| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Good for a laugh
|
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Good for a laugh
On 4/13/2014 3:50 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 13 Apr 2014 15:22:43 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: On 4/13/14, 2:54 PM, wrote: On Sun, 13 Apr 2014 11:39:32 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: The Iran-Contra affair was the Reagan Administration's. Period. I agree it was all Reagan's doing. I am also not sure how terrible it actually was. We gave Iran weapons to wage war against Saddam Hussein ... but I assume you liked Saddam. You saw no value in us tossing him out.. Clearly Israel thought Saddam was a bigger threat to them than the Ayatollah was, since they brokered the weapons deal with Iran and made money on it.. That is also why we eventually went after Saddam so Israel wouldn't do it. That was the scandal that never came to light. Oh, right. Sure. Again, what part was wrong? Part of the history revisionists (like Harry) have is they like to relate to an event that happened 30 years or so ago under a completely different set of circumstances and global issues to something that is going on today. Simplistic, but that's how Wishy-Washy, Never-Never Land liberals think. |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Good for a laugh
On 4/13/14, 4:18 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/13/2014 3:50 PM, wrote: On Sun, 13 Apr 2014 15:22:43 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: On 4/13/14, 2:54 PM, wrote: On Sun, 13 Apr 2014 11:39:32 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: The Iran-Contra affair was the Reagan Administration's. Period. I agree it was all Reagan's doing. I am also not sure how terrible it actually was. We gave Iran weapons to wage war against Saddam Hussein ... but I assume you liked Saddam. You saw no value in us tossing him out.. Clearly Israel thought Saddam was a bigger threat to them than the Ayatollah was, since they brokered the weapons deal with Iran and made money on it.. That is also why we eventually went after Saddam so Israel wouldn't do it. That was the scandal that never came to light. Oh, right. Sure. Again, what part was wrong? Part of the history revisionists (like Harry) have is they like to relate to an event that happened 30 years or so ago under a completely different set of circumstances and global issues to something that is going on today. Simplistic, but that's how Wishy-Washy, Never-Never Land liberals think. I'm not revising anything. Reagan and his gang broke a serious law, sold weapons to the Iranians, and used the proceeds to bolster murderous right-wing extremists in Nicaragua. Reagan, George H.W. Bush, et al, lied to Congress and the American people about this, and, of course, that traitor Oliver North was implicated up to his eyeballs. That's not "revisionism," that's what happened. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Good for a laugh | General | |||
| Need a good laugh? | General | |||
| What makes a good Democrat laugh... | General | |||
| Good laugh - must read | Cruising | |||
| yesterday, sauces laugh among good houses, unless they're blank | ASA | |||
Hybrid Mode
