value of unions
 

On 10/16/2013 12:08 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 11:57:01 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 10/16/13, 11:37 AM, wrote:
On 16 Oct 2013 15:29:30 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:

wrote:

It is the public service unions who will assure the furloughed
government workers will get all of their back pay for sitting home,
even if they are collecting unemployment right now.
Unreasonable union contracts are also the principle reason why public
schools suck and cities are going bankrupt.

Yawn. Another boring mindless tirade against teachers.

As usual your jerky knee won't allow you to get the point.
Unions hold down the good teachers and promote the bad ones based on
tenure and time on the job alone.
It is virtually impossible to get rid of a bad teacher, even if they
are screwing the students (physically or academically)



Every point you are trying to make there is bull****, and I'm not really
interested in your anecdotes, because that's all they are...anecdotes.


The failure of public school systems, particularly in the dominated
north is more than anecdotal.

You're an interesting guy, Greg, but it is obvious you value very little
formal education, rights for workers, environmental regulations, any
sorts of restrictions on business, anything that doesn't inordinately
benefit the so-called investor class.

As a person who lives off of investments, I am very interested in
equities appreciation and the success of the corporations that drive
that.

To you, people who still have to
work for a modest living are nothing more than serfs, sheep to be
sheared by their bosses and everyone else waiting in line to take
advantage of them.

Qualified people move up on merit. A corporation has that in it's best
interest. The real problem is that the consumer is not willing to pay
for quality so quality workers are not needed. I don't have an answer
for that problem. Do you?


You know what the poor will eat when you and your buddies finally get
everything from them? They'll eat the rich or those who think they are.
You're not rich, you're just a wannabe, so you can be the appetizer.

I do OK.

Harry does OK too, thanks to his sugar momma.

value of unions
 

On 10/16/2013 12:22 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/16/13, 12:08 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 11:57:01 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 10/16/13, 11:37 AM, wrote:
On 16 Oct 2013 15:29:30 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:

wrote:

It is the public service unions who will assure the furloughed
government workers will get all of their back pay for sitting home,
even if they are collecting unemployment right now.
Unreasonable union contracts are also the principle reason why public
schools suck and cities are going bankrupt.

Yawn. Another boring mindless tirade against teachers.

As usual your jerky knee won't allow you to get the point.
Unions hold down the good teachers and promote the bad ones based on
tenure and time on the job alone.
It is virtually impossible to get rid of a bad teacher, even if they
are screwing the students (physically or academically)



Every point you are trying to make there is bull****, and I'm not really
interested in your anecdotes, because that's all they are...anecdotes.


The failure of public school systems, particularly in the dominated
north is more than anecdotal.

The failures in school systems have mostly to do with the failure of
parenting.



Parents are certainly part of the problem. I'll give you a C+ for that
brilliant observation.

value of unions
 

wrote:
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 12:22:27 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 10/16/13, 12:08 PM, wrote:


The failure of public school systems, particularly in the dominated
north is more than anecdotal.

The failures in school systems have mostly to do with the failure of
parenting.


That is certainly part of but the irrational fight over any kind of
meaningful performance standards is part of it too.
If it is not measured, it doesn't get done.


Soon as all kids have a decent home environment let me know.

value of unions
 

On 10/16/13, 1:29 PM, Charlemagne wrote:
On 10/16/2013 1:27 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
Charlemagne wrote:
On 10/16/2013 12:47 PM, John H wrote:
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 12:39:32 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 08:57:30 -0700 (PDT), True North
wrote:

Johnny...why do you feel, it necessary to aid and abetted
Snottie's creepy behaviour?
If he was contacting your grandkids behind their parents backs you'd
take him to task for it........wouldn't you Johnny?

And, BTW, what is your response to the 'social posts' idea? I'm
plenty
willing if you are.

Not sure how I aided and abetted anything. If Kevin's kid wrote to
Scotty, and iboaterre is not
Kevin, what's his bitch? Any idea?

I might be interested, if my grandkids were communicating with
someone
on this newsgroup, but I'd
have to know a lot more before I'd take anyone to task for it. One of
my kids does communicate with
a member of the group. Doesn't bother me a whole lot. I raised
them to
know the difference between
right and wrong.

I'm sure Kevin did too, so what's iboaterer whining about?

John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!

Learn to read, then ESAD.

What does this have to do with Harry?

