Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2013
Posts: 6,972
Default It's not about servers

On 3/5/2015 8:44 AM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...

Joe Scarborough had it right this morning on "Morning Joe".

With regard to Hillary's emails, her supporters have rallied
quickly to excuse the email thing as a minor issue and blames
the GOP for blood hunting.

Joe's point is spot on. It's not about emails, servers or
how long her personal, private server keeps her emails while
serving as Secretary of State.

She served as SofS from 2009 to 2013. In 2009 federal laws
were changed that mandated that official, government emails
be sent and received (encryted) via a government email address and on
government servers designed to archive and preserve them.
It's the law, not a "preference".


You actually believe Crazy Joe Scarborough? LOL.
Here's the "law" in effect when HRC was Sec of State.
BTW, violating this "law" carries no criminal penalty.




"According to Section 1236.22 of the 2009 NARA requirements, which
Schmidt provided in an email, "Agencies that allow employees to send and
receive official electronic mail messages using a system not operated by
the agency must ensure that Federal records sent or received on such
systems are preserved in the appropriate agency recordkeeping system."


And Hillary did not ensure her official electronic mail messages as SofS
were preserved in the "appropriate agency" (meaning federal) record
keeping system.

She kept them on her own, private server. Only now ... 2 years since
she resigned and the emails have been discovered is she offering her
screened and approved releases to the State Department.

The intent of the law was to make official government related emails
available and preserved on government servers, not her own. Government
officials and employees are supposed to use a government email address
for these correspondences.

First, she tried to claim that if she sent an email from her personal
email server address to a government email address ... it would be
preserved. But that doesn't account for them all.

I suppose to the Clintons it matters what "@" means.



  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,401
Default It's not about servers

In article ,
says...


"According to Section 1236.22 of the 2009 NARA requirements, which
Schmidt provided in an email, "Agencies that allow employees to send and
receive official electronic mail messages using a system not operated by
the agency must ensure that Federal records sent or received on such
systems are preserved in the appropriate agency recordkeeping system."


And Hillary did not ensure her official electronic mail messages as SofS
were preserved in the "appropriate agency" (meaning federal) record
keeping system.


And you know this how? And what's the time limit for "ensuring?"
This just shows how the "requirement" is weak.
Without going into reasons "why" she used her own server for emails - I
can think of many - what is "official?"
Think about that in the realm of Dept of State, which is rife with
"personal" relationships.
The Dept of State can *never* operate entirely via gov email.


She kept them on her own, private server. Only now ... 2 years since
she resigned and the emails have been discovered is she offering her
screened and approved releases to the State Department.


You get what you get. So it is. That's why you have "memoirs."
I'm sure "official business" has all been preserved.

The intent of the law was to make official government related emails
available and preserved on government servers, not her own. Government
officials and employees are supposed to use a government email address
for these correspondences.


Yes. For "official" business. And I'm sure that business has all been
appropriately captured on gov systems.
What is it that you want?

First, she tried to claim that if she sent an email from her personal
email server address to a government email address ... it would be
preserved. But that doesn't account for them all.


What is "all of them?" A "Happy birthday!" to Angela Merkel?
Remember that Joe Scarborough would demand that too.
I'm not a fan of the Clintons. But I am resistant to to seeing unfair
attacks on anybody. And this just smells like...Benghazi, Benghazi,
Benghazi.




  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,186
Default It's not about servers

On 3/5/15 8:17 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...


"According to Section 1236.22 of the 2009 NARA requirements, which
Schmidt provided in an email, "Agencies that allow employees to send and
receive official electronic mail messages using a system not operated by
the agency must ensure that Federal records sent or received on such
systems are preserved in the appropriate agency recordkeeping system."


And Hillary did not ensure her official electronic mail messages as SofS
were preserved in the "appropriate agency" (meaning federal) record
keeping system.


And you know this how? And what's the time limit for "ensuring?"
This just shows how the "requirement" is weak.
Without going into reasons "why" she used her own server for emails - I
can think of many - what is "official?"
Think about that in the realm of Dept of State, which is rife with
"personal" relationships.
The Dept of State can *never* operate entirely via gov email.


She kept them on her own, private server. Only now ... 2 years since
she resigned and the emails have been discovered is she offering her
screened and approved releases to the State Department.


