Yo John!
 

Gun #32 is on it's way to my dealer. A stainless S&W .500 magnum. I
ordered the 6.5" barrel.

http://www.smith-wesson.com/webapp/w...layErrorView_Y

Yo John!
 

On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 at 4:53:40 PM UTC-7, Someone wrote:
Gun #32 is on it's way to my dealer. A stainless S&W .500 magnum. I
ordered the 6.5" barrel.

http://www.smith-wesson.com/webapp/w...layErrorView_Y

My brother has one. Those things are just plain angry!

Yo John!
 

Tim wrote:
On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 at 4:53:40 PM UTC-7, Someone wrote:
Gun #32 is on it's way to my dealer. A stainless S&W .500 magnum. I
ordered the 6.5" barrel.

http://www.smith-wesson.com/webapp/w...layErrorView_Y
My brother has one. Those things are just plain angry!


And hungry!

Yo John!
 

On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 at 5:29:33 PM UTC-7, Someone wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 at 4:53:40 PM UTC-7, Someone wrote:
Gun #32 is on it's way to my dealer. A stainless S&W .500 magnum. I
ordered the 6.5" barrel.

http://www.smith-wesson.com/webapp/w...layErrorView_Y
My brother has one. Those things are just plain angry!


And hungry!

"Gnarly" describes it too!

Yo John!
 

On 3/12/2015 2:35 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 19:53:41 -0400, Someone
wrote:

Gun #32 is on it's way to my dealer. A stainless S&W .500 magnum. I
ordered the 6.5" barrel.

http://www.smith-wesson.com/webapp/w...layErrorView_Y


How does that compare to the desert eagle .50
(Yeah I know I could just google something up)

Or this baby, which, I'm sure, Harry has his eye on. The Pfeifer Zeliska
28mm Revolver.

--

Respectfully submitted by Justan

Laugh of the day from Krause

"I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here.
I've been "born again" as a nice guy."

Yo John!
 

On 3/12/15 2:35 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 19:53:41 -0400, Someone
wrote:

Gun #32 is on it's way to my dealer. A stainless S&W .500 magnum. I
ordered the 6.5" barrel.

http://www.smith-wesson.com/webapp/w...layErrorView_Y


How does that compare to the desert eagle .50
(Yeah I know I could just google something up)



Well, one is a revolver and the other...isn't.

Either would be perfect for the conservative Florida househubby who
fears his wife is going to run off with an armadildo. (Yes, I know)
Or perhaps a George Zimmerman wannabe. Speaking of whom, I wonder which
woman he is beating up this week...

:)

--
Proud to be a Liberal.

Yo John!
 

Greg, the .500 is a lot more powerful

Yo John!
 

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dtQOL-nBc50

Yo John!
 

On 3/12/15 9:28 AM, Tim wrote:
Greg, the .500 is a lot more powerful



Yeah, and either is the perfect conceal carry handgun. :)

--
Proud to be a Liberal.

Yo John!
 

On 3/12/15 10:06 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 09:17:24 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/12/15 2:35 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 19:53:41 -0400, Someone
wrote:

Gun #32 is on it's way to my dealer. A stainless S&W .500 magnum. I
ordered the 6.5" barrel.

http://www.smith-wesson.com/webapp/w...layErrorView_Y


How does that compare to the desert eagle .50
(Yeah I know I could just google something up)



Well, one is a revolver and the other...isn't.

Either would be perfect for the conservative Florida househubby who
fears his wife is going to run off with an armadildo. (Yes, I know)
Or perhaps a George Zimmerman wannabe. Speaking of whom, I wonder which
woman he is beating up this week...

:)

You could have just said you don't have a clue.

Instead we got this brain fart


You mean, that was a serious question from you?
It's hard to tell sometimes.

Well, the Smith rounds are longer.

--
Proud to be a Liberal.

Yo John!
 

On 3/12/15 10:26 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 06:28:23 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

Greg, the .500 is a lot more powerful

OK I did look it up.

The .50 is capped at 36000 pounds of pressure and the 500 can go up to
60000. That means the muzzle energy can be at least 1000 ft/p greater.

It sounds more like a good caliber for a carbine than a handgun

They have bullets up over an ounce moving at over 1500 fps which puts
you in the 12ga slug category.



