Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() And it is a Federal Requirement to placard the dispensing pump. It is illegal to burn E15 in boats! http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/ethanol.shtml Twenty years from now you will be more disppointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So, throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover. - Mark Twain 1987 23' Grady-White Gulfstream 2005 20' Angler CC 2004 17' G3 CC 1756 Out of Shallotte, NC |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 20:51:17 -0500, Gene Kearns wrote: And it is a Federal Requirement to placard the dispensing pump. It is illegal to burn E15 in boats! http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/ethanol.shtml Ethanol is the biggest scam since the chlorophyll craze in the 50s. The corn farmers want corn in everything and they figured out how to get it in your car. A real ecologist would point out it is worse than gasoline on several counts, not to mention the depletion of the Ogalalla aquifer. When that water is gone, we will forget there was ever an oil "crisis". If alcohol was such a good thing, we would drop tariffs on imported cane sugar and it's products. And the poor could afford to eat corn products. Been riots in Mexico over the cost of corn tortillas. Due to the oil required to grow corn and refine it, there is less than a 5% energy gain. 9 times as much alcohol from equal acreage of sugar cane to corn. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/27/2015 7:52 AM, Gene Kearns wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:19:02 -0500, wrote: I would agree (aside from corn farmers) there is nothing good about ethanol. One of my biggest concerns is labeling. In NC, the General Assembly, unable to ban labeling, defunded enforcement. So, I wonder if consumers will actually know what they are pouring into their tank.... unless the Feds are doing the enforcement. On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 20:51:17 -0500, Gene Kearns wrote: And it is a Federal Requirement to placard the dispensing pump. It is illegal to burn E15 in boats! http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/ethanol.shtml Ethanol is the biggest scam since the chlorophyll craze in the 50s. The corn farmers want corn in everything and they figured out how to get it in your car. A real ecologist would point out it is worse than gasoline on several counts, not to mention the depletion of the Ogalalla aquifer. When that water is gone, we will forget there was ever an oil "crisis". Twenty years from now you will be more disppointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So, throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover. - Mark Twain 1987 23' Grady-White Gulfstream 2005 20' Angler CC 2004 17' G3 CC 1756 Out of Shallotte, NC Gene, what would replace the oxygenator in gasoline? That was the original purpose of ethanol ... as a replacement for MBTE which was banned. Maybe you are of the school that engines today do not need an oxygenator in gasoline? |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 09:19:11 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 1/27/2015 7:52 AM, Gene Kearns wrote: On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:19:02 -0500, wrote: I would agree (aside from corn farmers) there is nothing good about ethanol. One of my biggest concerns is labeling. In NC, the General Assembly, unable to ban labeling, defunded enforcement. So, I wonder if consumers will actually know what they are pouring into their tank.... unless the Feds are doing the enforcement. On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 20:51:17 -0500, Gene Kearns wrote: And it is a Federal Requirement to placard the dispensing pump. It is illegal to burn E15 in boats! http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/ethanol.shtml Ethanol is the biggest scam since the chlorophyll craze in the 50s. The corn farmers want corn in everything and they figured out how to get it in your car. A real ecologist would point out it is worse than gasoline on several counts, not to mention the depletion of the Ogalalla aquifer. When that water is gone, we will forget there was ever an oil "crisis". Twenty years from now you will be more disppointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So, throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover. - Mark Twain 1987 23' Grady-White Gulfstream 2005 20' Angler CC 2004 17' G3 CC 1756 Out of Shallotte, NC Gene, what would replace the oxygenator in gasoline? That was the original purpose of ethanol ... as a replacement for MBTE which was banned. Maybe you are of the school that engines today do not need an oxygenator in gasoline? Aunt Clara says everyone's not as happy with E15 as you appear to be. http://content.usatoday.com/communit...1#.VMetMCwfq70 -- Guns don't cause problems. The behavior of certain gun owners causes problems. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/27/2015 1:20 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 09:19:11 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 1/27/2015 7:52 AM, Gene Kearns wrote: On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:19:02 -0500, wrote: I would agree (aside from corn farmers) there is nothing good about ethanol. One of my biggest concerns is labeling. In NC, the General Assembly, unable to ban labeling, defunded enforcement. So, I wonder if consumers will actually know what they are pouring into their tank.... unless the Feds are doing the enforcement. On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 20:51:17 -0500, Gene Kearns wrote: And it is a Federal Requirement to placard the dispensing pump. It is illegal to burn E15 in boats! http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/ethanol.shtml Ethanol is the biggest scam since the chlorophyll craze in the 50s. The corn farmers want corn in everything and they figured out how to get it in your car. A real ecologist would point out it is worse than gasoline on several counts, not to mention the depletion of the Ogalalla aquifer. When that water is gone, we will forget