BoatBanter.com - Thank you, Richard!!!

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)

- General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)

- - Thank you, Richard!!! (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/162486-thank-you-richard.html)

Thank you, Richard!!!

On 11/15/2014 6:41 AM, KC wrote:
On 11/15/2014 4:49 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/15/2014 1:27 AM, KC wrote:
On 11/14/2014 8:56 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 14:20:04 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

I don't think private sellers at gun shows or anywhere for that matter
are criminals by nature, looking to break any laws. They may not have
even known that the state law to check ID's existed. They are gun
nuts,
not professional dealers.

===

You can be sure that anyone with a booth at a gun show has been
advised of their legal obligations and has signed a statement
acknowledging those obligations. The organizers take care of such
things to protect themselves from legal action.

I think the problem here is the source and ones point of view of the
source. Dick trusts the source (in this case CNN) go give you the
straight skinny so he takes the limited info they gave us as gospel. If
you take those numbers as a fair stat on illegal gun sales, you come to
about 25% dirty sales. On the other hand 1, many here don't take CNN as
fair and balanced since they have been caught red handed in the past
taking sides, secondly, the real time personal experience of each and
ever gun buyer on this group would suggest that it's nowhere near 25%,
again suggesting CNN possibly didn't play straight, and with their
history, I give the weight to that side of the story.. but then again, I
wear a tin hat, I mean, I think MSNBC is biased too :)

The CNN thing was not a documentary on the percentage of illegal gun
sales or even the number of attempts at buying. It was very simply a
demonstration of how easy it was to purchase a bunch of firearms over a
weekend with no questions asked.

That's all it was. If you want to believe it was all scripted and made
with hired actors, that's your call.

Again, I didn't say that, I am starting to think you are too stupid to
see beyond the hyperbole...

I've been trying to ignore your remarks because you seem to have issues.
But you crossed the line. You are an ungrateful little snot. And you
know what I mean.

Thank you, Richard!!!

FlatulentOne sez....
"I've been trying to ignore your remarks because you seem to have issues.
But you crossed the line. You are an ungrateful little snot. And you
know what I mean. "

Bingo!
You're finally making some sense.
It was my impression a few years ago that Richard made a substantial contribution to the MickeyMouse racing team and who knows what else to help out the little PeterPan/Tinkerbell deadbeat on his mis-adventures.
You'd think L'il Snot would keep this in mind.
On the other hand, maybe we just think differently up here. Every year we thank the good people of Boston and the state of Mass for the help they generously gave us 97 years ago in our hour of need.

Thank you, Richard!!!

On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 20:33:54 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 11/14/2014 7:47 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 11:44:20 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

You
should not be able to buy or sell or gift a firearm without paperwork
recording the giver, seller and buyer.

===

That's your opinion because it is the party line of all weenies just
like you.

You can add me to your "weenie" file because I agree with him.

===
I've never regarded you as a weenie but if you want to be one, I can't
stop you.

BTW, it's not the Federal Government you need to worry about so much.
State governments can and do create and enforce their own gun laws.

If everyone remains unwilling to give a bit, Florida may end up
like Massachusetts.

===
That is extremely unlikely. There are a lot of people in Florida who
would advocate seceding from the US before they'd let that happen. Let
me understand this however. As a resident of a state with highly
restrictive gun laws, some of which seem to make little or no sense,
you think it is your duty to export that nonsense to other states
where sanity still prevails?

That's why I am an advocate of uniform and standardized laws that
everyone can live with.

BTW ... state laws for guns on board vary also. Wouldn't it be nice if
they were all the same when you travel?

===
I've never felt the need to carry a gun on the boat in this country.
If I did feel the need, I could always carry a long gun. Most likely
I'd just stop cruising however.

Thank you, Richard!!!

On 11/15/2014 7:26 AM, True North wrote:
FlatulentOne sez....
"I've been trying to ignore your remarks because you seem to have issues.
But you crossed the line. You are an ungrateful little snot. And you
know what I mean. "

Bingo!
You're finally making some sense.
It was my impression a few years ago that Richard made a substantial contribution to the MickeyMouse racing team and who knows what else to help out the little PeterPan/Tinkerbell deadbeat on his mis-adventures.
You'd think L'il Snot would keep this in mind.
On the other hand, maybe we just think differently up here. Every year we thank the good people of Boston and the state of Mass for the help they generously gave us 97 years ago in our hour of need.

