Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/26/15 12:32 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 12:18:10 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/26/15 12:03 PM, wrote: On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 11:09:33 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/26/15 11:07 AM, wrote: On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 05:22:58 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: I have shot one several times. Its angry. Especially at $3. A pull That is why I say a guy with one, should be reloading. With revolvers, recovering the brass is not even hard. It's a buck and a half a shot with factory loads. What's you guess about reloading, assuming you recycled the brass a few times and were buying readymade bullets? You will run into the same issue with bullets as Tim was referencing, small production runs but a buck a pop would not surprise me for a performance bullet. Cast bullets should be a lot cheaper., maybe 30-40 cents, way less if you cast your own.. Primers and powder are pennies a shot. These hand cannons remind me of the chopper (motorcycles) that were popular in the 70s. When I questioned the tiny gas tank, the guy said "if you go that far you will want to get off anyway". I doubt anyone is going to shoot a lot of full power loads. I looked a little and there are some "cowboy" loads that push out subsonic cast bullets and should shoot fairly easy. The full power load is at least 3-4 times the energy. I pay about 30 cents a round for decent factory 158 grain .357 MAG rounds, similar to what I pay for .223 rifle ammo. That seems enough to spend on ammo to me. ![]() The .500 S&W is not your regular plinker. It is like comparing a Bugatti to a Camry Why would you want to "plink" with it, unless you are into hurting your wrist/arm and annoying everyone around you? |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 12:44:26 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: On 8/26/15 12:32 PM, wrote: On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 12:18:10 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/26/15 12:03 PM, wrote: On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 11:09:33 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/26/15 11:07 AM, wrote: On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 05:22:58 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: I have shot one several times. Its angry. Especially at $3. A pull That is why I say a guy with one, should be reloading. With revolvers, recovering the brass is not even hard. It's a buck and a half a shot with factory loads. What's you guess about reloading, assuming you recycled the brass a few times and were buying readymade bullets? You will run into the same issue with bullets as Tim was referencing, small production runs but a buck a pop would not surprise me for a performance bullet. Cast bullets should be a lot cheaper., maybe 30-40 cents, way less if you cast your own.. Primers and powder are pennies a shot. These hand cannons remind me of the chopper (motorcycles) that were popular in the 70s. When I questioned the tiny gas tank, the guy said "if you go that far you will want to get off anyway". I doubt anyone is going to shoot a lot of full power loads. I looked a little and there are some "cowboy" loads that push out subsonic cast bullets and should shoot fairly easy. The full power load is at least 3-4 times the energy. I pay about 30 cents a round for decent factory 158 grain .357 MAG rounds, similar to what I pay for .223 rifle ammo. That seems enough to spend on ammo to me. ![]() The .500 S&W is not your regular plinker. It is like comparing a Bugatti to a Camry Why would you want to "plink" with it, unless you are into hurting your wrist/arm and annoying everyone around you? I think that was what I said ;-) If you shot the cowboy rounds out of it, you would save yourself a lot of punishment. I don't think a .357 is a plinker either, unless you are shooting .38 wad cutters out of it. That was the round I loaded most often. A 148gr wc in front of about 2.5 gr of Bullseye was a very pleasant load to shoot, very accurate and easy on the brass. If I was loading a full power .357 round, the brass takes a beating, along with the shooter. I was loading some stuff that was a bit hotter than anything you could buy. I had a 125gr round nose half jacket that was going 1725 FPS. That is smoking for a .357. It was not pleasant to shoot tho and I threw the brass away. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Greg, at those pressures it can often times swell the cylinders. A guy I know did that with a .44 mag and made it hotter. It swelled the cylinder bad enough he had to knock the spent shells out with hammer slightly tapping on a metal rod. Not the best idea
|
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 10:44:13 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote: Greg, at those pressures it can often times swell the cylinders. A guy I know did that with a .44 mag and made it hotter. It swelled the cylinder bad enough he had to knock the spent shells out with hammer slightly tapping on a metal rod. Not the best idea I worked up to that load, I didn't just stuff the case and give it a try ;-) It ejected just fine. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 12:44:26 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/26/15 12:32 PM, wrote: On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 12:18:10 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/26/15 12:03 PM, wrote: On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 11:09:33 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/26/15 11:07 AM, wrote: On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 05:22:58 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: I have shot one several times. Its angry. Especially at $3. A pull That is why I say a guy with one, should be reloading. With revolvers, recovering the brass is not even hard. It's a buck and a half a shot with factory loads. What's you guess about reloading, assuming you recycled the brass a few times and were buying readymade bullets? You will run into the same issue with bullets as Tim was referencing, small production runs but a buck a pop would not surprise me for a performance bullet. Cast bullets should be a lot cheaper., maybe 30-40 cents, way less if you cast your own.. Primers and powder are pennies a shot. These hand cannons remind me of the chopper (motorcycles) that were popular in the 70s. When I questioned the tiny gas tank, the guy said "if you go that far you will want to get off anyway". I doubt anyone is going to shoot a lot of full power loads. I looked a little and there are some "cowboy" loads that push