Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/4/2014 2:49 PM, Califbill wrote:
KC wrote: On 2/3/2014 5:54 PM, Califbill wrote: KC wrote: On 2/3/2014 11:59 AM, wrote: On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 11:47:27 -0500, KC wrote: On 2/3/2014 11:24 AM, wrote: On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 05:21:38 -0500, KC wrote: On 2/2/2014 10:39 PM, wrote: I am saying you can and they do not have to include church dogma. I have no problem with religious organizations denying these services in their hospitals and as employers but I don't want them imposing it on everyone else through legislation. Now you are starting to sound like harry.... I don't see the little nuns trying to push their agenda on anybody else, they just don't want to be covered or charged for abortions.... Isn't that what I just said? I was talking about the "imposing" part.. Imposing what, and the same question we don't bother asking him, show me? When these groups push legislation that makes everyone follow their pro life policies it "imposing". So, asking for a reasonable time for a mom to decide is "imposing"? Is that what you are talking about? No, he is talking about the law requiring a doctor or hospital to do an abortion on demand. No matter the beliefs of the doctor or hospital! So, what you are saying is.... "The hospital not wanting to have imposed on it the requirement to do abortions on demand, is somehow "imposing" on the folks who choose to use their facility? Dumb.... No, I am saying a Catholic or other religious run hospital is forced to do abortions on demand, despite their beliefs. The women could easily choose another facility. That is willing to perform the procedure. So, I am still trying to see where the "imposing" comes in... |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
KC wrote:
On 2/4/2014 2:49 PM, Califbill wrote: KC wrote: On 2/3/2014 5:54 PM, Califbill wrote: KC wrote: On 2/3/2014 11:59 AM, wrote: On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 11:47:27 -0500, KC wrote: On 2/3/2014 11:24 AM, wrote: On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 05:21:38 -0500, KC wrote: On 2/2/2014 10:39 PM, wrote: I am saying you can and they do not have to include church dogma. I have no problem with religious organizations denying these services in their hospitals and as employers but I don't want them imposing it on everyone else through legislation. Now you are starting to sound like harry.... I don't see the little nuns trying to push their agenda on anybody else, they just don't want to be covered or charged for abortions.... Isn't that what I just said? I was talking about the "imposing" part.. Imposing what, and the same question we don't bother asking him, show me? When these groups push legislation that makes everyone follow their pro life policies it "imposing". So, asking for a reasonable time for a mom to decide is "imposing"? Is that what you are talking about? No, he is talking about the law requiring a doctor or hospital to do an abortion on demand. No matter the beliefs of the doctor or hospital! So, what you are saying is.... "The hospital not wanting to have imposed on it the requirement to do abortions on demand, is somehow "imposing" on the folks who choose to use their facility? Dumb.... No, I am saying a Catholic or other religious run hospital is forced to do abortions on demand, despite their beliefs. The women could easily choose another facility. That is willing to perform the procedure. So, I am still trying to see where the "imposing" comes in... Read the laws. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/5/2014 12:17 AM, Califbill wrote:
KC wrote: On 2/4/2014 2:49 PM, Califbill wrote: KC wrote: On 2/3/2014 5:54 PM, Califbill wrote: KC wrote: On 2/3/2014 11:59 AM, wrote: On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 11:47:27 -0500, KC wrote: On 2/3/2014 11:24 AM, wrote: On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 05:21:38 -0500, KC wrote: On 2/2/2014 10:39 PM, wrote: I am saying you can and they do not have to include church dogma. I have no problem with religious organizations denying these services in their hospitals and as employers but I don't want them imposing it on everyone else through legislation. Now you are starting to sound like harry.... I don't see the little nuns trying to push their agenda on anybody else, they just don't want to be covered or charged for abortions.... Isn't that what I just said? I was talking about the "imposing" part.. Imposing what, and the same question we don't bother asking him, show me? When these groups push legislation that makes everyone follow their pro life policies it "imposing". So, asking for a reasonable time for a mom to decide is "imposing"? Is that what you are talking about? No, he is talking about the law requiring a doctor or hospital to do an abortion on demand. No matter the beliefs of the doctor or hospital! So, what you are saying is.... "The hospital not wanting to have imposed on it the requirement to do abortions on demand, is somehow "imposing" on the folks who choose to use their facility? Dumb.... No, I am saying a Catholic or other religious run hospital is forced to do abortions on demand, despite their beliefs. The women could easily choose another facility. That is willing to perform the procedure. So, I am still trying to see where the "imposing" comes in... Read the laws. I will accept your non-answer, answer.. till you show me somewhere in the US where any woman, doesn't have access to abortion on demand... I stipulate the only imposition is making nuns have birth control, private doctors being forced to perform abortion on demand, and forcing us to pay for it all with no, not one reasonable compromise like some kind of time line for AOD, as opposed to saving life... or similar. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/5/14, 9:45 AM, KC wrote:
