amdx wrote:
On 8/16/2015 3:33 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:


I watch Ms.Maddow about once or maybe twice a week, and I don't find it hard,
difficult or confusing.

There is no surprise there.
Is it your contention I would believe otherwise?
Mikek

---

I''m not Fretwell, and therefore I don't know what you would believe. He's
the one with that very special ability. 😜


--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 14:10:38 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 8/16/15 1:47 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 11:26:10 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

In article ,
says...


Could it be the views she communicates, the manner in which she
communicates them and the glee she gets communicating them. (often
sarcastic)
Ya, that's it. I didn't need any help figuring it out.
What did you think it is that makes it hard to watch her?


Nothing wrong with her "views," though I sometimes
disagree with them.
Just her expression of those views.
She takes 5 minutes to express what should take 30
seconds.
Only to hear the sound of her own voice.
She's an obvious egomaniac.
She's even more selfish that O'Donnell.
At least he has some guests.
Last I watched she's still beginning the show with a
15 minute monologue. Then if she has an expert guest
on the subject of her monologue, she'll ask the guest
to validate her monologue. Her guests get little
time.
She endlessly repeats the same phrases over and over.
She - and others at MSNBC - touted "specials" last
week, where she supposedly gathered old clips of
candidates, which would be the main draw of the
"specials."
It was just another Maddow yakfest.
She's simply a motormouth.
I hardly watch the show any more. Every time I flip
there she's yakking, usually with no substance to
speak of.
She's becoming, no, "become" a joke.


Lyin' Brian will be a perfect addition to that cabal



Your Faux Channel was full up on lying broadcasters?

I am not a Fox person. Mostly CNN.


Frankly, my disappointment is with the promotions of Chuck Todd. What a
marshmellowed moron.

I think all of the recent host and anchor changes have been weak.
Dickerson may get better, Todd is a waste of time, Lester Holt is
pretty bad.
What the hell happened to guys like Cronkite and Brinkley. Hell even
that gas bag Rather was better than the people we have these days.

On 8/17/15 1:49 AM, wrote:
On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 14:10:38 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 8/16/15 1:47 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 11:26:10 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

In article ,
says...


Could it be the views she communicates, the manner in which she
communicates them and the glee she gets communicating them. (often
sarcastic)
Ya, that's it. I didn't need any help figuring it out.
What did you think it is that makes it hard to watch her?


Nothing wrong with her "views," though I sometimes
disagree with them.
Just her expression of those views.
She takes 5 minutes to express what should take 30
seconds.
Only to hear the sound of her own voice.
She's an obvious egomaniac.
She's even more selfish that O'Donnell.
At least he has some guests.
Last I watched she's still beginning the show with a
15 minute monologue. Then if she has an expert guest
on the subject of her monologue, she'll ask the guest
to validate her monologue. Her guests get little
time.
She endlessly repeats the same phrases over and over.
She - and others at MSNBC - touted "specials" last
week, where she supposedly gathered old clips of
candidates, which would be the main draw of the
"specials."
It was just another Maddow yakfest.
She's simply a motormouth.
I hardly watch the show any more. Every time I flip
there she's yakking, usually with no substance to
speak of.
She's becoming, no, "become" a joke.


Lyin' Brian will be a perfect addition to that cabal



Your Faux Channel was full up on lying broadcasters?

I am not a Fox person. Mostly CNN.


Frankly, my disappointment is with the promotions of Chuck Todd. What a
marshmellowed moron.

I think all of the recent host and anchor changes have been weak.
Dickerson may get better, Todd is a waste of time, Lester Holt is
pretty bad.
What the hell happened to guys like Cronkite and Brinkley. Hell even
that gas bag Rather was better than the people we have these days.


I don't watch a lot of TV "news," especially TV "political" news.

On 8/17/2015 1:49 AM, wrote:
On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 14:10:38 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 8/16/15 1:47 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 11:26:10 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

In article ,
says...


Could it be the views she communicates, the manner in which she
communicates them and the glee she gets communicating them. (often
sarcastic)
Ya, that's it. I didn't need any help figuring it out.
What did you think it is that makes it hard to watch her?


