On 2/28/15 4:47 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 13:23:18 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/28/15 12:44 PM, wrote:

Maryland is infringing on my 2nd Amendment rights? How?

Limiting what you can buy and the hoops you have to jump through to
buy what you can.

How is some legislator in Idaho making a symbolic gesture that
reflects the beliefs of his residents, "congress" making a law?

I look at things like this to be about as significant as making the
bald eagle the american bird. They don't make you buy one and keep it
as a pet.



Maryland's firearm regulations have never limited what firearms *I*
wanted to buy.

That is just you and I bet your wife calls that rationalization. AKA
sour grapes. You managed to fine the one AR platform that slipped
through a loophole in the law and then rationalized that it was what
you wanted all the time. Will you turn it in when someone points out
the error and they close that loophole?
BTW I stumbled into federal legislation that tries to do that the
other day when I was researching the DHS funding vote.


Actually, I asked around and was advised that an HBAR AR would do the
trick and there were side bennies to the HBAR, including greater
accuracy than the pencil or grenade launcher AR barrels. I think the
sour grapes are on your end. But what's it to you...you haven't bought a
firearm in this century.


--
Proud to be a Liberal.

On 2/28/15 8:02 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 17:06:33 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/28/15 4:47 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 13:23:18 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/28/15 12:44 PM, wrote:

Maryland is infringing on my 2nd Amendment rights? How?

Limiting what you can buy and the hoops you have to jump through to
buy what you can.

How is some legislator in Idaho making a symbolic gesture that
reflects the beliefs of his residents, "congress" making a law?

I look at things like this to be about as significant as making the
bald eagle the american bird. They don't make you buy one and keep it
as a pet.



Maryland's firearm regulations have never limited what firearms *I*
wanted to buy.

That is just you and I bet your wife calls that rationalization. AKA
sour grapes. You managed to fine the one AR platform that slipped
through a loophole in the law and then rationalized that it was what
you wanted all the time. Will you turn it in when someone points out
the error and they close that loophole?
BTW I stumbled into federal legislation that tries to do that the
other day when I was researching the DHS funding vote.


Actually, I asked around and was advised that an HBAR AR would do the
trick and there were side bennies to the HBAR, including greater
accuracy than the pencil or grenade launcher AR barrels. I think the
sour grapes are on your end. But what's it to you...you haven't bought a
firearm in this century.

I haven't felt the need. I have all the guns I want. I have a far more
wide ranging selection than you since I don't have to sell one to
afford a new one.
BTW I didn't say I didn't buy any recently, just not a new one.


I don't have to sell one to buy a new one, either. I have no need for
two .357 MAG pistols, and I wanted to play with a S&W for a while, so I
sold the Ruger for a little less than I paid for it.

--
Proud to be a Liberal.

On 2/28/2015 9:00 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 2/28/15 8:02 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 17:06:33 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/28/15 4:47 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 13:23:18 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/28/15 12:44 PM, wrote:

Maryland is infringing on my 2nd Amendment rights? How?

Limiting what you can buy and the hoops you have to jump through to
buy what you can.

How is some legislator in Idaho making a symbolic gesture that
reflects the beliefs of his residents, "congress" making a law?

I look at things like this to be about as significant as making the
bald eagle the american bird. They don't make you buy one and
keep it
as a pet.



Maryland's firearm regulations have never limited what firearms *I*
wanted to buy.

That is just you and I bet your wife calls that rationalization. AKA
sour grapes. You managed to fine the one AR platform that slipped
through a loophole in the law and then rationalized that it was what
you wanted all the time. Will you turn it in when someone points out
the error and they close that loophole?
BTW I stumbled into federal legislation that tries to do that the
other day when I was researching the DHS funding vote.


Actually, I asked around and was advised that an HBAR AR would do the
trick and there were side bennies to the HBAR, including greater
accuracy than the pencil or grenade launcher AR barrels. I think the
sour grapes are on your end. But what's it to you...you haven't bought a
firearm in this century.

