On 11/15/2014 10:52 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sat, 15 Nov 2014 06:41:25 -0500, KC wrote:

On 11/15/2014 4:49 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/15/2014 1:27 AM, KC wrote:
On 11/14/2014 8:56 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 14:20:04 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

I don't think private sellers at gun shows or anywhere for that matter
are criminals by nature, looking to break any laws. They may not have
even known that the state law to check ID's existed. They are gun
nuts,
not professional dealers.

===

You can be sure that anyone with a booth at a gun show has been
advised of their legal obligations and has signed a statement
acknowledging those obligations. The organizers take care of such
things to protect themselves from legal action.



I think the problem here is the source and ones point of view of the
source. Dick trusts the source (in this case CNN) go give you the
straight skinny so he takes the limited info they gave us as gospel. If
you take those numbers as a fair stat on illegal gun sales, you come to
about 25% dirty sales. On the other hand 1, many here don't take CNN as
fair and balanced since they have been caught red handed in the past
taking sides, secondly, the real time personal experience of each and
ever gun buyer on this group would suggest that it's nowhere near 25%,
again suggesting CNN possibly didn't play straight, and with their
history, I give the weight to that side of the story.. but then again, I
wear a tin hat, I mean, I think MSNBC is biased too


The CNN thing was not a documentary on the percentage of illegal gun
sales or even the number of attempts at buying. It was very simply a
demonstration of how easy it was to purchase a bunch of firearms over a
weekend with no questions asked.

That's all it was. If you want to believe it was all scripted and made
with hired actors, that's your call.


Again, I didn't say that, I am starting to think you are too stupid to
see beyond the hyperbole...

Name calling unnecessary. Let them do it.


Sorry, it was a reaction to continually having words put in our mouth....

On 11/15/14 11:06 AM, KC wrote:
On 11/15/2014 10:52 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sat, 15 Nov 2014 06:41:25 -0500, KC wrote:

On 11/15/2014 4:49 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/15/2014 1:27 AM, KC wrote:
On 11/14/2014 8:56 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 14:20:04 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"

wrote:

I don't think private sellers at gun shows or anywhere for that
matter
are criminals by nature, looking to break any laws. They may not
have
even known that the state law to check ID's existed. They are gun
nuts,
not professional dealers.

===

You can be sure that anyone with a booth at a gun show has been
advised of their legal obligations and has signed a statement
acknowledging those obligations. The organizers take care of such
things to protect themselves from legal action.



I think the problem here is the source and ones point of view of the
source. Dick trusts the source (in this case CNN) go give you the
straight skinny so he takes the limited info they gave us as
gospel. If
you take those numbers as a fair stat on illegal gun sales, you
come to
about 25% dirty sales. On the other hand 1, many here don't take
CNN as
fair and balanced since they have been caught red handed in the past
taking sides, secondly, the real time personal experience of each and
ever gun buyer on this group would suggest that it's nowhere near 25%,
again suggesting CNN possibly didn't play straight, and with their
history, I give the weight to that side of the story.. but then
again, I
wear a tin hat, I mean, I think MSNBC is biased too


The CNN thing was not a documentary on the percentage of illegal gun
sales or even the number of attempts at buying. It was very simply a
demonstration of how easy it was to purchase a bunch of firearms over a
weekend with no questions asked.

That's all it was. If you want to believe it was all scripted and made
with hired actors, that's your call.


Again, I didn't say that, I am starting to think you are too stupid to
see beyond the hyperbole...

Name calling unnecessary. Let them do it.


Sorry, it was a reaction to continually having words put in our mouth....


With all that is in your mouth already, there's hardly room for someone
else's words.

--
Just because you are opposed to abortion doesn’t make you pro-life. Your
morality is deeply lacking if all you want is a child born but not a
child fed, not a child educated, not a child housed, not a child
clothed, not a child able to see the doctor. That’s not pro-life…that’s
pro-birth.

On Sat, 15 Nov 2014 11:06:18 -0500, KC wrote:

On 11/15/2014 10:52 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sat, 15 Nov 2014 06:41:25 -0500, KC wrote:

On 11/15/2014 4:49 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/15/2014 1:27 AM, KC wrote:
On 11/14/2014 8:56 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 14:20:04 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

I don't think private sellers at gun shows or anywhere for that matter
are criminals by nature, looking to break any laws. They may not have
even known that the state law to check ID's existed. They are gun
nuts,
not professional dealers.

===

You can be sure that anyone with a booth at a gun show has been
advised of their legal obligations and has signed a statement
acknowledging those obligations. The organizers take care of such
things to protect themselves from legal action.



I think the problem here is the source and ones point of view of the
source. Dick trusts the source (in this case CNN) go give you the
straight skinny so he takes the limited info they gave us as gospel. If
you take those numbers as a fair stat on illegal gun sales, you come to
about 25% dirty sales. On the other hand 1, many here don't take CNN as
fair and balanced since they have been caught red handed in the past
taking sides, secondly, the real time personal experience of each and
ever gun buyer on this group would suggest that it's nowhere near 25%,
again suggesting CNN possibly didn't play straight, and with their
history, I give the weight to that side of the story.. but then again, I
wear a tin hat, I mean, I think MSNBC is biased too


The CNN thing was not a documentary on the percentage of illegal gun
sales or even the number of attempts at buying. It was very simply a
demonstration of how easy it was to purchase a bunch of firearms over a
weekend with no questions asked.

That's all it was. If you want to believe it was all scripted and made
with hired actors, that's your call.


Again, I didn't say that, I am starting to think you are too stupid to
see beyond the hyperbole...

Name calling unnecessary. Let them do it.


Sorry, it was a reaction to continually having words put in our mouth....

I'm not the one deserving an apology.

On 11/15/2014 11:42 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sat, 15 Nov 2014 11:06:18 -0500, KC wrote:

On 11/15/2014 10:52 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sat, 15 Nov 2014 06:41:25 -0500, KC wrote:

On 11/15/2014 4:49 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:




That's all it was. If you want to believe it was all scripted and made
with hired actors, that's your call.




Again, I didn't say that, I am starting to think you are too stupid to
see beyond the hyperbole...

Name calling unnecessary. Let them do it.


Sorry, it was a reaction to continually having words put in our mouth....

I'm not the one deserving an apology.


I was reacting to what luddite said above, he just keeps spewing
harryisms like "If you want to believe it was all scripted and made
with hired actors, that's your call." as if we don't follow his
opinion, that the only other option like harry saying if you don't
follow him, you must want to beat up women, etc....