Nothing wrong with her "views," though I sometimes
disagree with them.
Just her expression of those views.
She takes 5 minutes to express what should take 30
seconds.
Only to hear the sound of her own voice.
She's an obvious egomaniac.
She's even more selfish that O'Donnell.
At least he has some guests.
Last I watched she's still beginning the show with a
15 minute monologue. Then if she has an expert guest
on the subject of her monologue, she'll ask the guest
to validate her monologue. Her guests get little
time.
She endlessly repeats the same phrases over and over.
She - and others at MSNBC - touted "specials" last
week, where she supposedly gathered old clips of
candidates, which would be the main draw of the
"specials."
It was just another Maddow yakfest.
She's simply a motormouth.
I hardly watch the show any more. Every time I flip
there she's yakking, usually with no substance to
speak of.
She's becoming, no, "become" a joke.


Lyin' Brian will be a perfect addition to that cabal



Your Faux Channel was full up on lying broadcasters?

I am not a Fox person. Mostly CNN.


Frankly, my disappointment is with the promotions of Chuck Todd. What a
marshmellowed moron.

I think all of the recent host and anchor changes have been weak.
Dickerson may get better, Todd is a waste of time, Lester Holt is
pretty bad.
What the hell happened to guys like Cronkite and Brinkley. Hell even
that gas bag Rather was better than the people we have these days.

We've been watching David Muir lately. Lester Holt wasn't so "bad" when
compared to Brian Williams.

--

Respectfully submitted by Justan

Laugh of the day from Krause

"I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here.
I've been "born again" as a nice guy."

On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 06:46:23 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 8/17/15 1:49 AM, wrote:

I think all of the recent host and anchor changes have been weak.
Dickerson may get better, Todd is a waste of time, Lester Holt is
pretty bad.
What the hell happened to guys like Cronkite and Brinkley. Hell even
that gas bag Rather was better than the people we have these days.


I don't watch a lot of TV "news," especially TV "political" news.

I usually watch it with my finger on the "skip" button.
That is why I have a good idea of how much free time Trump is getting
vs everyone else. I can just count the number of 30 second skips it
takes to get by them.

We still prefer Paul Henry from New Zealand.
He covers a lot of international stuff we never hear.
One thing we haven't heard much about here is the TPP. What happened
to that? It is a big deal in the Pacific community.

wrote:
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 06:46:23 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 8/17/15 1:49 AM, wrote:

I think all of the recent host and anchor changes have been weak.
Dickerson may get better, Todd is a waste of time, Lester Holt is
pretty bad.
What the hell happened to guys like Cronkite and Brinkley. Hell even
that gas bag Rather was better than the people we have these days.


I don't watch a lot of TV "news," especially TV "political" news.

I usually watch it with my finger on the "skip" button.
That is why I have a good idea of how much free time Trump is getting
vs everyone else. I can just count the number of 30 second skips it
takes to get by them.

We still prefer Paul Henry from New Zealand.
He covers a lot of international stuff we never hear.
One thing we haven't heard much about here is the TPP. What happened
to that? It is a big deal in the Pacific community.

TPP?

On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 13:42:06 -0500, Califbill billnews wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 06:46:23 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 8/17/15 1:49 AM, wrote:

I think all of the recent host and anchor changes have been weak.
Dickerson may get better, Todd is a waste of time, Lester Holt is
pretty bad.
What the hell happened to guys like Cronkite and Brinkley. Hell even
that gas bag Rather was better than the people we have these days.


I don't watch a lot of TV "news," especially TV "political" news.

I usually watch it with my finger on the "skip" button.
That is why I have a good idea of how much free time Trump is getting
vs everyone else. I can just count the number of 30 second skips it
takes to get by them.

We still prefer Paul Henry from New Zealand.
He covers a lot of international stuff we never hear.
One thing we haven't heard much about here is the TPP. What happened
to that? It is a big deal in the Pacific community.

TPP?

