Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2013
Posts: 6,972
Default It's not about servers


Joe Scarborough had it right this morning on "Morning Joe".

With regard to Hillary's emails, her supporters have rallied
quickly to excuse the email thing as a minor issue and blames
the GOP for blood hunting.

Joe's point is spot on. It's not about emails, servers or
how long her personal, private server keeps her emails while
serving as Secretary of State.

She served as SofS from 2009 to 2013. In 2009 federal laws
were changed that mandated that official, government emails
be sent and received (encryted) via a government email address and on
government servers designed to archive and preserve them.
It's the law, not a "preference".

True to form however Hillary decided that she's so important
that she's above the law. It's another demonstration of her
deceit and her sense of being "special" compared to others.

This is not a minor issue that can be swept under the rug like
other issues have been in her 30 year public career. It's a
vivid example of the moral character of the person the Democrats
want as the next POTUS. Some Democrats and liberal pundits are
beginning to have reservations about her.

I think emailgate may be the demise of Hillary's aspirations to
be the first woman president. She can't be trusted with the keys
to the White House. It's one thing to discover after the fact
that a politician lied in order to be elected but quite different
to nominate or elect someone *knowing* they have a long history
of lying and deceit. I hope the voters of this country wake up.






  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 10,492
Default It's not about servers

On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 07:27:30 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

True to form however Hillary decided that she's so important
that she's above the law. It's another demonstration of her
deceit and her sense of being "special" compared to others.


===

I wonder if that attitude is pervasive among the so called liberal
elite. So far we've got a sample size of two, maybe three counting
Bill. :-)
  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,663
Default It's not about servers

On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 07:27:30 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:


Joe Scarborough had it right this morning on "Morning Joe".

With regard to Hillary's emails, her supporters have rallied
quickly to excuse the email thing as a minor issue and blames
the GOP for blood hunting.

Joe's point is spot on. It's not about emails, servers or
how long her personal, private server keeps her emails while
serving as Secretary of State.

She served as SofS from 2009 to 2013. In 2009 federal laws
were changed that mandated that official, government emails
be sent and received (encryted) via a government email address and on
government servers designed to archive and preserve them.
It's the law, not a "preference".

True to form however Hillary decided that she's so important
that she's above the law. It's another demonstration of her
deceit and her sense of being "special" compared to others.

This is not a minor issue that can be swept under the rug like
other issues have been in her 30 year public career. It's a
vivid example of the moral character of the person the Democrats
want as the next POTUS. Some Democrats and liberal pundits are
beginning to have reservations about her.

I think emailgate may be the demise of Hillary's aspirations to
be the first woman president. She can't be trusted with the keys
to the White House. It's one thing to discover after the fact
that a politician lied in order to be elected but quite different
to nominate or elect someone *knowing* they have a long history
of lying and deceit. I hope the voters of this country wake up.



Wait, wait...one of our very own said this just yesterday:

"Hey, the Repubnants have nothing in terms of viable candidates, so Hillary's email
account *prior* to the law change is news."
--

Guns don't cause problems. The behavior
of certain gun owners causes problems.
  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2013
Posts: 6,972
Default It's not about servers

On 3/5/2015 7:41 AM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 07:27:30 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:


Joe Scarborough had it right this morning on "Morning Joe".

With regard to Hillary's emails, her supporters have rallied
quickly to excuse the email thing as a minor issue and blames
the GOP for blood hunting.

Joe's point is spot on. It's not about emails, servers or
how long her personal, private server keeps her emails while
serving as Secretary of State.

She served as SofS from 2009 to 2013. In 2009 federal laws
were changed that mandated that official, government emails
be sent and received (encryted) via a government email address and on
government servers designed to archive and preserve them.
It's the law, not a "preference".

True to form however Hillary decided that she's so important
that she's above the law. It's another demonstration of her
deceit and her sense of being "special" compared to others.

This is not a minor issue that can be swept under the rug like
other issues have been in her 30 year public career. It's a
vivid example of the moral character of the person the Democrats
want as the next POTUS. Some Democrats and liberal pundits are
beginning to have reservations about her.

I think emailgate may be the demise of Hillary's aspirations to
be the first woman president. She can't be trusted with the keys
to the White House. It's one thing to discover after the fact
that a politician lied in order to be elected but quite different
to nominate or elect someone *knowing* they have a long history
of lying and deceit. I hope the voters of this country wake up.



Wait, wait...one of our very own said this just yesterday:

"Hey, the Repubnants have nothing in terms of viable candidates, so Hillary's email
account *prior* to the law change is news."



