Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#26
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/14/2014 10:06 PM, KC wrote:
On 1/14/2014 6:50 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: Reasonable, but I still think the "Force Command" (not commander) should be responsible for the safety of the Force.... Obviously you don't understand how the Navy chain of command works. No I don't... But imagine how cool it would be if you would educate us... When a ship is out in service, who is responsible for the safety of the crews? For the sake of argument lets say, the reports of contaminated drinking water are true, who is it that should have been watching for that, surely it's not the corporation or country we are going to help?? The Commanding Officer has the responsibility. You are assuming that: 1. He didn't do what he was supposed to do and: 2. The lawsuit filed has any merit. I repeat again ... to date the Navy, the CO, any of his crew members or any of his superiors have *not* been named in the lawsuit. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Straight Military Personnel with HIV... | General | |||
How much do they pay US military officers anyway? | General | |||
Known Risks | General | |||
OT The Military Salute | ASA | |||
( OT ) Albright: 'Our personnel were authorized to kill bin Laden' | General |