===

http://robertreich.org/post/107257859130

On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 13:42:06 -0500, Califbill billnews wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 06:46:23 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 8/17/15 1:49 AM, wrote:

I think all of the recent host and anchor changes have been weak.
Dickerson may get better, Todd is a waste of time, Lester Holt is
pretty bad.
What the hell happened to guys like Cronkite and Brinkley. Hell even
that gas bag Rather was better than the people we have these days.


I don't watch a lot of TV "news," especially TV "political" news.

I usually watch it with my finger on the "skip" button.
That is why I have a good idea of how much free time Trump is getting
vs everyone else. I can just count the number of 30 second skips it
takes to get by them.

We still prefer Paul Henry from New Zealand.
He covers a lot of international stuff we never hear.
One thing we haven't heard much about here is the TPP. What happened
to that? It is a big deal in the Pacific community.

TPP?

The trade deal. Trans Pacific Partnership.

We only seemed to look at it as a break for China and Korea but it is
a lot more wide ranging, particularly for the smaller countries.
New Zealand is mad about the dairy tariff the US and Canada charge on
their products.

On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 15:25:29 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 13:42:06 -0500, Califbill billnews wrote:

wrote:
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 06:46:23 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 8/17/15 1:49 AM, wrote:

I think all of the recent host and anchor changes have been weak.
Dickerson may get better, Todd is a waste of time, Lester Holt is
pretty bad.
What the hell happened to guys like Cronkite and Brinkley. Hell even
that gas bag Rather was better than the people we have these days.


I don't watch a lot of TV "news," especially TV "political" news.

I usually watch it with my finger on the "skip" button.
That is why I have a good idea of how much free time Trump is getting
vs everyone else. I can just count the number of 30 second skips it
takes to get by them.

We still prefer Paul Henry from New Zealand.
He covers a lot of international stuff we never hear.
One thing we haven't heard much about here is the TPP. What happened
to that? It is a big deal in the Pacific community.

TPP?

===

http://robertreich.org/post/107257859130

Reich is big on rhetoric and short on facts.
It would be interesting to get actual examples and not broad
generalizations but that will not be forthcoming from media companies
that have a large intellectual property stake in this. Evidently they
got everything they want.
These are the kinds of things we never learn about until it is over.
What did Nancy say, "you have to pass the bill before you can know
what is in it" or words to that effect.

On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 10:52:10 -0500, amdx wrote:

On 8/16/2015 10:40 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
amdx wrote:
On 8/15/2015 2:27 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/15/15 2:47 PM, amdx wrote:
On 8/14/2015 8:46 AM, Boating All Out wrote:

I thought it was a case of temporary insanity, but
Mika is REALLY against HRC.
She gives no quarter and hasn't since it was revealed
HRC had used a "personal" server at State.
That has absolutely disqualified HRC. It's done.
HRC can not be President.
It's like watching Fox News, and she is just as
transparent in her hatred for HRC. Almost as bad as
Luddite.
Look for some fireworks ahead. You can't be insane
and have Democrat party guests. Doesn't mix well.
She just may move to Fox.

Why would she move to Fox? Just because she sees all the shenanigans
that Hillary is trying to get away with and she's honest enough to call
her on it?
Fox has enough honest reporters, she can stay at MSNBC, maybe it's the
start of an MSNBC turn around.


She's become as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow.

Ain't nobody as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow!

Mikek





Hahahahah...you're a pistol, Mikey.

Rachel is hard for you to watch because, well, you'll figure it out or
someone will tell you.

Could it be the views she communicates, the manner in which she
communicates them and the glee she gets communicating them. (often sarcastic)
Ya, that's it. I didn't need any help figuring it out.
What did you think it is that makes it hard to watch her?

Mikek

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

You picked those reasons for your inability to comprehend. I had another
reason for you in mind.


At least when Rachel says something the subject is clear.
You write but there is no subject, it's like you are keeping a secret.
When someone asks, you have no response.
Mikek


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Ah, you noticed. He provides no response any time the questions get him backed into a
corner or prove he's a liar.

Ask him for what organization he was collecting bodies in Vietnam. So far, no one has
been 'entitled' to an answer.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!