The government email requirement and server became law in 2009, the year
Hillary assumed her role as Secretary of State.

Don't know what Harry is talking about.


  #5   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 10,492
Default It's not about servers

On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 07:47:39 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

The government email requirement and server became law in 2009, the year
Hillary assumed her role as Secretary of State.

Don't know what Harry is talking about.


===

And neither does he. Hillary is cooked and I don't think her party
has a backup plan.


  #6   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,401
Default It's not about servers

In article ,
says...

Joe Scarborough had it right this morning on "Morning Joe".

With regard to Hillary's emails, her supporters have rallied
quickly to excuse the email thing as a minor issue and blames
the GOP for blood hunting.

Joe's point is spot on. It's not about emails, servers or
how long her personal, private server keeps her emails while
serving as Secretary of State.

She served as SofS from 2009 to 2013. In 2009 federal laws
were changed that mandated that official, government emails
be sent and received (encryted) via a government email address and on
government servers designed to archive and preserve them.
It's the law, not a "preference".


You actually believe Crazy Joe Scarborough? LOL.
Here's the "law" in effect when HRC was Sec of State.
BTW, violating this "law" carries no criminal penalty.

"According to Section 1236.22 of the 2009 NARA requirements, which
Schmidt provided in an email, "Agencies that allow employees to send and
receive official electronic mail messages using a system not operated by
the agency must ensure that Federal records sent or received on such
systems are preserved in the appropriate agency recordkeeping system."

HRC is a lawyer. Joe still isn't over his days in Congress, when he
impeached her husband. Shades of Whitewater,Vince Foster, Travelgate,
et al. All went nowhere. Joe appears to be a sore loser.

  #7   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2013
Posts: 6,972
Default It's not about servers

On 3/5/2015 8:44 AM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...

Joe Scarborough had it right this morning on "Morning Joe".

With regard to Hillary's emails, her supporters have rallied
quickly to excuse the email thing as a minor issue and blames
the GOP for blood hunting.

Joe's point is spot on. It's not about emails, servers or
how long her personal, private server keeps her emails while
serving as Secretary of State.

She served as SofS from 2009 to 2013. In 2009 federal laws
were changed that mandated that official, government emails
be sent and received (encryted) via a government email address and on
government servers designed to archive and preserve them.
It's the law, not a "preference".


You actually believe Crazy Joe Scarborough? LOL.
Here's the "law" in effect when HRC was Sec of State.
BTW, violating this "law" carries no criminal penalty.




"According to Section 1236.22 of the 2009 NARA requirements, which
Schmidt provided in an email, "Agencies that allow employees to send and
receive official electronic mail messages using a system not operated by
the agency must ensure that Federal records sent or received on such
systems are preserved in the appropriate agency recordkeeping system."


And Hillary did not ensure her official electronic mail messages as SofS
were preserved in the "appropriate agency" (meaning federal) record
keeping system.

She kept them on her own, private server. Only now ... 2 years since
she resigned and the emails have been discovered is she offering her
screened and approved releases to the State Department.

The intent of the law was to make official government related emails
available and preserved on government servers, not her own. Government
officials and employees are supposed to use a government email address
for these correspondences.

First, she tried to claim that if she sent an email from her personal
email server address to a government email address ... it would be
preserved. But that doesn't account for them all.

I suppose to the Clintons it matters what "@" means.



  #8   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,663
Default It's not about servers

On Thu, 5 Mar 2015 07:44:55 -0600, Boating All Out wrote:

In article ,
says...

Joe Scarborough had it right this morning on "Morning Joe".

With regard to Hillary's emails, her supporters have rallied
quickly to excuse the email thing as a minor issue and blames
the GOP for blood hunting.

Joe's point is spot on. It's not about emails, servers or
how long her personal, private server keeps her emails while
serving as Secretary of State.

She served as SofS from 2009 to 2013. In 2009 federal laws
were changed that mandated that official, government emails
be sent and received (encryted) via a government email address and on
government servers designed to archive and preserve them.
It's the law, not a "preference".


You actually believe Crazy Joe Scarborough? LOL.
Here's the "law" in effect when HRC was Sec of State.
BTW, violating this "law" carries no criminal penalty.

"According to Section 1236.22 of the 2009 NARA requirements, which
Schmidt provided in an email, "Agencies that allow employees to send and
receive official electronic mail messages using a system not operated by
the agency must ensure that Federal records sent or received on such
systems are preserved in the appropriate agency recordkeeping system."

