On 1/15/2014 12:07 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 1/14/2014 10:06 PM, KC wrote:
On 1/14/2014 6:50 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:



Reasonable, but I still think the "Force Command" (not commander)
should
be responsible for the safety of the Force....

Obviously you don't understand how the Navy chain of command works.



No I don't... But imagine how cool it would be if you would educate
us... When a ship is out in service, who is responsible for the safety
of the crews? For the sake of argument lets say, the reports of
contaminated drinking water are true, who is it that should have been
watching for that, surely it's not the corporation or country we are
going to help??


The Commanding Officer has the responsibility.

You are assuming that:

1. He didn't do what he was supposed to do and:
2. The lawsuit filed has any merit.

No I didn't

I repeat again ... to date the Navy, the CO, any of his crew members or
any of his superiors have *not* been named in the lawsuit.



Completely irrelevant to the question I asked which was simply, if so,
"who is responsible"?

Please read again... I never assumed either. I simply stated an opinion,
that you questioned, mocked, and then I asked a question. You are the
only one assuming anything...