On 2/5/2014 12:17 AM, Califbill wrote: KC wrote: On 2/4/2014 2:49 PM, Califbill wrote: KC wrote: On 2/3/2014 5:54 PM, Califbill wrote: KC wrote: On 2/3/2014 11:59 AM, wrote: On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 11:47:27 -0500, KC wrote: On 2/3/2014 11:24 AM, wrote: On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 05:21:38 -0500, KC wrote: On 2/2/2014 10:39 PM, wrote: I am saying you can and they do not have to include church dogma. I have no problem with religious organizations denying these services in their hospitals and as employers but I don't want them imposing it on everyone else through legislation. Now you are starting to sound like harry.... I don't see the little nuns trying to push their agenda on anybody else, they just don't want to be covered or charged for abortions.... Isn't that what I just said? I was talking about the "imposing" part.. Imposing what, and the same question we don't bother asking him, show me? When these groups push legislation that makes everyone follow their pro life policies it "imposing". So, asking for a reasonable time for a mom to decide is "imposing"? Is that what you are talking about? No, he is talking about the law requiring a doctor or hospital to do an abortion on demand. No matter the beliefs of the doctor or hospital! So, what you are saying is.... "The hospital not wanting to have imposed on it the requirement to do abortions on demand, is somehow "imposing" on the folks who choose to use their facility? Dumb.... No, I am saying a Catholic or other religious run hospital is forced to do abortions on demand, despite their beliefs. The women could easily choose another facility. That is willing to perform the procedure. So, I am still trying to see where the "imposing" comes in... Read the laws. I will accept your non-answer, answer.. till you show me somewhere in the US where any woman, doesn't have access to abortion on demand... I stipulate the only imposition is making nuns have birth control, private doctors being forced to perform abortion on demand, and forcing us to pay for it all with no, not one reasonable compromise like some kind of time line for AOD, as opposed to saving life... or similar. To name two states, Kansas and Texas have closed down most clinics where women can obtain abortions, forcing women to drive to other states or even another country to get one. -- There’s no point crying over spilled 4-Methylcyclohexanemethanol. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 05 Feb 2014 10:02:01 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
snipped To name two states, Kansas and Texas have closed down most clinics where women can obtain abortions, forcing women to drive to other states or even another country to get one. Well, I suppose these put the lie to that: http://www.southwindwomenscenter.org/abortion-care/ http://www.routhstreet.com/ |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/5/14, 11:04 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Wed, 05 Feb 2014 10:02:01 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: snipped To name two states, Kansas and Texas have closed down most clinics where women can obtain abortions, forcing women to drive to other states or even another country to get one. Well, I suppose these put the lie to that: http://www.southwindwomenscenter.org/abortion-care/ http://www.routhstreet.com/ I fail to see how your post disputes the fact that Kansas and Texas have closed most clinics where women can get abortions. You did see the word "most" in there, right? "Most" does not mean all. -- There’s no point crying over spilled 4-Methylcyclohexanemethanol. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
KC wrote:
On 2/5/2014 12:17 AM, Califbill wrote: KC wrote: On 2/4/2014 2:49 PM, Califbill wrote: KC wrote: On 2/3/2014 5:54 PM, Califbill wrote: KC wrote: On 2/3/2014 11:59 AM, wrote: On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 11:47:27 -0500, KC wrote: On 2/3/2014 11:24 AM, wrote: On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 05:21:38 -0500, KC wrote: On 2/2/2014 10:39 PM, wrote: I am saying you can and they do not have to include church dogma. I have no problem with religious organizations denying these services in their hospitals and as employers but I don't want them imposing it on everyone else through legislation. Now you are starting to sound like harry.... I don't see the little nuns trying to push their agenda on anybody else, they just don't want to be covered or charged for abortions.... Isn't that what I just said? I was talking about the "imposing" part.. Imposing what, and the same question we don't bother asking him, show me? When these groups push legislation that makes everyone follow their pro life policies it "imposing". So, asking for a reasonable time for a mom to decide is "imposing"? Is that what you are talking about? No, he is talking about the law requiring a doctor or hospital to do an abortion on demand. No matter the beliefs of the doctor or hospital! So, what you are saying is.... "The hospital not wanting to have imposed on it the requirement to do abortions on demand, is somehow "imposing" on the folks who choose to use their facility? Dumb.... No, I am saying a Catholic or other religious run hospital is forced to do abortions on demand, despite their beliefs. The women could easily choose another facility. That is willing to perform the procedure. So, I am still trying to see where the "imposing" comes in... Read the laws. I will accept your non-answer, answer.. till you show me somewhere in the US where any woman, doesn't have access to abortion on demand... I stipulate the only imposition is making nuns have birth control, private doctors being forced to perform abortion on demand, and forcing us to pay for it all with no, not one reasonable compromise like some kind of time line for AOD, as opposed to saving life... or similar. I am saying the law requires Catholic and other religious order run hospitals to also do abortions. |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/5/2014 2:20 PM, Califbill wrote:
