On 4/12/14, 11:38 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/12/2014 9:29 AM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 4/12/14, 9:10 AM, KC wrote:
On 4/12/2014 9:07 AM, BAR wrote:
In article , says...
If a gunfight breaks out, I hope the feds kill them all. In this
country,
these sorts of disputes are supposed to be settled in court.
Well, I guess that union disputes that turn violent, should have
all the
union members killed that are at the violence location! Frik'n
idiot. I
guess that Waco and Ruby Ridge are high on your approval list.
You're a funny guy, Zell.
I may be funny, but you are sick.
Waco and Ruby Ridge prove that if you engage the government in a
gunfight, you are probably going to die.
Our country was born from our engagement of the government in a
gunfight. Some died, many more lived and the greatest incubator of
innovation and wealth creation emerged.
If you dig a little you will see that this all ties back to the land, a
Chinese Solar firm, and dun, dun, dun.... Senator Harry Reid.
If you dig a little more, you'll see that Bundy doesn't own the land and
hasn't paid the required rent on it for more than a decade. But that's
not the issue. The issue is, if you engage the federal government in a
shooting match, you are going to lose.
Who instigated the conflict? Not Bundy. Not his neighbors. Not the
state. Not even the federal government until Reid got involved along
with his son with a deal to have the Chinese build a solar energy site.
First it was endangered "dessert tortoises". What a joke.
Heheh. You fellows just don't get it. The point is, if you start an
armed battle with the feds or locals in this country, you are going to
.... *lose* .