value of unions
 

On 10/17/13, 9:41 AM, True North wrote:
On Thursday, 17 October 2013 10:11:50 UTC-3, Charlemagne wrote:
snip...

Cause I have it all right here, with easily traceable google email

addresses, not some crazy eternal-september like whoever wrote the note

that seems to have you going off.....

so..L'il CreepyCharlene from Connecticut keeps changing his story...
first he claims to have corresponded with another poster's kid..
then he says the other poster's kid contacted him..
now he's saying someone else actually talked to the minor...
Sounds like the kind of talk expected from some weasel who tries to 'groom' young kids. I'd let the police sort it out. they can see past the lies and deception...even those from a 'natural born liar'.



It's PsychoSnotty...he's psychotic and therefore you cannot expect
rational, cohesive thought from him.

value of unions
 

On Thursday, October 17, 2013 8:20:38 AM UTC-4, Hank© wrote:

You sure are infatuated with Scott, aren't you?


" Cockhole " Donnie will get jealous.

value of unions
 

On 10/17/2013 9:41 AM, True North wrote:
On Thursday, 17 October 2013 10:11:50 UTC-3, Charlemagne wrote:
snip...

Cause I have it all right here, with easily traceable google email

addresses, not some crazy eternal-september like whoever wrote the note

that seems to have you going off.....

so..L'il CreepyCharlene from Connecticut keeps changing his story...
first he claims to have corresponded with another poster's kid..
then he says the other poster's kid contacted him..
now he's saying someone else actually talked to the minor...
Sounds like the kind of talk expected from some weasel who tries to 'groom' young kids. I'd let the police sort it out. they can see past the lies and deception...even those from a 'natural born liar'.

I'll bet you called on the Mounties frequently to help you deal with
your problem child.

value of unions
 

On Thursday, 17 October 2013 16:09:44 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 10/17/2013 9:41 AM, True North wrote:

On Thursday, 17 October 2013 10:11:50 UTC-3, Charlemagne wrote:

snip...



Cause I have it all right here, with easily traceable google email



addresses, not some crazy eternal-september like whoever wrote the note



that seems to have you going off.....



so..L'il CreepyCharlene from Connecticut keeps changing his story...

first he claims to have corresponded with another poster's kid..

then he says the other poster's kid contacted him..

now he's saying someone else actually talked to the minor...

Sounds like the kind of talk expected from some weasel who tries to 'groom' young kids. I'd let the police sort it out. they can see past the lies and deception...even those from a 'natural born liar'.



I'll bet you called on the Mounties frequently to help you deal with

your problem child.

Duh!
Didn't have a "problem child" and we're city people with a city police department.
Boy... you must really indentify with CreepyCharlene from CT.

value of unions
 

On 10/17/13, 4:36 PM, True North wrote:
On Thursday, 17 October 2013 16:09:44 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 10/17/2013 9:41 AM, True North wrote:

On Thursday, 17 October 2013 10:11:50 UTC-3, Charlemagne wrote:

snip...



Cause I have it all right here, with easily traceable google email



addresses, not some crazy eternal-september like whoever wrote the note



that seems to have you going off.....



so..L'il CreepyCharlene from Connecticut keeps changing his story...

first he claims to have corresponded with another poster's kid..

then he says the other poster's kid contacted him..

now he's saying someone else actually talked to the minor...

Sounds like the kind of talk expected from some weasel who tries to 'groom' young kids. I'd let the police sort it out. they can see past the lies and deception...even those from a 'natural born liar'.



I'll bet you called on the Mounties frequently to help you deal with

your problem child.

Duh!
Didn't have a "problem child" and we're city people with a city police department.
Boy... you must really indentify with CreepyCharlene from CT.



HankyPanky, as you refer to him, is interested in keeping the pot
boiling between PsychoScotty and his adversaries here. FlaJim's kid
probably committed suicide.

value of unions
 

"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 10/17/13, 4:36 PM, True North wrote:
On Thursday, 17 October 2013 16:09:44 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 10/17/2013 9:41 AM, True North wrote:

On Thursday, 17 October 2013 10:11:50 UTC-3, Charlemagne wrote:

snip...



Cause I have it all right here, with easily traceable google email



addresses, not some crazy eternal-september like whoever wrote the note



that seems to have you going off.....



so..L'il CreepyCharlene from Connecticut keeps changing his story...

first he claims to have corresponded with another poster's kid..

then he says the other poster's kid contacted him..

now he's saying someone else actually talked to the minor...

Sounds like the kind of talk expected from some weasel who tries to
'groom' young kids. I'd let the police sort it out. they can see past
the lies and deception...even those from a 'natural born liar'.



I'll bet you called on the Mounties frequently to help you deal with

your problem child.

Duh!
Didn't have a "problem child" and we're city people with a city police department.
Boy... you must really indentify with CreepyCharlene from CT.



HankyPanky, as you refer to him, is interested in keeping the pot boiling
between PsychoScotty and his adversaries here. FlaJim's kid probably committed suicide.

What a sick ******* you are!

value of unions
 

On 10/17/13, 5:02 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 10/17/13, 4:36 PM, True North wrote:
On Thursday, 17 October 2013 16:09:44 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 10/17/2013 9:41 AM, True North wrote:

On Thursday, 17 October 2013 10:11:50 UTC-3, Charlemagne wrote:

snip...



Cause I have it all right here, with easily traceable google email



addresses, not some crazy eternal-september like whoever wrote the note



that seems to have you going off.....



so..L'il CreepyCharlene from Connecticut keeps changing his story...

first he claims to have corresponded with another poster's kid..

then he says the other poster's kid contacted him..

now he's saying someone else actually talked to the minor...

