About Us

amdx[_3_]

On 8/17/2015 12:00 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 07:53:04 -0400, Keyser SÃ¶ze
wrote:

BUT we have more than $800 billion for the very rich in
tax subsidies and breaks every year

Maybe you would like one of the flat tax guys.
When Forbes ran the numbers a few cycles ago, he showed a 15-19% flat
tax with no loopholes was harder in the rich than the thousand page
tax code we had at the time.
If you believe the hype, it is better for them now than when the flat
tax was proposed.
With a good sized exemption, I am not sure why it wouldn't work.
The problem comes from all of the special interests who thrive on the
tax code the way it is.

I would do away with rich people and corporate welfare this morning if
I was king. That is usually just the payback for a huge bribe. hmmm
"contribution"

What corporate welfare would you start with?
Mikek

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

[email protected]

On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 13:35:44 -0500, amdx wrote:

On 8/17/2015 12:00 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 07:53:04 -0400, Keyser SÃ¶ze
wrote:

BUT we have more than $800 billion for the very rich in
tax subsidies and breaks every year

Maybe you would like one of the flat tax guys.
When Forbes ran the numbers a few cycles ago, he showed a 15-19% flat
tax with no loopholes was harder in the rich than the thousand page
tax code we had at the time.
If you believe the hype, it is better for them now than when the flat
tax was proposed.
With a good sized exemption, I am not sure why it wouldn't work.
The problem comes from all of the special interests who thrive on the
tax code the way it is.

I would do away with rich people and corporate welfare this morning if
I was king. That is usually just the payback for a huge bribe. hmmm
"contribution"

What corporate welfare would you start with?
Mikek

Tax breaks for companies that moving jobs offshore.
Tax breaks for executive "perks". That should be reported as ordinary
income.
Eliminate a vast number of the federal subsidies given to fund things
that do not make sense but are just politically popular..

Wayne.B

On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 15:18:22 -0400, wrote:

Eliminate a vast number of the federal subsidies given to fund things
that do not make sense but are just politically popular..

===

Good luck attacking the pork barrel.

[email protected]

On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 15:32:40 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 15:18:22 -0400, wrote:

Eliminate a vast number of the federal subsidies given to fund things
that do not make sense but are just politically popular..

===

Good luck attacking the pork barrel.

Isn't that the major problem with the government doing anything?

As long as politicians direct the government and they take massive
amounts of money from big companies, pork will always be where most of
the money goes.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Sailing author: Hubert Marcoux	[email protected]	Cruising	5	May 25th 08 11:32 PM
Sailing author: Hubert Marcoux	[email protected]	General	3	May 25th 08 09:22 PM
Sailing author: Hubert Marcoux	[email protected]	ASA	4	May 25th 08 09:22 PM
Jaws author died	Billgran	General	23	February 15th 06 04:45 AM
You are all wrong about the Fischer Panda author	Craig	Cruising	27	September 30th 03 01:47 PM

Menu

About Us