**** you, Donnie.
Fix your boisenberry. It has line length issues.

Thank you, Richard!!!

On 11/15/2014 7:27 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
That is extremely unlikely. There are a lot of people in Florida who
would advocate seceding from the US before they'd let that happen. Let
me understand this however. As a resident of a state with highly
restrictive gun laws, some of which seem to make little or no sense,
you think it is your duty to export that nonsense to other states
where sanity still prevails?

You can't even clean up your property in that state without special
permissions.

Thank you, Richard!!!

On 11/15/2014 7:27 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 20:33:54 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 11/14/2014 7:47 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 11:44:20 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

You
should not be able to buy or sell or gift a firearm without paperwork
recording the giver, seller and buyer.

===

That's your opinion because it is the party line of all weenies just
like you.

You can add me to your "weenie" file because I agree with him.

===
I've never regarded you as a weenie but if you want to be one, I can't
stop you.

BTW, it's not the Federal Government you need to worry about so much.
State governments can and do create and enforce their own gun laws.

If everyone remains unwilling to give a bit, Florida may end up
like Massachusetts.

===
That is extremely unlikely. There are a lot of people in Florida who
would advocate seceding from the US before they'd let that happen. Let
me understand this however. As a resident of a state with highly
restrictive gun laws, some of which seem to make little or no sense,
you think it is your duty to export that nonsense to other states
where sanity still prevails?

That's why I am an advocate of uniform and standardized laws that
everyone can live with.

BTW ... state laws for guns on board vary also. Wouldn't it be nice if
they were all the same when you travel?

===
I've never felt the need to carry a gun on the boat in this country.
If I did feel the need, I could always carry a long gun. Most likely
I'd just stop cruising however.

Wayne, there is no question that Massachusetts has gone overboard in
some of it's gun control measures IMO. The worst in my mind is the
convoluted and mysterious way in which the types and models of handguns
are "approved" for sale in the state. It's a case of government
over-reaching .... or a case of outright bribery and corruption. I am
not sure which.

Although it doesn't really affect what I do I think limits on magazine
sizes doesn't make a firearm any safer nor does a requirement for a 10lb
trigger pull. IMO, those are "real good" laws that don't really add to
any safety issues.

The only gun control regulations that make sense to me a

A gun handling and safety course requirement that includes an overview
of federal, state and local laws governing the use of firearms and:

A background check for a license and an instant background
check when making gun purchases, and:

The registration of purchased firearms tying it's serial number
to the original and subsequent owners.

I'd love to see reciprocal recognition of licenses or permits throughout
all the states. It may be possible someday if all
the states had the minimum requirements of background checks and
registration.

I don't see any of those requirements as being unreasonable or an
infringement on the right to own a firearm. I see them as being
responsible gun ownership.

Thank you, Richard!!!

FlatulentOne spews....

"**** you, Donnie."

Not a chance....your L'il Snot and his SugarDaddy, Scott Dickson, are more your type.
Happy hunting.

Thank you, Richard!!!

On 11/15/14 8:49 AM, True North wrote:
FlatulentOne spews....

"**** you, Donnie."

Not a chance....your L'il Snot and his SugarDaddy, Scott Dickson, are more your type.
Happy hunting.

Was that an utterance from FlaJim? What a jerk.

--
Just because you are opposed to abortion doesn’t make you pro-life. Your
morality is deeply lacking if all you want is a child born but not a
child fed, not a child educated, not a child housed, not a child
clothed, not a child able to see the doctor. That’s not pro-life…that’s
pro-birth.

Thank you, Richard!!!

On 11/15/2014 8:38 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:

Although it doesn't really affect what I do I think limits on magazine
sizes doesn't make a firearm any safer nor does a requirement for a 10lb
trigger pull. IMO, those are "real good" laws that don't really add to
any safety issues.

Meant to type "feel good" not "real good". Can't even blame that on
a spell checker. :-)

Thank you, Richard!!!