Sounds like the kind of talk expected from some weasel who tries to
'groom' young kids. I'd let the police sort it out. they can see past
the lies and deception...even those from a 'natural born liar'.



I'll bet you called on the Mounties frequently to help you deal with

your problem child.

Duh!
Didn't have a "problem child" and we're city people with a city police department.
Boy... you must really indentify with CreepyCharlene from CT.



HankyPanky, as you refer to him, is interested in keeping the pot boiling
between PsychoScotty and his adversaries here. FlaJim's kid probably committed suicide.

What a sick ******* you are!



I'm not the teabagger, Bilious...you are.

value of unions
 

On 10/17/2013 5:02 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 10/17/13, 4:36 PM, True North wrote:
On Thursday, 17 October 2013 16:09:44 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 10/17/2013 9:41 AM, True North wrote:

On Thursday, 17 October 2013 10:11:50 UTC-3, Charlemagne wrote:

snip...



Cause I have it all right here, with easily traceable google email



addresses, not some crazy eternal-september like whoever wrote the note



that seems to have you going off.....



so..L'il CreepyCharlene from Connecticut keeps changing his story...

first he claims to have corresponded with another poster's kid..

then he says the other poster's kid contacted him..

now he's saying someone else actually talked to the minor...

Sounds like the kind of talk expected from some weasel who tries to
'groom' young kids. I'd let the police sort it out. they can see past
the lies and deception...even those from a 'natural born liar'.



I'll bet you called on the Mounties frequently to help you deal with

your problem child.

Duh!
Didn't have a "problem child" and we're city people with a city police department.
Boy... you must really indentify with CreepyCharlene from CT.



HankyPanky, as you refer to him, is interested in keeping the pot boiling
between PsychoScotty and his adversaries here. FlaJim's kid probably committed suicide.

What a sick ******* you are!


Yeah, that's why I am not posting the letters from kevin and his kid...
It's pretty good odds, it's harry krause at the other end, spoofing
loogie, the way he has spoofed himself and so many others over the
years.....

value of unions
 

On 10/17/13, 5:22 PM, Charlemagne wrote:
On 10/17/2013 5:02 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 10/17/13, 4:36 PM, True North wrote:
On Thursday, 17 October 2013 16:09:44 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 10/17/2013 9:41 AM, True North wrote:

On Thursday, 17 October 2013 10:11:50 UTC-3, Charlemagne wrote:

snip...



Cause I have it all right here, with easily traceable google email



addresses, not some crazy eternal-september like whoever wrote
the note



that seems to have you going off.....



so..L'il CreepyCharlene from Connecticut keeps changing his story...

first he claims to have corresponded with another poster's kid..

then he says the other poster's kid contacted him..

now he's saying someone else actually talked to the minor...

Sounds like the kind of talk expected from some weasel who tries to
'groom' young kids. I'd let the police sort it out. they can see
past
the lies and deception...even those from a 'natural born liar'.



I'll bet you called on the Mounties frequently to help you deal with

your problem child.

Duh!
Didn't have a "problem child" and we're city people with a city
police department.
Boy... you must really indentify with CreepyCharlene from CT.



HankyPanky, as you refer to him, is interested in keeping the pot
boiling
between PsychoScotty and his adversaries here. FlaJim's kid probably
committed suicide.

What a sick ******* you are!


Yeah, that's why I am not posting the letters from kevin and his kid...
It's pretty good odds, it's harry krause at the other end, spoofing
loogie, the way he has spoofed himself and so many others over the
years.....


Sorry, little psychoturd, but it ain't me. I think you've been "caught"
engaging in aberrant behavior with a minor via email, and you are doing
everything you can do to peddle your Big Wheels away from it.

value of unions
 

On 10/17/2013 5:27 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/17/13, 5:22 PM, Charlemagne wrote:
On 10/17/2013 5:02 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 10/17/13, 4:36 PM, True North wrote:
On Thursday, 17 October 2013 16:09:44 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 10/17/2013 9:41 AM, True North wrote:

On Thursday, 17 October 2013 10:11:50 UTC-3, Charlemagne wrote:

snip...



Cause I have it all right here, with easily traceable google email



addresses, not some crazy eternal-september like whoever wrote
the note



that seems to have you going off.....



so..L'il CreepyCharlene from Connecticut keeps changing his story...

first he claims to have corresponded with another poster's kid..

then he says the other poster's kid contacted him..

now he's saying someone else actually talked to the minor...

Sounds like the kind of talk expected from some weasel who tries to
'groom' young kids. I'd let the police sort it out. they can see
past
the lies and deception...even those from a 'natural born liar'.



I'll bet you called on the Mounties frequently to help you deal with

your problem child.

Duh!
Didn't have a "problem child" and we're city people with a city
police department.
Boy... you must really indentify with CreepyCharlene from CT.



HankyPanky, as you refer to him, is interested in keeping the pot
boiling
between PsychoScotty and his adversaries here. FlaJim's kid probably
committed suicide.

What a sick ******* you are!


Yeah, that's why I am not posting the letters from kevin and his kid...
It's pretty good odds, it's harry krause at the other end, spoofing
loogie, the way he has spoofed himself and so many others over the
years.....


Sorry, little psychoturd, but it ain't me. I think you've been "caught"
engaging in aberrant behavior with a minor via email, and you are doing
everything you can do to peddle your Big Wheels away from it.

You have a nasty imagination harry to take a retail order and turn it so
nasty... Funny how Dick isn't around again... LOL!