Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2013
Posts: 6,972
Default Scout 42' center console

On 12/23/2014 12:54 PM, Tim wrote:

Richard I'm surprised he didn't have you arrested for taking 'seized property'


I was aware of the fact that everything within his fenced in area had
been seized until the bankruptcy proceedings had been completed but that
could have taken 6 months to a year.

I was so ****ed off I didn't care. I got the boat and never heard
anything about it.



  #13   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,186
Default Scout 42' center console

On 12/23/14 1:35 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 24 Dec 2014 00:16:36 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 12:15:50 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 12/24/14 12:03 AM,
wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 11:05:00 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 12/23/14 10:44 AM, Tim wrote:
Very nice boats. Way pricy but very very nice boats!



Scout has always made some interesting fishing boats, but the idea of a
boat that size and weight with four 300+ gasoline outboards on it can
only make the oil companies smile.

That is why they make the 7 Marine ;-)
Two of them would make this a pretty fast boat.
Three would make it really fast.

Like Tim says, if money is an issue, you would not be buying this.



Well, i think the decision regarding the fuel burn should involved more
than "can I afford the gasoline."


Most of the people who buy boats like this, do not have the time to
actually use them much so I don't see the issue.

I bet they burned far more fuel in their Gulf Stream, just getting to
the boat.


===

Absolutely right. If you want to start limiting conspicuous
consumption of fossil fuels, start with the private jets. Boats are
almost efficient by comparison.

I wonder how much energy we could save by shutting down the internet
in Maryland?



I did not state or imply there should be limitations on consumption of
fossil fuels. I said the decision should involve more than "can I afford
the gasoline." As for what private planes consume, well, that's probably
a good issue for a private plane newsgroup.

Your snarky remark ignored, Wayne.

As always, have nice day.
  #14   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,006
Default Scout 42' center console

On Tuesday, December 23, 2014 10:44:29 AM UTC-5, Tim wrote:

Very nice boats. Way pricy but very very nice boats!


Yep. Tom had his at the same marina where we keep our boat. I kept an eye on it for him.

A friend just bought a new Scout 225 XSF. As you said, very nice boats. He sent me the link because we were talking the other day about how these large center consoles are really getting popular. They are beginning to take the place of the big twin diesel Sport-Fisher. A run out to the gulf stream can be 30-50 miles here in SC, so folks want something that will get them there and back in a hurry.
  #17   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Banned
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,692
Default Scout 42' center console

On Tuesday, December 23, 2014 1:50:25 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/23/14 1:35 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 24 Dec 2014 00:16:36 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 12:15:50 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 12/24/14 12:03 AM,
wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 11:05:00 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 12/23/14 10:44 AM, Tim wrote:
Very nice boats. Way pricy but very very nice boats!



Scout has always made some interesting fishing boats, but the idea of a
boat that size and weight with four 300+ gasoline outboards on it can
only make the oil companies smile.

That is why they make the 7 Marine ;-)
Two of them would make this a pretty fast boat.
Three would make it really fast.

Like Tim says, if money is an issue, you would not be buying this.



Well, i think the decision regarding the fuel burn should involved more
than "can I afford the gasoline."

Most of the people who buy boats like this, do not have the time to
actually use them much so I don't see the issue.

I bet they burned far more fuel in their Gulf Stream, just getting to
the boat.


===

Absolutely right. If you want to start limiting conspicuous
consumption of fossil fuels, start with the private jets. Boats are
almost efficient by comparison.

I wonder how much energy we could save by shutting down the internet
in Maryland?



I did not state or imply there should be limitations on consumption of
fossil fuels. I said the decision should involve more than "can I afford
the gasoline." As for what private planes consume, well, that's probably
a good issue for a private plane newsgroup.

Your snarky remark ignored, Wayne.



....but you still read it ass****.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SW Tom's Next Center Console HK General 10 December 31st 07 01:34 PM
24ft. Center Console tgodiver General 0 July 20th 04 09:27 PM
FS: Center Console Top in NY Bobsprit Marketplace 0 March 14th 04 04:34 AM
FS: 23' Center Console in S.C. Chuck Dreier Marketplace 0 March 3rd 04 01:09 AM
Center Console Tailgunner Boat Building 8 November 21st 03 12:31 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:42 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017