Tim wrote:
On Tuesday, June 2, 2015 at 2:11:40 PM UTC-7, wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jun 2015 13:49:30 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

Greg, you said your 'ex'

Did that boat used to be 'your' barnacle farm?

Nope it came with her second husband.

Ah, good payment plan...

Good one.

Tim wrote:
Bill, hopefully they'll strive to improve things.
I know that Bayliners used to have a vary poor reputation. Maybe still
do. Even if they improve considerably , it's hard to overcome a bad past.

Doubt they can overcome the negativity. My statement is they were nice
lines, nice looking boats. Poorly constructed, but nice design.

Understood Bill. Beauty is bet skin deep but ugly cuts clean to the bone. Truth!

On 6/3/15 6:19 PM, Califbill wrote:
Tim wrote:
Bill, hopefully they'll strive to improve things.
I know that Bayliners used to have a vary poor reputation. Maybe still
do. Even if they improve considerably , it's hard to overcome a bad past.

Doubt they can overcome the negativity. My statement is they were nice
lines, nice looking boats. Poorly constructed, but nice design.


If you like bubble boats. The Trophy line sort of looked okay, but back
then they had a chintzy lamination schedule and lousy, lightweight
hardware.

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/2/15 4:14 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 02 Jun 2015 16:07:17 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Tue, 2 Jun 2015 12:18:48 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

Bill, hopefully they'll strive to improve things.
I know that Bayliners used to have a vary poor reputation. Maybe
still do. Even if they improve considerably , it's hard to overcome
a bad past.

===

I know several people who are happy with their Bayliners. In the end
it comes down to expectations and how you're going to use the boat.
The larger boats in particular seem to have been better built.

My ex has one, 30 sumpin feet but I think it is basically a barnacle
farm since she got away from being the commander of the CGaux there in
DC.


Does the government subsidize barnacle farms with price supports?



They (we) subsidize you, deadbeat.

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/3/15 6:19 PM, Califbill wrote:
Tim wrote:
Bill, hopefully they'll strive to improve things.
I know that Bayliners used to have a vary poor reputation. Maybe still
do. Even if they improve considerably , it's hard to overcome a bad past.

Doubt they can overcome the negativity. My statement is they were nice
lines, nice looking boats. Poorly constructed, but nice design.


If you like bubble boats. The Trophy line sort of looked okay, but back
then they had a chintzy lamination schedule and lousy, lightweight hardware.

Did you not comprehend what has been written? You have to restate the poor
construction"

On 6/3/15 10:59 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/3/15 6:19 PM, Califbill wrote:
Tim wrote:
Bill, hopefully they'll strive to improve things.
I know that Bayliners used to have a vary poor reputation. Maybe still
do. Even if they improve considerably , it's hard to overcome a bad past.

Doubt they can overcome the negativity. My statement is they were nice
lines, nice looking boats. Poorly constructed, but nice design.


If you like bubble boats. The Trophy line sort of looked okay, but back
then they had a chintzy lamination schedule and lousy, lightweight hardware.

Did you not comprehend what has been written? You have to restate the poor
construction"



"Nice design" means more than the way they looked, Bilious, and "poorly
constructed" means more than the materials that were selected.

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/3/15 10:59 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/3/15 6:19 PM, Califbill wrote:
Tim wrote:
Bill, hopefully they'll strive to improve things.
I know that Bayliners used to have a vary poor reputation. Maybe still
do. Even if they improve considerably , it's hard to overcome a bad past.

Doubt they can overcome the negativity. My statement is they were nice
lines, nice looking boats. Poorly constructed, but nice design.


If you like bubble boats. The Trophy line sort of looked okay, but back
then they had a chintzy lamination schedule and lousy, lightweight hardware.

Did you not comprehend what has been written? You have to restate the poor
construction"



"Nice design" means more than the way they looked, Bilious, and "poorly
constructed" means more than the materials that were selected.

Repeat.

On 6/4/15 12:38 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/3/15 10:59 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/3/15 6:19 PM, Califbill wrote:
Tim wrote:
Bill, hopefully they'll strive to improve things.
I know that Bayliners used to have a vary poor reputation. Maybe still
do. Even if they improve considerably , it's hard to overcome a bad past.

Doubt they can overcome the negativity. My statement is they were nice
lines, nice looking boats. Poorly constructed, but nice design.


If you like bubble boats. The Trophy line sort of looked okay, but back
then they had a chintzy lamination schedule and lousy, lightweight hardware.

Did you not comprehend what has been written? You have to restate the poor
construction"



"Nice design" means more than the way they looked, Bilious, and "poorly
constructed" means more than the materials that were selected.

Repeat.



Take another sip, Bilious, and go sit in the rocking chairs on the porch
with Zell while the daycare nurse prepares your lunch.

On Thu, 04 Jun 2015 12:45:23 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Take another sip, Bilious, and go sit in the rocking chairs on the porch
with Zell while the daycare nurse prepares your lunch.

===

Don't judge everyone else's infirmities by your own.