On 9/1/2014 3:09 PM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 9/1/14 2:07 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 01 Sep 2014 12:35:39 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

Thanks, Dubya, for ****ing over America to fulfill your fantasies and
lining the pockets of the military-industrial complex.

It is hard to name a president who didn't do that.
Carter springs to mind but I doubt anyone wants to relive that 4 years
of defeats, inflation, recession and general "malaise" (his
description, not mine).
Every other president in my lifetime had no problem increasing the
military budget and getting us in foreign misadventures (covertly or
overtly). Your sweetie Hillary is just GW in a pants suit.


Hillary is neither my sweetie nor my first choice for the POTUS
nomination, but if she is the nominee, I will happily vote for her. I'm
certainly not going to vote for any of the Republican crazies who will
be nominated.


Bernie Sanders is testing the political winds.

On 9/1/14 3:47 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 9/1/2014 3:09 PM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 9/1/14 2:07 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 01 Sep 2014 12:35:39 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

Thanks, Dubya, for ****ing over America to fulfill your fantasies and
lining the pockets of the military-industrial complex.

It is hard to name a president who didn't do that.
Carter springs to mind but I doubt anyone wants to relive that 4 years
of defeats, inflation, recession and general "malaise" (his
description, not mine).
Every other president in my lifetime had no problem increasing the
military budget and getting us in foreign misadventures (covertly or
overtly). Your sweetie Hillary is just GW in a pants suit.


Hillary is neither my sweetie nor my first choice for the POTUS
nomination, but if she is the nominee, I will happily vote for her. I'm
certainly not going to vote for any of the Republican crazies who will
be nominated.


Bernie Sanders is testing the political winds.


I like Bernie Sanders, and I think he's terrific as a U.S. Senator. He
has no more chance of being elected POTUS than you or I do.

On 9/1/2014 4:27 PM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 9/1/14 3:47 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 9/1/2014 3:09 PM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 9/1/14 2:07 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 01 Sep 2014 12:35:39 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

Thanks, Dubya, for ****ing over America to fulfill your fantasies and
lining the pockets of the military-industrial complex.

It is hard to name a president who didn't do that.
Carter springs to mind but I doubt anyone wants to relive that 4 years
of defeats, inflation, recession and general "malaise" (his
description, not mine).
Every other president in my lifetime had no problem increasing the
military budget and getting us in foreign misadventures (covertly or
overtly). Your sweetie Hillary is just GW in a pants suit.


Hillary is neither my sweetie nor my first choice for the POTUS
nomination, but if she is the nominee, I will happily vote for her. I'm
certainly not going to vote for any of the Republican crazies who will
be nominated.


Bernie Sanders is testing the political winds.


I like Bernie Sanders, and I think he's terrific as a U.S. Senator. He
has no more chance of being elected POTUS than you or I do.


The Democratic Party has it's share of looney's. Hopefully neither of
these screwballs have become your first choice:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vermin_Supreme

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeff_Boss

On 9/1/14 5:04 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 9/1/2014 4:27 PM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 9/1/14 3:47 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 9/1/2014 3:09 PM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 9/1/14 2:07 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 01 Sep 2014 12:35:39 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

Thanks, Dubya, for ****ing over America to fulfill your fantasies and
lining the pockets of the military-industrial complex.

It is hard to name a president who didn't do that.
Carter springs to mind but I doubt anyone wants to relive that 4 years
of defeats, inflation, recession and general "malaise" (his
description, not mine).
Every other president in my lifetime had no problem increasing the
military budget and getting us in foreign misadventures (covertly or
overtly). Your sweetie Hillary is just GW in a pants suit.


Hillary is neither my sweetie nor my first choice for the POTUS
nomination, but if she is the nominee, I will happily vote for her. I'm
certainly not going to vote for any of the Republican crazies who will
be nominated.


Bernie Sanders is testing the political winds.


I like Bernie Sanders, and I think he's terrific as a U.S. Senator. He
has no more chance of being elected POTUS than you or I do.


The Democratic Party has it's share of looney's. Hopefully neither of
these screwballs have become your first choice:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vermin_Supreme

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeff_Boss

Please. The Dems have nothing to compare in terms of craziness with the
nut cases seeking the Republican nomination, and I don't mean the
candidates of whom no one has heard.

On Monday, September 1, 2014 1:27:21 PM UTC-7, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 9/1/14 3:47 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:

On 9/1/2014 3:09 PM, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 9/1/14 2:07 PM, wrote:

On Mon, 01 Sep 2014 12:35:39 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:



Thanks, Dubya, for ****ing over America to fulfill your fantasies and

lining the pockets of the military-industrial complex.



It is hard to name a president who didn't do that.

Carter springs to mind but I doubt anyone wants to relive that 4 years

of defeats, inflation, recession and general "malaise" (his

description, not mine).

Every other president in my lifetime had no problem increasing the

military budget and getting us in foreign misadventures (covertly or

overtly). Your sweetie Hillary is just GW in a pants suit.





Hillary is neither my sweetie nor my first choice for the POTUS

nomination, but if she is the nominee, I will happily vote for her. I'm

certainly not going to vote for any of the Republican crazies who will

be nominated.





Bernie Sanders is testing the political winds.





I like Bernie Sanders, and I think he's terrific as a U.S. Senator. He

has no more chance of being elected POTUS than you or I do.

Of course you would Krause. Someone like you would.

On 9/1/14 6:45 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 01 Sep 2014 15:47:54 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:


Bernie Sanders is testing the political winds.

Hell Romney could beat him


Sanders would slaughter Romney in any discussion/debate about the
horrors the Romneys of this world have perpetuated on the average
working American. But Romney isn't on my list of GOP'ers I'd like to see
get the nomination. He's an asshole, but he's neither crazy nor stupid.
The GOP deserves one or the other or both.

On 9/1/14 8:01 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 01 Sep 2014 18:53:24 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 9/1/14 6:45 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 01 Sep 2014 15:47:54 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:


Bernie Sanders is testing the political winds.

Hell Romney could beat him


Sanders would slaughter Romney in any discussion/debate about the
horrors the Romneys of this world have perpetuated on the average
working American. But Romney isn't on my list of GOP'ers I'd like to see
get the nomination. He's an asshole, but he's neither crazy nor stupid.
The GOP deserves one or the other or both.

Sanders is only popular in the socialist circles you live in. I don't
think Romney is particularly smart or a good debater but Sanders just
preaches to the choir of the left


Which has nothing to do with my point that Sanders would slaughter
Romney in a debate about issues that are important to the average
American. And, again, I want the GOP'ers to have the candidate they
deserve.