I haven't felt the need. I have all the guns I want. I have a far more
wide ranging selection than you since I don't have to sell one to
afford a new one.
BTW I didn't say I didn't buy any recently, just not a new one.


I don't have to sell one to buy a new one, either. I have no need for
two .357 MAG pistols, and I wanted to play with a S&W for a while, so I
sold the Ruger for a little less than I paid for it.

What's your "need" for one 357 mag pistol?

--

Respectfully submitted by Justan

Laugh of the day from Krause

"I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here.
I've been "born again" as a nice guy."

On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 22:39:10 -0500, Justan Olphart
wrote:

I don't have to sell one to buy a new one, either. I have no need for
two .357 MAG pistols, and I wanted to play with a S&W for a while, so I
sold the Ruger for a little less than I paid for it.

What's your "need" for one 357 mag pistol?

===

His enemies list is longer than Richard Nixon's. :-)

I honestly believe that Harry is in a state of physical and mental
decline.

On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 22:51:13 -0500, Wayne.B wrote:

On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 22:39:10 -0500, Justan Olphart
wrote:

I don't have to sell one to buy a new one, either. I have no need for
two .357 MAG pistols, and I wanted to play with a S&W for a while, so I
sold the Ruger for a little less than I paid for it.

What's your "need" for one 357 mag pistol?

===

His enemies list is longer than Richard Nixon's. :-)

I honestly believe that Harry is in a state of physical and mental
decline.

He's just looking for attention. My mother-in-law, for a while before she died at age
88, needed the same thing.
--

Guns don't cause problems. The behavior
of certain gun owners causes problems.

On 2/28/2015 10:51 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 22:39:10 -0500, Justan Olphart
wrote:

I don't have to sell one to buy a new one, either. I have no need for
two .357 MAG pistols, and I wanted to play with a S&W for a while, so I
sold the Ruger for a little less than I paid for it.

What's your "need" for one 357 mag pistol?

===

His enemies list is longer than Richard Nixon's. :-)

I honestly believe that Harry is in a state of physical and mental
decline.

It doesn't take a brain surgeon to see that. ;-)

--

Respectfully submitted by Justan

Laugh of the day from Krause

"I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here.
I've been "born again" as a nice guy."

On Saturday, February 28, 2015 at 10:51:45 PM UTC-5, Wayne. B wrote:

I honestly believe that Harry is in a state of physical and mental
decline.

Exactly. His " desperate " constant postings on here tells me he is severely short of attention.
Why...do you dumb****s keep replying to " it " ?

On 2/28/15 11:26 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 21:00:24 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/28/15 8:02 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 17:06:33 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/28/15 4:47 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 13:23:18 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/28/15 12:44 PM, wrote:

Maryland is infringing on my 2nd Amendment rights? How?

Limiting what you can buy and the hoops you have to jump through to
buy what you can.

How is some legislator in Idaho making a symbolic gesture that
reflects the beliefs of his residents, "congress" making a law?

I look at things like this to be about as significant as making the
bald eagle the american bird. They don't make you buy one and keep it
as a pet.



Maryland's firearm regulations have never limited what firearms *I*
wanted to buy.

That is just you and I bet your wife calls that rationalization. AKA
sour grapes. You managed to fine the one AR platform that slipped
through a loophole in the law and then rationalized that it was what
you wanted all the time. Will you turn it in when someone points out
the error and they close that loophole?
BTW I stumbled into federal legislation that tries to do that the
other day when I was researching the DHS funding vote.


Actually, I asked around and was advised that an HBAR AR would do the
trick and there were side bennies to the HBAR, including greater
accuracy than the pencil or grenade launcher AR barrels. I think the
sour grapes are on your end. But what's it to you...you haven't bought a
firearm in this century.

I haven't felt the need. I have all the guns I want. I have a far more
wide ranging selection than you since I don't have to sell one to
afford a new one.
BTW I didn't say I didn't buy any recently, just not a new one.


