|
The more...
On 11/29/2014 8:06 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/29/2014 7:46 AM, Toasty The Snowless Man wrote: On 11/28/2014 11:15 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/28/2014 11:07 PM, wrote: On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 19:48:08 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: If Brown was aggressively going after Wilson after taking at least a couple of gun shot hits, then I think Wilson acted appropriately. However, I don't just don't know for sure. Too many contradictory accounts by witnesses. The blood evidence on the pavement showed that he turned around and came back at least 25 feet before he went down.. Turned around and came back 25 feet to do what? Wilson was armed. Brown was not. Look, I am not trying to make a case that Wilson was wrong in what he did. I just think the DA predetermined what he felt the GJ outcome should be and influenced it that way. That's what is unusual. Given what happened later, it may have been better to indite on some lesser charge, have a public trial, present all the same evidence and have Wilson found not guilty. And two million dollars later the riots would still come. What happened later had nothing to do with Wilson. It had to do with racist agitators like Sharpton and the punk's felon stepfather. All they saw was black man down white man standing; exactly the way our own rec.boats racist sees it. How many violent protests, demonstrations, burning of buildings, cars and looting occurred when the verdict for George Zimmerman was announced? None. There were some protests but they were all peaceful in nature. Granted, Zimmerman was not a cop but his trial was public for the world to see. His fate was not determined by an anonymous group hidden behind closed doors and with controlled evidence. Zimmerman's case was slightly different. He was not allowed his right to a Grand Jury. He was the underdog who was pursued by highly recognizable racist figureheads. Martin's parents maintained their dignity throughout the trial. The local black community was sophisticated enough to realize that rioting and looting did not serve their purpose to maintain acceptable race relations, despite the taunts from Sharpton and others who make thier living being divisive. |
The more...
On 11/29/2014 8:24 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 21:27:16 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: On 11/28/14 9:07 PM, Poco Loco wrote: On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 19:52:27 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: You don't understand the purpose of a grand jury or what a prosecutor is supposed to do when presenting. It isn't to indict, necessarily, but in this case, the prosecutor seemingly did not want an indictment. "Why spend the taxpayer's money on a losing case? Unless he wanted to placate the bed-wetting libs, like yourself." (42580435) You are delusional if you think I give any consideration to the utterances of you and your right-wing racist buddies here, Johnny. On matters political and racial, you're all just clones of PsychoScotty. Toad, your response speaks for itself. That comment is not up for consideration by his holiness. ;-) |
The more...
On 11/29/2014 8:50 AM, Toasty The Snowless Man wrote:
On 11/29/2014 8:06 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/29/2014 7:46 AM, Toasty The Snowless Man wrote: On 11/28/2014 11:15 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/28/2014 11:07 PM, wrote: On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 19:48:08 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: If Brown was aggressively going after Wilson after taking at least a couple of gun shot hits, then I think Wilson acted appropriately. However, I don't just don't know for sure. Too many contradictory accounts by witnesses. The blood evidence on the pavement showed that he turned around and came back at least 25 feet before he went down.. Turned around and came back 25 feet to do what? Wilson was armed. Brown was not. Look, I am not trying to make a case that Wilson was wrong in what he did. I just think the DA predetermined what he felt the GJ outcome should be and influenced it that way. That's what is unusual. Given what happened later, it may have been better to indite on some lesser charge, have a public trial, present all the same evidence and have Wilson found not guilty. And two million dollars later the riots would still come. What happened later had nothing to do with Wilson. It had to do with racist agitators like Sharpton and the punk's felon stepfather. All they saw was black man down white man standing; exactly the way our own rec.boats racist sees it. How many violent protests, demonstrations, burning of buildings, cars and looting occurred when the verdict for George Zimmerman was announced? None. There were some protests but they were all peaceful in nature. Granted, Zimmerman was not a cop but his trial was public for the world to see. His fate was not determined by an anonymous group hidden behind closed doors and with controlled evidence. Zimmerman's case was slightly different. He was not allowed his right to a Grand Jury. He was the underdog who was pursued by highly recognizable racist figureheads. Martin's parents maintained their dignity throughout the trial. The local black community was sophisticated enough to realize that rioting and looting did not serve their purpose to maintain acceptable race relations, despite the taunts from Sharpton and others who make thier living being divisive. Yada, yada, yada. So how many violent protests, building and car burnings resulted from him having a fair trial? |
The more...
