F*O*A*D wrote:
On 4/10/14, 3:37 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/10/2014 3:33 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
"Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 4/10/2014 3:05 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 10:46:37 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

All the cites quote back to a 20-year-old item that allegedly
appeared

in the Chicago Sun-Times, and virtually all the cites are from

right-wing sites. I've never seen a cite that definitively proves

Jackson said any such thing.

Yet just one post back you tried to definitively say that you knew
what
he meant when he said it. You're full of it, as usual.

===

That's absolutely true of course, but Harry is what he is and nothing
will change him.

After watching more than a few of these exchanges on rec.boats over
the years I am once again reminded of why you should never mud wrestle
with a pig. The pig gets irritated and everyone gets dirty.



It is fun sometimes however to see how creatively he can rope-a-dope.

The usual smug republicans in denial. Nothing else is new.


Rope-a-Dope !


Please. In the last few days, *your* political party nationally and in
various states has taken measures to restrict voting, to not extend
unemployment compensation, to deny equal pay for equal work, and in the
Ryan budget that passed the House today, further slice what remains of
the social safety network in order to give more tax breaks to the
wealthy. All of those moves, every one of them, impact the poor and
minorities negatively. Smug Republicans in denial.

Why should we extend unemployment? Isn't two years enough for someone to
learn a new job? Why not restrict voting to those legal to vote in an
election. Person moved 2 years ago, to another district, why should it not
be questioned when he wants to vote in a local election? An local election
that does not concern them. Why should a person in Chicago or anyplace
else get to vote each year for 75 years after they died? We, as a nation
are broke! Why should we not change welfare, when it seems to not improved
the nation in 75 years? When we are on the 6 or 7th generation of welfare
family, even a concrete brain like yours has to admit, IT AIN'T WORKING.
The poor pay no IRS taxes! why give them a break? Look at dividend income
from 2014 on. Max tax rate from IRS, 35%. But that money was already
taxed at 38% corporate tax rate. Seems as if removes incentive to invest
for long term, or even to pay dividends. Kills those 401K and pension
funds even more. Why are we borrowing 47cents of every dollar the Federal
Government spends. Seems even worse since the modern Dem's are in control
of the Executive branch. We better change something, as what we are doing
now AIN'T work'n.

On 4/10/2014 8:25 PM, Califbill wrote:
F*O*A*D wrote:
On 4/10/14, 3:37 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/10/2014 3:33 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
"Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 4/10/2014 3:05 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 10:46:37 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

All the cites quote back to a 20-year-old item that allegedly
appeared

in the Chicago Sun-Times, and virtually all the cites are from

right-wing sites. I've never seen a cite that definitively proves

Jackson said any such thing.

Yet just one post back you tried to definitively say that you knew
what
he meant when he said it. You're full of it, as usual.

===

That's absolutely true of course, but Harry is what he is and nothing
will change him.

After watching more than a few of these exchanges on rec.boats over
the years I am once again reminded of why you should never mud wrestle
with a pig. The pig gets irritated and everyone gets dirty.



It is fun sometimes however to see how creatively he can rope-a-dope.

The usual smug republicans in denial. Nothing else is new.


Rope-a-Dope !


Please. In the last few days, *your* political party nationally and in
various states has taken measures to restrict voting, to not extend
unemployment compensation, to deny equal pay for equal work, and in the
Ryan budget that passed the House today, further slice what remains of
the social safety network in order to give more tax breaks to the
wealthy. All of those moves, every one of them, impact the poor and
minorities negatively. Smug Republicans in denial.

Why should we extend unemployment? Isn't two years enough for someone to
learn a new job? Why not restrict voting to those legal to vote in an
election. Person moved 2 years ago, to another district, why should it not
be questioned when he wants to vote in a local election? An local election
that does not concern them. Why should a person in Chicago or anyplace
else get to vote each year for 75 years after they died? We, as a nation
are broke! Why should we not change welfare, when it seems to not improved
the nation in 75 years? When we are on the 6 or 7th generation of welfare
family, even a concrete brain like yours has to admit, IT AIN'T WORKING.
The poor pay no IRS taxes! why give them a break? Look at dividend income
from 2014 on. Max tax rate from IRS, 35%. But that money was already
taxed at 38% corporate tax rate. Seems as if removes incentive to invest
for long term, or even to pay dividends. Kills those 401K and pension
funds even more. Why are we borrowing 47cents of every dollar the Federal
Government spends. Seems even worse since the modern Dem's are in control
of the Executive branch. We better change something, as what we are doing
now AIN'T work'n.

