Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Tim Tim is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,107
Default Value of restored Bristol 26?

On Saturday, March 29, 2014 9:26:09 PM UTC-7, Wayne. B wrote:
On Sat, 29 Mar 2014 19:28:23 -0700 (PDT), Tim

wrote:





In August of 1972 my wife and I chartered a Bristol 25 for two weeks.




It was our first cruising experience on Long Island Sound and Block




Island. It was a pretty small boat and didn't sail very well but we




had a great time. A year or two later we bought a Westerly 28 which




was another small boat but it was like the Queen Mary compared to the




Bristol. We did a lot of sailing on the Westerly and once got as far




as eastern Maine with it - big adventure for us at the time. We




actually did sell that boat for more than we paid, considerably more,




but that was a time of very high inflation and we had repowered it




with a new Volvo diesel.




From a 25 to a 28'




What made the big difference in their performance, Wayne?




===



Taller mast, bigger and better sails, more efficient keel with less

wetted surface (lower drag, greater lift), longer water line length.



It also had a much bigger main cabin.



When our kids got to be 5 or 6 we decided it was time for another

bigger boat and we got the Cal-34 that we had for many years. That

was another huge jump in relative size and performance, still small by

the standards of many, but it served us well for a long time.


Understood. Unless something radical it does seem odd that a mere 3 feet can make that big of a difference.

Like going from my 18 ft. Chris Craft to the 23 ft. Marquis.
  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 10,492
Default Value of restored Bristol 26?

On Sun, 30 Mar 2014 06:18:14 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Saturday, March 29, 2014 9:26:09 PM UTC-7, Wayne. B wrote:
On Sat, 29 Mar 2014 19:28:23 -0700 (PDT), Tim

wrote:





In August of 1972 my wife and I chartered a Bristol 25 for two weeks.




It was our first cruising experience on Long Island Sound and Block




Island. It was a pretty small boat and didn't sail very well but we




had a great time. A year or two later we bought a Westerly 28 which




was another small boat but it was like the Queen Mary compared to the




Bristol. We did a lot of sailing on the Westerly and once got as far




as eastern Maine with it - big adventure for us at the time. We




actually did sell that boat for more than we paid, considerably more,




but that was a time of very high inflation and we had repowered it




with a new Volvo diesel.




From a 25 to a 28'




What made the big difference in their performance, Wayne?




===



Taller mast, bigger and better sails, more efficient keel with less

wetted surface (lower drag, greater lift), longer water line length.



It also had a much bigger main cabin.



When our kids got to be 5 or 6 we decided it was time for another

bigger boat and we got the Cal-34 that we had for many years. That

was another huge jump in relative size and performance, still small by

the standards of many, but it served us well for a long time.


Understood. Unless something radical it does seem odd that a mere 3 feet can make that big of a difference.

Like going from my 18 ft. Chris Craft to the 23 ft. Marquis.


===

When you stretch the length of a boat, usually every other dimension
goes up also such as height and width. As a general rule of thumb
the interior volume increases in proportion to the cube of the length.
Let's look at a 25% increase just as an example. We're talking
about the cube of 1.25 (1.25 x 1.25 x 1.25 = 1.95), or almost double
the interior space.
  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2014
Posts: 2,337
Default Value of restored Bristol 26?

On Sun, 30 Mar 2014 11:11:14 -0400, Wayne.B wrote:

On Sun, 30 Mar 2014 06:18:14 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Saturday, March 29, 2014 9:26:09 PM UTC-7, Wayne. B wrote:
On Sat, 29 Mar 2014 19:28:23 -0700 (PDT), Tim

wrote:





In August of 1972 my wife and I chartered a Bristol 25 for two weeks.



It was our first cruising experience on Long Island Sound and Block



Island. It was a pretty small boat and didn't sail very well but we



had a great time. A year or two later we bought a Westerly 28 which



was another small boat but it was like the Queen Mary compared to the



Bristol. We did a lot of sailing on the Westerly and once got as far



as eastern Maine with it - big adventure for us at the time. We



actually did sell that boat for more than we paid, considerably more,



but that was a time of very high inflation and we had repowered it



with a new Volvo diesel.



From a 25 to a 28'



What made the big difference in their performance, Wayne?



===



Taller mast, bigger and better sails, more efficient keel with less

wetted surface (lower drag, greater lift), longer water line length.



It also had a much bigger main cabin.



When our kids got to be 5 or 6 we decided it was time for another

bigger boat and we got the Cal-34 that we had for many years. That

was another huge jump in relative size and performance, still small by

the standards of many, but it served us well for a long time.


Understood. Unless something radical it does seem odd that a mere 3 feet can make that big of a difference.

Like going from my 18 ft. Chris Craft to the 23 ft. Marquis.


===

When you stretch the length of a boat, usually every other dimension
goes up also such as height and width. As a general rule of thumb
the interior volume increases in proportion to the cube of the length.
Let's look at a 25% increase just as an example. We're talking
about the cube of 1.25 (1.25 x 1.25 x 1.25 = 1.95), or almost double
the interior space.


Never thought of it that way. Thanks!
  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Tim Tim is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,107
Default Value of restored Bristol 26?

On Sunday, March 30, 2014 8:11:14 AM UTC-7, Wayne. B wrote:
On Sun, 30 Mar 2014 06:18:14 -0700 (PDT), Tim

wrote:



On Saturday, March 29, 2014 9:26:09 PM UTC-7, Wayne. B wrote:


On Sat, 29 Mar 2014 19:28:23 -0700 (PDT), Tim




wrote:












In August of 1972 my wife and I chartered a Bristol 25 for two weeks.








It was our first cruising experience on Long Island Sound and Block








Island. It was a pretty small boat and didn't sail very well but we








had a great time. A year or two later we bought a Westerly 28 which








was another small boat but it was like the Queen Mary compared to the








Bristol. We did a lot of sailing on the Westerly and once got as far








as eastern Maine with it - big adventure for us at the time. We








actually did sell that boat for more than we paid, considerably more,








but that was a time of very high inflation and we had repowered it








with a new Volvo diesel.








From a 25 to a 28'








What made the big difference in their performance, Wayne?








===








Taller mast, bigger and better sails, more efficient keel with less




wetted surface (lower drag, greater lift), longer water line length.








It also had a much bigger main cabin.








When our kids got to be 5 or 6 we decided it was time for another




bigger boat and we got the Cal-34 that we had for many years. That




was another huge jump in relative size and performance, still small by




the standards of many, but it served us well for a long time.




Understood. Unless something radical it does seem odd that a mere 3 feet can make that big of a difference.




Like going from my 18 ft. Chris Craft to the 23 ft. Marquis.




===



When you stretch the length of a boat, usually every other dimension

goes up also such as height and width. As a general rule of thumb

the interior volume increases in proportion to the cube of the length.

Let's look at a 25% increase just as an example. We're talking

about the cube of 1.25 (1.25 x 1.25 x 1.25 = 1.95), or almost double

the interior space.


Understood, Wayne. My 22 is a lot bigger boat than my 18, and mt 23 is a lot smaller than my old '27 Chris Cavlier. In this case, just a little bit means a lot.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I'm getting it restored... Tim General 9 April 13th 13 02:03 PM
Windjammer film to be restored CJB Tall Ships 0 December 19th 09 07:42 PM
Restored 1920 Dorris K-4 Gwyneð Bennetdottir General 19 January 2nd 08 06:07 PM
My SORRY OL Faded BoAt! RESTORED/TRANSFORMED acoolway2sayit Boat Building 0 November 15th 05 02:08 AM
Fully Restored PT 658 *JimH* General 6 August 20th 05 04:21 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017