Quick followup shots are a bitch. Seriously. If a bear is after you and
you miss with the first shot, which is likely, you'll be joining Mr.
Griz for lunch. Of course, in Florida, it's the perfect Stand Your
Ground revolver, eh?

--
Proud to be a Liberal.

Yo John!
 

On 3/12/15 10:39 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:34:12 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/12/15 10:26 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 06:28:23 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

Greg, the .500 is a lot more powerful

OK I did look it up.

The .50 is capped at 36000 pounds of pressure and the 500 can go up to
60000. That means the muzzle energy can be at least 1000 ft/p greater.

It sounds more like a good caliber for a carbine than a handgun

They have bullets up over an ounce moving at over 1500 fps which puts
you in the 12ga slug category.



Quick followup shots are a bitch. Seriously. If a bear is after you and
you miss with the first shot, which is likely, you'll be joining Mr.
Griz for lunch. Of course, in Florida, it's the perfect Stand Your
Ground revolver, eh?

Brain fart again

Maybe you should try some Beano.

You are really incapable of civil conversation.



This is rec.boats. I tried "civil" for several months here, from
December through the end of February. Same old right-wing assholes
acting like right-wing assholes. There's no point in being "nice" in
this sewer.

My point about the .500 S&W is perfectly valid. Quick followup shots
are a bitch, and if you miss the bear, the bear is going to have you for
lunch. You disagree, eh?

Well, I have shot a Ruger Super Redhawk in .454 Casull. It's a bitch to
handle, and, really, not that much fun. The .500 S&W has to be about the
same or worse.

Of course, you're a theoretical shooter, right? I've been to the range
twice this month so far. You?

--
Proud to be a Liberal.

Yo John!
 

On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:55:12 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

I've been to the range
twice this month so far.

===

Don't they have any membership standards?

We bounce one or two asshats every year from our group.

Yo John!
 

On 3/12/2015 11:08 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:55:12 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

I've been to the range
twice this month so far.

===

Don't they have any membership standards?

We bounce one or two asshats every year from our group.

It would be difficult to measure Harry by standards used to judge normal
men.

--

Respectfully submitted by Justan

Laugh of the day from Krause

"I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here.
I've been "born again" as a nice guy."

Yo John!
 

On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 19:53:41 -0400, Someone wrote:

Gun #32 is on it's way to my dealer. A stainless S&W .500 magnum. I
ordered the 6.5" barrel.

http://www.smith-wesson.com/webapp/w...layErrorView_Y

Been out playing golf, and I came back to see this. Beautiful. Are you going to shoot
it or keep it nice and pretty. S&W has already shot it, yes? Hell, might as well
enjoy the thing.

Congrats.
--

Guns don't cause problems. Gun owner
*behavior* causes problems.

Yo John!
 

On 3/12/15 12:09 PM, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 19:53:41 -0400, Someone wrote:

Gun #32 is on it's way to my dealer. A stainless S&W .500 magnum. I
ordered the 6.5" barrel.

http://www.smith-wesson.com/webapp/w...layErrorView_Y

Been out playing golf, and I came back to see this. Beautiful. Are you going to shoot
it or keep it nice and pretty. S&W has already shot it, yes? Hell, might as well
enjoy the thing.

Congrats.


He's going to use it to *Stand His Ground* of course. It's Florida. Now,
to find an inside the waistband holster for concealed carry...



--
Proud to be a Liberal.

Yo John!
 

On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 11:42:22 -0400, Justan Olphart wrote:

On 3/12/2015 11:08 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:55:12 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

I've been to the range
twice this month so far.

===

Don't they have any membership standards?

We bounce one or two asshats every year from our group.

It would be difficult to measure Harry by standards used to judge normal
men.

Harry's already told us how much better than the cops he shoots.
--

Guns don't cause problems. Gun owner
*behavior* causes problems.

Yo John!
 

On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 09:17:24 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

Either would be perfect for the conservative Florida househubby who
fears his wife is going to run off with an armadildo. (Yes, I know)
Or perhaps a George Zimmerman wannabe. Speaking of whom, I wonder which
woman he is beating up this week...

