John H. wrote:
On 8 Aug 2015 22:00:20 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 16:57:42 -0400, Wayne.B wrote:

On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 15:13:04 -0400, John H.
wrote:

Perhaps questions about his plans for the economy? There are all kinds of pertinent
questions one with his background could have been asked. The name of the game was
'Get Trump'. I think it reflected very poorly on FOX.

===

I'll concede you this, he's a darned easy target. Would you really be
comfortable with a loose cannon like that rolling around on deck? In
all honesty Fox has never exactly been known for their unbiased
journalism. I do think they went for Trump's throat intentionally
because his temper and boorish manner are his biggest weakness. It's
important for his supporters to see those true colors before going to
the alter with him. Hitler used many of the same blustering tactics
to gain power in Germany. We all know how that turned out.

Whether or not he should be president wasn't the point. The point was the way he was
treated by FOX. I agree - they went for Trump's throat. I don't think that was
appropriate for a 'debate'.




Poor Donald. Proceed.

It would not have even been fair to you, Krause, and we all know how you lie.
--

It was perfectly fair to Trump, and it is likely his many supporters in the
GOP relish his actions and his comments about women, Mexicans, other
candidates, etc. Trump speaks for many in the GOP, including white racist
trash like you.

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+