![]() |
Former Virginia Gubernatorial Candidate Assaulted in Home
On 11/20/2013 6:54 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
Tightening state budgets have widened the gap in available beds. In the wake of the 2007 Virginia Tech shooting that claimed 32 lives, Virginia’s legislature took measures to revamp the emergency-evaluation processes, updated the criteria for involuntary psychiatric commitment and raised state funding for community mental-health services. But according to a report from the National Alliance on Mental Illness, Virginia’s overall state mental-health budget decreased $37.7 million dollars from $424.3 million to $386.6 million between fiscal years 2009 and 2012. “The consequences of not providing treatment should demonstrate the importance of the need for it,” says Kristina Ragosta, director of advocacy at the Treatment Advocacy Center. “Most people with mental illness are no more violent than the general population, but when we talk about people with untreated mental illness, they are at greater risk of committing violent acts.” Even the private facilities are tough to get into right away. They are usually full and there's often a waiting period for a bed. It's hard because it takes a herculean effort by friends and family to convince an addict that they need help and even a day's delay can result in the person going back into denial mode and refusing help. The situation I am familiar with took several attempts over a 2 year period to finally get the person into rehab. The first time he agreed to go and his friends got him into a facility in Boston. He stayed overnight and was evaluated by a shrink the next day. The shrink determined he was suffering from anxiety and depression and prescribed some pills to make him feel better. All it did was make matters worse because he left the facility the next day, now armed with a prescription anti-depressants along with his alcohol addiction. When he finally hit "rock bottom", he still wouldn't admit he had a problem. He was now drinking plus taking some over-the-counter medication that, when combined with booze, produced a "high" similar to the anti-depressant drugs the shrink had prescribed. He was a mess. Some of his friends finally got him into another 5 day de-tox. Temporarily sober, he left and by the next afternoon was passed out from drinking again. That was when we became actively involved in trying to get him some help but he continued to deny there was any problem. His personality had totally changed ... truly out of his mind, he had lost his job and was living in a shed in a friend's backyard. The next Saturday he was transported to a hospital for yet another overnight de-tox after being found by the police on a beach with booze and pills. The hospital discharged him the next day and he immediately hit the booze and pills again. On Sunday I visited to check up on him and found him laying unconscious and having difficulty breathing. Called 911 and back to the hospital he went. One of the cops told me that I should call the hospital and request that he have a psychiatric evaluation following the de-tox period and before he was released. He explained the "involuntary commitment" procedure for rehab in a state facility (which happens to be run in state prisons). I did as he suggested. The doc who conducted the evaluation called me the next morning and said that based on her observation she could *not* recommend involuntary commitment because she determined he was not an immediate threat to himself or others. She and I had quite a go-around about that, but she was patient with me and explained how the law works in the case of a court ordered commitment to rehab. Meanwhile, we had located a private facility who could take him but he had to agree to go within 24 hours, otherwise the bed would go to the next person on the list. So, I lied to him. I told him that I had all the paperwork and recommendations required for a court ordered, 30 day involuntary commitment to a state re-hab facility. I explained it would be a mandatory 30 day stay at a minimum. "Or", I said, "You can go to a private facility voluntarily and you can leave anytime you want if you don't like it." It still took much convincing and we now only had about 10 hours left before he would lose his spot in the private facility. At one point it got pretty testy and I thought things would get physical. He continued to refuse to go, so I told him that I had no choice and would make the phone call to have the police pick him up for transport to the state facility. That's what it took to get him to finally agree to enter re-hab at the private facility. He still didn't go cheerfully, but he went and has been clean since. The fog in his head has cleared and he has reverted back to the decent, considerate person that we and others knew him to be. |
Former Virginia Gubernatorial Candidate Assaulted in Home
On 11/20/2013 6:34 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
Your comment that because the young man's father is a state senator, a room would automatically be made available is just more of your uninformed nonsense. The reality is, many of the "facts" of this sad case are still unknown. -- Religion: together we can find the cure. Lack of facts hasn't stopped you from jumping to conclusions, in the past. -- Americans deserve better. |
Former Virginia Gubernatorial Candidate Assaulted in Home
On 11/20/2013 6:54 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 11/19/13, 10:18 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/19/2013 8:47 PM, wrote: On Tue, 19 Nov 2013 19:41:29 -0500, BAR wrote: The sad thing is that the kid, the one who offed himself, was released because they didn't have a bed in a pshyc facility available for him. I guess closing down all of the mental healht care facilities and releasing all of the nut jobs in the 70's served its purpose. That was mostly caused by a series of cases where the courts decided involuntary commitment equated to depriving a person of liberty and could only be imposed by due process. (14th amendment). Subsequent laws that defined "evaluations" further restricted exactly how long someone can be held with or without a court order. We don't know the details of this sad event, so this is pure speculation on my part, but it wouldn't surprise me if drug and/or alcohol addiction is involved with Gus (the son) still in total denial. The early reports indicate he had been released from an area hospital Monday following a mental health evaluation. That could also have been an overnight "detox" period followed by the mental health evaluation. Getting