Another moronic piece of left-wing drivel
--

Guns don't cause problems. Gun owner
*behavior* causes problems.

Yo John!
 

On 3/12/15 12:22 PM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 11:42:22 -0400, Justan Olphart wrote:

On 3/12/2015 11:08 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:55:12 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

I've been to the range
twice this month so far.

===

Don't they have any membership standards?

We bounce one or two asshats every year from our group.

It would be difficult to measure Harry by standards used to judge normal
men.

Harry's already told us how much better than the cops he shoots.



Wow! Wayne, FlaJim, and Col. Klink...Three Right-Wing Turds on a Log. :)

--
Proud to be a Liberal.

Yo John!
 

On 3/12/2015 12:16 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/12/15 12:09 PM, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 19:53:41 -0400, Someone
wrote:

Gun #32 is on it's way to my dealer. A stainless S&W .500 magnum. I
ordered the 6.5" barrel.

http://www.smith-wesson.com/webapp/w...layErrorView_Y


Been out playing golf, and I came back to see this. Beautiful. Are you
going to shoot
it or keep it nice and pretty. S&W has already shot it, yes? Hell,
might as well
enjoy the thing.

Congrats.


He's going to use it to *Stand His Ground* of course. It's Florida. Now,
to find an inside the waistband holster for concealed carry...



Why would he do that. I'm sure he has more appropriate carry guns. What
made you so crazy, Harry? Syphilis?

--

Respectfully submitted by Justan

Laugh of the day from Krause

"I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here.
I've been "born again" as a nice guy."

Yo John!
 

On 3/12/2015 12:29 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/12/15 12:22 PM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 11:42:22 -0400, Justan Olphart
wrote:

On 3/12/2015 11:08 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:55:12 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

I've been to the range
twice this month so far.

===

Don't they have any membership standards?

We bounce one or two asshats every year from our group.

It would be difficult to measure Harry by standards used to judge normal
men.

Harry's already told us how much better than the cops he shoots.



Wow! Wayne, FlaJim, and Col. Klink...Three Right-Wing Turds on a Log. :)

Don't feel so outnumbered and over powered. Come back with something
smart. Take your time, we'll wait.

--

Respectfully submitted by Justan

Laugh of the day from Krause

"I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here.
I've been "born again" as a nice guy."

Yo John!
 

DitzyDan spews...
"Gun #32 is on it's way to my dealer. *A stainless S&W .500 magnum. *I
ordered the 6.5" barrel."


Is that 32 guns you own, Ditzy.
That sure must be some shortcoming you're over compensating for.
How do y'all do it on a counterman's salary?

Yo John!
 

On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:38:25 -0700 (PDT), True North wrote:

DitzyDan spews...
"Gun #32 is on it's way to my dealer. *A stainless S&W .500 magnum. *I
ordered the 6.5" barrel."


Is that 32 guns you own, Ditzy.
That sure must be some shortcoming you're over compensating for.
How do y'all do it on a counterman's salary?

Don, you are so far out in left field that I doubt you could see the catcher even if
it were Harry.

And, have you considered the possibility that the #32 refers only to revolvers?
Perhaps

From where did you get the 'counterman' nonsense?

You should really consider thinking before you post.
--

Guns don't cause problems. Gun owner
*behavior* causes problems.

Yo John!
 

On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:20:56 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:55:12 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

My point about the .500 S&W is perfectly valid. Quick followup shots
are a bitch, and if you miss the bear, the bear is going to have you for
lunch. You disagree, eh?

Define "quick". I am sure a guy who shoots one regularly could get
back down in far less than a second.

A guy who shoots one regularly probably wouldn't need to worry about 'quick followup
shots'.

[NB: Harry does not fall into that category.]
--

Guns don't cause problems. Gun owner
*behavior* causes problems.

Yo John!
 

wrote:
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:33:32 -0400, John H.
wrote:

On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:20:56 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:55:12 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

My point about the .500 S&W is perfectly valid. Quick followup shots
are a bitch, and if you miss the bear, the bear is going to have you for
lunch. You disagree, eh?

Define "quick". I am sure a guy who shoots one regularly could get
back down in far less than a second.

A guy who shoots one regularly probably wouldn't need to worry about 'quick followup
shots'.

[NB: Harry does not fall into that category.]

