Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() And it is a Federal Requirement to placard the dispensing pump. It is illegal to burn E15 in boats! http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/ethanol.shtml Twenty years from now you will be more disppointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So, throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover. - Mark Twain 1987 23' Grady-White Gulfstream 2005 20' Angler CC 2004 17' G3 CC 1756 Out of Shallotte, NC |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 20:51:17 -0500, Gene Kearns wrote: And it is a Federal Requirement to placard the dispensing pump. It is illegal to burn E15 in boats! http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/ethanol.shtml Ethanol is the biggest scam since the chlorophyll craze in the 50s. The corn farmers want corn in everything and they figured out how to get it in your car. A real ecologist would point out it is worse than gasoline on several counts, not to mention the depletion of the Ogalalla aquifer. When that water is gone, we will forget there was ever an oil "crisis". If alcohol was such a good thing, we would drop tariffs on imported cane sugar and it's products. And the poor could afford to eat corn products. Been riots in Mexico over the cost of corn tortillas. Due to the oil required to grow corn and refine it, there is less than a 5% energy gain. 9 times as much alcohol from equal acreage of sugar cane to corn. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:18:26 -0600, Califbill wrote: wrote: On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 20:51:17 -0500, Gene Kearns wrote: And it is a Federal Requirement to placard the dispensing pump. It is illegal to burn E15 in boats! http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/ethanol.shtml Ethanol is the biggest scam since the chlorophyll craze in the 50s. The corn farmers want corn in everything and they figured out how to get it in your car. A real ecologist would point out it is worse than gasoline on several counts, not to mention the depletion of the Ogalalla aquifer. When that water is gone, we will forget there was ever an oil "crisis". If alcohol was such a good thing, we would drop tariffs on imported cane sugar and it's products. And the poor could afford to eat corn products. Been riots in Mexico over the cost of corn tortillas. Due to the oil required to grow corn and refine it, there is less than a 5% energy gain. 9 times as much alcohol from equal acreage of sugar cane to corn. The problem with that is sugar cane carries it's own ecological damage. You only have to look at what it is doing to the Everglades. But a cane plantation is probably as environment rntally friendly as a corn farm. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:30:23 -0600, Califbill wrote: wrote: On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:18:26 -0600, Califbill wrote: wrote: On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 20:51:17 -0500, Gene Kearns wrote: And it is a Federal Requirement to placard the dispensing pump. It is illegal to burn E15 in boats! http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/ethanol.shtml Ethanol is the biggest scam since the chlorophyll craze in the 50s. The corn farmers want corn in everything and they figured out how to get it in your car. A real ecologist would point out it is worse than gasoline on several counts, not to mention the depletion of the Ogalalla aquifer. When that water is gone, we will forget there was ever an oil "crisis". If alcohol was such a good thing, we would drop tariffs on imported cane sugar and it's products. And the poor could afford to eat corn products. Been riots in Mexico over the cost of corn tortillas. Due to the oil required to grow corn and refine it, there is less than a 5% energy gain. 9 times as much alcohol from equal acreage of sugar cane to corn. The problem with that is sugar cane carries it's own ecological damage. You only have to look at what it is doing to the Everglades. But a cane plantation is probably as environment rntally friendly as a corn farm. You must not know much about sugar. To start with they burn the field before harvest and then they flood the field afterwards and that "runnoft" (movie reference) is what causes a lot of that pollution. (Look at "back pumping" in Lake Okeechobee) They also use at least as much if not more fertilizer, Most of these sugar plantations are on reclaimed wet lands, including in the US. According to the people I talked to Australia last year, who are in the cane area. No burning. And why flood afterwards? No ash to get rid of. Hawaii actually dug a ditch and tunnels to bring eater to the cane fields way back when. You can now do a ditch kayak trip on the Big Island. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 19:24:43 -0600, Califbill wrote: wrote: On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:30:23 -0600, Califbill wrote: wrote: On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:18:26 -0600, Califbill wrote: wrote: On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 20:51:17 -0500, Gene Kearns wrote: And it is a Federal Requirement to placard the dispensing pump. It is illegal to burn E15 in boats! http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/ethanol.shtml Ethanol is the biggest scam since the chlorophyll craze in the 50s. The corn farmers want corn in everything and they figured out how to get it in your car. A real ecologist would point out it is worse than gasoline on several counts, not to mention the depletion of the Ogalalla aquifer. When that water is gone, we will forget there was ever an oil "crisis". If alcohol was such a good thing, we would drop tariffs on imported cane sugar and it's products. And the poor could afford to eat corn products. Been riots in Mexico over the cost of corn tortillas. Due to the oil required to grow corn and refine it, there is less than a 5% energy gain. 9 times as much alcohol from equal acreage of sugar cane to corn. The problem with that is sugar cane carries it's own ecological damage. You only have to look at what it is doing to the Everglades. But a cane plantation is probably as environment rntally friendly as a corn farm. You must not know much about sugar. To start with they burn the field before harvest and then they flood the field afterwards and that "runnoft" (movie reference) is what causes a lot of that pollution. (Look at "back pumping" in Lake Okeechobee) They also use at least as much if not more fertilizer, Most of these sugar plantations are on reclaimed wet lands, including in the US. According to the people I talked to Australia last year, who are in the cane area. No burning. And why flood afterwards? No ash to get rid of. Hawaii actually dug a ditch