Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/15/2014 1:27 AM, KC wrote:
On 11/14/2014 8:56 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 14:20:04 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: I don't think private sellers at gun shows or anywhere for that matter are criminals by nature, looking to break any laws. They may not have even known that the state law to check ID's existed. They are gun nuts, not professional dealers. === You can be sure that anyone with a booth at a gun show has been advised of their legal obligations and has signed a statement acknowledging those obligations. The organizers take care of such things to protect themselves from legal action. I think the problem here is the source and ones point of view of the source. Dick trusts the source (in this case CNN) go give you the straight skinny so he takes the limited info they gave us as gospel. If you take those numbers as a fair stat on illegal gun sales, you come to about 25% dirty sales. On the other hand 1, many here don't take CNN as fair and balanced since they have been caught red handed in the past taking sides, secondly, the real time personal experience of each and ever gun buyer on this group would suggest that it's nowhere near 25%, again suggesting CNN possibly didn't play straight, and with their history, I give the weight to that side of the story.. but then again, I wear a tin hat, I mean, I think MSNBC is biased too ![]() The CNN thing was not a documentary on the percentage of illegal gun sales or even the number of attempts at buying. It was very simply a demonstration of how easy it was to purchase a bunch of firearms over a weekend with no questions asked. That's all it was. If you want to believe it was all scripted and made with hired actors, that's your call. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/15/2014 4:49 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/15/2014 1:27 AM, KC wrote: On 11/14/2014 8:56 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 14:20:04 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: I don't think private sellers at gun shows or anywhere for that matter are criminals by nature, looking to break any laws. They may not have even known that the state law to check ID's existed. They are gun nuts, not professional dealers. === You can be sure that anyone with a booth at a gun show has been advised of their legal obligations and has signed a statement acknowledging those obligations. The organizers take care of such things to protect themselves from legal action. I think the problem here is the source and ones point of view of the source. Dick trusts the source (in this case CNN) go give you the straight skinny so he takes the limited info they gave us as gospel. If you take those numbers as a fair stat on illegal gun sales, you come to about 25% dirty sales. On the other hand 1, many here don't take CNN as fair and balanced since they have been caught red handed in the past taking sides, secondly, the real time personal experience of each and ever gun buyer on this group would suggest that it's nowhere near 25%, again suggesting CNN possibly didn't play straight, and with their history, I give the weight to that side of the story.. but then again, I wear a tin hat, I mean, I think MSNBC is biased too ![]() The CNN thing was not a documentary on the percentage of illegal gun sales or even the number of attempts at buying. It was very simply a demonstration of how easy it was to purchase a bunch of firearms over a weekend with no questions asked. That's all it was. If you want to believe it was all scripted and made with hired actors, that's your call. Again, I didn't say that, I am starting to think you are too stupid to see beyond the hyperbole... |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/15/14 6:41 AM, KC wrote:
On 11/15/2014 4:49 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/15/2014 1:27 AM, KC wrote: On 11/14/2014 8:56 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 14:20:04 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: I don't think private sellers at gun shows or anywhere for that matter are criminals by nature, looking to break any laws. They may not have even known that the state law to check ID's existed. They are gun nuts, not professional dealers. === You can be sure that anyone with a booth at a gun show has been advised of their legal obligations and has signed a statement acknowledging those obligations. The organizers take care of such things to protect themselves from legal action. I think the problem here is the source and ones point of view of the source. Dick trusts the source (in this case CNN) go give you the straight skinny so he takes the limited info they gave us as gospel. If you take those numbers as a fair stat on illegal gun sales, you come to about 25% dirty sales. On the other hand 1, many here don't take CNN as fair and balanced since they have been caught red handed in the past taking sides, secondly, the real time personal experience of each and ever gun buyer on this group would suggest that it's nowhere near 25%, again suggesting CNN possibly didn't play straight, and with their history, I give the weight to that side of the story.. but then again, I wear a tin hat, I mean, I think MSNBC is biased too ![]() The CNN thing was not a documentary on the percentage of illegal gun sales or even the number of attempts at buying. It was very simply a demonstration of how easy it was to purchase a bunch of firearms over a weekend with no questions asked. That's all it was. If you want to believe it was all scripted and made with hired actors, that's your call. Again, I didn't say that, I am starting to think you are too stupid to see beyond the hyperbole... You are less bright than Forest Gump and without the charm. -- Just because you are opposed to abortion doesn’t make you pro-life. Your morality is deeply lacking if all you want is a child born but not a child fed, not a child educated, not a child housed, not a child clothed, not a child able to see the doctor. That’s not pro-life…that’s pro-birth. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/15/2014 6:41 AM, KC wrote:
On 11/15/2014 4:49 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/15/2014 1:27 AM, KC wrote: On 11/14/2014 8:56 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 14:20:04 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: I don't think private sellers at gun shows or anywhere for that matter are criminals by nature, looking to break any laws. They may not have even known that the state law to check ID's existed. They are gun nuts, not professional dealers. === You can be sure that anyone with a booth at a gun show has been advised of their legal obligations and has signed a statement acknowledging those obligations. The organizers take care of such things to protect themselves from legal action. I think the problem here is the source and ones point of view of the source. Dick trusts the source (in this case CNN) go give you the straight skinny so he takes the limited info they gave us as gospel. If you take those numbers as a fair stat on illegal gun sales, you come to about 25% dirty sales. On the other hand 1, many here don't take CNN as fair and balanced since they have been caught red handed in the past taking sides, secondly, the real time personal experience of each and ever gun buyer on this group would suggest that it's nowhere near 25%, again suggesting CNN possibly didn't play straight, and with their history, I give the weight to that side of the story.. but then again, I wear a tin hat, I mean, I think MSNBC is biased too ![]() The CNN thing was not a documentary on the percentage of illegal gun sales or even the number of attempts at buying. It was very simply a demonstration of how easy it was to purchase a bunch of firearms over a weekend with no questions asked. That's all it was. If you want to believe it was all scripted and made with hired actors, that's your call. Again, I didn't say that, I am starting to think you are too stupid to see beyond the hyperbole... I've been trying to ignore your remarks because you seem to have issues. But you crossed the line. You are an ungrateful little snot. And you know what I mean. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
FlatulentOne sez....
"I've been trying to ignore your remarks because you seem to have issues. But you crossed the line. You are an ungrateful little snot. And you know what I mean. " Bingo! You're finally making some sense. It was my impression a few years ago that Richard made a substantial contribution to the MickeyMouse racing team and who knows what else to help out the little PeterPan/Tinkerbell deadbeat on his mis-adventures. You'd think L'il Snot would keep this in mind. On the other hand, maybe we just think differently up here. Every year we thank the good people of Boston and the state of Mass for the help they generously gave us 97 years ago in our hour of need. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/15/2014 7:26 AM, True North wrote:
FlatulentOne sez.... "I've been trying to ignore your remarks because you seem to have issues. But you crossed the line. You are an ungrateful little snot. And you know what I mean. " Bingo! You're finally making some sense. It was my impression a few years ago that Richard made a substantial contribution to the MickeyMouse racing team and who knows what else to help out the little PeterPan/Tinkerbell deadbeat on his mis-adventures. You'd think L'il Snot would keep this in mind. On the other hand, maybe we just think differently up here. Every year we thank the good people of Boston and the state of Mass for the help they generously gave us 97 years ago in our hour of need. **** you, Donnie. Fix your boisenberry. It has line length issues. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
FlatulentOne spews....
"**** you, Donnie." Not a chance....your L'il Snot and his SugarDaddy, Scott Dickson, are more your type. Happy hunting. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/15/14 8:49 AM, True North wrote:
FlatulentOne spews.... "**** you, Donnie." Not a chance....your L'il Snot and his SugarDaddy, Scott Dickson, are more your type. Happy hunting. Was that an utterance from FlaJim? What a jerk. -- Just because you are opposed to abortion doesn’t make you pro-life. Your morality is deeply lacking if all you want is a child born but not a child fed, not a child educated, not a child housed, not a child clothed, not a child able to see the doctor. That’s not pro-life…that’s pro-birth. |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/15/2014 8:49 AM, True North wrote:
Don, referring to a recent post you made regarding "contributions" made to a participant in this newsgroup: I request that you keep any knowledge of that circumstance to yourself. You don't know what the story was and you are misrepresenting it here. It was a long time ago, had nothing to do with motorcycle racing and I was not alone in lending some help during a rough time. Some things should be off the table in terms of discussion. Ok? |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
True North wrote:
FlatulentOne spews.... "**** you, Donnie." Not a chance....your L'il Snot and his SugarDaddy, Scott Dickson, are more your type. Happy hunting. Get a real computer, Donnie. Writing your own quotes is moronic. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Hey Richard... | General | |||
Hey Richard | General | |||
for Richard | General | |||
hey Richard. have you seen this? | General | |||
Think Richard made it? | ASA |