If you are going to buy commercial ammo, you won't be able to afford
to shoot this a lot. It looks like the ammo is $2 a round. OTOH the
bullets are about a quarter each in quantity of 500 (at Natchez) so
the reloaders really make out. Powder and primers add another nickel
or so.

$2 will buy about six quality FMJ rounds in .357 Mag. But of course we
don't have griz like they do in SE Florida 😃

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

Yo John!
 

On 3/12/2015 5:03 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
wrote:
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:33:32 -0400, John H.
wrote:

On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:20:56 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:55:12 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

My point about the .500 S&W is perfectly valid. Quick followup shots
are a bitch, and if you miss the bear, the bear is going to have you for
lunch. You disagree, eh?

Define "quick". I am sure a guy who shoots one regularly could get
back down in far less than a second.

A guy who shoots one regularly probably wouldn't need to worry about 'quick followup
shots'.

[NB: Harry does not fall into that category.]

If you are going to buy commercial ammo, you won't be able to afford
to shoot this a lot. It looks like the ammo is $2 a round. OTOH the
bullets are about a quarter each in quantity of 500 (at Natchez) so
the reloaders really make out. Powder and primers add another nickel
or so.

$2 will buy about six quality FMJ rounds in .357 Mag. But of course we
don't have griz like they do in SE Florida 😃

Griz in Florida?

--

Respectfully submitted by Justan

Laugh of the day from Krause

"I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here.
I've been "born again" as a nice guy."

Yo John!
 

On 3/12/15 2:33 PM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:20:56 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:55:12 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

My point about the .500 S&W is perfectly valid. Quick followup shots
are a bitch, and if you miss the bear, the bear is going to have you for
lunch. You disagree, eh?

Define "quick". I am sure a guy who shoots one regularly could get
back down in far less than a second.

A guy who shoots one regularly probably wouldn't need to worry about 'quick followup
shots'.

[NB: Harry does not fall into that category.]


Not to worry, Colonel Klink: with your list of ailments, surgeries, and
vision problems, you probably should stick to your Daisy BB rifle.

--
Proud to be a Liberal.

Yo John!
 

On 3/12/15 2:20 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:55:12 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

My point about the .500 S&W is perfectly valid. Quick followup shots
are a bitch, and if you miss the bear, the bear is going to have you for
lunch. You disagree, eh?

Define "quick". I am sure a guy who shoots one regularly could get
back down in far less than a second.


Who shoots one of those cannons "regularly"? I'd bet on the grizzly bear
and, of course, that is such a distinct possibility in SE Florida. :)

--
Proud to be a Liberal.

Yo John!
 

On 3/12/15 2:16 PM, John H. wrote:


You should really consider thinking before you post.


I'd suggest you follow your own advice, but, then, there is no evidence
here you are capable of doing so, eh, Colonel Klink?

--
Proud to be a Liberal.

Yo John!
 

wrote:
On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 19:53:41 -0400, Someone
wrote:

Gun #32 is on it's way to my dealer. A stainless S&W .500 magnum. I
ordered the 6.5" barrel.

http://www.smith-wesson.com/webapp/w...layErrorView_Y

How does that compare to the desert eagle .50
(Yeah I know I could just google something up)

I have both and will be shooting them early next week. I'll let you know.

The .50AE is a much smaller cartridge. 300 grain vs 440 in the magnum.

Yo John!
 

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/12/15 2:35 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 19:53:41 -0400, Someone
wrote:

Gun #32 is on it's way to my dealer. A stainless S&W .500 magnum. I
ordered the 6.5" barrel.

http://www.smith-wesson.com/webapp/w...layErrorView_Y



How does that compare to the desert eagle .50
(Yeah I know I could just google something up)



Well, one is a revolver and the other...isn't.

Either would be perfect for the conservative Florida househubby who
fears his wife is going to run off with an armadildo. (Yes, I know)
Or perhaps a George Zimmerman wannabe. Speaking of whom, I wonder
which woman he is beating up this week...

:)

How narcissistic of you, tax deadbeat!

Yo John!
 