and tunnels to bring eater to the cane fields way back when. You can now do a ditch kayak trip on the Big Island. According to the industry The benefits of burning sugarcane a An overall lower cost of production that benefits farmers and consumers Allows more efficient harvesting of sugarcane in the field Reduces the number of hauling units on the highways delivering sugarcane to the factory for processing, thus reducing wear and tear on public roads Decreases the volume of material to be processed by the factories Shortens the harvest season by as much as 10 percent Increases the yield of sugar recovered per ton of sugarcane by the factories and improves overall quality of the sugar produced Reduces wear and tear on field and factory equipment Reduces energy expenditures in the field and by the factory It is the common practice in Florida, Louisiana and Maui along with the fields in the Caribbean and South America. If the wind is right, we can smell them burning in Clewiston. Those ditches are what I am talking about. They keep the field marshy and then they back pump them or let gravity drain it if the land is high, before they harvest The Kohalo ditch was to deliver water from I think 20 miles away. I remember the burning when I was stationed in Biloxi, but the Australians said they do not burn. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/27/2015 7:52 AM, Gene Kearns wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:19:02 -0500, wrote: I would agree (aside from corn farmers) there is nothing good about ethanol. One of my biggest concerns is labeling. In NC, the General Assembly, unable to ban labeling, defunded enforcement. So, I wonder if consumers will actually know what they are pouring into their tank.... unless the Feds are doing the enforcement. On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 20:51:17 -0500, Gene Kearns wrote: And it is a Federal Requirement to placard the dispensing pump. It is illegal to burn E15 in boats! http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/ethanol.shtml Ethanol is the biggest scam since the chlorophyll craze in the 50s. The corn farmers want corn in everything and they figured out how to get it in your car. A real ecologist would point out it is worse than gasoline on several counts, not to mention the depletion of the Ogalalla aquifer. When that water is gone, we will forget there was ever an oil "crisis". Twenty years from now you will be more disppointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So, throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover. - Mark Twain 1987 23' Grady-White Gulfstream 2005 20' Angler CC 2004 17' G3 CC 1756 Out of Shallotte, NC Gene, what would replace the oxygenator in gasoline? That was the original purpose of ethanol ... as a replacement for MBTE which was banned. Maybe you are of the school that engines today do not need an oxygenator in gasoline? |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 09:19:11 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 1/27/2015 7:52 AM, Gene Kearns wrote: On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:19:02 -0500, wrote: I would agree (aside from corn farmers) there is nothing good about ethanol. One of my biggest concerns is labeling. In NC, the General Assembly, unable to ban labeling, defunded enforcement. So, I wonder if consumers will actually know what they are pouring into their tank.... unless the Feds are doing the enforcement. On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 20:51:17 -0500, Gene Kearns wrote: And it is a Federal Requirement to placard the dispensing pump. It is illegal to burn E15 in boats! http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/ethanol.shtml Ethanol is the biggest scam since the chlorophyll craze in the 50s. The corn farmers want corn in everything and they figured out how to get it in your car. A real ecologist would point out it is worse than gasoline on several counts, not to mention the depletion of the Ogalalla aquifer. When that water is gone, we will forget there was ever an oil "crisis". Twenty years from now you will be more disppointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So, throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover. - Mark Twain 1987 23' Grady-White Gulfstream 2005 20' Angler CC 2004 17' G3 CC 1756 Out of Shallotte, NC Gene, what would replace the oxygenator in gasoline? That was the original purpose of ethanol ... as a replacement for MBTE which was banned. Maybe you are of the school that engines today do not need an oxygenator in gasoline? Aunt Clara says everyone's not as happy with E15 as you appear to be. http://content.usatoday.com/communit...1#.VMetMCwfq70 -- Guns don't cause problems. The behavior of certain gun owners causes problems. |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 1/27/2015 7:52 AM, Gene Kearns wrote: On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:19:02 -0500, wrote: I would agree (aside from corn farmers) there is nothing good about ethanol. One of my biggest concerns is labeling. In NC, the General Assembly, unable to ban labeling, defunded enforcement. So, I wonder if consumers will actually know what they are pouring into their tank.... unless the Feds are doing the enforcement. On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 20:51:17 -0500, Gene Kearns wrote: And it is a Federal Requirement to placard the dispensing pump. It is illegal to burn E15 in boats! http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/ethanol.shtml Ethanol is the biggest scam since the chlorophyll craze in the 50s. The corn farmers want corn in everything and they figured out how to get it in your car. A real ecologist would point out it is worse than gasoline on several counts, not to mention the depletion of the Ogalalla aquifer. When that water is gone, we will forget there was ever an oil "crisis". Twenty years from now you will be more disppointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So, throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover. - Mark Twain 1987 23' Grady-White Gulfstream 2005 20' Angler CC 2004 17' G3 CC 1756 Out of Shallotte, NC Gene, what would replace the oxygenator in gasoline? That was the original purpose of ethanol ... as a replacement for MBTE which was banned. Maybe you are of the school that engines today do not need an oxygenator in gasoline? Other than ARCO who was a producer of MTBE the refineries said they could meet requirements via refining. That is the stated reason for adding alcohol. Really it is a payoff to ADM. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Putting 'em on the spot... | General | |||
Putting a good face on IT | General | |||
Considering putting in tile. | Boat Building | |||
Putting ballast to work | Cruising |