HRC is a lawyer. Joe still isn't over his days in Congress, when he
impeached her husband. Shades of Whitewater,Vince Foster, Travelgate,
et al. All went nowhere. Joe appears to be a sore loser.


And to think, without the Benghazi hearings, this would all be totally hidden.

You'd best stick to your knowledge of ISIS.
--

Guns don't cause problems. The behavior
of certain gun owners causes problems.
  #9   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,186
Default It's not about servers

On 3/5/15 9:41 AM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 5 Mar 2015 07:44:55 -0600, Boating All Out wrote:

In article ,
says...

Joe Scarborough had it right this morning on "Morning Joe".

With regard to Hillary's emails, her supporters have rallied
quickly to excuse the email thing as a minor issue and blames
the GOP for blood hunting.

Joe's point is spot on. It's not about emails, servers or
how long her personal, private server keeps her emails while
serving as Secretary of State.

She served as SofS from 2009 to 2013. In 2009 federal laws
were changed that mandated that official, government emails
be sent and received (encryted) via a government email address and on
government servers designed to archive and preserve them.
It's the law, not a "preference".


You actually believe Crazy Joe Scarborough? LOL.
Here's the "law" in effect when HRC was Sec of State.
BTW, violating this "law" carries no criminal penalty.

"According to Section 1236.22 of the 2009 NARA requirements, which
Schmidt provided in an email, "Agencies that allow employees to send and
receive official electronic mail messages using a system not operated by
the agency must ensure that Federal records sent or received on such
systems are preserved in the appropriate agency recordkeeping system."

HRC is a lawyer. Joe still isn't over his days in Congress, when he
impeached her husband. Shades of Whitewater,Vince Foster, Travelgate,
et al. All went nowhere. Joe appears to be a sore loser.


And to think, without the Benghazi hearings, this would all be totally hidden.

You'd best stick to your knowledge of ISIS.


You mean the seven, nine, or a dozen Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi
hearings that uncovered...nothing?

I'm getting a laugh out of this. I don't know if Hillary will run, but
if she does, she'll wipe the floor with any of your GOP wannabes, all of
whom have much more in their deep dark closets than emails...



--
Proud to be a Liberal.
  #10   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,663
Default It's not about servers

On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 10:13:37 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 3/5/15 9:41 AM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 5 Mar 2015 07:44:55 -0600, Boating All Out wrote:

In article ,
says...

Joe Scarborough had it right this morning on "Morning Joe".

With regard to Hillary's emails, her supporters have rallied
quickly to excuse the email thing as a minor issue and blames
the GOP for blood hunting.

Joe's point is spot on. It's not about emails, servers or
how long her personal, private server keeps her emails while
serving as Secretary of State.

She served as SofS from 2009 to 2013. In 2009 federal laws
were changed that mandated that official, government emails
be sent and received (encryted) via a government email address and on
government servers designed to archive and preserve them.
It's the law, not a "preference".


You actually believe Crazy Joe Scarborough? LOL.
Here's the "law" in effect when HRC was Sec of State.
BTW, violating this "law" carries no criminal penalty.

"According to Section 1236.22 of the 2009 NARA requirements, which
Schmidt provided in an email, "Agencies that allow employees to send and
receive official electronic mail messages using a system not operated by
the agency must ensure that Federal records sent or received on such
systems are preserved in the appropriate agency recordkeeping system."

HRC is a lawyer. Joe still isn't over his days in Congress, when he
impeached her husband. Shades of Whitewater,Vince Foster, Travelgate,
et al. All went nowhere. Joe appears to be a sore loser.


And to think, without the Benghazi hearings, this would all be totally hidden.

You'd best stick to your knowledge of ISIS.


You mean the seven, nine, or a dozen Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi
hearings that uncovered...nothing?

I'm getting a laugh out of this. I don't know if Hillary will run, but
if she does, she'll wipe the floor with any of your GOP wannabes, all of
whom have much more in their deep dark closets than emails...


It's hard to uncover the truth when the truth is hidden on a server in Arkansas.
--

Guns don't cause problems. Gun owner
*behavior* causes problems.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NOMINATION: Sidaway Free news servers are a disservice to Usenet. K. A. Cannon ASA 2 October 6th 08 06:20 PM
Are The Servers Scared of Rough Weather arabqueen General 0 June 12th 05 12:01 AM
Fast free news servers? Capt,Neal? ASA 34 November 22nd 04 12:26 AM
OT - Some good free news servers. Simple Simon ASA 0 November 8th 03 12:12 AM
NG Servers katysails ASA 107 August 11th 03 11:32 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:15 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017