KC wrote: On 2/5/2014 12:17 AM, Califbill wrote: KC wrote: On 2/4/2014 2:49 PM, Califbill wrote: KC wrote: On 2/3/2014 5:54 PM, Califbill wrote: KC wrote: On 2/3/2014 11:59 AM, wrote: On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 11:47:27 -0500, KC wrote: On 2/3/2014 11:24 AM, wrote: On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 05:21:38 -0500, KC wrote: On 2/2/2014 10:39 PM, wrote: I am saying you can and they do not have to include church dogma. I have no problem with religious organizations denying these services in their hospitals and as employers but I don't want them imposing it on everyone else through legislation. Now you are starting to sound like harry.... I don't see the little nuns trying to push their agenda on anybody else, they just don't want to be covered or charged for abortions.... Isn't that what I just said? I was talking about the "imposing" part.. Imposing what, and the same question we don't bother asking him, show me? When these groups push legislation that makes everyone follow their pro life policies it "imposing". So, asking for a reasonable time for a mom to decide is "imposing"? Is that what you are talking about? No, he is talking about the law requiring a doctor or hospital to do an abortion on demand. No matter the beliefs of the doctor or hospital! So, what you are saying is.... "The hospital not wanting to have imposed on it the requirement to do abortions on demand, is somehow "imposing" on the folks who choose to use their facility? Dumb.... No, I am saying a Catholic or other religious run hospital is forced to do abortions on demand, despite their beliefs. The women could easily choose another facility. That is willing to perform the procedure. So, I am still trying to see where the "imposing" comes in... Read the laws. I will accept your non-answer, answer.. till you show me somewhere in the US where any woman, doesn't have access to abortion on demand... I stipulate the only imposition is making nuns have birth control, private doctors being forced to perform abortion on demand, and forcing us to pay for it all with no, not one reasonable compromise like some kind of time line for AOD, as opposed to saving life... or similar. I am saying the law requires Catholic and other religious order run hospitals to also do abortions. That I agree... But that is not pro lifers imposing on AOD'ers, it's exactly the opposite, it's Abortion On Demanders imposing on pro lifers. Pro lifers who by the way, would be willing to talk about some reasonable compromise, but the AOD'ers will have none of it... |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/5/14, 4:45 PM, KC wrote:
On 2/5/2014 2:20 PM, Califbill wrote: KC wrote: On 2/5/2014 12:17 AM, Califbill wrote: KC wrote: On 2/4/2014 2:49 PM, Califbill wrote: KC wrote: On 2/3/2014 5:54 PM, Califbill wrote: KC wrote: On 2/3/2014 11:59 AM, wrote: On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 11:47:27 -0500, KC wrote: On 2/3/2014 11:24 AM, wrote: On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 05:21:38 -0500, KC wrote: On 2/2/2014 10:39 PM, wrote: I am saying you can and they do not have to include church dogma. I have no problem with religious organizations denying these services in their hospitals and as employers but I don't want them imposing it on everyone else through legislation. Now you are starting to sound like harry.... I don't see the little nuns trying to push their agenda on anybody else, they just don't want to be covered or charged for abortions.... Isn't that what I just said? I was talking about the "imposing" part.. Imposing what, and the same question we don't bother asking him, show me? When these groups push legislation that makes everyone follow their pro life policies it "imposing". So, asking for a reasonable time for a mom to decide is "imposing"? Is that what you are talking about? No, he is talking about the law requiring a doctor or hospital to do an abortion on demand. No matter the beliefs of the doctor or hospital! So, what you are saying is.... "The hospital not wanting to have imposed on it the requirement to do abortions on demand, is somehow "imposing" on the folks who choose to use their facility? Dumb.... No, I am saying a Catholic or other religious run hospital is forced to do abortions on demand, despite their beliefs. The women could easily choose another facility. That is willing to perform the procedure. So, I am still trying to see where the "imposing" comes in... Read the laws. I will accept your non-answer, answer.. till you show me somewhere in the US where any woman, doesn't have access to abortion on demand... I stipulate the only imposition is making nuns have birth control, private doctors being forced to perform abortion on demand, and forcing us to pay for it all with no, not one reasonable compromise like some kind of time line for AOD, as opposed to saving life... or similar. I am saying the law requires Catholic and other religious order run hospitals to also do abortions. That I agree... But that is not pro lifers imposing on AOD'ers, it's exactly the opposite, it's Abortion On Demanders imposing on pro lifers. Pro lifers who by the way, would be willing to talk about some reasonable compromise, but the AOD'ers will have none of it... Oh? And what would that compromise be, pray tell? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Looking for a new country . . . | Cruising | |||
Isn't it great we still have some really bright kids in this country? | General | |||
Our Country | General | |||
IS THIS A GREAT COUNTRY OR WHAT? | General | |||
Great Trip in Liberal Country | General |