a court order for involuntary commitment is difficult. Laws protect the rights of the person in question. A shrink's evaluation that the person "could" or "might" hurt himself or others is not sufficient in itself to cause a judge to order an involuntary commitment. The person has to actually hurt him/herself (attempt suicide) or cause injury to another person in order to be involuntarily committed in most circumstances. This was explained to me last year when I was involved in getting someone some help for severe alcoholism. The fact that the person in question had a blood alcohol level that is considered "lethal" (450) and had been driving a car in a reckless manner (endangering others) still wasn't sufficient. I was flabbergasted to learn this, but that's the law. If the person in question is still in a state of denial of their addiction, but hasn't actually hurt him/herself or anyone else, it's tough to have them involuntarily committed. My speculation is that this may be the case in this situation. If Gus had been determined to be an *immediate* threat to himself or others by virtue of demonstrated action, a bed would have been found. I would guess there are a couple of detox facilities out there in rural Virginia, but no real psych hospital. The dad had to be flown to Charlottesville for treatment of his knife wounds, which tells me there isn't even much of a general hospital out there. It's a lightly populated county. Here's a bit from another news report: Streeting...is an issue Virginia has struggled with before. In 2011, Virginia inspector general G. Douglas Bevelacqua released a report chastising the state for turning away in a month an estimated 200 patients determined to be a threat to themselves or others who met the criteria for a temporary detention, only because state facilities lacked the room to hold them. Twenty-three of Virginia’s 40 community-services boards acknowledged that “streeting” occurred at their facilities. “I wouldn’t say this happens every day, but it’s more common than we’d like for it to be,” Mary Ann Bergeron, the executive director of the Virginia Association of Community Services Board, told the Washington Post. Under Virginia’s emergency-custody-order process, the family of a patient petitions a magistrate to order an evaluation, and medical staff have a four-hour window to decide whether someone should be committed, according to Cropper, who declined to speak about the specifics of the Deeds case out of respect for the family’s privacy. The clock starts when a sheriff picks up the patient and brings him or her in for clinical evaluation. Once the evaluation is complete, physicians make a recommendation to the magistrate. If the magistrate approves, medical staff then search for an available hospital bed. It all has to happen during the four-hour time frame. “We can sometimes get an extension of two hours on that, but beyond the six hours we cannot. So if we don’t find a bed within six hours, then an individual would have to be released. We can’t keep them,” says Cropper. The availability of inpatient psychiatric care has decreased nationally in recent years. Research from the Treatment Advocacy Center, a national nonprofit focused on eliminating barriers to treatment of severe mental illness, found that the number of state psychiatric beds decreased nationwide by 14% between 2005 and 2010. In 2005 there were 50,509 state psychiatric beds nationwide, and in 2010 there were 43,318. It’s estimated that a person with severe mental illness is three times more likely to be in a state prison than a psychiatric hospital. Tightening state budgets have widened the gap in available beds. In the wake of the 2007 Virginia Tech shooting that claimed 32 lives, Virginia’s legislature took measures to revamp the emergency-evaluation processes, updated the criteria for involuntary psychiatric commitment and raised state funding for community mental-health services. But according to a report from the National Alliance on Mental Illness, Virginia’s overall state mental-health budget decreased $37.7 million dollars from $424.3 million to $386.6 million between fiscal years 2009 and 2012. “The consequences of not providing treatment should demonstrate the importance of the need for it,” says Kristina Ragosta, director of advocacy at the Treatment Advocacy Center. “Most people with mental illness are no more violent than the general population, but when we talk about people with untreated mental illness, they are at greater risk of committing violent acts.” Your mental health expert got her degree from a catholic girls liberal arts school. But I suppose she's as qualified to diagnose and treat mental illness as most of the quacks out there who release dangerous head cases back into society, declaring them cured or rehabilitated. -- Americans deserve better. |
Former Virginia Gubernatorial Candidate Assaulted in Home
On 11/20/13, 9:13 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/20/2013 6:54 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: Tightening state budgets have widened the gap in available beds. In the wake of the 2007 Virginia Tech shooting that claimed 32 lives, Virginia’s legislature took measures to revamp the emergency-evaluation processes, updated the criteria for involuntary psychiatric commitment and raised state funding for community mental-health services. But according to a report from the National Alliance on Mental Illness, Virginia’s overall state mental-health budget decreased $37.7 million dollars from $424.3 million to $386.6 million between fiscal years 2009 and 2012. “The consequences of not providing treatment should demonstrate the importance of the need for it,” says Kristina Ragosta, director of advocacy at the Treatment Advocacy Center. “Most people with mental illness are no more violent than the general population, but when we talk about people with untreated mental illness, they are at greater risk of committing violent acts.” Even the private facilities are tough to get into right away. They are usually full and there's often a waiting period for a bed. It's hard because it takes a herculean effort by friends and family to convince an addict that they need help and even a day's delay can result in the person going back into denial mode and refusing help. The situation I am familiar with took several attempts over a 2 year period to finally get the person into rehab. The first time he agreed to go and his friends got him into a facility in Boston. He stayed overnight and was evaluated by a shrink the next day. The shrink determined he was suffering from anxiety