I don't have to sell one to buy a new one, either. I have no need for
two .357 MAG pistols, and I wanted to play with a S&W for a while, so I
sold the Ruger for a little less than I paid for it.

I have two .38s and a 357. So what? Granted one of the .38s is a true
antique that I don't shoot.



So far, I haven't noticed any qualitative differences between the Ruger
GP 100 and the S&W 686. They're both nicely finished, smoothly operating
revolvers. I haven't shot the Smith yet, but I have dry fired it a few
times. The D/A trigger pull seems heavier than on the Ruger.

--
Proud to be a Liberal.

On 3/1/2015 7:56 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 2/28/15 11:26 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 21:00:24 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/28/15 8:02 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 17:06:33 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/28/15 4:47 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 13:23:18 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/28/15 12:44 PM, wrote:

Maryland is infringing on my 2nd Amendment rights? How?

Limiting what you can buy and the hoops you have to jump through to
buy what you can.

How is some legislator in Idaho making a symbolic gesture that
reflects the beliefs of his residents, "congress" making a law?

I look at things like this to be about as significant as making the
bald eagle the american bird. They don't make you buy one and
keep it
as a pet.



Maryland's firearm regulations have never limited what firearms *I*
wanted to buy.

That is just you and I bet your wife calls that rationalization. AKA
sour grapes. You managed to fine the one AR platform that slipped
through a loophole in the law and then rationalized that it was what
you wanted all the time. Will you turn it in when someone points out
the error and they close that loophole?
BTW I stumbled into federal legislation that tries to do that the
other day when I was researching the DHS funding vote.


Actually, I asked around and was advised that an HBAR AR would do the
trick and there were side bennies to the HBAR, including greater
accuracy than the pencil or grenade launcher AR barrels. I think the
sour grapes are on your end. But what's it to you...you haven't
bought a
firearm in this century.

I haven't felt the need. I have all the guns I want. I have a far more
wide ranging selection than you since I don't have to sell one to
afford a new one.
BTW I didn't say I didn't buy any recently, just not a new one.


I don't have to sell one to buy a new one, either. I have no need for
two .357 MAG pistols, and I wanted to play with a S&W for a while, so I
sold the Ruger for a little less than I paid for it.

I have two .38s and a 357. So what? Granted one of the .38s is a true
antique that I don't shoot.



So far, I haven't noticed any qualitative differences between the Ruger
GP 100 and the S&W 686. They're both nicely finished, smoothly operating
revolvers. I haven't shot the Smith yet, but I have dry fired it a few
times. The D/A trigger pull seems heavier than on the Ruger.

So what. You want a 2lb DA pull?

--

Respectfully submitted by Justan

Laugh of the day from Krause

"I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here.
I've been "born again" as a nice guy."

On 3/1/15 10:52 AM, wrote:
On Sun, 01 Mar 2015 07:56:43 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:



So far, I haven't noticed any qualitative differences between the Ruger
GP 100 and the S&W 686. They're both nicely finished, smoothly operating
revolvers. I haven't shot the Smith yet, but I have dry fired it a few
times. The D/A trigger pull seems heavier than on the Ruger.

My old Trooper is not as nice as the OM match but the speculation was
that the OM probably had some trigger work and maybe even a different
main spring. In SA it has a very crisp trigger. It has a very light
hammer strike in DA tho and I have had a few failures to fire. (that
seem to be primer brand dependent)



I don't have a trigger gauge/scale, so I'm just guessing based on feel
with the Smith. The SA seems fine, I'm guessing maybe three to three and
a half pounds, which is good enough for a revolver. I think the DA will
feel better after a few hundred rounds. If I still think it is too high,
I can have it worked on and also replace the springs.

One difference for sure between the Ruger and the Smith...the Ruger has
a solid, one piece frame and the trigger assembly drops out the bottom.
The Smith has a side plate that is held on with screws. I don't know
that one is better than the other, but I am sure Smith knows how to
build revolvers that stand up to magnum loads.

--
Proud to be a Liberal.