China had the biggest military parade in their history this week and
it was clearly aimed at Japan. (Their first major celebration of the
1945 defeat of Japan). This is happening in the midst of territorial
disputes.
Will that be the next place we see a war?

It is amusing that they are making it sound l;ike Mao's troops pretty
much beat Japan by themselves and the reality is that the nationalist
army was the only significant force. I guess they waited 70 years and
hope nobody remembers.

On Thu, 03 Sep 2015 02:24:34 -0400, wrote:

China had the biggest military parade in their history this week and
it was clearly aimed at Japan. (Their first major celebration of the
1945 defeat of Japan). This is happening in the midst of territorial
disputes.
Will that be the next place we see a war?

It is amusing that they are making it sound l;ike Mao's troops pretty
much beat Japan by themselves and the reality is that the nationalist
army was the only significant force. I guess they waited 70 years and
hope nobody remembers.

Do you think our president would do anything about Chinese aggression? I don't.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

On Thu, 03 Sep 2015 07:18:54 -0400, John H.
wrote:

On Thu, 03 Sep 2015 02:24:34 -0400, wrote:

China had the biggest military parade in their history this week and
it was clearly aimed at Japan. (Their first major celebration of the
1945 defeat of Japan). This is happening in the midst of territorial
disputes.
Will that be the next place we see a war?

It is amusing that they are making it sound l;ike Mao's troops pretty
much beat Japan by themselves and the reality is that the nationalist
army was the only significant force. I guess they waited 70 years and
hope nobody remembers.

Do you think our president would do anything about Chinese aggression? I don't.

I am not sure I want them to if it is just about some unoccupied
islands that they have been arguing about for 200 years.

On Thu, 03 Sep 2015 10:51:14 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 03 Sep 2015 07:18:54 -0400, John H.
wrote:

On Thu, 03 Sep 2015 02:24:34 -0400, wrote:

China had the biggest military parade in their history this week and
it was clearly aimed at Japan. (Their first major celebration of the
1945 defeat of Japan). This is happening in the midst of territorial
disputes.
Will that be the next place we see a war?

It is amusing that they are making it sound l;ike Mao's troops pretty
much beat Japan by themselves and the reality is that the nationalist
army was the only significant force. I guess they waited 70 years and
hope nobody remembers.

Do you think our president would do anything about Chinese aggression? I don't.

I am not sure I want them to if it is just about some unoccupied
islands that they have been arguing about for 200 years.

Is that it? Or is that it 'for now'? At what point does the island taking stop?
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

On Thu, 03 Sep 2015 11:10:57 -0400, John H.
wrote:

On Thu, 03 Sep 2015 10:51:14 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 03 Sep 2015 07:18:54 -0400, John H.
wrote:

On Thu, 03 Sep 2015 02:24:34 -0400, wrote:

China had the biggest military parade in their history this week and
it was clearly aimed at Japan. (Their first major celebration of the
1945 defeat of Japan). This is happening in the midst of territorial
disputes.
Will that be the next place we see a war?

It is amusing that they are making it sound l;ike Mao's troops pretty
much beat Japan by themselves and the reality is that the nationalist
army was the only significant force. I guess they waited 70 years and
hope nobody remembers.

Do you think our president would do anything about Chinese aggression? I don't.

I am not sure I want them to if it is just about some unoccupied
islands that they have been arguing about for 200 years.

Is that it? Or is that it 'for now'? At what point does the island taking stop?

It would certainly be a place where the ownership was less ambiguous.

On 9/3/15 12:12 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 03 Sep 2015 11:10:57 -0400, John H.
wrote:

On Thu, 03 Sep 2015 10:51:14 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 03 Sep 2015 07:18:54 -0400, John H.
wrote:

On Thu, 03 Sep 2015 02:24:34 -0400, wrote:

China had the biggest military parade in their history this week and
it was clearly aimed at Japan. (Their first major celebration of the
1945 defeat of Japan). This is happening in the midst of territorial
disputes.
Will that be the next place we see a war?

It is amusing that they are making it sound l;ike Mao's troops pretty
much beat Japan by themselves and the reality is that the nationalist
army was the only significant force. I guess they waited 70 years and
hope nobody remembers.

Do you think our president would do anything about Chinese aggression? I don't.

I am not sure I want them to if it is just about some unoccupied
islands that they have been arguing about for 200 years.

Is that it? Or is that it 'for now'? At what point does the island taking stop?

It would certainly be a place where the ownership was less ambiguous.



China has pledged to solve its territorial disputes peacefully. Further,
despite its massive military parade, China has announced it plans to cut
its military forces by 300,000, and concentrate more on technological
advances. Since the end of the U.S. War Against Vietnam, China has
invaded far fewer countries and destroyed their governments than we
have.

I don't read many of Herring's posts anymore, but I see from your
reposting of one of his, he thinks the POTUS wouldn't "do anything"
about Chinese aggression. I wonder what the aggression is to which he
refers, other than silly posturing, and what would he expect our POTUS
to "do" about China? I'd favor parachuting in Dick Cheney, of course.