Regarding voting, why would we want someone that does not have the
ability to figure out how to get valid Identification go into a voting
booth and pick the person responsible for the nation, no matter what
party they would vote for.
Mikek

amdx wrote:
On 4/10/2014 8:25 PM, Califbill wrote:
F*O*A*D wrote:
On 4/10/14, 3:37 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/10/2014 3:33 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
"Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 4/10/2014 3:05 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 10:46:37 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

All the cites quote back to a 20-year-old item that allegedly
appeared

in the Chicago Sun-Times, and virtually all the cites are from

right-wing sites. I've never seen a cite that definitively proves

Jackson said any such thing.

Yet just one post back you tried to definitively say that you knew
what
he meant when he said it. You're full of it, as usual.

===

That's absolutely true of course, but Harry is what he is and nothing
will change him.

After watching more than a few of these exchanges on rec.boats over
the years I am once again reminded of why you should never mud wrestle
with a pig. The pig gets irritated and everyone gets dirty.



It is fun sometimes however to see how creatively he can rope-a-dope.

The usual smug republicans in denial. Nothing else is new.


Rope-a-Dope !


Please. In the last few days, *your* political party nationally and in
various states has taken measures to restrict voting, to not extend
unemployment compensation, to deny equal pay for equal work, and in the
Ryan budget that passed the House today, further slice what remains of
the social safety network in order to give more tax breaks to the
wealthy. All of those moves, every one of them, impact the poor and
minorities negatively. Smug Republicans in denial.

Why should we extend unemployment? Isn't two years enough for someone to
learn a new job? Why not restrict voting to those legal to vote in an
election. Person moved 2 years ago, to another district, why should it not
be questioned when he wants to vote in a local election? An local election
that does not concern them. Why should a person in Chicago or anyplace
else get to vote each year for 75 years after they died? We, as a nation
are broke! Why should we not change welfare, when it seems to not improved
the nation in 75 years? When we are on the 6 or 7th generation of welfare
family, even a concrete brain like yours has to admit, IT AIN'T WORKING.
The poor pay no IRS taxes! why give them a break? Look at dividend income
from 2014 on. Max tax rate from IRS, 35%. But that money was already
taxed at 38% corporate tax rate. Seems as if removes incentive to invest
for long term, or even to pay dividends. Kills those 401K and pension
funds even more. Why are we borrowing 47cents of every dollar the Federal
Government spends. Seems even worse since the modern Dem's are in control
of the Executive branch. We better change something, as what we are doing
now AIN'T work'n.

Regarding voting, why would we want someone that does not have the
ability to figure out how to get valid Identification go into a voting
booth and pick the person responsible for the nation, no matter what
party they would vote for.
Mikek

You boys should ask BAR for applications to join his BORN AGAIN JOHN BIRCH
SOCIETY. It is your kind of group.

F.O.A.D. wrote:
amdx wrote:
On 4/10/2014 8:25 PM, Califbill wrote:
F*O*A*D wrote:
On 4/10/14, 3:37 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/10/2014 3:33 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
"Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 4/10/2014 3:05 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 10:46:37 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

All the cites quote back to a 20-year-old item that allegedly
appeared

in the Chicago Sun-Times, and virtually all the cites are from

right-wing sites. I've never seen a cite that definitively proves

Jackson said any such thing.

Yet just one post back you tried to definitively say that you knew
what
he meant when he said it. You're full of it, as usual.

===

That's absolutely true of course, but Harry is what he is and nothing
will change him.

After watching more than a few of these exchanges on rec.boats over
the years I am once again reminded of why you should never mud wrestle
with a pig. The pig gets irritated and everyone gets dirty.



It is fun sometimes however to see how creatively he can rope-a-dope.

The usual smug republicans in denial. Nothing else is new.


Rope-a-Dope !


