value of unions
 

On 10/15/13, 4:54 PM, Charlemagne wrote:
On 10/15/2013 2:24 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says...

On 10/15/2013 11:00 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/15/13, 10:57 AM, True North wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 10:47:23 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 10/15/2013 8:04 AM, True North wrote:

Why would Snottie be contacting another poster's kids.

That's downright creepy.



What the hell are you talking about on that crappy little
Blackberry of

yours?


On reflection, Hankie..it was your little BFF in CT who said he was
talking to IBoaters kid by e-mail.

see his exact words:
" Remember, I talked
to your kid by email... not just you.... ****face..."

As I said... CREEPY!


Crikey...that would have been enough to initiate a call to the
police in
any normal family.

She was over 18 at the time... it was a typical retail transaction. But
do go ahead and file a false report against me, again... go for it...

If you are talking to me, and about MY family, that is a complete lie.

For the record, I have and had no reccolection of the posts you
associated with me now, or when I talked to the police last time you
filed a false report against me and there, as far as I know, and like I
told them.. It came from "eternal-september, it was probably harry
krause trying to get me in trouble... .. so like I said, go ahead and
file false charges against me again...

What you said was that you had emailed MY kid. MY kid is not over 18.
We'll let the courts decide the rest.

Did PsychoSnotty include weenie photos ?


She emailed me... If you file a false report knowing that, I will file
charges and sue too.....

Who emailed you? Some underaged girl? The kind you like, eh?
I'm over 21. If you mail photos of your weenie to me, I'll donate them
to the Smithsonian as evidence of pygmyism.

value of unions
 

On 10/15/13, 4:55 PM, Califbill wrote:
F.O.A.D. wrote:
iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says...

On 10/15/2013 11:00 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/15/13, 10:57 AM, True North wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 10:47:23 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 10/15/2013 8:04 AM, True North wrote:

Why would Snottie be contacting another poster's kids.

That's downright creepy.



What the hell are you talking about on that crappy little Blackberry of

yours?


On reflection, Hankie..it was your little BFF in CT who said he was
talking to IBoaters kid by e-mail.

see his exact words:
" Remember, I talked
to your kid by email... not just you.... ****face..."

As I said... CREEPY!


Crikey...that would have been enough to initiate a call to the police in
any normal family.

She was over 18 at the time... it was a typical retail transaction. But
do go ahead and file a false report against me, again... go for it...

If you are talking to me, and about MY family, that is a complete lie.

For the record, I have and had no reccolection of the posts you
associated with me now, or when I talked to the police last time you
filed a false report against me and there, as far as I know, and like I
told them.. It came from "eternal-september, it was probably harry
krause trying to get me in trouble... .. so like I said, go ahead and
file false charges against me again...

What you said was that you had emailed MY kid. MY kid is not over 18.
We'll let the courts decide the rest.

Did PsychoSnotty include weenie photos ?

Oh, you wanted them?


I'm sure a naked photo of PsychoSnotty would cure constipation in a monkey.

value of unions
 

On 10/15/2013 4:56 PM, Charlemagne wrote:
On 10/15/2013 4:05 PM, Hank© wrote:
On 10/15/2013 1:55 PM, Charlemagne wrote:
On 10/15/2013 11:00 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/15/13, 10:57 AM, True North wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 10:47:23 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 10/15/2013 8:04 AM, True North wrote:

Why would Snottie be contacting another poster's kids.

That's downright creepy.



What the hell are you talking about on that crappy little
Blackberry of

yours?


On reflection, Hankie..it was your little BFF in CT who said he was
talking to IBoaters kid by e-mail.

see his exact words:
" Remember, I talked
to your kid by email... not just you.... ****face..."

As I said... CREEPY!


Crikey...that would have been enough to initiate a call to the
police in
any normal family.

She was over 18 at the time... it was a typical retail transaction. But
do go ahead and file a false report against me, again... go for it...

For the record, I have and had no reccolection of the posts you
associated with me now, or when I talked to the police last time you
filed a false report against me and there, as far as I know, and like I
told them.. It came from "eternal-september, it was probably harry
krause trying to get me in trouble... .. so like I said, go ahead and
file false charges against me again...

Krause sure does like messin with you.

He did send the cops to my house once, I was busy and didn't need the
aggravation.... if it happens again here, I will sue whoever does it and
see to it they are charged with filing a false police report...

Won't get nuttin from Krausie. He's penniless.

value of unions
 

On Tuesday, October 15, 2013 7:51:24 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:

Listen, you mess with my kid and you'll live to regret it. Got it? Now

go ahead and call my bluff. I ****ing DARE you.


Oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooooooooooooh...

what a poser.

value of unions
 

On Tuesday, October 15, 2013 11:15:12 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:

I didn't know he had, and I WILL take action!


OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOooooooooooooooh....

what a poser. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

value of unions
 

On Tuesday, October 15, 2013 11:19:01 AM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:

Is he sending naughty photos of himself to your kid via email? Wouldn't

surprise me if he were.



Something you've already do to Cockhole Donnie, and several others......****.

value of unions
 

On 10/15/2013 5:02 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/15/13, 4:54 PM, Charlemagne wrote:
On 10/15/2013 2:24 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says...