John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!



harry krause is the one that took it to the nambla level of nasty, he
really got loogie going this time too which is always funny....

Take your meds.


No, look back.. you were the one who took it straight to sex nasty, you
know, the kind you think is ok... with minors, etc... Asking if someone
had sent sexually explicit pictures to kevins' kid.. that was you harry
krause, no one else went there.... Lucky Dick missed all this.. snerk


I don't believe any form of deviance is beyond you, including sending
photos of your undersized weenie to an underaged kid.

value of unions
 

On 10/16/2013 1:55 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/16/13, 1:29 PM, Charlemagne wrote:
On 10/16/2013 1:27 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
Charlemagne wrote:
On 10/16/2013 12:47 PM, John H wrote:
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 12:39:32 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 08:57:30 -0700 (PDT), True North
wrote:

Johnny...why do you feel, it necessary to aid and abetted
Snottie's creepy behaviour?
If he was contacting your grandkids behind their parents backs
you'd
take him to task for it........wouldn't you Johnny?

And, BTW, what is your response to the 'social posts' idea? I'm
plenty
willing if you are.

Not sure how I aided and abetted anything. If Kevin's kid wrote to
Scotty, and iboaterre is not
Kevin, what's his bitch? Any idea?

I might be interested, if my grandkids were communicating with
someone
on this newsgroup, but I'd
have to know a lot more before I'd take anyone to task for it.
One of
my kids does communicate with
a member of the group. Doesn't bother me a whole lot. I raised
them to
know the difference between
right and wrong.

I'm sure Kevin did too, so what's iboaterer whining about?

John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!

Learn to read, then ESAD.

What does this have to do with Harry?

John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!



harry krause is the one that took it to the nambla level of nasty, he
really got loogie going this time too which is always funny....

Take your meds.


No, look back.. you were the one who took it straight to sex nasty, you
know, the kind you think is ok... with minors, etc... Asking if someone
had sent sexually explicit pictures to kevins' kid.. that was you harry
krause, no one else went there.... Lucky Dick missed all this.. snerk


I don't believe any form of deviance is beyond you, including sending
photos of your undersized weenie to an underaged kid.

Report back to us when you get your act cleaned up, and your sink, and
your coffeemaker, and your litterboxs. Good afternoon WAFA. Looking
forward to hearing from you. SNERK

value of unions
 

Hankie...you're hooking your puny cart up to the wrong ass.
Best stick to old Navy buddies...at least they'll keep your snout out of the gutter.

value of unions
 

On 10/16/2013 2:03 PM, Hank© wrote:
On 10/16/2013 1:55 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/16/13, 1:29 PM, Charlemagne wrote:
On 10/16/2013 1:27 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
Charlemagne wrote:
On 10/16/2013 12:47 PM, John H wrote:
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 12:39:32 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 08:57:30 -0700 (PDT), True North
wrote:

Johnny...why do you feel, it necessary to aid and abetted
Snottie's creepy behaviour?
If he was contacting your grandkids behind their parents backs
you'd
take him to task for it........wouldn't you Johnny?

And, BTW, what is your response to the 'social posts' idea? I'm
plenty
willing if you are.

Not sure how I aided and abetted anything. If Kevin's kid wrote to
Scotty, and iboaterre is not
Kevin, what's his bitch? Any idea?

I might be interested, if my grandkids were communicating with
someone
on this newsgroup, but I'd
have to know a lot more before I'd take anyone to task for it.
One of
my kids does communicate with
a member of the group. Doesn't bother me a whole lot. I raised
them to
know the difference between
right and wrong.

I'm sure Kevin did too, so what's iboaterer whining about?

John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!

Learn to read, then ESAD.

What does this have to do with Harry?

John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!



harry krause is the one that took it to the nambla level of nasty, he
really got loogie going this time too which is always funny....

Take your meds.


No, look back.. you were the one who took it straight to sex nasty, you
know, the kind you think is ok... with minors, etc... Asking if someone
had sent sexually explicit pictures to kevins' kid.. that was you harry
krause, no one else went there.... Lucky Dick missed all this.. snerk


I don't believe any form of deviance is beyond you, including sending
photos of your undersized weenie to an underaged kid.