You get what you get. So it is. That's why you have "memoirs."
I'm sure "official business" has all been preserved.

The intent of the law was to make official government related emails
available and preserved on government servers, not her own. Government
officials and employees are supposed to use a government email address
for these correspondences.


Yes. For "official" business. And I'm sure that business has all been
appropriately captured on gov systems.
What is it that you want?

First, she tried to claim that if she sent an email from her personal
email server address to a government email address ... it would be
preserved. But that doesn't account for them all.


What is "all of them?" A "Happy birthday!" to Angela Merkel?
Remember that Joe Scarborough would demand that too.
I'm not a fan of the Clintons. But I am resistant to to seeing unfair
attacks on anybody. And this just smells like...Benghazi, Benghazi,
Benghazi.





It's Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi of course with Trey Gowdy trying to
gin up his reputation.

--
Proud to be a Liberal.
  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2013
Posts: 6,972
Default It's not about servers

On 3/5/2015 8:21 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/5/15 8:17 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...


"According to Section 1236.22 of the 2009 NARA requirements, which
Schmidt provided in an email, "Agencies that allow employees to send
and
receive official electronic mail messages using a system not
operated by
the agency must ensure that Federal records sent or received on such
systems are preserved in the appropriate agency recordkeeping system."

And Hillary did not ensure her official electronic mail messages as SofS
were preserved in the "appropriate agency" (meaning federal) record
keeping system.


And you know this how? And what's the time limit for "ensuring?"
This just shows how the "requirement" is weak.
Without going into reasons "why" she used her own server for emails - I
can think of many - what is "official?"
Think about that in the realm of Dept of State, which is rife with
"personal" relationships.
The Dept of State can *never* operate entirely via gov email.


She kept them on her own, private server. Only now ... 2 years since
she resigned and the emails have been discovered is she offering her
screened and approved releases to the State Department.


You get what you get. So it is. That's why you have "memoirs."
I'm sure "official business" has all been preserved.

The intent of the law was to make official government related emails
available and preserved on government servers, not her own. Government
officials and employees are supposed to use a government email address
for these correspondences.


Yes. For "official" business. And I'm sure that business has all been
appropriately captured on gov systems.
What is it that you want?

First, she tried to claim that if she sent an email from her personal
email server address to a government email address ... it would be
preserved. But that doesn't account for them all.


What is "all of them?" A "Happy birthday!" to Angela Merkel?
Remember that Joe Scarborough would demand that too.
I'm not a fan of the Clintons. But I am resistant to to seeing unfair
attacks on anybody. And this just smells like...Benghazi, Benghazi,
Benghazi.





It's Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi of course with Trey Gowdy trying to
gin up his reputation.


It has nothing to do with Benghazi and everything to do with compliance
to regulations, honesty and trustworthiness. Hillary is not exactly a
shining example of any of those. Sorry for being rather closed minded
about her but I think she's a snake in the grass and in no way qualified
to be POTUS. That is unless having the first woman president is more
important than anything else.


  #5   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,663
Default It's not about servers

On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 20:21:14 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 3/5/15 8:17 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...


"According to Section 1236.22 of the 2009 NARA requirements, which
Schmidt provided in an email, "Agencies that allow employees to send and
receive official electronic mail messages using a system not operated by
the agency must ensure that Federal records sent or received on such
systems are preserved in the appropriate agency recordkeeping system."

And Hillary did not ensure her official electronic mail messages as SofS
were preserved in the "appropriate agency" (meaning federal) record
keeping system.


And you know this how? And what's the time limit for "ensuring?"
This just shows how the "requirement" is weak.
Without going into reasons "why" she used her own server for emails - I
can think of many - what is "official?"
Think about that in the realm of Dept of State, which is rife with
"personal" relationships.
The Dept of State can *never* operate entirely via gov email.


She kept them on her own, private server. Only now ... 2 years since
she resigned and the emails have been discovered is she offering her
screened and approved releases to the State Department.


You get what you get. So it is. That's why you have "memoirs."
I'm sure "official business" has all been preserved.

The intent of the law was to make official government related emails
available and preserved on government servers, not her own. Government
officials and employees are supposed to use a government email address
for these correspondences.


Yes. For "official" business. And I'm sure that business has all been
appropriately captured on gov systems.
What is it that you want?