Please. In the last few days, *your* political party nationally and in
various states has taken measures to restrict voting, to not extend
unemployment compensation, to deny equal pay for equal work, and in the
Ryan budget that passed the House today, further slice what remains of
the social safety network in order to give more tax breaks to the
wealthy. All of those moves, every one of them, impact the poor and
minorities negatively. Smug Republicans in denial.

Why should we extend unemployment? Isn't two years enough for someone to
learn a new job? Why not restrict voting to those legal to vote in an
election. Person moved 2 years ago, to another district, why should it not
be questioned when he wants to vote in a local election? An local election
that does not concern them. Why should a person in Chicago or anyplace
else get to vote each year for 75 years after they died? We, as a nation
are broke! Why should we not change welfare, when it seems to not improved
the nation in 75 years? When we are on the 6 or 7th generation of welfare
family, even a concrete brain like yours has to admit, IT AIN'T WORKING.
The poor pay no IRS taxes! why give them a break? Look at dividend income
from 2014 on. Max tax rate from IRS, 35%. But that money was already
taxed at 38% corporate tax rate. Seems as if removes incentive to invest
for long term, or even to pay dividends. Kills those 401K and pension
funds even more. Why are we borrowing 47cents of every dollar the Federal
Government spends. Seems even worse since the modern Dem's are in control
of the Executive branch. We better change something, as what we are doing
now AIN'T work'n.

Regarding voting, why would we want someone that does not have the
ability to figure out how to get valid Identification go into a voting
booth and pick the person responsible for the nation, no matter what
party they would vote for.
Mikek

You boys should ask BAR for applications to join his BORN AGAIN JOHN BIRCH
SOCIETY. It is your kind of group.

Sounds more like the JB type organization is your type group. Restrict the
laws, so only those who agree with you get a vote. Legal or not. Answer
why welfare as it is presently structure is good and working. Or at least
your Rope-A-Dope answer.

On 4/10/2014 10:44 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
amdx wrote:
On 4/10/2014 8:25 PM, Califbill wrote:
F*O*A*D wrote:
On 4/10/14, 3:37 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/10/2014 3:33 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
"Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 4/10/2014 3:05 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 10:46:37 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

All the cites quote back to a 20-year-old item that allegedly
appeared

in the Chicago Sun-Times, and virtually all the cites are from

right-wing sites. I've never seen a cite that definitively proves

Jackson said any such thing.

Yet just one post back you tried to definitively say that you knew
what
he meant when he said it. You're full of it, as usual.

===

That's absolutely true of course, but Harry is what he is and nothing
will change him.

After watching more than a few of these exchanges on rec.boats over
the years I am once again reminded of why you should never mud wrestle
with a pig. The pig gets irritated and everyone gets dirty.



It is fun sometimes however to see how creatively he can rope-a-dope.

The usual smug republicans in denial. Nothing else is new.


Rope-a-Dope !


Please. In the last few days, *your* political party nationally and in
various states has taken measures to restrict voting, to not extend
unemployment compensation, to deny equal pay for equal work, and in the
Ryan budget that passed the House today, further slice what remains of
the social safety network in order to give more tax breaks to the
wealthy. All of those moves, every one of them, impact the poor and
minorities negatively. Smug Republicans in denial.

Why should we extend unemployment? Isn't two years enough for someone to
learn a new job? Why not restrict voting to those legal to vote in an
election. Person moved 2 years ago, to another district, why should it not
be questioned when he wants to vote in a local election? An local election
that does not concern them. Why should a person in Chicago or anyplace
else get to vote each year for 75 years after they died? We, as a nation
are broke! Why should we not change welfare, when it seems to not improved
the nation in 75 years? When we are on the 6 or 7th generation of welfare
family, even a concrete brain like yours has to admit, IT AIN'T WORKING.
The poor pay no IRS taxes! why give them a break? Look at dividend income
from 2014 on. Max tax rate from IRS, 35%. But that money was already
taxed at 38% corporate tax rate. Seems as if removes incentive to invest
for long term, or even to pay dividends. Kills those 401K and pension
funds even more. Why are we borrowing 47cents of every dollar the Federal
Government spends. Seems even worse since the modern Dem's are in control
of the Executive branch. We better change something, as what we are doing
now AIN'T work'n.

