On 3/17/14, 9:22 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Mon, 17 Mar 2014 09:06:12 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 3/16/14, 10:48 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, March 16, 2014 8:41:14 PM UTC-5, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 3/16/14, 8:59 PM, Tim wrote:

On Sunday, March 16, 2014 7:06:53 PM UTC-5, F*O*A*D wrote:





Is the god of Phelps a different entity than, say, the god of Noah or



the god of Lot or the god of, say, all the creeps throughout history who



took it upon themselves to kill in the name of their god? How about all



the genocides in history done in the name of religious beliefs,



including those in the last century? Was the god these murderers were



satiating the same old god?



Harry, you take a simple statement , twist it around, then try to justify it. You really shouldn't try to confuse yourself lieke that...







No confusion here. I'm merely questioning whether the god of Phelps,

which you claim is different than "god," is in reality the same god.

Keep questioning, Harry. You may get it figured out....eventually.



I think it reasonable to assume that the god in question is the same
entity man has conjured up over the dozen or so millennia in which we
have an inkling of modern mankind's history.

Totally silly. Some believe in one God, others believe in multiple Gods. To say it is 'the same
entity ....over the dozen so millennia' is quite stupid, eh?

You're little more than a ****ing joke, Krause.


The "evolution" of believing in many gods to the belief in a single god
is little more than the refining of a concept that some religions went
through as their acolytes paid more attention to their environment and
realized there were rational, science-based explanations for much of
what was mysterious.

Obviously, you aren't equipped intellectually to discuss these sorts of
concepts without your usual junior high school name-calling.