First, she tried to claim that if she sent an email from her personal
email server address to a government email address ... it would be
preserved. But that doesn't account for them all.


What is "all of them?" A "Happy birthday!" to Angela Merkel?
Remember that Joe Scarborough would demand that too.
I'm not a fan of the Clintons. But I am resistant to to seeing unfair
attacks on anybody. And this just smells like...Benghazi, Benghazi,
Benghazi.





It's Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi of course with Trey Gowdy trying to
gin up his reputation.


Get original, it's 'Bush, Bush, Bush'.
--

Guns don't cause problems. Gun owner
*behavior* causes problems.


  #6   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2013
Posts: 6,972
Default It's not about servers

On 3/5/2015 8:17 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...


"According to Section 1236.22 of the 2009 NARA requirements, which
Schmidt provided in an email, "Agencies that allow employees to send and
receive official electronic mail messages using a system not operated by
the agency must ensure that Federal records sent or received on such
systems are preserved in the appropriate agency recordkeeping system."


And Hillary did not ensure her official electronic mail messages as SofS
were preserved in the "appropriate agency" (meaning federal) record
keeping system.


And you know this how? And what's the time limit for "ensuring?"
This just shows how the "requirement" is weak.
Without going into reasons "why" she used her own server for emails - I
can think of many - what is "official?"
Think about that in the realm of Dept of State, which is rife with
"personal" relationships.
The Dept of State can *never* operate entirely via gov email.


She kept them on her own, private server. Only now ... 2 years since
she resigned and the emails have been discovered is she offering her
screened and approved releases to the State Department.


You get what you get. So it is. That's why you have "memoirs."
I'm sure "official business" has all been preserved.

The intent of the law was to make official government related emails
available and preserved on government servers, not her own. Government
officials and employees are supposed to use a government email address
for these correspondences.


Yes. For "official" business. And I'm sure that business has all been
appropriately captured on gov systems.
What is it that you want?

First, she tried to claim that if she sent an email from her personal
email server address to a government email address ... it would be
preserved. But that doesn't account for them all.


What is "all of them?" A "Happy birthday!" to Angela Merkel?
Remember that Joe Scarborough would demand that too.
I'm not a fan of the Clintons. But I am resistant to to seeing unfair
attacks on anybody. And this just smells like...Benghazi, Benghazi,
Benghazi.






Sounds to me like you are searching for justification. The answers to
your questions are easily obtained by watching any of the news media
outlets ... pro Clinton or not pro Clinton. All have acknowledged that
her methods were ... unusual.


  #8   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
KC KC is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,563
Default It's not about servers

On 3/5/2015 8:17 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...


"According to Section 1236.22 of the 2009 NARA requirements, which
Schmidt provided in an email, "Agencies that allow employees to send and
receive official electronic mail messages using a system not operated by
the agency must ensure that Federal records sent or received on such
systems are preserved in the appropriate agency recordkeeping system."


And Hillary did not ensure her official electronic mail messages as SofS
were preserved in the "appropriate agency" (meaning federal) record
keeping system.


And you know this how? And what's the time limit for "ensuring?"
This just shows how the "requirement" is weak.
Without going into reasons "why" she used her own server for emails - I
can think of many - what is "official?"
Think about that in the realm of Dept of State, which is rife with
"personal" relationships.
The Dept of State can *never* operate entirely via gov email.


She kept them on her own, private server. Only now ... 2 years since
she resigned and the emails have been discovered is she offering her
screened and approved releases to the State Department.


You get what you get. So it is. That's why you have "memoirs."
I'm sure "official business" has all been preserved.

The intent of the law was to make official government related emails
available and preserved on government servers, not her own. Government
officials and employees are supposed to use a government email address
for these correspondences.


Yes. For "official" business. And I'm sure



OH, you are sure! LOL... No, you are bought and paid for and will say
what they tell you to say...




that business has all been
appropriately captured on gov systems.
What is it that you want?

First, she tried to claim that if she sent an email from her personal
email server address to a government email address ... it would be
preserved. But that doesn't account for them all.


What is "all of them?" A "Happy birthday!" to Angela Merkel?
Remember that Joe Scarborough would demand that too.
I'm not a fan of the Clintons. But I am resistant to to seeing unfair
attacks on anybody. And this just smells like...Benghazi, Benghazi,
Benghazi.





