Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/14/2014 2:04 PM, KC wrote:
On 1/14/2014 1:09 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 1/14/2014 12:44 PM, KC wrote: On 1/14/2014 12:32 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: however it seems that the problem was contamination of the ocean water itself that got into the ship's fresh water supply. Again, unfortunate but very likely not anticipated. Sometimes **** happens. Leaves me wondering, "how the hell could that happen"? I mean, how could something so obvious as contamination of the force water supply be "not anticipated"... That's just incomprehensible to me that they could miss that.. That's the basis of the lawsuits. According to the lawyers, Japan under-reported the extent of the radiation leakage. The powers to be determined that the distance the carrier stayed off shore mitigated any danger, based on the reported level of radiation leakage. Turns out the leakage was much more severe than what was reported. Just blows me away they would even consider any outside info, and not just be monitoring themselves. This is on Fleet Command, nobody else... I see. And the commanding officer of a nuclear powered aircraft carrier is a complete idiot as are the fleet admirals he reports to. Got it. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Straight Military Personnel with HIV... | General | |||
How much do they pay US military officers anyway? | General | |||
Known Risks | General | |||
OT The Military Salute | ASA | |||
( OT ) Albright: 'Our personnel were authorized to kill bin Laden' | General |