Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Joe Scarborough had it right this morning on "Morning Joe". With regard to Hillary's emails, her supporters have rallied quickly to excuse the email thing as a minor issue and blames the GOP for blood hunting. Joe's point is spot on. It's not about emails, servers or how long her personal, private server keeps her emails while serving as Secretary of State. She served as SofS from 2009 to 2013. In 2009 federal laws were changed that mandated that official, government emails be sent and received (encryted) via a government email address and on government servers designed to archive and preserve them. It's the law, not a "preference". True to form however Hillary decided that she's so important that she's above the law. It's another demonstration of her deceit and her sense of being "special" compared to others. This is not a minor issue that can be swept under the rug like other issues have been in her 30 year public career. It's a vivid example of the moral character of the person the Democrats want as the next POTUS. Some Democrats and liberal pundits are beginning to have reservations about her. I think emailgate may be the demise of Hillary's aspirations to be the first woman president. She can't be trusted with the keys to the White House. It's one thing to discover after the fact that a politician lied in order to be elected but quite different to nominate or elect someone *knowing* they have a long history of lying and deceit. I hope the voters of this country wake up. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 07:27:30 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: True to form however Hillary decided that she's so important that she's above the law. It's another demonstration of her deceit and her sense of being "special" compared to others. === I wonder if that attitude is pervasive among the so called liberal elite. So far we've got a sample size of two, maybe three counting Bill. :-) |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 07:27:30 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:
Joe Scarborough had it right this morning on "Morning Joe". With regard to Hillary's emails, her supporters have rallied quickly to excuse the email thing as a minor issue and blames the GOP for blood hunting. Joe's point is spot on. It's not about emails, servers or how long her personal, private server keeps her emails while serving as Secretary of State. She served as SofS from 2009 to 2013. In 2009 federal laws were changed that mandated that official, government emails be sent and received (encryted) via a government email address and on government servers designed to archive and preserve them. It's the law, not a "preference". True to form however Hillary decided that she's so important that she's above the law. It's another demonstration of her deceit and her sense of being "special" compared to others. This is not a minor issue that can be swept under the rug like other issues have been in her 30 year public career. It's a vivid example of the moral character of the person the Democrats want as the next POTUS. Some Democrats and liberal pundits are beginning to have reservations about her. I think emailgate may be the demise of Hillary's aspirations to be the first woman president. She can't be trusted with the keys to the White House. It's one thing to discover after the fact that a politician lied in order to be elected but quite different to nominate or elect someone *knowing* they have a long history of lying and deceit. I hope the voters of this country wake up. Wait, wait...one of our very own said this just yesterday: "Hey, the Repubnants have nothing in terms of viable candidates, so Hillary's email account *prior* to the law change is news." -- Guns don't cause problems. The behavior of certain gun owners causes problems. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/5/2015 7:41 AM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 07:27:30 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: Joe Scarborough had it right this morning on "Morning Joe". With regard to Hillary's emails, her supporters have rallied quickly to excuse the email thing as a minor issue and blames the GOP for blood hunting. Joe's point is spot on. It's not about emails, servers or how long her personal, private server keeps her emails while serving as Secretary of State. She served as SofS from 2009 to 2013. In 2009 federal laws were changed that mandated that official, government emails be sent and received (encryted) via a government email address and on government servers designed to archive and preserve them. It's the law, not a "preference". True to form however Hillary decided that she's so important that she's above the law. It's another demonstration of her deceit and her sense of being "special" compared to others. This is not a minor issue that can be swept under the rug like other issues have been in her 30 year public career. It's a vivid example of the moral character of the person the Democrats want as the next POTUS. Some Democrats and liberal pundits are beginning to have reservations about her. I think emailgate may be the demise of Hillary's aspirations to be the first woman president. She can't be trusted with the keys to the White House. It's one thing to discover after the fact that a politician lied in order to be elected but quite different to nominate or elect someone *knowing* they have a long history of lying and deceit. I hope the voters of this country wake up. Wait, wait...one of our very own said this just yesterday: "Hey, the Repubnants have nothing in terms of viable candidates, so Hillary's email account *prior* to the law change is news." The government email requirement and server became law in 2009, the year Hillary assumed her role as Secretary of State. Don't know what Harry is talking about. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 07:47:39 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: The government email requirement and server became law in 2009, the year Hillary assumed her role as Secretary of State. Don't know what Harry is talking about. === And neither does he. Hillary is cooked and I don't think her party has a backup plan. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/5/2015 8:44 AM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article , says... Joe Scarborough had it right this morning on "Morning Joe". With regard to Hillary's emails, her supporters have rallied quickly to excuse the email thing as a minor issue and blames the GOP for blood hunting. Joe's point is spot on. It's not about emails, servers or how long her personal, private server keeps her emails while serving as Secretary of State. She served as SofS from 2009 to 2013. In 2009 federal laws were changed that mandated that official, government emails be sent and received (encryted) via a government email address and on government servers designed to archive and preserve them. It's the law, not a "preference". You actually believe Crazy Joe Scarborough? LOL. Here's the "law" in effect when HRC was Sec of State. BTW, violating this "law" carries no criminal penalty. "According to Section 1236.22 of the 2009 NARA requirements, which Schmidt provided in an email, "Agencies that allow employees to send and receive official electronic mail messages using a system not operated by the agency must ensure that Federal records sent or received on such systems are preserved in the appropriate agency recordkeeping system." And Hillary did not ensure her official electronic mail messages as SofS were preserved in the "appropriate agency" (meaning federal) record keeping system. She kept them on her own, private server. Only now ... 2 years since she resigned and the emails have been discovered is she offering her screened and approved releases to the State Department. The intent of the law was to make official government related emails available and preserved on government servers, not her own. Government officials and employees are supposed to use a government email address for these correspondences. First, she tried to claim that if she sent an email from her personal email server address to a government email address ... it would be preserved. But that doesn't account for them all. I suppose to the Clintons it matters what "@" means. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 5 Mar 2015 07:44:55 -0600, Boating All Out wrote:
In article , says... Joe Scarborough had it right this morning on "Morning Joe". With regard to Hillary's emails, her supporters have rallied quickly to excuse the email thing as a minor issue and blames the GOP for blood hunting. Joe's point is spot on. It's not about emails, servers or how long her personal, private server keeps her emails while serving as Secretary of State. She served as SofS from 2009 to 2013. In 2009 federal laws were changed that mandated that official, government emails be sent and received (encryted) via a government email address and on government servers designed to archive and preserve them. It's the law, not a "preference". You actually believe Crazy Joe Scarborough? LOL. Here's the "law" in effect when HRC was Sec of State. BTW, violating this "law" carries no criminal penalty. "According to Section 1236.22 of the 2009 NARA requirements, which Schmidt provided in an email, "Agencies that allow employees to send and receive official electronic mail messages using a system not operated by the agency must ensure that Federal records sent or received on such systems are preserved in the appropriate agency recordkeeping system." HRC is a lawyer. Joe still isn't over his days in Congress, when he impeached her husband. Shades of Whitewater,Vince Foster, Travelgate, et al. All went nowhere. Joe appears to be a sore loser. And to think, without the Benghazi hearings, this would all be totally hidden. You'd best stick to your knowledge of ISIS. -- Guns don't cause problems. The behavior of certain gun owners causes problems. |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 10:13:37 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/5/15 9:41 AM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 5 Mar 2015 07:44:55 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... Joe Scarborough had it right this morning on "Morning Joe". With regard to Hillary's emails, her supporters have rallied quickly to excuse the email thing as a minor issue and blames the GOP for blood hunting. Joe's point is spot on. It's not about emails, servers or how long her personal, private server keeps her emails while serving as Secretary of State. She served as SofS from 2009 to 2013. In 2009 federal laws were changed that mandated that official, government emails be sent and received (encryted) via a government email address and on government servers designed to archive and preserve them. It's the law, not a "preference". You actually believe Crazy Joe Scarborough? LOL. Here's the "law" in effect when HRC was Sec of State. BTW, violating this "law" carries no criminal penalty. "According to Section 1236.22 of the 2009 NARA requirements, which Schmidt provided in an email, "Agencies that allow employees to send and receive official electronic mail messages using a system not operated by the agency must ensure that Federal records sent or received on such systems are preserved in the appropriate agency recordkeeping system." HRC is a lawyer. Joe still isn't over his days in Congress, when he impeached her husband. Shades of Whitewater,Vince Foster, Travelgate, et al. All went nowhere. Joe appears to be a sore loser. And to think, without the Benghazi hearings, this would all be totally hidden. You'd best stick to your knowledge of ISIS. You mean the seven, nine, or a dozen Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi hearings that uncovered...nothing? I'm getting a laugh out of this. I don't know if Hillary will run, but if she does, she'll wipe the floor with any of your GOP wannabes, all of whom have much more in their deep dark closets than emails... It's hard to uncover the truth when the truth is hidden on a server in Arkansas. -- Guns don't cause problems. Gun owner *behavior* causes problems. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
NOMINATION: Sidaway Free news servers are a disservice to Usenet. | ASA | |||
Are The Servers Scared of Rough Weather | General | |||
Fast free news servers? | ASA | |||
OT - Some good free news servers. | ASA | |||
NG Servers | ASA |