and depression and prescribed some pills to make him feel better. All it did was make matters worse because he left the facility the next day, now armed with a prescription anti-depressants along with his alcohol addiction. When he finally hit "rock bottom", he still wouldn't admit he had a problem. He was now drinking plus taking some over-the-counter medication that, when combined with booze, produced a "high" similar to the anti-depressant drugs the shrink had prescribed. He was a mess. Some of his friends finally got him into another 5 day de-tox. Temporarily sober, he left and by the next afternoon was passed out from drinking again. That was when we became actively involved in trying to get him some help but he continued to deny there was any problem. His personality had totally changed ... truly out of his mind, he had lost his job and was living in a shed in a friend's backyard. The next Saturday he was transported to a hospital for yet another overnight de-tox after being found by the police on a beach with booze and pills. The hospital discharged him the next day and he immediately hit the booze and pills again. On Sunday I visited to check up on him and found him laying unconscious and having difficulty breathing. Called 911 and back to the hospital he went. One of the cops told me that I should call the hospital and request that he have a psychiatric evaluation following the de-tox period and before he was released. He explained the "involuntary commitment" procedure for rehab in a state facility (which happens to be run in state prisons). I did as he suggested. The doc who conducted the evaluation called me the next morning and said that based on her observation she could *not* recommend involuntary commitment because she determined he was not an immediate threat to himself or others. She and I had quite a go-around about that, but she was patient with me and explained how the law works in the case of a court ordered commitment to rehab. Meanwhile, we had located a private facility who could take him but he had to agree to go within 24 hours, otherwise the bed would go to the next person on the list. So, I lied to him. I told him that I had all the paperwork and recommendations required for a court ordered, 30 day involuntary commitment to a state re-hab facility. I explained it would be a mandatory 30 day stay at a minimum. "Or", I said, "You can go to a private facility voluntarily and you can leave anytime you want if you don't like it." It still took much convincing and we now only had about 10 hours left before he would lose his spot in the private facility. At one point it got pretty testy and I thought things would get physical. He continued to refuse to go, so I told him that I had no choice and would make the phone call to have the police pick him up for transport to the state facility. That's what it took to get him to finally agree to enter re-hab at the private facility. He still didn't go cheerfully, but he went and has been clean since. The fog in his head has cleared and he has reverted back to the decent, considerate person that we and others knew him to be. You definitely get the Good Scout award. -- Religion: together we can find the cure. |
Former Virginia Gubernatorial Candidate Assaulted in Home
|
Former Virginia Gubernatorial Candidate Assaulted in Home
|
Former Virginia Gubernatorial Candidate Assaulted in Home
On 11/20/13, 12:46 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 20 Nov 2013 12:22:00 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 11/20/13, 12:10 PM, wrote: Did someone other than you mention "drugging them and warehousing" them? What else do they do in cases of true mental illness? They can certainly find the right cocktail of drugs to make someone seem somewhat normal but that cocktail need to be constantly monitored and adjusted. Then you have the problem that the patient simply stops taking the drugs. The flip side of that are the people with addiction problems. We really have not come up with any long term plan to deal with those people. You can dry them out and release them but most are back abusing something pretty quickly. True mental illness? Interesting choice of words. Drugs, therapy, compassion, assistance can help many of those with "true mental illness" lead better lives. And many people with addiction problems can be helped out of their addictions and back to normal lives. You're too quick to discard your fellow human beings who are suffering. I guess I have just seen too many system failures. Your wife must just assume anyone who leaves her care is "cured". I doubt it. -- Religion: together we can find the cure. |
Former Virginia Gubernatorial Candidate Assaulted in Home
On 11/20/13, 12:48 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 20 Nov 2013 12:23:26 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 11/20/13, 12:12 PM, wrote: On Wed, 20 Nov 2013 08:33:56 -0500, BAR wrote: I question why a guy with a gun would stab someone. It sounds like the police are trying to relieve the father's consciousness because he actually killed his son. That is my guess too but we may never know. Uh-huh. Right. Of course. There is only one witness. I wasn't referring to the fact that only one of the two people in this tragedy is alive but to the assumption that the father shot and killed his son. -- Religion: together we can find the cure. |
Former Virginia Gubernatorial Candidate Assaulted in Home
On 11/20/13, 3:28 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 20 Nov 2013 14:19:54 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 11/20/13, 12:48 PM, wrote: On Wed, 20 Nov 2013 12:23:26 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 11/20/13, 12:12 PM, wrote: On Wed, 20 Nov 2013 08:33:56 -0500, BAR wrote: I question why a guy with a gun would stab someone. It sounds like the police are trying to relieve the father's consciousness because he actually killed his son. That is my guess too but we may never know. Uh-huh. Right. Of course. There is only one witness. I wasn't referring to the fact that only one of the two people in this tragedy is alive but to the assumption that the father shot and killed his son. But he is the only one who knows for sure. I could understand if the cops did not really investigate this that closely. There is nothing to be gained by putting the gun in the dad's hand You mean, shooting someone who stabbed you multiple times is justification for standing your ground? -- Religion: together we can find the cure. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:21 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com