Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2015
Posts: 824
Default Very nice P51 RC aircraft

On 1/22/2015 7:15 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/22/15 6:44 PM, wrote:
On Thursday, January 22, 2015 at 6:05:08 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/22/15 5:56 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On 22 Jan 2015 22:18:45 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

Frankly, John, I find your touting of firearms actually used in
wars and
toys depicting actual military airplanes divisive and offensive. ?

===

How does that jibe with your ownership and glowing descriptions of an
AR-15?

Your new found sensitivity is touching BTW.


I don't own an M16.


"The AR-15 was designed to fit this exploration into a smaller caliber
around 1958, which led to the development of the 5.56x45, commercially
known as the .223Rem. ArmaLite sold the rights of the two designs to
Colt in 1959. The USAF and US Army began seriously looking at the
AR-15. The USAF adopted it shortly thereafter and it was made the
primary infantry weapon for all of the branches of the US military a
few years later in 1967, despite resistance by some in the higher
ranks of the Army and USMC. Dubbed, the "M16" (US Military
designation), it replaced the M14 and M1 Carbine."

Your distinction is quite a bit more than dubious.



The M16s the military issues can be fired on full automatic. My civilian
AR-15 was built in 2014 and cannot be fired on full automatic.
It is not the rifle the military issues. There are other differences. I
don't own a military rifle.

How would you describe yours? A clone, copy, lookalike, facsimile,
knockoff, Kit bashed piece of ****e? The latter is probably most
apropos, dontcha think? Aren't you a little old to be playing Rambo?


--

Respectfully submitted by Justan

Laugh of the day from Krause

"I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here.
I've been "born again" as a nice guy."


  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2014
Posts: 2,337
Default Very nice P51 RC aircraft

On Thu, 22 Jan 2015 20:04:32 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote:

On 1/22/2015 7:15 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/22/15 6:44 PM, wrote:
On Thursday, January 22, 2015 at 6:05:08 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/22/15 5:56 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On 22 Jan 2015 22:18:45 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

Frankly, John, I find your touting of firearms actually used in
wars and
toys depicting actual military airplanes divisive and offensive. ?

===

How does that jibe with your ownership and glowing descriptions of an
AR-15?

Your new found sensitivity is touching BTW.


I don't own an M16.

"The AR-15 was designed to fit this exploration into a smaller caliber
around 1958, which led to the development of the 5.56x45, commercially
known as the .223Rem. ArmaLite sold the rights of the two designs to
Colt in 1959. The USAF and US Army began seriously looking at the
AR-15. The USAF adopted it shortly thereafter and it was made the
primary infantry weapon for all of the branches of the US military a
few years later in 1967, despite resistance by some in the higher
ranks of the Army and USMC. Dubbed, the "M16" (US Military
designation), it replaced the M14 and M1 Carbine."

Your distinction is quite a bit more than dubious.



The M16s the military issues can be fired on full automatic. My civilian
AR-15 was built in 2014 and cannot be fired on full automatic.
It is not the rifle the military issues. There are other differences. I
don't own a military rifle.

How would you describe yours? A clone, copy, lookalike, facsimile,
knockoff, Kit bashed piece of ****e? The latter is probably most
apropos, dontcha think? Aren't you a little old to be playing Rambo?


'Playing' is the key word.
--

Guns don't cause problems. The behavior
of certain gun owners causes problems.
  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,186
Default Very nice P51 RC aircraft

On 1/23/15 8:00 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015 20:04:32 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote:

On 1/22/2015 7:15 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/22/15 6:44 PM, wrote:
On Thursday, January 22, 2015 at 6:05:08 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/22/15 5:56 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On 22 Jan 2015 22:18:45 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

Frankly, John, I find your touting of firearms actually used in
wars and
toys depicting actual military airplanes divisive and offensive. ?

===

How does that jibe with your ownership and glowing descriptions of an
AR-15?

Your new found sensitivity is touching BTW.


I don't own an M16.

"The AR-15 was designed to fit this exploration into a smaller caliber
around 1958, which led to the development of the 5.56x45, commercially
known as the .223Rem. ArmaLite sold the rights of the two designs to
Colt in 1959. The USAF and US Army began seriously looking at the
AR-15. The USAF adopted it shortly thereafter and it was made the
primary infantry weapon for all of the branches of the US military a
few years later in 1967, despite resistance by some in the higher
ranks of the Army and USMC. Dubbed, the "M16" (US Military
designation), it replaced the M14 and M1 Carbine."

Your distinction is quite a bit more than dubious.



The M16s the military issues can be fired on full automatic. My civilian
AR-15 was built in 2014 and cannot be fired on full automatic.
It is not the rifle the military issues. There are other differences. I
don't own a military rifle.

How would you describe yours? A clone, copy, lookalike, facsimile,
knockoff, Kit bashed piece of ****e? The latter is probably most
apropos, dontcha think? Aren't you a little old to be playing Rambo?


'Playing' is the key word.


Sly and I are almost the same age, and both of us are younger than you,
Johnny, and neither of us are interested in playing "Russian soldier."

--
Proud to be a Liberal.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hank - RC Aircraft and Boats Poco Loco General 57 March 6th 14 06:09 AM
It's really a boat, not an aircraft Eddie General 5 March 8th 11 12:54 AM
More aircraft terror [email protected] General 1 December 11th 05 02:56 PM
Greater lift for aircraft Bertie the Bunyip ASA 15 October 7th 03 12:34 AM
Questions on 9/11 aircraft. Bertie the Bunyip ASA 9 September 28th 03 02:06 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017