/15 10:59 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 21:34:04 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 9/3/15 8:42 PM, wrote: On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 19:53:00 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: I noticed that the news did not show any pictures of the straight couples who could not get a license there. I suppose they just drove 15 miles down the road to the next county seat. Because the clerk in their county refused to do her job, and keep her damned religion out of it. So you admit this was just a political protest, not an actual hardship. I still say that as long as she did not issue any marriage licenses at all, she may have a case, for whatever the motive might be. I'm not admitting anything of the sort. What is the matter with your processing? Maybe if your answers were more responsive, it would make more sense. This was clearly a political protest because there were no straight couples protesting and they were locked out too. They arranged cameras to be there when a gay couple came up to the counter in a clearly staged event. If this is what you are referring to my statement is clearly relevant. BTW I would not be shocked if this couple never got married. It is like the handicapped, would be, stripper who forced the case of a wheelchair accessible titty bar stage. Once they put it in, she never came back Not one time,. There are just some professional protesters. I guess it is a living I have no knowledge of whether it was "clearly a political protest" and neither do you. Davis was elected to do the job of the clerk, which includes issuing marriage licenses. If she has some moronic religious reason preventing her from doing that, she should resign. This is not a country in which the christian taliban rule, and while she is entitled to believe whatever she wants, she cannot use those beliefs to determine whether she will issue marriage licenses. She was found in contempt of court. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/3/2015 8:42 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 19:53:00 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 9/3/15 7:16 PM, wrote: On Thu, 03 Sep 2015 17:25:44 -0400, "Just wait a frekin' minute!" wrote: John H. wrote: On Thu, 03 Sep 2015 13:38:13 -0500, Califbill billnews wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: Kim Davis, the defiant Kentucky county clerk, was found in contempt of court and taken into federal custody. U.S. District Court Judge David Bunning ordered Davis, the Rowan County clerk, to be jailed on the contempt charges until she agrees to comply with multiple court orders to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. The judge ordered her held indefinitely because he did not believe fines would be enough to compel her to follow the law. Her office refused to issue a marriage license to a same-sex couple as recently as Thursday morning, before Davis and her staff closed the office made the half-hour trip from Morehead to Ashland. I question why a Federal Court. Should be a state issue. Perhaps state law hasn't caught up with the Supreme Court, such as in this case: http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/l...marria/323201/ -- Ban idiots, not guns! I saw the video, they were just out looking to offend and put someone in jail for their own amusement. Intolerance is after all the core of the gay rights movement.. I noticed that the news did not show any pictures of the straight couples who could not get a license there. I suppose they just drove 15 miles down the road to the next county seat. Because the clerk in their county refused to do her job, and keep her damned religion out of it. So you admit this was just a political protest, not an actual hardship. I still say that as long as she did not issue any marriage licenses at all, she may have a case, for whatever the motive might be. Folks who can't or won't follow orders have the options of being fired, filing a grievance or quitting. Why is the court sticking its nose into it? The employer and the employee should resolve the situation without the gubmints interference. |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 21:14:21 -0400, Justan Olphart
wrote: On 9/3/2015 8:42 PM, wrote: So you admit this was just a political protest, not an actual hardship. I still say that as long as she did not issue any marriage licenses at all, she may have a case, for whatever the motive might be. Folks who can't or won't follow orders have the options of being fired, filing a grievance or quitting. Why is the court sticking its nose into it? The employer and the employee should resolve the situation without the gubmints interference. Ms Davis is not an employee, she is an elected official. They can't fire her and they have little to say about what she does. She can only be sued, arrested or impeached. They went with arrested because everything would take months or even years.. |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/3/15 10:50 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 21:14:21 -0400, Justan Olphart wrote: On 9/3/2015 8:42 PM, wrote: So you admit this was just a political protest, not an actual hardship. I still say that as long as she did not issue any marriage licenses at all, she may have a case, for whatever the motive might be. Folks who can't or won't follow orders have the options of being fired, filing a grievance or quitting. Why is the court sticking its nose into it? The employer and the employee should resolve the situation without the gubmints interference. Ms Davis is not an employee, she is an elected official. They can't fire her and they have little to say about what she does. She can only be sued, arrested or impeached. They went with arrested because everything would take months or even years.. The judge jailed her because he assumed the right-wing bigots who support her lack of action would simply pay her fine. If she can't do the job she was elected to do, she should simply resign. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Michele Davis | General | |||
Watch this clerk dance! - Feel Good! | General | |||
Watch this clerk dance! - Feel Good! | Cruising | |||
Watch this clerk dance! - Feel Good! | Boat Building | |||
Davis wind meter | Cruising |