On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 08:01:11 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 2/17/14, 7:40 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 07:29:48 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 2/17/14, 7:07 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/17/2014 7:00 AM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 2/17/14, 6:12 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 22:35:22 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 03:21:15 -0500, HanK wrote:

So Harry, are you saying you don't stir anything at all in here,
good
buddy??


Did I say that? No. What I said was that Wayne has with his daily
personal insults reduced himself to a more educated version of
Slammer. That's why I shoved him into the dumpster. I for the most
part have refrained since the beginning of the year from personally
insulting other posters here. Wayne has not, Hank has not, Slammer
has
not, and a couple of others have not.
A true professional would have written: "I, for the most part,
have...". You chose to not highlight the "for the most part"
point in
your post. It's obvious why you took that path.

His punctuation is horrible, doncha think?

===

But he is a world class writer and editor - in his own mind. It's
interesting the way some people can weave together such a complex
fantasy world and utterly believe it.

Oh Wayne, be nice. We just went through Valentine's Day, a day to
bestow love, hugs, and kisses.

Besides, it's his cut'n'pastin' that earns the award.



Americans who are poorly educated or sloppy in the use of English tend
to overuse commas.


I, overuse commas, all the, time.



I don't pay much attention to my own spelling or grammar here since
after all it is just rec.boats. I pay even less attention to spelling or
grammar here when I post with my cell phone.

That has, on several occasions, been the subject of observation and comment.


Is it your presumption that rec.boats is worth paying close attention?

Close attention was not required.