On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 20:10:17 -0400, Someone wrote:

wrote:
On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 19:53:41 -0400, Someone
wrote:

Gun #32 is on it's way to my dealer. A stainless S&W .500 magnum. I
ordered the 6.5" barrel.

http://www.smith-wesson.com/webapp/w...layErrorView_Y

How does that compare to the desert eagle .50
(Yeah I know I could just google something up)

I have both and will be shooting them early next week. I'll let you know.

The .50AE is a much smaller cartridge. 300 grain vs 440 in the magnum.

And, Dan, we want video.
--

Guns don't cause problems. Gun owner
*behavior* causes problems.

Yo John!
 

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/12/15 9:28 AM, Tim wrote:
Greg, the .500 is a lot more powerful



Yeah, and either is the perfect conceal carry handgun. :)

Some of us shoot for sport.

Yo John!
 

John H. wrote:
On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 19:53:41 -0400, Someone wrote:

Gun #32 is on it's way to my dealer. A stainless S&W .500 magnum. I
ordered the 6.5" barrel.

http://www.smith-wesson.com/webapp/w...layErrorView_Y
Been out playing golf, and I came back to see this. Beautiful. Are you going to shoot
it or keep it nice and pretty. S&W has already shot it, yes? Hell, might as well
enjoy the thing.

Congrats.

Thanks. I only have two guns I don't fire. This will be an occasional
shooter but a nice addition to my collection.

Yo John!
 

On 3/12/15 8:10 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 17:42:53 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 3/12/15 2:20 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:55:12 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

My point about the .500 S&W is perfectly valid. Quick followup shots
are a bitch, and if you miss the bear, the bear is going to have you for
lunch. You disagree, eh?

Define "quick". I am sure a guy who shoots one regularly could get
back down in far less than a second.


Who shoots one of those cannons "regularly"? I'd bet on the grizzly bear
and, of course, that is such a distinct possibility in SE Florida. :)

I seldom go to SE Florida.
I also have no interest in a "50" anything.




Oh. I thought when you said a guy who shoots a .50 regularly could get
off additional shots in a hurry, you had first-hand experience firing
the weapons.

I like SE Florida, but I also have no interest in 50 caliber weaponry.

--
Proud to be a Liberal.

Yo John!
 

John H. wrote:
On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 19:53:41 -0400, Someone wrote:

Gun #32 is on it's way to my dealer. A stainless S&W .500 magnum. I
ordered the 6.5" barrel.

http://www.smith-wesson.com/webapp/w...layErrorView_Y
Been out playing golf, and I came back to see this. Beautiful. Are you going to shoot
it or keep it nice and pretty. S&W has already shot it, yes? Hell, might as well
enjoy the thing.

Congrats.


BTW - #33 is in my sights. I'm linking the new Savage A17. I'm waiting
to see if they offer it in stainless.

Yo John!
 

John H. wrote:
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:38:25 -0700 (PDT), True North wrote:

DitzyDan spews...
"Gun #32 is on it's way to my dealer. A stainless S&W .500 magnum. I
ordered the 6.5" barrel."


Is that 32 guns you own, Ditzy.
That sure must be some shortcoming you're over compensating for.
How do y'all do it on a counterman's salary?
Don, you are so far out in left field that I doubt you could see the catcher even if
it were Harry.

And, have you considered the possibility that the #32 refers only to revolvers?
Perhaps

From where did you get the 'counterman' nonsense?

You should really consider thinking before you post.


Harry's narcissism is rubbing off on him. There are gun collectors out
there with hundreds of guns. I choose mine carefully with no intention
of ever selling them. The last gun I sold was a Beretta .25 a few years
ago and I regret that. I don't know where the "counterman" thing comes
from but I also don't know where he dreams up half of the crap he posts.

Yo John!
 

Yo John!
 

Yo John!
 

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/12/15 2:20 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:55:12 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

My point about the .500 S&W is perfectly valid. Quick followup shots
are a bitch, and if you miss the bear, the bear is going to have you
for
lunch. You disagree, eh?

Define "quick". I am sure a guy who shoots one regularly could get
back down in far less than a second.


Who shoots one of those cannons "regularly"? I'd bet on the grizzly
bear and, of course, that is such a distinct possibility in SE
Florida. :)

No one shoots "on" a bear that I've ever seen. Some drunk Ruskies might
do that sort of thing.