out subsonic cast bullets and should shoot fairly easy. The full power load is at least 3-4 times the energy. I pay about 30 cents a round for decent factory 158 grain .357 MAG rounds, similar to what I pay for .223 rifle ammo. That seems enough to spend on ammo to me. ![]() The .500 S&W is not your regular plinker. It is like comparing a Bugatti to a Camry Why would you want to "plink" with it, unless you are into hurting your wrist/arm and annoying everyone around you? I think that was what I said ;-) If you shot the cowboy rounds out of it, you would save yourself a lot of punishment. I don't think a .357 is a plinker either, unless you are shooting .38 wad cutters out of it. That was the round I loaded most often. A 148gr wc in front of about 2.5 gr of Bullseye was a very pleasant load to shoot, very accurate and easy on the brass. If I was loading a full power .357 round, the brass takes a beating, along with the shooter. I was loading some stuff that was a bit hotter than anything you could buy. I had a 125gr round nose half jacket that was going 1725 FPS. That is smoking for a .357. It was not pleasant to shoot tho and I threw the brass away. I agree. I rarely fire 357 in the 357. Mostly 38's or reloaded 357 with semi wad utters. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 14:08:32 -0500, Califbill billnews wrote:
wrote: I don't think a .357 is a plinker either, unless you are shooting .38 wad cutters out of it. That was the round I loaded most often. A 148gr wc in front of about 2.5 gr of Bullseye was a very pleasant load to shoot, very accurate and easy on the brass. If I was loading a full power .357 round, the brass takes a beating, along with the shooter. I was loading some stuff that was a bit hotter than anything you could buy. I had a 125gr round nose half jacket that was going 1725 FPS. That is smoking for a .357. It was not pleasant to shoot tho and I threw the brass away. I agree. I rarely fire 357 in the 357. Mostly 38's or reloaded 357 with semi wad utters. That 2.5 gr of Bullseye behind the 148 gr wad cutter is a great round for casual plinking or paper busting. It was pretty slow tho, I don't remember exactly but I think it chronos at 750 fps or so. I know it was really slow. A can of power is a lifetime supply tho. I had a supply of really cheap bullets and primers were less than a penny each if you bought in volume. I was shooting .38 for about what 22rf was going for.. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 15:20:46 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: On 8/26/15 1:19 PM, wrote: On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 12:44:26 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: Why would you want to "plink" with it, unless you are into hurting your wrist/arm and annoying everyone around you? I think that was what I said ;-) If you shot the cowboy rounds out of it, you would save yourself a lot of punishment. I don't think a .357 is a plinker either, unless you are shooting .38 wad cutters out of it. That was the round I loaded most often. A 148gr wc in front of about 2.5 gr of Bullseye was a very pleasant load to shoot, very accurate and easy on the brass. If I was loading a full power .357 round, the brass takes a beating, along with the shooter. I was loading some stuff that was a bit hotter than anything you could buy. I had a 125gr round nose half jacket that was going 1725 FPS. That is smoking for a .357. It was not pleasant to shoot tho and I threw the brass away. I don't reload, so I don't care if my .357 MAG brass takes a beating. I do dump the "empties" into a plastic box and give them to a buddy, who does reload. But, actually, he trades the empties I give him to someone who gives him back brass in a size he uses. I haven't found my .357 unpleasant to shoot with full power rounds. It's certainly noisy, though. I wear plugs inside my electronic muffs. ![]() The last time I took it to the range, I went through nearly two full 50-round boxes of .357 rounds. The S&W is a terrific shooter. Blast is a big part of it and I was shooting inside. When my buddy tried out his new 29 Smith at my house, it took pictures off the wall. (worse than a 12 ga) It felt like someone hitting you in the face with a wet towel. I did have to call bull**** on Dirty Harry shooting his .44 in that concrete hallway with no hearing protection. |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 12:32:50 -0400, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 12:18:10 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/26/15 12:03 PM, wrote: On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 11:09:33 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/26/15 11:07 AM, wrote: On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 05:22:58 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: I have shot one several times. Its angry. Especially at $3. A pull That is why I say a guy with one, should be reloading. With revolvers, recovering the brass is not even hard. It's a buck and a half a shot with factory loads. What's you guess about reloading, assuming you recycled the brass a few times and were buying readymade bullets? You will run into the same issue with bullets as Tim was referencing, small production runs but a buck a pop would not surprise me for a performance bullet. Cast bullets should be a lot cheaper., maybe 30-40 cents, way less if you cast your own.. Primers and powder are pennies a shot. These hand cannons remind me of the chopper (motorcycles) that were popular in the 70s. When I questioned the tiny gas tank, the guy said "if you go that far you will want to get off anyway". I doubt anyone is going to shoot a lot of full power loads. I looked a little and there are some "cowboy" loads that push out subsonic cast bullets and should shoot fairly easy. The full power load is at least 3-4 times the energy. I pay about 30 cents a round for decent factory 158 grain .357 MAG rounds, similar to what I pay for .223 rifle ammo. That seems enough to spend on ammo to me. ![]() The .500 S&W is not your regular plinker. It is like comparing a Bugatti to a Camry Sounds like it would be a great gun for someone who is constantly seeking attention. Gosh, it would be very photogenic, especially if the photo included lots of ammo. -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Holland - "Good Speed-Sas Van Gent-Netherlands 1.JPG" (2/2) 641.5 KBytes yEnc | Tall Ship Photos | |||
Holland - "Good Speed-Sas Van Gent-Netherlands 1.JPG" (1/2) 641.5 KBytes yEnc | Tall Ship Photos | |||
I "knew" there was a connection between JimH and Skipper... | General | |||
I "knew" there was a connection between JimH and Skipper... | General | |||
I "knew" there was a connection between JimH and Skipper... | General |