Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 19 Oct 2014 18:40:06 -0500, Califbill
wrote: "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 10/19/2014 2:13 PM, Poco Loco wrote: On Sun, 19 Oct 2014 12:46:27 -0500, Califbill wrote: Poco Loco wrote: On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 21:43:25 -0400, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 21:31:04 -0400, Poco Loco wrote: On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 20:04:38 -0400, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 18:36:52 -0400, Poco Loco wrote: Virtually all of the serious target shooters that I know use a scope. At 100 yards it is difficult just getting on the paper consistently without one. With a good rifle, good scope and good ammo, you can shoot 1 inch groups inside the 10 ring. I would most likely never be a *serious* target shooter. My eyes aren't good enough for that. I go to the range only because I enjoy shooting. I haven't really shot a rifle since early Army days with the M-14. I was very good with it. In Vietnam I fired the M-16 only a few times. More or less for familiarization. My First Sergeant and I would go out to the local laterite pit and practiced on beer cans. === A good scope can compensate for just about everything except cataracts or macular degeneration. Just turn the focus ring until everything is sharp. Cataracts can be fixed with surgery of course. This is the one I use on my customized Ruger 10/22 for CMP competiton at 50 yards: http://www.amazon.com/Monarch-Riflescope-4-16x42SF-Matte-BDC/dp/B000OZU92K I used two other scopes prior to the Nikon until I found one I liked. The others both had excessive parallax error. From the prone position I can now shoot 97s and 98s with 30 or 40% in the "X" ring. I've got a cataract in my right eye. Also, I'm right handed, and don't want to learn to shoot a rifle left handed. When I get the right eye operated on, it's my understanding I have to choose between near and far vision. Which would be best for shooting? Now I'm using my right eye, but the front sight is pretty blurry, along with the target. However, with a handgun I can switch to my left eye without much problem. === If you don't mind wearing reading glasses I'd probably go for distance vision. A decent scope can be dialed in for either however. I'll still have to wear glasses. And I'll have pretty good distance vision with the left eye. I guess the question comes down to which is more important to see clearly (without the scope) - the front sight or the target. Right now they're both blurry, but not bad I can't hit the target. I do better with my left eye however. You want distance. When they did my right eye, was what I went for. Now only need the glasses for reading. Left eye cataract is getting worse. Will look in to that problem tomorrow at eye doc appointment. Wife has distance on one eye and her contact on other eye is for close work. I think would confuse me, but she had same for years with just contacts. My doc says the cataract is not bad enough to operate yet. I'll still need glasses though, as the left eye is blurry both near and far. Ah, the joys of becoming senile! I was very surprised when I had my eye sight tested a year ago. I've always had good vision but sometimes have a tough time when tired focusing close up which is very typical for most of us old farts. The last test (after the infection in my left eye due to shingles had cleared up) was 20/20 right eye and 20/15 left eye. Today is my 65th birthday. Big year. Medicare, senior citizen discounts and high dose flu shots. :-) Congratulations on reaching 65. Was in Burger King getting a soda, while waiting for wife's airplane. Senior drink. $0.25. McD's seem to be 75 cents. I think 55 is the age for senior drinks. McD's had free senior coffee for a couple weeks. And I've found the McD's prices range from 50 cents to 75 cents...depending on where you go. North Carolina seems cheaper than Northern Virginia all the time. I do get tired of them checking my ID every time I ask for a senior coffee! :) |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/20/2014 10:17 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sun, 19 Oct 2014 18:40:06 -0500, Califbill wrote: "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 10/19/2014 2:13 PM, Poco Loco wrote: On Sun, 19 Oct 2014 12:46:27 -0500, Califbill wrote: Poco Loco wrote: On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 21:43:25 -0400, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 21:31:04 -0400, Poco Loco wrote: On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 20:04:38 -0400, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 18:36:52 -0400, Poco Loco wrote: Virtually all of the serious target shooters that I know use a scope. At 100 yards it is difficult just getting on the paper consistently without one. With a good rifle, good scope and good ammo, you can shoot 1 inch groups inside the 10 ring. I would most likely never be a *serious* target shooter. My eyes aren't good enough for that. I go to the range only because I enjoy shooting. I haven't really shot a rifle since early Army days with the M-14. I was very good with it. In Vietnam I fired the M-16 only a few times. More or less for familiarization. My First Sergeant and I would go out to the local laterite pit and practiced on beer cans. === A good scope can compensate for just about everything except cataracts or macular degeneration. Just turn the focus ring until everything is sharp. Cataracts can be fixed with surgery of course. This is the one I use on my customized Ruger 10/22 for CMP competiton at 50 yards: http://www.amazon.com/Monarch-Riflescope-4-16x42SF-Matte-BDC/dp/B000OZU92K I used two other scopes prior to the Nikon until I found one I liked. The others both had excessive parallax error. From the prone position I can now shoot 97s and 98s with 30 or 40% in the "X" ring. I've got a cataract in my right eye. Also, I'm right handed, and don't want to learn to shoot a rifle left handed. When I get the right eye operated on, it's my understanding I have to choose between near and far vision. Which would be best for shooting? Now I'm using my right eye, but the front sight is pretty blurry, along with the target. However, with a handgun I can switch to my left eye without much problem. === If you don't mind wearing reading glasses I'd probably go for distance vision. A decent scope can be dialed in for either however. I'll still have to wear glasses. And I'll have pretty