| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Hope this gives apoplexy...
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 23:26:06 -0600, Califbill wrote:
John H. wrote: On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:26:47 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:12:34 -0500, John H. wrote: Why limit it to two? Are you discriminating against the "B"s? Because one person should not be able to deduct more than one spouse on her income tax return You can deduct all of your dependents now, gay straight or whatever. True, but there is only one box for 'Spouse'. And how come you keep editing my posts? John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! How about unreconstructed Mormon? More than one spouse. I wonder if they can claim them all as 'spouses'. John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hope this gives apoplexy...
On 12/24/2013 8:55 AM, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 23:26:06 -0600, Califbill wrote: John H. wrote: On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:26:47 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:12:34 -0500, John H. wrote: Why limit it to two? Are you discriminating against the "B"s? Because one person should not be able to deduct more than one spouse on her income tax return You can deduct all of your dependents now, gay straight or whatever. True, but there is only one box for 'Spouse'. And how come you keep editing my posts? John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! How about unreconstructed Mormon? More than one spouse. I wonder if they can claim them all as 'spouses'. John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! You know as well as I do that there has to be limits. Any more than ten would be decadent and subject to a luxury tax. IMO -- Americans deserve better. |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hope this gives apoplexy...
On Tue, 24 Dec 2013 09:19:08 -0500, Hank© wrote:
On 12/24/2013 8:55 AM, John H. wrote: On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 23:26:06 -0600, Califbill wrote: John H. wrote: On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:26:47 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:12:34 -0500, John H. wrote: Why limit it to two? Are you discriminating against the "B"s? Because one person should not be able to deduct more than one spouse on her income tax return You can deduct all of your dependents now, gay straight or whatever. True, but there is only one box for 'Spouse'. And how come you keep editing my posts? John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! How about unreconstructed Mormon? More than one spouse. I wonder if they can claim them all as 'spouses'. John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! You know as well as I do that there has to be limits. Any more than ten would be decadent and subject to a luxury tax. IMO Would the same rules apply to sheep, goats, etc? John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hope this gives apoplexy...
On 12/24/2013 9:44 AM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 24 Dec 2013 09:19:08 -0500, Hank© wrote: On 12/24/2013 8:55 AM, John H. wrote: On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 23:26:06 -0600, Califbill wrote: John H. wrote: On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:26:47 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:12:34 -0500, John H. wrote: Why limit it to two? Are you discriminating against the "B"s? Because one person should not be able to deduct more than one spouse on her income tax return You can deduct all of your dependents now, gay straight or whatever. True, but there is only one box for 'Spouse'. And how come you keep editing my posts? John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! How about unreconstructed Mormon? More than one spouse. I wonder if they can claim them all as 'spouses'. John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! You know as well as I do that there has to be limits. Any more than ten would be decadent and subject to a luxury tax. IMO Would the same rules apply to sheep, goats, etc? John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! You know sheep and goats, like Harry, don't pay taxes. -- Americans deserve better. |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hope this gives apoplexy...
John H. wrote:
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 23:26:06 -0600, Califbill wrote: John H. wrote: On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:26:47 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:12:34 -0500, John H. wrote: Why limit it to two? Are you discriminating against the "B"s? Because one person should not be able to deduct more than one spouse on her income tax return You can deduct all of your dependents now, gay straight or whatever. True, but there is only one box for 'Spouse'. And how come you keep editing my posts? John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! How about unreconstructed Mormon? More than one spouse. I wonder if they can claim them all as 'spouses'. John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! You can claim all the spouses as dependents. But there is only married and single as the spouse choice. Problem would be do you fill in spouse info with First Wife info? |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hope this gives apoplexy...
In article , says...
On Tue, 24 Dec 2013 08:55:43 -0500, John H. wrote: On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 23:26:06 -0600, Califbill wrote: John H. wrote: On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:26:47 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:12:34 -0500, John H. wrote: Why limit it to two? Are you discriminating against the "B"s? Because one person should not be able to deduct more than one spouse on her income tax return You can deduct all of your dependents now, gay straight or whatever. True, but there is only one box for 'Spouse'. And how come you keep editing my posts? John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! How about unreconstructed Mormon? More than one spouse. I wonder if they can claim them all as 'spouses'. John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! As long as you list a spouse, you can use the "married" column in the tax table. (better rate than single in some circumstances) Everyone else is just a dependent defined as "any other person(other than your spouse) who lived with you all year as a member of your household" -1040 instruction book In fact, it would actually be better for you if you did not list a spouse if you have dependents since you could use the "single head of household" column. (much better rate) That is one reason why I question all of this gay marriage thing in the first place As a tax payer I welcome them choosing to pay higher taxes tho. If the gays want to pay the marriage penalty let them. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Let's hope this happens to us! | General | |||
| I hope your having fun... | General | |||
| The last best hope for... | General | |||
| Some hope for the US after all... | General | |||
| Hope | ASA | |||
![John H.[_5_] is offline](https://www.boatbanter.com/images/SultanThemeVB3R/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Hybrid Mode
