On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 17:38:32 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 2/10/14, 5:23 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/10/2014 5:06 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 2/10/14, 4:57 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 13:24:55 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Monday, February 10, 2014 9:12:05 AM UTC-6, wrote:

I suppose the idea of moving them to a shelter is just too humane for

you.



Of course they would lose their "freedom" (freedom to get

drunk/stoned)

Or their 'freedom' in general. You can't tell me that many[if not
most] of the 'shelterless' don't have this attitude-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DvLLQAAr8zQ

It is usually their quest for "freedom" that keeps them from gainful
employment, keeps them from going to shelters and what got them kicked
out of the Army.



I had *no* idea you righties were university and professionally trained
case workers with at least bachelors degrees in social work and intimate
knowledge of the plight of the homeless gained from your years of
working directly with hundreds or even thousands of homeless folks.
Perhaps you should get on the lecture circuit.


There you go again assuming that a specific degree is required to make
fundamental conclusions based on experience and common sense. It's
amazing that so many parents can successfully raise and guide kids for
18 years without benefit of some advanced degree in child psychology.


Raising a few rug rats doesn't equate helping the homeless.

There you go, that explains it. Most of us raised our children. Equating yours with 'rug rats'
doesn't sound worthy of someone knowledgeable in all this psychology.

When did you get your experience with hundreds, even thousands, of homeless folks. Because, if you
have the knowledge and experience to say someone here is wrong, then you must have the experience
from somewhere, eh?

Or did we miss the point again?