On 10/15/2013 11:00 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/15/13, 10:57 AM, True North wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 10:47:23 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 10/15/2013 8:04 AM, True North wrote:

Why would Snottie be contacting another poster's kids.

That's downright creepy.



What the hell are you talking about on that crappy little
Blackberry of

yours?


On reflection, Hankie..it was your little BFF in CT who said he was
talking to IBoaters kid by e-mail.

see his exact words:
" Remember, I talked
to your kid by email... not just you.... ****face..."

As I said... CREEPY!


Crikey...that would have been enough to initiate a call to the
police in
any normal family.

She was over 18 at the time... it was a typical retail transaction.
But
do go ahead and file a false report against me, again... go for it...

If you are talking to me, and about MY family, that is a complete lie.

For the record, I have and had no reccolection of the posts you
associated with me now, or when I talked to the police last time you
filed a false report against me and there, as far as I know, and
like I
told them.. It came from "eternal-september, it was probably harry
krause trying to get me in trouble... .. so like I said, go ahead and
file false charges against me again...

What you said was that you had emailed MY kid. MY kid is not over 18.
We'll let the courts decide the rest.

Did PsychoSnotty include weenie photos ?


She emailed me... If you file a false report knowing that, I will file
charges and sue too.....

Who emailed you? Some underaged girl? The kind you like, eh?
I'm over 21. If you mail photos of your weenie to me, I'll donate them
to the Smithsonian as evidence of pygmyism.

You are one sick mother ****er harry krause...

value of unions
 

On 10/15/2013 5:03 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/15/13, 4:55 PM, Califbill wrote:
F.O.A.D. wrote:
iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says...

On 10/15/2013 11:00 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/15/13, 10:57 AM, True North wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 10:47:23 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 10/15/2013 8:04 AM, True North wrote:

Why would Snottie be contacting another poster's kids.

That's downright creepy.



What the hell are you talking about on that crappy little
Blackberry of

yours?


On reflection, Hankie..it was your little BFF in CT who said he was
talking to IBoaters kid by e-mail.

see his exact words:
" Remember, I talked
to your kid by email... not just you.... ****face..."

As I said... CREEPY!


Crikey...that would have been enough to initiate a call to the
police in
any normal family.

She was over 18 at the time... it was a typical retail transaction.
But
do go ahead and file a false report against me, again... go for it...

If you are talking to me, and about MY family, that is a complete lie.

For the record, I have and had no reccolection of the posts you
associated with me now, or when I talked to the police last time you
filed a false report against me and there, as far as I know, and
like I
told them.. It came from "eternal-september, it was probably harry
krause trying to get me in trouble... .. so like I said, go ahead and
file false charges against me again...

What you said was that you had emailed MY kid. MY kid is not over 18.
We'll let the courts decide the rest.

Did PsychoSnotty include weenie photos ?

Oh, you wanted them?


I'm sure a naked photo of PsychoSnotty would cure constipation in a monkey.

You are one sick mother ****er harry krause..

value of unions
 

On 10/15/2013 5:00 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/15/13, 4:56 PM, Charlemagne wrote:
On 10/15/2013 4:05 PM, Hank© wrote:
On 10/15/2013 1:55 PM, Charlemagne wrote:
On 10/15/2013 11:00 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/15/13, 10:57 AM, True North wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 10:47:23 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 10/15/2013 8:04 AM, True North wrote:

Why would Snottie be contacting another poster's kids.

That's downright creepy.



What the hell are you talking about on that crappy little
Blackberry of

yours?


On reflection, Hankie..it was your little BFF in CT who said he was
talking to IBoaters kid by e-mail.

see his exact words:
" Remember, I talked
to your kid by email... not just you.... ****face..."

As I said... CREEPY!


Crikey...that would have been enough to initiate a call to the
police in
any normal family.

She was over 18 at the time... it was a typical retail transaction. But
do go ahead and file a false report against me, again... go for it...

For the record, I have and had no reccolection of the posts you
associated with me now, or when I talked to the police last time you
filed a false report against me and there, as far as I know, and like I
told them.. It came from "eternal-september, it was probably harry
krause trying to get me in trouble... .. so like I said, go ahead and
file false charges against me again...

Krause sure does like messin with you.

He did send the cops to my house once, I was busy and didn't need the
aggravation.... if it happens again here, I will sue whoever does it and
see to it they are charged with filing a false police report...

You made a physical threat, psycho. It was documented. There was written
evidence. There were witnesses. You make physical threats, you get the
cops. The report from the cops was a lot different from what you
reported here.

No one needs to "get" you into trouble. Your uncontrolled mouth does it
for you.

Nope, the cops left knowing as little as to who wrote those posts, as I
did.... you better cover your bases harry, file another false report, go
for it...

value of unions
 

On 10/15/13, 6:32 PM, Charlemagne wrote:
On 10/15/2013 5:02 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:


She emailed me... If you file a false report knowing that, I will file
charges and sue too.....

Who emailed you? Some underaged girl? The kind you like, eh?
I'm over 21. If you mail photos of your weenie to me, I'll donate them
to the Smithsonian as evidence of pygmyism.

You are one sick mother ****er harry krause...


Uh, *I'm* not the one contacting underaged girls, psychosnotty.