On 11/18/14 8:32 AM, Tim wrote:
Cute?

Factual


The two aren't mutually exclusive.

--
Just because you are opposed to abortion doesn’t make you pro-life. Your
morality is deeply lacking if all you want is a child born but not a
child fed, not a child educated, not a child housed, not a child
clothed, not a child able to see the doctor. That’s not pro-life…that’s
pro-birth.

Harold I noticed the mis-spelling after the post. iPhone spell check strikes again. Lol!

On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 08:15:37 -0500, ****T*O*A*D
wrote:

On 11/18/14 8:09 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 20:08:37 -0500, T*O*A*D wrote:

On 11/17/14 7:39 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 18:51:11 -0500,T*O*A*D wrote:

On 11/17/14 6:18 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 16:23:51 -0500, T*O*A*D wrote:

Last time I went duck hunting was on the Indian River just south of
Merritt Is, FL. Got a bunch. Little buggers, not mallards for sure.


How brave. Big, strong, brave old fart shoots ducks.

That line only works if you are eating tofu wearing a cardboard belt.
Otherwise you just hire out your animal murder and you do not have any
moral authority at all..


There's no morality in non-subsistence hunting.

So you think the factory farm is morally better? OK but as Bill
pointed out, if it wasn't for hunters and groups like Ducks Unlimited,
we would have far less habitat and far fewer ducks, That one
organization does more than PETA, the Sierra Club and Greenpeace
combined to preserve natural habitat.
I don't hunt but I do recognize what hunters bring to the
environmental community.


Try reading for content. My comment was about non-subsistence hunting.
You might consider stopping your habit of reaching for conclusions out
of a silk top hat.

Try reading for content. I eat animals I kill, TOAD, including frogs.



You're not a subsistence hunter, ****head.

When I kill an animal or bird, TOAD, I eat it for dinner that night or
the next. If I didn't eat it for dinner, I'd be hungry that night.
Therefore I'm a subsistence hunter.

On 11/18/14 11:15 AM, Poco Loco wrote:

When I kill an animal or bird, TOAD, I eat it for dinner that night or
the next. If I didn't eat it for dinner, I'd be hungry that night.
Therefore I'm a subsistence hunter.



The squirrels, sparrows and rats in your neighborhood must live in fear
of all your little animal traps.

Apparently you don't know what a subsistence hunter is. It isn't someone
who buys most of his groceries at Safeway, Giant, or Walmart.
A subsistence hunter hunts and relies on what he kills to put food on
the table because he has no or few other ways to do it.
You're just an animal killer...and an asshole, a liar, and a racist.


--
Just because you are opposed to abortion doesn’t make you pro-life. Your
morality is deeply lacking if all you want is a child born but not a
child fed, not a child educated, not a child housed, not a child
clothed, not a child able to see the doctor. That’s not pro-life…that’s
pro-birth.

On 11/18/14 11:15 AM, Poco Loco wrote:

When I kill an animal or bird, TOAD, I eat it for dinner that night or
the next. If I didn't eat it for dinner, I'd be hungry that night.
Therefore I'm a subsistence hunter.


Or, you could hop on the 'guzi and run down to the supermarket to buy a
nice, thick steak.

On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 11:36:31 -0500, T*O*A*D wrote:

On 11/18/14 11:15 AM, Poco Loco wrote:

When I kill an animal or bird, TOAD, I eat it for dinner that night or
the next. If I didn't eat it for dinner, I'd be hungry that night.
Therefore I'm a subsistence hunter.



The squirrels, sparrows and rats in your neighborhood must live in fear
of all your little animal traps.

Only the chipmunks. The rest of those that are caught are released.

Apparently you don't know what a subsistence hunter is. It isn't someone
who buys most of his groceries at Safeway, Giant, or Walmart.
A subsistence hunter hunts and relies on what he kills to put food on
the table because he has no or few other ways to do it.
You're just an animal killer...and an asshole, a liar, and a racist.

Nah, you're projecting again. Subsistence hunting is what I did as a
kid 'cause we couldn't afford to put a lot of meat on the table. We
didn't have an extremely wealthy and adventurous daddy like you did.
Hell, when my dad took me fishing, we never got a fireboat welcome.

On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 12:01:14 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:


On 11/18/14 11:15 AM, Poco Loco wrote:

When I kill an animal or bird, TOAD, I eat it for dinner that night or
the next. If I didn't eat it for dinner, I'd be hungry that night.
Therefore I'm a subsistence hunter.


Or, you could hop on the 'guzi and run down to the supermarket to buy a
nice, thick steak.


Didn't have a Guzzi when I was hunting. My mom would say, "Come help
with dishes, John, we'll talk about motorcycles." This was when I was
in seventh and eighth grades. Worked too. But I didn't get a bike 'til
I was about 32s or so.

On 11/18/2014 1:12 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 06:50:08 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 11/18/14 12:51 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 22:22:10 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:




If you mean the palins, they are not subsistence hunters. I have no idea
who the "motor city mad man" is. I have no objection to, for example,
tribesmen who hunt because it is the only way they can feed themselves
and their families. You really should stop coming to conclusions based
upon your wild-assed guesses.

So someone who just hunts to supplement their income is evil?
Do you feel the same about gardening?

Personally I do not see much difference between shooting a deer and
paying Giant food to kill a steer, butcher and wrap it for me.
Both are going to be a dead mammal that we cook and eat.




*My* point was that there is no morality in non-subsistence hunting. If
a family with very little money can put food on the table or have
something to sell or trade by hunting, then *that* is subsistence hunting.

You don't seem to understand the point.

Maybe I do.

If the hunter is eating the game, it is subsistence hunting. If he is
just collecting trophies I agree with you.

The other side of this is controlling invasive species. I assume you
are OK with shooting wild hogs and pythons. You certainly should be if
protecting native species and habitat are important to you.




Does that mean we should be shooting illegal immigrants?

(just a joke, relax)

On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 13:18:01 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

Does that mean we should be shooting illegal immigrants?

===

Snow birds also?

On 11/18/2014 1:18 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/18/2014 1:12 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 06:50:08 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 11/18/14 12:51 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 22:22:10 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:




If you mean the palins, they are not subsistence hunters. I have no
idea
who the "motor city mad man" is. I have no objection to, for example,
tribesmen who hunt because it is the only way they can feed themselves
and their families. You really should stop coming to conclusions based
upon your wild-assed guesses.

So someone who just hunts to supplement their income is evil?
Do you feel the same about gardening?

Personally I do not see much difference between shooting a deer and
paying Giant food to kill a steer, butcher and wrap it for me.
Both are going to be a dead mammal that we cook and eat.




*My* point was that there is no morality in non-subsistence hunting. If
a family with very little money can put food on the table or have
something to sell or trade by hunting, then *that* is subsistence
hunting.

You don't seem to understand the point.

Maybe I do.

If the hunter is eating the game, it is subsistence hunting. If he is
just collecting trophies I agree with you.

The other side of this is controlling invasive species. I assume you
are OK with shooting wild hogs and pythons. You certainly should be if
protecting native species and habitat are important to you.




Does that mean we should be shooting illegal immigrants?

(just a joke, relax)

Or Socialists... joking too.. about the joking... um...