Regarding voting, why would we want someone that does not have the
ability to figure out how to get valid Identification go into a voting
booth and pick the person responsible for the nation, no matter what
party they would vote for.
Mikek

You boys should ask BAR for applications to join his BORN AGAIN JOHN BIRCH
SOCIETY. It is your kind of group.


Your union heritage causes you to believe that the lowest common
denominator deserves the same rewards as those who have achieved
something by way of honest hard work. It must really pain you to have to
look into the eyes of an achiever every morning at breakfast.

On 4/11/2014 7:22 AM, H*a*r*r*o*l*d wrote:


Your union heritage causes you to believe that the lowest common
denominator deserves the same rewards as those who have achieved
something by way of honest hard work.

That is well said.


It must really pain you to have to look into the eyes of an achiever
every morning at breakfast.

I have that problem myself, but it is not at breakfast, by that time
she is already opening the shop. This time of year she is trying to beat
the competition to the customers.
Mikek

On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 20:25:32 -0500, Califbill wrote:

F*O*A*D wrote:
On 4/10/14, 3:37 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/10/2014 3:33 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
"Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 4/10/2014 3:05 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 10:46:37 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

All the cites quote back to a 20-year-old item that allegedly
appeared

in the Chicago Sun-Times, and virtually all the cites are from

right-wing sites. I've never seen a cite that definitively proves

Jackson said any such thing.

Yet just one post back you tried to definitively say that you knew
what
he meant when he said it. You're full of it, as usual.

===

That's absolutely true of course, but Harry is what he is and nothing
will change him.

After watching more than a few of these exchanges on rec.boats over
the years I am once again reminded of why you should never mud wrestle
with a pig. The pig gets irritated and everyone gets dirty.



It is fun sometimes however to see how creatively he can rope-a-dope.

The usual smug republicans in denial. Nothing else is new.


Rope-a-Dope !


Please. In the last few days, *your* political party nationally and in
various states has taken measures to restrict voting, to not extend
unemployment compensation, to deny equal pay for equal work, and in the
Ryan budget that passed the House today, further slice what remains of
the social safety network in order to give more tax breaks to the
wealthy. All of those moves, every one of them, impact the poor and
minorities negatively. Smug Republicans in denial.

Why should we extend unemployment? Isn't two years enough for someone to
learn a new job? Why not restrict voting to those legal to vote in an
election. Person moved 2 years ago, to another district, why should it not
be questioned when he wants to vote in a local election? An local election
that does not concern them. Why should a person in Chicago or anyplace
else get to vote each year for 75 years after they died? We, as a nation
are broke! Why should we not change welfare, when it seems to not improved
the nation in 75 years? When we are on the 6 or 7th generation of welfare
family, even a concrete brain like yours has to admit, IT AIN'T WORKING.
The poor pay no IRS taxes! why give them a break? Look at dividend income
from 2014 on. Max tax rate from IRS, 35%. But that money was already
taxed at 38% corporate tax rate. Seems as if removes incentive to invest
for long term, or even to pay dividends. Kills those 401K and pension
funds even more. Why are we borrowing 47cents of every dollar the Federal
Government spends. Seems even worse since the modern Dem's are in control
of the Executive branch. We better change something, as what we are doing
now AIN'T work'n.

Well said. I'm sure Krause has no response, except some more ropeadope.

On 4/16/2014 10:33 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 20:25:32 -0500, Califbill wrote:

F*O*A*D wrote:
On 4/10/14, 3:37 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/10/2014 3:33 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
"Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 4/10/2014 3:05 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 10:46:37 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

All the cites quote back to a 20-year-old item that allegedly
appeared

in the Chicago Sun-Times, and virtually all the cites are from

right-wing sites. I've never seen a cite that definitively proves

Jackson said any such thing.

Yet just one post back you tried to definitively say that you knew
what
he meant when he said it. You're full of it, as usual.

===

That's absolutely true of course, but Harry is what he is and nothing
will change him.

After watching more than a few of these exchanges on rec.boats over
the years I am once again reminded of why you should never mud wrestle
with a pig. The pig gets irritated and everyone gets dirty.



It is fun sometimes however to see how creatively he can rope-a-dope.

The usual smug republicans in denial. Nothing else is new.


Rope-a-Dope !