Report back to us when you get your act cleaned up, and your sink, and
your coffeemaker, and your litterboxs. Good afternoon WAFA. Looking
forward to hearing from you. SNERK

I think it should bother kevin that harry keeps taking this to that
level of gross.....

value of unions
 

On 10/16/2013 2:41 PM, True North wrote:
Hankie...you're hooking your puny cart up to the wrong ass.
Best stick to old Navy buddies...at least they'll keep your snout out of the gutter.

Did Harry tell you to say that?

value of unions
 

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 12:39:32 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 08:57:30 -0700 (PDT), True North wrote:

Johnny...why do you feel, it necessary to aid and abetted Snottie's creepy behaviour?
If he was contacting your grandkids behind their parents backs you'd take him to task for it........wouldn't you Johnny?

And, BTW, what is your response to the 'social posts' idea? I'm plenty willing if you are.

Not sure how I aided and abetted anything. If Kevin's kid wrote to Scotty, and iboaterre is not
Kevin, what's his bitch? Any idea?

I might be interested, if my grandkids were communicating with someone on this newsgroup, but I'd
have to know a lot more before I'd take anyone to task for it. One of my kids does communicate with
a member of the group. Doesn't bother me a whole lot. I raised them to know the difference between
right and wrong.

I'm sure Kevin did too, so what's iboaterer whining about?

John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!

Learn to read, then ESAD.

What does this have to do with Harry?

John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!

Damn you are stupid.

value of unions
 

In article , says...

On 10/16/2013 12:42 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says...

On 10/16/2013 11:28 AM, John H wrote:
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 10:45:52 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article , says...

On 10/16/2013 9:56 AM, Hank© wrote:
On 10/16/2013 9:43 AM, Charlemagne wrote:
On 10/16/2013 7:30 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says...

On 10/15/2013 2:24 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says...

On 10/15/2013 11:00 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/15/13, 10:57 AM, True North wrote:
On Tuesday, 15 October 2013 10:47:23 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 10/15/2013 8:04 AM, True North wrote:

Why would Snottie be contacting another poster's kids.

That's downright creepy.



What the hell are you talking about on that crappy little
Blackberry of

yours?


On reflection, Hankie..it was your little BFF in CT who said he
was
talking to IBoaters kid by e-mail.

see his exact words:
" Remember, I talked
to your kid by email... not just you.... ****face..."

As I said... CREEPY!


Crikey...that would have been enough to initiate a call to the
police in
any normal family.

She was over 18 at the time... it was a typical retail
transaction. But
do go ahead and file a false report against me, again... go for
it...

If you are talking to me, and about MY family, that is a complete
lie.

For the record, I have and had no reccolection of the posts you
associated with me now, or when I talked to the police last time you
filed a false report against me and there, as far as I know, and
like I
told them.. It came from "eternal-september, it was probably harry
krause trying to get me in trouble... .. so like I said, go ahead
and
file false charges against me again...

What you said was that you had emailed MY kid. MY kid is not over 18.
We'll let the courts decide the rest.

Did PsychoSnotty include weenie photos ?


She emailed me... If you file a false report knowing that, I will file
charges and sue too.....

No she didn't. You are a liar. Hell, show the email then!


Nope, you figure it out.... I got time and I would love to own a home in
GA...

Loogie's a renter.

Don't know about that, but we sure know he is IBoater, Plume, Loogie,
Basskisser, and most importantly, kevin noble of snellville ga..... That
was too easy:)

Call me whatever you think I am. What you have done is admitted contact
with my minor child via email. I've talked to her and she said she
initiated NO contact with you, and said she feels creeped out by wha
you claim. Hold on, it's going to be a rough ride.

If he contacted Kevin's kid, and you're not Kevin, what's your bitch?

John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!



Well, we already knew that. I am not gonna' do kevin's homework for him,
but there is no email from me to his kid, anywhere out there... Just
figured I could stir him up a bit:) Fact is, it just doesn't exist...
However I do have 4 emails from him to me, and one from someone else
which specifically give me the spelling of his kids name, his kids
address (also his from what I can tell) and her shirt size, for a custom
embroidered shirt. I also have a request a couple years later for a
replacement for that shirt and a block form type response from RMR
Sales...... The rest is just kevin, blowing his "cover".. LOL!

Bull****, you are nothing short of a ****ing liar. Not to worry, I've
saved the email where you claim to have contacted my minor child. Once
again, your stupid mouth has you in trouble. This time perhaps a LOT.


Boo...

You'll be crying for sure!