https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...-ts=1421828030
--

Guns don't cause problems. The behavior
of certain gun owners causes problems.

Poquito Loco wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...-ts=1421828030

Frankly, John, I find your touting of firearms actually used in wars and
toys depicting actual military airplanes divisive and offensive. 😱
--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

On 22 Jan 2015 22:18:45 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

Poquito Loco wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...-ts=1421828030

Frankly, John, I find your touting of firearms actually used in wars and
toys depicting actual military airplanes divisive and offensive. ?

Practice what Richard says.
--

Guns don't cause problems. The behavior
of certain gun owners causes problems.

Poquito Loco wrote:
On 22 Jan 2015 22:18:45 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

Poquito Loco wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...-ts=1421828030

Frankly, John, I find your touting of firearms actually used in wars and
toys depicting actual military airplanes divisive and offensive. ?

Practice what Richard says.

You sure seem to enjoy telling others what to do. Does anyone pay you the
attention you think you deserve and so obviously want?

Besides once you have seen a real P51 fly, a toy is just...a toy.
--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

On 22 Jan 2015 22:30:55 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

Poquito Loco wrote:
On 22 Jan 2015 22:18:45 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

Poquito Loco wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...-ts=1421828030

Frankly, John, I find your touting of firearms actually used in wars and
toys depicting actual military airplanes divisive and offensive. ?

Practice what Richard says.

You sure seem to enjoy telling others what to do. Does anyone pay you the
attention you think you deserve and so obviously want?

Besides once you have seen a real P51 fly, a toy is just...a toy.

You could practice what Richard says.

--

Guns don't cause problems. The behavior
of certain gun owners causes problems.

On 1/22/15 6:05 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On 22 Jan 2015 22:30:55 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

Poquito Loco wrote:
On 22 Jan 2015 22:18:45 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

Poquito Loco wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...-ts=1421828030

Frankly, John, I find your touting of firearms actually used in wars and
toys depicting actual military airplanes divisive and offensive. ?

Practice what Richard says.

You sure seem to enjoy telling others what to do. Does anyone pay you the
attention you think you deserve and so obviously want?

Besides once you have seen a real P51 fly, a toy is just...a toy.

You could practice what Richard says.


That's better.

--
Proud to be a Liberal.

On 22 Jan 2015 22:18:45 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

Frankly, John, I find your touting of firearms actually used in wars and
toys depicting actual military airplanes divisive and offensive. ?

===

How does that jibe with your ownership and glowing descriptions of an
AR-15?

Your new found sensitivity is touching BTW.

On 1/22/15 5:56 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On 22 Jan 2015 22:18:45 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

Frankly, John, I find your touting of firearms actually used in wars and
toys depicting actual military airplanes divisive and offensive. ?

===

How does that jibe with your ownership and glowing descriptions of an
AR-15?

Your new found sensitivity is touching BTW.


I don't own an M16.

Indeed, sensitivity is nice. Try it sometime.

--
Proud to be a Liberal.

On Thursday, January 22, 2015 at 6:05:08 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/22/15 5:56 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On 22 Jan 2015 22:18:45 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

Frankly, John, I find your touting of firearms actually used in wars and
toys depicting actual military airplanes divisive and offensive. ?

===

How does that jibe with your ownership and glowing descriptions of an
AR-15?

Your new found sensitivity is touching BTW.


I don't own an M16.

"The AR-15 was designed to fit this exploration into a smaller caliber around 1958, which led to the development of the 5.56x45, commercially known as the .223Rem. ArmaLite sold the rights of the two designs to Colt in 1959. The USAF and US Army began seriously looking at the AR-15. The USAF adopted it shortly thereafter and it was made the primary infantry weapon for all of the branches of the US military a few years later in 1967, despite resistance by some in the higher ranks of the Army and USMC. Dubbed, the "M16" (US Military designation), it replaced the M14 and M1 Carbine."

Your distinction is quite a bit more than dubious.

On 1/22/15 6:44 PM, wrote:
On Thursday, January 22, 2015 at 6:05:08 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/22/15 5:56 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On 22 Jan 2015 22:18:45 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

Frankly, John, I find your touting of firearms actually used in wars and
toys depicting actual military airplanes divisive and offensive. ?

===

How does that jibe with your ownership and glowing descriptions of an
AR-15?

Your new found sensitivity is touching BTW.


I don't own an M16.

"The AR-15 was designed to fit this exploration into a smaller caliber around 1958, which led to the development of the 5.56x45, commercially known as the .223Rem. ArmaLite sold the rights of the two designs to Colt in 1959. The USAF and US Army began seriously looking at the AR-15. The USAF adopted it shortly thereafter and it was made the primary infantry weapon for all of the branches of the US military a few years later in 1967, despite resistance by some in the higher ranks of the Army and USMC. Dubbed, the "M16" (US Military designation), it replaced the M14 and M1 Carbine."

Your distinction is quite a bit more than dubious.



The M16s the military issues can be fired on full automatic. My civilian
AR-15 was built in 2014 and cannot be fired on full automatic.
It is not the rifle the military issues. There are other differences. I
don't own a military rifle.

--
Proud to be a Liberal.