Please. In the last few days, *your* political party nationally and in
various states has taken measures to restrict voting, to not extend
unemployment compensation, to deny equal pay for equal work, and in the
Ryan budget that passed the House today, further slice what remains of
the social safety network in order to give more tax breaks to the
wealthy. All of those moves, every one of them, impact the poor and
minorities negatively. Smug Republicans in denial.

Why should we extend unemployment? Isn't two years enough for someone to
learn a new job? Why not restrict voting to those legal to vote in an
election. Person moved 2 years ago, to another district, why should it not
be questioned when he wants to vote in a local election? An local election
that does not concern them. Why should a person in Chicago or anyplace
else get to vote each year for 75 years after they died? We, as a nation
are broke! Why should we not change welfare, when it seems to not improved
the nation in 75 years? When we are on the 6 or 7th generation of welfare
family, even a concrete brain like yours has to admit, IT AIN'T WORKING.
The poor pay no IRS taxes! why give them a break? Look at dividend income
from 2014 on. Max tax rate from IRS, 35%. But that money was already
taxed at 38% corporate tax rate. Seems as if removes incentive to invest
for long term, or even to pay dividends. Kills those 401K and pension
funds even more. Why are we borrowing 47cents of every dollar the Federal
Government spends. Seems even worse since the modern Dem's are in control
of the Executive branch. We better change something, as what we are doing
now AIN'T work'n.

Well said. I'm sure Krause has no response, except some more ropeadope.

You'd think he would tire of being the rope a dope victim.

On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 11:11:30 -0400, H*a*r*r*o*l*d wrote:

On 4/16/2014 10:33 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 20:25:32 -0500, Califbill wrote:

F*O*A*D wrote:
On 4/10/14, 3:37 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/10/2014 3:33 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
"Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 4/10/2014 3:05 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 10:46:37 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

All the cites quote back to a 20-year-old item that allegedly
appeared

in the Chicago Sun-Times, and virtually all the cites are from

right-wing sites. I've never seen a cite that definitively proves

Jackson said any such thing.

Yet just one post back you tried to definitively say that you knew
what
he meant when he said it. You're full of it, as usual.

===

That's absolutely true of course, but Harry is what he is and nothing
will change him.

After watching more than a few of these exchanges on rec.boats over
the years I am once again reminded of why you should never mud wrestle
with a pig. The pig gets irritated and everyone gets dirty.



It is fun sometimes however to see how creatively he can rope-a-dope.

The usual smug republicans in denial. Nothing else is new.


Rope-a-Dope !


Please. In the last few days, *your* political party nationally and in
various states has taken measures to restrict voting, to not extend
unemployment compensation, to deny equal pay for equal work, and in the
Ryan budget that passed the House today, further slice what remains of
the social safety network in order to give more tax breaks to the
wealthy. All of those moves, every one of them, impact the poor and
minorities negatively. Smug Republicans in denial.

Why should we extend unemployment? Isn't two years enough for someone to
learn a new job? Why not restrict voting to those legal to vote in an
election. Person moved 2 years ago, to another district, why should it not
be questioned when he wants to vote in a local election? An local election
that does not concern them. Why should a person in Chicago or anyplace
else get to vote each year for 75 years after they died? We, as a nation
are broke! Why should we not change welfare, when it seems to not improved
the nation in 75 years? When we are on the 6 or 7th generation of welfare
family, even a concrete brain like yours has to admit, IT AIN'T WORKING.
The poor pay no IRS taxes! why give them a break? Look at dividend income
from 2014 on. Max tax rate from IRS, 35%. But that money was already
taxed at 38% corporate tax rate. Seems as if removes incentive to invest
for long term, or even to pay dividends. Kills those 401K and pension
funds even more. Why are we borrowing 47cents of every dollar the Federal
Government spends. Seems even worse since the modern Dem's are in control
of the Executive branch. We better change something, as what we are doing
now AIN'T work'n.

Well said. I'm sure Krause has no response, except some more ropeadope.

You'd think he would tire of being the rope a dope victim.

As long as he gets his attention and can dole out his insults to those who respond to him, he's a
happy, narcissistic camper.

On 4/16/14, 12:52 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:

As long as he gets his attention and can dole out his insults to those who respond to him, he's a
happy, narcissistic camper.


Speaking of camping, where's your next stop with that RV? Alexandria?