there was ever an oil "crisis". Twenty years from now you will be more disppointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So, throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover. - Mark Twain 1987 23' Grady-White Gulfstream 2005 20' Angler CC 2004 17' G3 CC 1756 Out of Shallotte, NC Gene, what would replace the oxygenator in gasoline? That was the original purpose of ethanol ... as a replacement for MBTE which was banned. Maybe you are of the school that engines today do not need an oxygenator in gasoline? I am not sure what they use but we are seeing REC-90 (ethanol free) pumps popping up everywhere. I don't think it is worth the extra 50 cents to a buck extra but plenty of people do. A cruel joke would be to find out they swapped ethanol for methanol. That would not change the phase separation problem much. I was reading a couple of hours ago that ethanol was chosen to replace MBTE because it was inexpensive and plentiful. Henry Ford originally wanted to run his cars on it. I am not a proponent of ethanol. I just don't think it's responsible for many of the engine/fuel lines issues that you hear about, although at one time it was. I remember Yellowfin having to recall a number of boats with built-in fiberglass fuel tanks because the ethanol was reacting with the resin in the fiberglass. That was many years ago and the problem was fixed. Products (lawnmowers, chain saws, etc.,) that have been "ethanolized" with compatible rubber fuel lines and whatever don't seem to have any problems with it. As for phase separation and low octane "vodka" on the bottom of the tank, I remain skeptical. I ran the Town Car down almost to empty with the old gas that was in it because I thought I was going to have to drop the tank to replace the fuel sender unit. (Turns out I didn't have to). The car ran just fine with the tank almost empty and with 1-2 year old E-10 gas in it. Maybe it likes vodka. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 1/27/2015 7:52 AM, Gene Kearns wrote: On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:19:02 -0500, wrote: I would agree (aside from corn farmers) there is nothing good about ethanol. One of my biggest concerns is labeling. In NC, the General Assembly, unable to ban labeling, defunded enforcement. So, I wonder if consumers will actually know what they are pouring into their tank.... unless the Feds are doing the enforcement. On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 20:51:17 -0500, Gene Kearns wrote: And it is a Federal Requirement to placard the dispensing pump. It is illegal to burn E15 in boats! http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/ethanol.shtml Ethanol is the biggest scam since the chlorophyll craze in the 50s. The corn farmers want corn in everything and they figured out how to get it in your car. A real ecologist would point out it is worse than gasoline on several counts, not to mention the depletion of the Ogalalla aquifer. When that water is gone, we will forget there was ever an oil "crisis". Twenty years from now you will be more disppointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So, throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover. - Mark Twain 1987 23' Grady-White Gulfstream 2005 20' Angler CC 2004 17' G3 CC 1756 Out of Shallotte, NC Gene, what would replace the oxygenator in gasoline? That was the original purpose of ethanol ... as a replacement for MBTE which was banned. Maybe you are of the school that engines today do not need an oxygenator in gasoline? Other than ARCO who was a producer of MTBE the refineries said they could meet requirements via refining. That is the stated reason for adding alcohol. Really it is a payoff to ADM. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:18:26 -0600, Califbill wrote: wrote: On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 20:51:17 -0500, Gene Kearns wrote: And it is a Federal Requirement to placard the dispensing pump. It is illegal to burn E15 in boats! http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/ethanol.shtml Ethanol is the biggest scam since the chlorophyll craze in the 50s. The corn farmers want corn in everything and they figured out how to get it in your car. A real ecologist would point out it is worse than gasoline on several counts, not to mention the depletion of the Ogalalla aquifer. When that water is gone, we will forget there was ever an oil "crisis". If alcohol was such a good thing, we would drop tariffs on imported cane sugar and it's products. And the poor could afford to eat corn products. Been riots in Mexico over the cost of corn tortillas. Due to the oil required to grow corn and refine it, there is less than a 5% energy gain. 9 times as much alcohol from equal acreage of sugar cane to corn. The problem with that is sugar cane carries it's own ecological damage. You only have to look at what it is doing to the Everglades. But a cane plantation is probably as environment rntally friendly as a corn farm. |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 09:19:11 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: “With all due deference for the dream chemists, armchair farmers and platform orators who have touted alcohol-gasoline as the greatest of all fuels, oil industry technologists know and automotive engineers know that it is not as satisfactory a fuel as straight gasoline of normal quality.” Conger Reynolds (1939) Obviously, this is not a new issue. gasohol sucks as fuel for 2-cycle engines and any of the other millions of engines out there not specifically made to burn E15 or greater. It is hard to brag about any fuel that immediately voids the manufacturer's warranty. If you look at the history of gasoline, alcohol was abandoned in favor of tetraethyl lead, then abandoned in favor of MTBE..... and finally forced on the American engine owner by Federal Mandate (to appease the American corn farmer). Alcohol sucked at the turn of the century and it still does. Not related to this discussion, but additionally, it should be noted that alcohol is, from an environmental standpoint, a nightmare. On 1/27/2015 7:52 AM, Gene Kearns wrote: On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:19:02 -0500, wrote: I would agree (aside from corn farmers) there is nothing good about ethanol. One of my biggest concerns is labeling. In NC, the General Assembly, unable to ban labeling, defunded enforcement. So, I wonder if consumers will actually know what they are pouring into their tank.... unless the Feds are doing the enforcement. On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 20:51:17 -0500, Gene Kearns wrote: And it is a Federal Requirement to placard the dispensing pump. It is illegal to burn E15 in boats! http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/ethanol.shtml Ethanol is the biggest scam since the chlorophyll craze in the 50s. The corn farmers want corn in everything and they figured out how to get it in your car. A real ecologist would point out it is worse than gasoline on several counts, not to mention the depletion of the Ogalalla aquifer. When that water is gone, we will forget there was ever an oil "crisis". Twenty years from now you will be more disppointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So, throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover. - Mark Twain 1987 23' Grady-White Gulfstream 2005 20' Angler CC 2004 17' G3 CC 1756 Out of Shallotte, NC Gene, what would replace the oxygenator in gasoline? That was the original purpose of ethanol ... as a replacement for MBTE which was banned. Maybe you are of the school that engines today do not need an oxygenator in gasoline? Twenty years from now you will be more disppointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So, throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover. - Mark Twain 1987 23' Grady-White Gulfstream 2005 20' Angler CC 2004 17' G3 CC 1756 Out of Shallotte, NC |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/27/2015 3:35 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:55:14 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 1/27/2015 1:20 PM, wrote: On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 09:19:11 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 1/27/2015 7:52 AM, Gene Kearns wrote: On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:19:02 -0500, wrote: I would agree (aside from corn farmers) there is nothing good about ethanol. One of my biggest concerns is labeling. In NC, the General Assembly, unable to ban labeling, defunded enforcement. So, I wonder if consumers will actually know what they are pouring into their tank.... unless the Feds are doing the enforcement. On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 20:51:17 -0500, Gene Kearns wrote: And it is a Federal Requirement to placard the dispensing pump. It is illegal to burn E15 in boats! http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/ethanol.shtml Ethanol is the biggest scam since the chlorophyll craze in the 50s. The corn farmers want corn in everything and they figured out how to get it in your car. A real ecologist would point out it is worse than gasoline on several counts, not to mention the depletion of the Ogalalla aquifer. When that water is gone, we will forget there was ever an oil "crisis". Twenty years from now you will be more disppointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So, throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover. - Mark Twain 1987 23' Grady-White Gulfstream 2005 20' Angler CC 2004 17' G3 CC 1756 Out of Shallotte, NC Gene, what would replace the oxygenator in gasoline? That was the original purpose of ethanol ... as a replacement for MBTE which was banned. Maybe you are of the school that engines today do not need an oxygenator in gasoline? I am not sure what they use but we are seeing REC-90 (ethanol free) pumps popping up everywhere. I don't think it is worth the extra 50 cents to a buck extra but plenty of people do. A cruel joke would be to find out they swapped ethanol for methanol. That would not change the phase separation problem much. I was reading a couple of hours ago that ethanol was chosen to replace MBTE because it was inexpensive and plentiful. Henry Ford originally wanted to run his cars on it. I am not a proponent of ethanol. I just don't think it's responsible for many of the engine/fuel lines issues that you hear about, although at one time it was. I remember Yellowfin having to recall a number of boats with built-in fiberglass fuel tanks because the ethanol was reacting with the resin in the fiberglass. That was many years ago and the problem was fixed. Products (lawnmowers, chain saws, etc.,) that have been "ethanolized" with compatible rubber fuel lines and whatever don't seem to have any problems with it. As for phase separation and low octane "vodka" on the bottom of the tank, I remain skeptical. I ran the Town Car down almost to empty with the old gas that was in it because I thought I was going to have to drop the tank to replace the fuel sender unit. (Turns out I didn't have to). The car ran just fine with the tank almost empty and with 1-2 year old E-10 gas in it. Maybe it likes vodka. There is plenty of information about it on the web. They will tell you the Lincoln survived because new gas tanks are pretty much sealed. There is very little exchange of air with the atmosphere so you do not get the moisture in the gas. Honestly, I am not that afraid of it either but I don't store gas. It has a pretty short shelf life here and I am storing full cans. I try not to keep the mixed gas for my 2 stroke stuff very long. I mix it in small batches and dump the rest in my truck when I think I am done. You just made me realize something about the Honda generator. It's tank is also sealed similar to the old outboard motor gas tanks. There's a vent on the gas cap that you have to open otherwise it will run for a while and then die due to lack of gas. Maybe that contributes to why it could sit with old gas for so long and still start and run fine. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Putting 'em on the spot... | General | |||
Putting a good face on IT | General | |||
Considering putting in tile. | Boat Building | |||
Putting ballast to work | Cruising |