On 11/20/14 1:23 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 13:17:38 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 11/20/14 12:42 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 07:38:50 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 11/20/14 7:08 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 01:11:55 -0800 (PST), Tom Nofinger
wrote:

Nancy Pelsosi proves to be the biggest air head on the planet- even above Kim Krackassian. Sad to say but the poor girl thinks Custer won at the Little Big Horn too.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...on-shes-wrong/

John Stewart (as well as the Dem's) is getting tired of her ****!

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...way-right-now/


At least the good voters had sense enough to get rid of Reid. But I suppose good sense has it's limits. Pelosi is still in. That is, until a mutiny arises.



She's about as popular as Krause.



Why, Johnny ****head, if only you could see, you could be outdoors,
trackin', shootin', and skinnin' those dangerous but tasty rodents you
need for the potluck at the next Aryan Brothers RV Hootenanny/Model
Airplane/Golf Tourney for Aging White Racists. You know, your "friends."
And you could take your little buddy, PsychoScotty, along as sidekick...

Another off topic brain fart from Harry



Perhaps you can change the topic to your hatred of Israelis and Jews,
just for a change.

And the off topic brain farts keep coming.


How about your loonitarian disdain for food inspection?
Oh, in my previous post, to which you responded, I was rebutting Johnny
****head's comment about popularity by suggesting where he is popular. I
notice you did not comment about Johnny ****head's off-topic remark.
Hey, was that shooter at FSU standing his ground?

--
Just because you are opposed to abortion doesn’t make you pro-life. Your
morality is deeply lacking if all you want is a child born but not a
child fed, not a child educated, not a child housed, not a child
clothed, not a child able to see the doctor. That’s not pro-life…that’s
pro-birth.

On 11/20/14 2:01 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 13:33:28 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:



And the off topic brain farts keep coming.


How about your loonitarian disdain for food inspection?
Oh, in my previous post, to which you responded, I was rebutting Johnny
****head's comment about popularity by suggesting where he is popular. I
notice you did not comment about Johnny ****head's off-topic remark.
Hey, was that shooter at FSU standing his ground?

You are channeling Slammer these days. Never an on topic answer, just
mindless insults having nothing to do with what we are talking about.


Actually, I am channeling you, just in a more extreme way. If there's a
topic on the table and you don't like it, you'll try to turn it into
something else. Or you'll toss an insult. Tell you what, I'll take your
admonition a tad more seriously when you take it seriously yourself
*and* you regularly castigate everyone else who does it, especially all
your right-wing buddies.*

Have a nice day!


* That'll be the day.

--
Just because you are opposed to abortion doesn’t make you pro-life. Your
morality is deeply lacking if all you want is a child born but not a
child fed, not a child educated, not a child housed, not a child
clothed, not a child able to see the doctor. That’s not pro-life…that’s
pro-birth.

On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 14:32:37 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 11/20/14 2:01 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 13:33:28 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:



And the off topic brain farts keep coming.


How about your loonitarian disdain for food inspection?
Oh, in my previous post, to which you responded, I was rebutting Johnny
****head's comment about popularity by suggesting where he is popular. I
notice you did not comment about Johnny ****head's off-topic remark.
Hey, was that shooter at FSU standing his ground?

You are channeling Slammer these days. Never an on topic answer, just
mindless insults having nothing to do with what we are talking about.


Actually, I am channeling you, just in a more extreme way. If there's a
topic on the table and you don't like it, you'll try to turn it into
something else. Or you'll toss an insult. Tell you what, I'll take your
admonition a tad more seriously when you take it seriously yourself
*and* you regularly castigate everyone else who does it, especially all
your right-wing buddies.*

Have a nice day!


* That'll be the day.

In all fairness, Toad, Greg *has* appropriately castigated me!

Shame on you.

On 11/20/14 3:27 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 14:32:37 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 11/20/14 2:01 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 13:33:28 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:



And the off topic brain farts keep coming.


How about your loonitarian disdain for food inspection?
Oh, in my previous post, to which you responded, I was rebutting Johnny
****head's comment about popularity by suggesting where he is popular. I
notice you did not comment about Johnny ****head's off-topic remark.
Hey, was that shooter at FSU standing his ground?

You are channeling Slammer these days. Never an on topic answer, just
mindless insults having nothing to do with what we are talking about.


Actually, I am channeling you, just in a more extreme way. If there's a
topic on the table and you don't like it, you'll try to turn it into
something else. Or you'll toss an insult. Tell you what, I'll take your
admonition a tad more seriously when you take it seriously yourself
*and* you regularly castigate everyone else who does it, especially all
your right-wing buddies.*

Have a nice day!


* That'll be the day.

Telling a lie over and over again does not make it true


Denying your own behavior here and that of your right-wing buddies makes
you the paragon of virtue.

--
Just because you are opposed to abortion doesn’t make you pro-life. Your
morality is deeply lacking if all you want is a child born but not a
child fed, not a child educated, not a child housed, not a child
clothed, not a child able to see the doctor. That’s not pro-life…that’s
pro-birth.

On 11/20/2014 4:47 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 15:41:21 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 11/20/14 3:27 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 14:32:37 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 11/20/14 2:01 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 13:33:28 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:



And the off topic brain farts keep coming.


How about your loonitarian disdain for food inspection?
Oh, in my previous post, to which you responded, I was rebutting Johnny
****head's comment about popularity by suggesting where he is popular. I
notice you did not comment about Johnny ****head's off-topic remark.
Hey, was that shooter at FSU standing his ground?

You are channeling Slammer these days. Never an on topic answer, just
mindless insults having nothing to do with what we are talking about.