  #9   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
KC KC is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,563
Default It's not about servers

On 3/5/2015 8:17 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...


"According to Section 1236.22 of the 2009 NARA requirements, which
Schmidt provided in an email, "Agencies that allow employees to send and
receive official electronic mail messages using a system not operated by
the agency must ensure that Federal records sent or received on such
systems are preserved in the appropriate agency recordkeeping system."


And Hillary did not ensure her official electronic mail messages as SofS
were preserved in the "appropriate agency" (meaning federal) record
keeping system.


And you know this how? And what's the time limit for "ensuring?"
This just shows how the "requirement" is weak.
Without going into reasons "why" she used her own server for emails - I
can think of many - what is "official?"
Think about that in the realm of Dept of State, which is rife with
"personal" relationships.
The Dept of State can *never* operate entirely via gov email.


She kept them on her own, private server. Only now ... 2 years since
she resigned and the emails have been discovered is she offering her
screened and approved releases to the State Department.


You get what you get. So it is. That's why you have "memoirs."
I'm sure "official business" has all been preserved.

The intent of the law was to make official government related emails
available and preserved on government servers, not her own. Government
officials and employees are supposed to use a government email address
for these correspondences.


Yes. For "official" business. And I'm sure that business has all been
appropriately captured on gov systems.
What is it that you want?

First, she tried to claim that if she sent an email from her personal
email server address to a government email address ... it would be
preserved. But that doesn't account for them all.


What is "all of them?" A "Happy birthday!" to Angela Merkel?
Remember that Joe Scarborough would demand that too.
I'm not a fan of the Clintons. But I am resistant to to seeing unfair
attacks on anybody. And this just smells like...Benghazi, Benghazi,
Benghazi.




Only liberals would use a deal like Benghazi as a pejorative to mock
another crime. Seems military and other officials don't really matter to
dems and party line guys like you.
  #10   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
KC KC is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,563
Default It's not about servers

On 3/5/2015 9:00 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 3/5/2015 8:44 AM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...

Joe Scarborough had it right this morning on "Morning Joe".

With regard to Hillary's emails, her supporters have rallied
quickly to excuse the email thing as a minor issue and blames
the GOP for blood hunting.

Joe's point is spot on. It's not about emails, servers or
how long her personal, private server keeps her emails while
serving as Secretary of State.

She served as SofS from 2009 to 2013. In 2009 federal laws
were changed that mandated that official, government emails
be sent and received (encryted) via a government email address and on
government servers designed to archive and preserve them.
It's the law, not a "preference".


You actually believe Crazy Joe Scarborough? LOL.
Here's the "law" in effect when HRC was Sec of State.
BTW, violating this "law" carries no criminal penalty.




"According to Section 1236.22 of the 2009 NARA requirements, which
Schmidt provided in an email, "Agencies that allow employees to send and
receive official electronic mail messages using a system not operated by
the agency must ensure that Federal records sent or received on such
systems are preserved in the appropriate agency recordkeeping system."


And Hillary did not ensure her official electronic mail messages as SofS
were preserved in the "appropriate agency" (meaning federal) record
keeping system.

She kept them on her own, private server. Only now ... 2 years since
she resigned and the emails have been discovered is she offering her
screened and approved releases to the State Department.

The intent of the law was to make official government related emails
available and preserved on government servers, not her own. Government
officials and employees are supposed to use a government email address
for these correspondences.

First, she tried to claim that if she sent an email from her personal
email server address to a government email address ... it would be
preserved. But that doesn't account for them all.

I suppose to the Clintons it matters what "@" means.




It has been the clinton game for decades to stall long enough to flush
and cleanse records... then turn them over with a bit "whoops". You are
right Hillary is a lawyer, she knows exactly what she did but also knew
a crooked DOJ and Media will give her a pass...


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NOMINATION: Sidaway Free news servers are a disservice to Usenet. K. A. Cannon ASA 2 October 6th 08 06:20 PM
Are The Servers Scared of Rough Weather arabqueen General 0 June 12th 05 12:01 AM
Fast free news servers? Capt,Neal? ASA 34 November 22nd 04 12:26 AM
OT - Some good free news servers. Simple Simon ASA 0 November 8th 03 12:12 AM
NG Servers katysails ASA 107 August 11th 03 11:32 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:40 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017