good distance vision with the left eye. I guess the question comes down to which is more important to see clearly (without the scope) - the front sight or the target. Right now they're both blurry, but not bad I can't hit the target. I do better with my left eye however. You want distance. When they did my right eye, was what I went for. Now only need the glasses for reading. Left eye cataract is getting worse. Will look in to that problem tomorrow at eye doc appointment. Wife has distance on one eye and her contact on other eye is for close work. I think would confuse me, but she had same for years with just contacts. My doc says the cataract is not bad enough to operate yet. I'll still need glasses though, as the left eye is blurry both near and far. Ah, the joys of becoming senile! I was very surprised when I had my eye sight tested a year ago. I've always had good vision but sometimes have a tough time when tired focusing close up which is very typical for most of us old farts. The last test (after the infection in my left eye due to shingles had cleared up) was 20/20 right eye and 20/15 left eye. Today is my 65th birthday. Big year. Medicare, senior citizen discounts and high dose flu shots. :-) Congratulations on reaching 65. Was in Burger King getting a soda, while waiting for wife's airplane. Senior drink. $0.25. McD's seem to be 75 cents. I think 55 is the age for senior drinks. McD's had free senior coffee for a couple weeks. And I've found the McD's prices range from 50 cents to 75 cents...depending on where you go. North Carolina seems cheaper than Northern Virginia all the time. I do get tired of them checking my ID every time I ask for a senior coffee! :) Feel blessed. If you looked like Harry, they wouldn't ask. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:29:02 -0400, Poco Loco
wrote: McD's sausage biscuit, for a buck, with a small orange juice is the best breakfast deal around - unless you can find a Hardees - which have better biscuits. === Damn, I can still remember when you could get 2 eggs with bacon, toast and coffee for a buck. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:52:33 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote: On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:29:02 -0400, Poco Loco wrote: McD's sausage biscuit, for a buck, with a small orange juice is the best breakfast deal around - unless you can find a Hardees - which have better biscuits. === Damn, I can still remember when you could get 2 eggs with bacon, toast and coffee for a buck. Yeah, well...back then I couldn't afford a buck! |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/20/14 6:38 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/20/2014 4:36 PM, wrote: On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 14:04:58 -0400, Poco Loco wrote: On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:52:33 -0400, Wayne.B wrote: On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:29:02 -0400, Poco Loco wrote: McD's sausage biscuit, for a buck, with a small orange juice is the best breakfast deal around - unless you can find a Hardees - which have better biscuits. === Damn, I can still remember when you could get 2 eggs with bacon, toast and coffee for a buck. Yeah, well...back then I couldn't afford a buck! My breakfast in High School was usually 2 ten cent Little Tavern hamburgers My earliest recollection of McDonalds is fifteen cent hamburgers and seventeen cent cheeseburgers. My buddy and I used to ride our bicycles down to the McDonalds in Hingham, MA (the only one around back then). In those days they cooked 'em on a grill and piled them up under heat lamps until they sold. You didn't hit the McDonald's on the Boston Post Road in Orange, or the one in Hamden? The one in Orange was across the BPR from Nick's Italian Grocery, maker of the best subs anywhere. Some people thought McDonald's would put Nick's out of business, but Nick had a secret weapon: he was the biggest bookie in the Orange-West Haven area, and never suffered a business downturn. The McDonald's had a trampoline park next door, too. In those days, I thought the only thing McDonald's had that was edible were the fries. The burgers were and still are for ****, and the shakes had no milk in them. -- Of life’s simple pleasures, few are more satisfying than being attacked by the right-wing trash in rec.boats. ![]() |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
F*O*A*D wrote:
On 10/20/14 6:38 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/20/2014 4:36 PM, wrote: On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 14:04:58 -0400, Poco Loco wrote: On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:52:33 -0400, Wayne.B wrote: On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:29:02 -0400, Poco Loco wrote: McD's sausage biscuit, for a buck, with a small orange juice is the best breakfast deal around - unless you can find a Hardees - which have better biscuits. === Damn, I can still remember when you could get 2 eggs with bacon, toast and coffee for a buck. Yeah, well...back then I couldn't afford a buck! My breakfast in High School was usually 2 ten cent Little Tavern hamburgers My earliest recollection of McDonalds is fifteen cent hamburgers and seventeen cent cheeseburgers. My buddy and I used to ride our bicycles down to the McDonalds in Hingham, MA (the only one around back then). In those days they cooked 'em on a grill and piled them up under heat lamps until they sold. You didn't hit the McDonald's on the Boston Post Road in Orange, or the one in Hamden? The one in Orange was across the BPR from Nick's Italian Grocery, maker of the best subs anywhere. Some people thought McDonald's would put Nick's out of business, but Nick had a secret weapon: he was the biggest bookie in the Orange-West Haven area, and never suffered a business downturn. The McDonald's had a trampoline park next door, too. In those days, I thought the only thing McDonald's had that was edible were the fries. The burgers were and still are for ****, and the shakes had no milk in them. Ray Krock actually bought McDonalds for their Milk Shake Machine. |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
YOU'RE FULL OF SMART-ASS TALK WHEN IN THE COMPANY OF OTHERS.....BUTALONE.....WILL YOUR MOUTH RING SO SMART????? I DONT THINK SO. | General | |||
OT "Smart Cars" not so smart | General | |||
Smart Yoga: - Learn Yoga in a smart way | General | |||
Smart Yoga: - Learn Yoga in a smart way | General | |||
Getting smart | General |