Actually, I am channeling you, just in a more extreme way. If there's a
topic on the table and you don't like it, you'll try to turn it into
something else. Or you'll toss an insult. Tell you what, I'll take your
admonition a tad more seriously when you take it seriously yourself
*and* you regularly castigate everyone else who does it, especially all
your right-wing buddies.*

Have a nice day!


* That'll be the day.

Telling a lie over and over again does not make it true


Denying your own behavior here and that of your right-wing buddies makes
you the paragon of virtue.

This is that false equivalency thing again. You are trying to compare
me expanding a topic to a logical conclusion with you simply throwing
in a totally off topic insult that has nothing to do with anything but
your twisted mind


I am reminded of the 80's when car computers were coming into their
own... I used to say, they are limited by the fact that if they are
really ****ed up they can't even process the info coming in, much less
diagnose, become aware of their own issues to shoot a proper
diagnosis... You are troubleshooting a processor that is ****ed up to
the core

On 11/20/14 4:47 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 15:41:21 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 11/20/14 3:27 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 14:32:37 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 11/20/14 2:01 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 13:33:28 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:



And the off topic brain farts keep coming.


How about your loonitarian disdain for food inspection?
Oh, in my previous post, to which you responded, I was rebutting Johnny
****head's comment about popularity by suggesting where he is popular. I
notice you did not comment about Johnny ****head's off-topic remark.
Hey, was that shooter at FSU standing his ground?

You are channeling Slammer these days. Never an on topic answer, just
mindless insults having nothing to do with what we are talking about.


Actually, I am channeling you, just in a more extreme way. If there's a
topic on the table and you don't like it, you'll try to turn it into
something else. Or you'll toss an insult. Tell you what, I'll take your
admonition a tad more seriously when you take it seriously yourself
*and* you regularly castigate everyone else who does it, especially all
your right-wing buddies.*

Have a nice day!


* That'll be the day.

Telling a lie over and over again does not make it true


Denying your own behavior here and that of your right-wing buddies makes
you the paragon of virtue.

This is that false equivalency thing again. You are trying to compare
me expanding a topic to a logical conclusion with you simply throwing
in a totally off topic insult that has nothing to do with anything but
your twisted mind


I'm sorry, but tell me again how subsistence hunting is the same as
hunting "hawgs" in South Florida.

--
Just because you are opposed to abortion doesn’t make you pro-life. Your
morality is deeply lacking if all you want is a child born but not a
child fed, not a child educated, not a child housed, not a child
clothed, not a child able to see the doctor. That’s not pro-life…that’s
pro-birth.

wrote:
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 16:55:20 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 11/20/14 4:47 PM, wrote:

This is that false equivalency thing again. You are trying to compare
me expanding a topic to a logical conclusion with you simply throwing
in a totally off topic insult that has nothing to do with anything but
your twisted mind


I'm sorry, but tell me again how subsistence hunting is the same as
hunting "hawgs" in South Florida.

Talking about hunting in a hunting thread is certainly a lot more "on
topic" than a brain fart from you about someone smuggling drugs in his
boat or calling someone else a racist.

You really just have to go to the top of this thread that was about
Pelosi and you immediately started an insult laced diatribe about
everyone here who you disagree with ... which is pretty much everyone.

Insults atop insults are off topic, eh?
--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

On 21 Nov 2014 00:11:42 GMT, F*O*A*D wrote:

wrote:
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 16:55:20 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 11/20/14 4:47 PM, wrote:

This is that false equivalency thing again. You are trying to compare
me expanding a topic to a logical conclusion with you simply throwing
in a totally off topic insult that has nothing to do with anything but
your twisted mind


I'm sorry, but tell me again how subsistence hunting is the same as
hunting "hawgs" in South Florida.

Talking about hunting in a hunting thread is certainly a lot more "on
topic" than a brain fart from you about someone smuggling drugs in his
boat or calling someone else a racist.

You really just have to go to the top of this thread that was about
Pelosi and you immediately started an insult laced diatribe about
everyone here who you disagree with ... which is pretty much everyone.

Insults atop insults are off topic, eh?

===

As you have proven to us time and time again, nothing is off topic to
a sociopath.

Take the test and see for yourself:

http://www.wikihow.com/Determine-if-Someone-Is-a-Sociopath

On 11/20/14 7:20 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On 21 Nov 2014 00:11:42 GMT, F*O*A*D wrote:

wrote:
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 16:55:20 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 11/20/14 4:47 PM, wrote:

This is that false equivalency thing again. You are trying to compare
me expanding a topic to a logical conclusion with you simply throwing
in a totally off topic insult that has nothing to do with anything but
your twisted mind


I'm sorry, but tell me again how subsistence hunting is the same as
hunting "hawgs" in South Florida.

Talking about hunting in a hunting thread is certainly a lot more "on
topic" than a brain fart from you about someone smuggling drugs in his
boat or calling someone else a racist.

You really just have to go to the top of this thread that was about
Pelosi and you immediately started an insult laced diatribe about
everyone here who you disagree with ... which is pretty much everyone.

Insults atop insults are off topic, eh?

===

As you have proven to us time and time again, nothing is off topic to
a sociopath.

Take the test and see for yourself:

http://www.wikihow.com/Determine-if-Someone-Is-a-Sociopath



Shouldn't you be plotting the safest routes for your next Carib gun/drug
sale run?

--
Just because you are opposed to abortion doesn’t make you pro-life. Your
morality is deeply lacking if all you want is a child born but not a
child fed, not a child educated, not a child housed, not a child
clothed, not a child able to see the doctor. That’s not pro-life…that’s
pro-birth.

On Thursday, November 20, 2014 2:02:03 PM UTC-5, wrote:

You are channeling Slammer these days.

Right on, ****stick!!!! Someone hit a nerve on you, " Greggy-Poo ".