On 11/29/14 9:08 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/29/2014 8:50 AM, Toasty The Snowless Man wrote: On 11/29/2014 8:06 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/29/2014 7:46 AM, Toasty The Snowless Man wrote: On 11/28/2014 11:15 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/28/2014 11:07 PM, wrote: On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 19:48:08 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: If Brown was aggressively going after Wilson after taking at least a couple of gun shot hits, then I think Wilson acted appropriately. However, I don't just don't know for sure. Too many contradictory accounts by witnesses. The blood evidence on the pavement showed that he turned around and came back at least 25 feet before he went down.. Turned around and came back 25 feet to do what? Wilson was armed. Brown was not. Look, I am not trying to make a case that Wilson was wrong in what he did. I just think the DA predetermined what he felt the GJ outcome should be and influenced it that way. That's what is unusual. Given what happened later, it may have been better to indite on some lesser charge, have a public trial, present all the same evidence and have Wilson found not guilty. And two million dollars later the riots would still come. What happened later had nothing to do with Wilson. It had to do with racist agitators like Sharpton and the punk's felon stepfather. All they saw was black man down white man standing; exactly the way our own rec.boats racist sees it. How many violent protests, demonstrations, burning of buildings, cars and looting occurred when the verdict for George Zimmerman was announced? None. There were some protests but they were all peaceful in nature. Granted, Zimmerman was not a cop but his trial was public for the world to see. His fate was not determined by an anonymous group hidden behind closed doors and with controlled evidence. Zimmerman's case was slightly different. He was not allowed his right to a Grand Jury. He was the underdog who was pursued by highly recognizable racist figureheads. Martin's parents maintained their dignity throughout the trial. The local black community was sophisticated enough to realize that rioting and looting did not serve their purpose to maintain acceptable race relations, despite the taunts from Sharpton and others who make thier living being divisive. Yada, yada, yada. So how many violent protests, building and car burnings resulted from him having a fair trial? Better watch it there, fella...pretty soon they'll be accusing you of being a...communist. :) -- I feel no need to explain my politics to stupid right-wingers. After all, I am *not* the Jackass Whisperer. |
The more...
|
The more...
On 11/29/2014 12:47 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 29 Nov 2014 12:22:22 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: On 11/29/14 12:20 PM, wrote: On Sat, 29 Nov 2014 09:08:14 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: Yada, yada, yada. So how many violent protests, building and car burnings resulted from him having a fair trial? The issue here was they would never believe Wilson would get a fair trial. Think Rodney King. A jury of nine whites and three blacks...would result in a hung jury, of course. :) With this evidence, you would hang an all black jury if they didn't simply acquit. Now it turns out the pathologist the Brown family hired for their widely hyped autopsy is a fraud. I thought Dr. Baden was on that team? |
The more...
On 11/30/14 12:30 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 29 Nov 2014 13:07:27 -0500, KC wrote: On 11/29/2014 12:47 PM, wrote: On Sat, 29 Nov 2014 12:22:22 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: On 11/29/14 12:20 PM, wrote: On Sat, 29 Nov 2014 09:08:14 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: Yada, yada, yada. So how many violent protests, building and car burnings resulted from him having a fair trial? The issue here was they would never believe Wilson would get a fair trial. Think Rodney King. A jury of nine whites and three blacks...would result in a hung jury, of course. :) With this evidence, you would hang an all black jury if they didn't simply acquit. Now it turns out the pathologist the Brown family hired for their widely hyped autopsy is a fraud. I thought Dr. Baden was on that team? Parcells took the lead and he is a fraud Ahh, he's the same sort of fake-credentialed fraud as *Dr* Rand Paul. :) -- I feel no need to explain my politics to stupid right-wingers. After all, I am *not* the Jackass Whisperer. |
The more...
On 11/30/2014 1:05 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 30 Nov 2014 12:35:42 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: On 11/30/14 12:30 PM, wrote: I thought Dr. Baden was on that team? Parcells took the lead and he is a fraud Ahh, he's the same sort of fake-credentialed fraud as *Dr* Rand Paul. :) Duke is not a medical school? How about Dr. Dr. Dr. Kare...... um, forget it, that was a lie :) |
The more...
On 11/30/14 1:05 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 30 Nov 2014 12:35:42 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: On 11/30/14 12:30 PM, wrote: I thought Dr. Baden was on that team? Parcells took the lead and he is a fraud Ahh, he's the same sort of fake-credentialed fraud as *Dr* Rand Paul. :) Duke is not a medical school? "Dr" Paul didn't like the licensing provisions/procedures of the recognized professional organization that governs his specialty, so he started his own. -- I feel no need to explain my politics to stupid right-wingers. After all, I am *not* the Jackass Whisperer. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:22 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com